forum

How Do Emotions Trigger Quality? (Sadness)

posted
Total Posts
36
Topic Starter
Blitzfrog

Does Sadness Increase the Likelihood of Producing a Quality Thread?


Abstract:
To find out if the emotion, sadness, triggers quality we planted into the participants and watched them make a thread. It turns out that sadness does not produce the most qualitative thread.

Introduction:

A long standing problem in OT was the lack of quality threads being made. It is well known that OT is a seesaw, whereby the amount of quality threads needs to match the amount of trash threads in a ratio of 1:3 at the bare minimum. However, this is not the case at the moment, the amount of trash threads currently outweighs the amount of quality, although the seesaw has been balancing out, we must find the trigger for quality thread.

Here is a graph of the ratio of trash threads to quality threads


You can see that it has been rising, and during the start of April it showed a decline. We know for a start that every actions made by a human is driven by it's emotions, whether the action was adjusted by logic or not, the incentive originally is emotions. By that, we can give a rough idea of what sort of thread does each emotion drive towards by looking at the thread made by the person after a certain emotion is detected. With a result, it will show the emotion that best produces quality threads, therefore we can work on making every OT denizen feel such emotion and therefore increase the amount of quality threads produced.

We invited several participants and dragged their bodies out of their house asked them politely whether they would participate in a social experiment. We then forced them into a situation to feel the emotion, and finally observed them and keeping track of the thread they made. For this experiment, we had participant Levesterz to help us out. We only got one participant so we are allowed to skew the result There were other participants but they would like to be kept anonymous.

Method:

Participants were tide to a chair, unable to move. We then pulled their loved ones and killed them made a short movie which showed a starving African kid. We made sure to play several tapes until the participants began bursting out tears. Next, we forced them into a room and locked their hands to a position in which they could only type. They were given an opportunity to rant on OT, and we then recorded their produced thread.

Results

Participant Levesterz produced a thread title'd Happy Birthday to the month of June
1 thread produced
Rated by the scientist as a none-super-quality thread

Discussion

It was shown through a fair experimental test with large sample data that with the sadness emotion triggered in the participant, it was not strong enough to produce a qualitative thread. There are some possible reasons for this. The first one being that the method did not provoke a sufficient amount of sadness in the participant. It was speculated that the amount of loved ones killed starving African clips were not enough. Another possible reason being that sadness naturally is not a trigger for qualitative threads as it does not provide a driving motive for the person to write intense discussions since your fingers may feel too weak to type. Sadness is also a way to kill creativity as the mind only concentrate on the sad event therefore unable to freely roam around and search for hooks. In summary, sadness is not a good trigger for qualitative threads.

Author Information

Affiliations

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
Wenfeng Xia, Malcolm C. Finlay & Adrien E. Desjardins
Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Surgical and Interventional Sciences, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House Street, London, W1W 7EJ, United Kingdom
Wenfeng Xia, Sebastien Ourselin, Anna L. David & Adrien E. Desjardins
Department of Anaesthesia, University College Hospital, Main Theatres, Maple Bridge Link Corridor, Podium 3, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
Simeon J. West
St Bartholomew’s Hospital and Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom
Malcolm C. Finlay
GePaSud, University of French Polynesia, Faa’a, 98702, French Polynesia
Jean-Martial Mari
Centre for Medical Imaging Computing, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
Sebastien Ourselin
Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, 86-96 Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HX, United Kingdom
Anna L. David
levesterz
I will try it okie after this okie
Aomi
Do*
and ur supposed to be a scientist ?? unbelievable.
Tae

Blitzfrog wrote:

the amount of trash threads currently outweighs the amount of quality, although the seesaw has been balancing out, we must find the trigger for quality thread.
So... you were so against my ideas, saying it was all wrong, that nothing of it would actually work, and yet you're using them in your threads...?

Are you mocking me or are you just that dumb?
Topic Starter
Blitzfrog

Aomi wrote:

Do*
and ur supposed to be a scientist ?? unbelievable.
Scientists are not equivalent to highschool English teachers.

