02:22:044 (1) - I don't wanna say this is lame but can you just copy jubilea's idea in some shape or form, it's so much better than slamming a spinner onto this
02:10:496 (1) - Would suggest stretching this out for longer, like how the other diffs handled it. Feels a bit premature to cut it off for a kickdrum that realistically has no impact here
00:50:735 (1,2,3,4) - This kinda feels like you just ran out of space up there, feels super cramped in comparison to 00:46:568 (2,3,4,1). How about smth like this?
00:45:258 (2,3) - Doesn't fit the vocal structure, would suggest just doing 1/2 sliders here
02:46:449 (3,1) - Remove these two objects and look at what happens to the SR lol
This spacing is absolutely not okay for this diff. For comparison - 02:51:925 (1,2,3,1).
I know that one doesn't peak as hard but still helps to illustrate how out of proportion the jump mentioned above is.
I actually don't like this at all because I dictated the rhythm density here not just based on how intense the vocals are in general but also in accordance to how the vocals gradually rise and then drop off again. Having the current 6 represented as active would make that more active than 01:07:783 (7). To circumvent that I could also turn 7 into 1/2 circles, but that'd result in a triple 1/2 which I don't feel is fitting here
Atfer investigating further I came to the conclusion that the producer didn't bother to align everything onto the downbeats "perfectly".
After pausing, rewinding and playing on repeat for like 2-3 minutes I feel like the 2nd timing point is obsolete as long as I shift the offset to 486. Hence, I will do just that.
It took two BNs and a barely-failed BN applicant to figure out the offset on a non-multitime song. That's both hilarious and kinda depressing now that I think about it