A ticket for a full mod.
[General]
Where is your video !!!!!????? maybe it is crying somewhere because you missed it, call it back please OAQ
[Easy]
AR+1, AR2 is quite slow since you make many 1/1 beats to connect the object, 3 is better for me.
00:34:492 (3) - move it two grid left to make 00:33:810 (1,2,3) a consistent spacing. Don't forget to adjust 00:35:856 (4) a bit bcause of spacing changing.
00:37:560 (1) - obviously, there is a symbal. seens you miss a finish on the slider's head.
01:31:424 (4) - why you let the volume down ? the beat itself is as heavy as 01:29:378 (1,2,3). A sudden volume change feels wired.
01:34:662 (1) - end the spinner at 01:37:390 -, because the beat at 01:37:390 is much heavier than 01:37:049 one. when you can just follow one of two beats, you should follow the heavier one, it fits the music better.
[Normal]
00:31:424 (4) - put it to (76,256) and move third point of slider to (108,152) for making a perfect blanket with 00:32:106 (1).
00:32:787 (3) - move it two grid left for spacing consistency.
00:51:197 (1) - let me tell you my feeling about the finish sound. you may notice that the beat at 00:51:537 is MUCH STRONGER than 00:51:197 (1). So obviously, I would change the finish to 00:51:537 (2)'s head if I were you, but not at 00:51:197 (1). hey look, this change makes the song more different, it's about "the effect for emphasis". I would like to see how you use finish for this part for every diff.
00:51:197 (1) - move it to (480,48) for consistent spacing.
00:53:753 (5,1) - and so are their finish sounds, you know what I mean, right ?
01:05:515 (2) - move slider's second point to (128,316), third point to (180,320) for a blanket with 01:05:174 (1).
01:18:128 (4) - nazi but, move it to (248,128) is much better for me because 01:17:106 (3,4,1) spacings would be consistent after you changed it.
01:28:526 (2) - move third point of slider to (76,256) for a blanket with 01:29:719 (2). you may worry about the spacing change between 01:28:526 (2,1) since you NCed 01:29:378 (1) then it can warn a jump.
01:37:901 (1,1) - since you have emphasized those heavy beat by using NC. Why not use jump a bit for emphasizing more ? :p
let's get some fun.
[Insane]
00:22:049 (4,5) - according to your normal spacing 1.0x, I don't think it is a time that you reduce the spacing here. move 00:22:049 (4) to (472,616) ; 00:22:219 (5) to (428,136) for a best solution.
00:32:958 (5) - move it to (264,284) in order to stack on 00:31:594 (6)'s head perfectly.
00:42:503 (3) - ctrl + j, h, g (3 steps) and then move it to (244,344) for a better flow.
01:05:685 (4) - move it to (385,267) for a perfect stacking with 01:04:833 (1)'s tail. And then move 01:05:685 (4)'s third point to (260,144) for consistency with your normal spacing (I know you can not replace 01:06:197 (1) because you want to stack it with 01:07:731 (4), 01:08:753 (1),01:09:265 (5)). Unreasonable reducing spacing is awkward to play, and doesn't fit the song at all.
01:14:037 (4) - ctrl + h, j and then put it to (76,48). It's much better for me, how does it feel ?
01:17:447 (2) - I would appreciate if you remake the slider
like this. It would reduce some stress from right hand during moving though.
[Hard]
00:13:356 (2) - let me nazi a bit :p, move third point of the slider to (336,176) to make a better blanket with 00:12:844 (1)'s tail,
like this.
00:21:197 (1) - this short NC doesn't make sense cuz I don't see any thing need to emphasize. If you still need to keep the NC exisit, move 00:21:537 (2,3) to (136,72) to make a jump, then the NC has a reason "emphasize the jump" to keep it. Or you should remove it.
00:28:697 (3) - notice this, move it to (344,156) to make 00:28:015 (1,2,3) a pritteir shape. It would be
like this after you did it. Also don't forget to replace 00:29:208 (4,5) as well (:
00:57:162 (2) - move the last point of slider to (256,124) to make a better blanket with 00:56:651 (1)'s tail. you just need to select 00:57:674 (3,1,2) then adjust them a bit for wrong spacing after you change it.
00:59:549 (1) - you don't need to NC here cuz the beats for 00:59:378 (1,1) is togerther, I feel more make sense when the NC is removed.
01:22:902 (1,1) - Both NCs are unecessary, if you need a NC for helping reading, 01:23:583 (1) is enough.
01:29:037 (1) - there is unreasonable to add NC here since there is no strong beat, jump or something related. the heavy beats you want to emphasize start at 01:29:378 (1), not 01:29:037 (1).
About your hitsound : Check your all diffs to have your finish sounds consistent and look for some modders checking for whistles (A major problem about the hitsounds) seens enough.