We are allowed to make minor grammatical errors and the content/idea will still remain the same
Tae

Blitzfrog wrote:

Scientists are not equivalent to highschool English teachers.

We are allowed to make minor grammatical errors and the content/idea will still remain the same
Any report would have been thoroughly proofread for grammatical errors such as that before even being published.

Any "scientist" in an English-speaking country should at least have a basic understanding of the language as well.
Topic Starter
Blitzfrog

Tae wrote:

Blitzfrog wrote:

Scientists are not equivalent to highschool English teachers.

We are allowed to make minor grammatical errors and the content/idea will still remain the same
Any report would have been thoroughly proofread for grammatical errors such as that before even being published.

Any "scientist" in an English-speaking country should at least have a basic understanding of the language as well.
FALSE!!!
Theoretical Physicists don't proof read anything but the maths, they just submit papers!! They don't even have money to buy a meal less than a proof reader
Einstein couldn't speak English but he was in America!!

I am Chinese!! I don't give a damn about English!! Hail the small eyes!! Who the hell carres grammar about?
Tae

Blitzfrog wrote:

FALSE!!!
Theoretical Physicists don't proof read anything but the maths, they just submit papers!!
It wouldn't necessarily have been proofread by just themselves though... I'm sure it'd be like writers, they have people who make sure everything is grammatically correct.

Blitzfrog wrote:

I am Chinese!! I don't give a damn about English!! Hail the small eyes!! Who the hell carres grammar about?
Good for you. You still speak English because you want to be understood though, hence why grammar is important.
Topic Starter
Blitzfrog

Tae wrote:

Blitzfrog wrote:

FALSE!!!
Theoretical Physicists don't proof read anything but the maths, they just submit papers!!
It wouldn't necessarily have been proofread by just themselves though... I'm sure it'd be like writers, they have people who make sure everything is grammatically correct.
This was a submission to the OT Royal Science foundation. It was leaked by accident. You're lucky to even see this masterpiece.

Tae wrote:

Good for you. You still speak English because you want to be understood though, hence why grammar is important.
whu said grmmr is need to understood huh?
Tae

Blitzfrog wrote:

This was a submission to the OT Royal Science foundation. It was leaked by accident. You're lucky to even see this masterpiece.
So you leaked it yourself, right.

Blitzfrog wrote:

whu said grmmr is need to understood huh?
Really?
Meah
I want to pee
Topic Starter
Blitzfrog

Meah wrote:

I want to pee
Pleese...
Meah

Blitzfrog wrote:

Meah wrote:

I want to pee
Pleese...

In front of your door
kai99
tldr: i didnt read

dw i will do at home
it's just too much for my 4s to handle on its timy screen
abraker
Through my studies, I have concluded boredom is the emotion which correlates with quality. The reason is simple, boredom implies time in which the individual is tired of doing something and would rather do something else. If that something else is direct towards OT, then that has potential for a quality thread. Do note this doesn't imply that the thread would be quality. It is more like for the thread to be shit, or even worse, trash, if the boredom is not supplemented with a creative idea. The following relationship demonstrates what I mean by this:
  • boredom + imagination --> quality
    boredom - imagination --> trash

    therefore,

    2*boredom --> quality + trash
As demonstrated, twice the usual boredom implies a superposition of quality and trash, but unless imagination is supplied, it can go either way. It is also more complex than this, involving tensors, phase angles, etc in order to calculate the likelihood of either quality or trash, and further quantitative analysis to breakdown quality, trash, and boredom into its sub-components to determine their fundamental makeup. However, this is outside the scope of the subject I am discussing today.
johnmedina999

abraker wrote:

boredom + imagination --> quality
boredom - imagination --> trash

therefore,

2*boredom --> quality + trash
That makes no sense.

b = boredom
q = quality
t = trash
i = imagination

b + i = q
b - i = t

b = q - i
b = t + i

q - i = t + i
q = t + 2i

As we can see here, the secret to quality is to take trash and improve it with 2 times the imagination one has. Because it is impossible to have more that 1x imagination, quality doesn't exist, unless we work together.
abraker

johnmedina999 wrote:

abraker wrote:

boredom + imagination --> quality
boredom - imagination --> trash

therefore,

2*boredom --> quality + trash
That makes no sense.

b = boredom
q = quality
t = trash
i = imagination

b + i = q
b - i = t

b = q - i
b = t + i

q - i = t + i
q = t + 2i

As we can see here, the secret to quality is to take trash and improve it with 2 times the imagination one has. Because it is impossible to have more that 1x imagination, quality doesn't exist, unless we work together.
You are aware that you can add two different equations, right?

..(b + i = q)
+(b - i = t)
..(2*b + i - i = q + t)

2*b = q + t
Meah
But what if emotions doesn't really affect quality posting and is an inborn talent, will the giraffes suffer? but what if the giraffes are actually aliens cosplaying? will they move to Area 51? but what if Area 51 is actually underwater? will the giraffes learn how to swim? but what if they can't breath underwater? will they use breathing apparatus? but what if it'll not suit them? will they turn fish? but what if they are actually fishes who's acting like a land animal? will they eat noodles? but what if they actually eat cake? will they go to pastry houses? but what if they can't walk? will they fly? but what if they can't fly? will they ride taxi? but what if they gets blackmailed? will they star on faketaxi? but what if it is not a taxi but a boat? will it become fake boat? but what if it'll sunk because it is fake? will they turn fish? but what if they are actually fishes who's acting like a land animal? will they eat noodles? but what if they actually eat cake? will they go to pastry houses? but what if they can't walk? will they fly? but what if they can't fly? will they ride taxi? but what if they gets blackmailed? will they star on faketaxi? but what if it is not a taxi but a boat? will it become fake boat? but what if it'll sunk because it is fake?
Zekks
10,199,789 users, 14,107 online now.
A total of 6.35 billion ranked plays!
Info »
Download
Wiki / Help »
Beatmaps »
Rankings »
Community »

Custom Search

User

Beatmap
Welcome, [ - Zekks - ] No messages Search Settings Logout
preview this page in the new forum design!
Index » Other » Off-Topic » How Do Emotions Trigger Quality? (Sadness)
Subscribe topic | Bookmark topic
Blitzfrog
User avatar
Combo Commander
475 posts
Offline Send private message New Zealand

about 11 hours ago
Does Sadness Increase the Likelihood of Producing a Quality Thread?



Abstract:
To find out if the emotion, sadness, triggers quality we planted into the participants and watched them make a thread. It turns out that sadness does not produce the most qualitative thread.


Introduction:

A long standing problem in OT was the lack of quality threads being made. It is well known that OT is a seesaw, whereby the amount of quality threads needs to match the amount of trash threads in a ratio of 1:3 at the bare minimum. However, this is not the case at the moment, the amount of trash threads currently outweighs the amount of quality, although the seesaw has been balancing out, we must find the trigger for quality thread.

Here is a graph of the ratio of trash threads to quality threads
Image

You can see that it has been rising, and during the start of April it showed a decline. We know for a start that every actions made by a human is driven by it's emotions, whether the action was adjusted by logic or not, the incentive originally is emotions. By that, we can give a rough idea of what sort of thread does each emotion drive towards by looking at the thread made by the person after a certain emotion is detected. With a result, it will show the emotion that best produces quality threads, therefore we can work on making every OT denizen feel such emotion and therefore increase the amount of quality threads produced.

We invited several participants and dragged their bodies out of their house asked them politely whether they would participate in a social experiment. We then forced them into a situation to feel the emotion, and finally observed them and keeping track of the thread they made. For this experiment, we had participant Levesterz to help us out. We only got one participant so we are allowed to skew the result There were other participants but they would like to be kept anonymous.


Method:

Participants were tide to a chair, unable to move. We then pulled their loved ones and killed them made a short movie which showed a starving African kid. We made sure to play several tapes until the participants began bursting out tears. Next, we forced them into a room and locked their hands to a position in which they could only type. They were given an opportunity to rant on OT, and we then recorded their produced thread.


Results

Participant Levesterz produced a thread title'd Happy Birthday to the month of June
1 thread produced
Rated by the scientist as a none-super-quality thread


Discussion

It was shown through a fair experimental test with large sample data that with the sadness emotion triggered in the participant, it was not strong enough to produce a qualitative thread. There are some possible reasons for this. The first one being that the method did not provoke a sufficient amount of sadness in the participant. It was speculated that the amount of loved ones killed starving African clips were not enough. Another possible reason being that sadness naturally is not a trigger for qualitative threads as it does not provide a driving motive for the person to write intense discussions since your fingers may feel too weak to type. Sadness is also a way to kill creativity as the mind only concentrate on the sad event therefore unable to freely roam around and search for hooks. In summary, sadness is not a good trigger for qualitative threads.


Author Information

Affiliations

Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
Wenfeng Xia, Malcolm C. Finlay & Adrien E. Desjardins
Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Surgical and Interventional Sciences, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House Street, London, W1W 7EJ, United Kingdom
Wenfeng Xia, Sebastien Ourselin, Anna L. David & Adrien E. Desjardins
Department of Anaesthesia, University College Hospital, Main Theatres, Maple Bridge Link Corridor, Podium 3, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
Simeon J. West
St Bartholomew’s Hospital and Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom
Malcolm C. Finlay
GePaSud, University of French Polynesia, Faa’a, 98702, French Polynesia
Jean-Martial Mari
Centre for Medical Imaging Computing, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
Sebastien Ourselin
Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, 86-96 Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HX, United Kingdom
Anna L. David
Last edited by Blitzfrog on about 9 hours ago, edited 1 time in total.
Image
levesterz
User avatar
Slider Savant
106 posts
Offline Send private message Malaysia

about 10 hours ago
I will try it okie after this okie
Image
Aomi
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
859 posts
Online Send private message Serbia
about 9 hours ago
Do*
and ur supposed to be a scientist ?? unbelievable.
You need people like me.
You need people like me so you can point
your fuckin' fingers and say ''That's the bad guy.''
Tae
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
1,180 posts
Offline Send private message United Kingdom

about 9 hours ago
Blitzfrog wrote:
the amount of trash threads currently outweighs the amount of quality, although the seesaw has been balancing out, we must find the trigger for quality thread.

So... you were so against my ideas, saying it was all wrong, that nothing of it would actually work, and yet you're using them in your threads...?

Are you mocking me or are you just that dumb?
Image
Blitzfrog
User avatar
Combo Commander
475 posts
Offline Send private message New Zealand

about 9 hours ago
Aomi wrote:
Do*
and ur supposed to be a scientist ?? unbelievable.


Scientists are not equivalent to highschool English teachers.

We are allowed to make minor grammatical errors and the content/idea will still remain the same
Image
Tae
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
1,180 posts
Offline Send private message United Kingdom

about 9 hours ago
Blitzfrog wrote:
Scientists are not equivalent to highschool English teachers.

We are allowed to make minor grammatical errors and the content/idea will still remain the same

Any report would have been thoroughly proofread for grammatical errors such as that before even being published.

Any "scientist" in an English-speaking country should at least have a basic understanding of the language as well.
Image
Blitzfrog
User avatar
Combo Commander
475 posts
Offline Send private message New Zealand

about 8 hours ago
Tae wrote:
Blitzfrog wrote:
Scientists are not equivalent to highschool English teachers.

We are allowed to make minor grammatical errors and the content/idea will still remain the same

Any report would have been thoroughly proofread for grammatical errors such as that before even being published.

Any "scientist" in an English-speaking country should at least have a basic understanding of the language as well.


FALSE!!!
Theoretical Physicists don't proof read anything but the maths, they just submit papers!! They don't even have money to buy a meal less than a proof reader
Einstein couldn't speak English but he was in America!!

I am Chinese!! I don't give a damn about English!! Hail the small eyes!! Who the hell carres grammar about?
Image
Tae
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
1,180 posts
Offline Send private message United Kingdom

about 8 hours ago
Blitzfrog wrote:
FALSE!!!
Theoretical Physicists don't proof read anything but the maths, they just submit papers!!

It wouldn't necessarily have been proofread by just themselves though... I'm sure it'd be like writers, they have people who make sure everything is grammatically correct.

Blitzfrog wrote:
I am Chinese!! I don't give a damn about English!! Hail the small eyes!! Who the hell carres grammar about?

Good for you. You still speak English because you want to be understood though, hence why grammar is important.
Image
Blitzfrog
User avatar
Combo Commander
475 posts
Offline Send private message New Zealand

about 8 hours ago
Tae wrote:
Blitzfrog wrote:
FALSE!!!
Theoretical Physicists don't proof read anything but the maths, they just submit papers!!

It wouldn't necessarily have been proofread by just themselves though... I'm sure it'd be like writers, they have people who make sure everything is grammatically correct.


This was a submission to the OT Royal Science foundation. It was leaked by accident. You're lucky to even see this masterpiece.

Tae wrote:
Good for you. You still speak English because you want to be understood though, hence why grammar is important.


whu said grmmr is need to understood huh?
Image
Tae
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
1,180 posts
Offline Send private message United Kingdom

about 8 hours ago
Blitzfrog wrote:
This was a submission to the OT Royal Science foundation. It was leaked by accident. You're lucky to even see this masterpiece.

So you leaked it yourself, right.

Blitzfrog wrote:
whu said grmmr is need to understood huh?

Really?
Image
Meah
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
850 posts
Offline Send private message Philippines
about 8 hours ago
I want to pee
Twitter • Youtube • Steam • osu! replay videos • Userpage • Dotabuff
HuhGak(허각), Jeong EunJi(정은지) - Bada 'Ocean.wav' (바다) • So Min is crazy c:
Project im@s ~ ♥ ~ DECADE Anniversary Day2 Onegai!CINDERELLA • Apink ♥ - Always
Off
Blitzfrog
User avatar
Combo Commander
475 posts
Offline Send private message New Zealand

about 8 hours ago
Meah wrote:
I want to pee


Pleese...
Image
Meah
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
850 posts
Offline Send private message Philippines
about 8 hours ago
Blitzfrog wrote:
Meah wrote:
I want to pee


Pleese...


In front of your door
Twitter • Youtube • Steam • osu! replay videos • Userpage • Dotabuff
HuhGak(허각), Jeong EunJi(정은지) - Bada 'Ocean.wav' (바다) • So Min is crazy c:
Project im@s ~ ♥ ~ DECADE Anniversary Day2 Onegai!CINDERELLA • Apink ♥ - Always
Off
kai99
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
530 posts
Offline Send private message South Korea

about 5 hours ago
tldr: i didnt read

dw i will do at home
it's just too much for my 4s to handle on its timy screen
Image
Come join the Off-Topic Forum
or
Image
Image
abraker
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
2,959 posts
Offline Send private message United States
about 2 hours ago
Through my studies, I have concluded boredom is the emotion which correlates with quality. The reason is simple, boredom implies time in which the individual is tired of doing something and would rather do something else. If that something else is direct towards OT, then that has potential for a quality thread. Do note this doesn't imply that the thread would be quality. It is more like for the thread to be shit, or even worse, trash, if the boredom is not supplemented with a creative idea. The following relationship demonstrates what I mean by this:
boredom + imagination --> quality
boredom - imagination --> trash

therefore,

2*boredom --> quality + trash

As demonstrated, twice the usual boredom implies a superposition of quality and trash, but unless imagination is supplied, it can go either way. It is also more complex than this, involving tensors, phase angles, etc in order to calculate the likelihood of either quality or trash, and further quantitative analysis to breakdown quality, trash, and boredom into its sub-components to determine their fundamental makeup. However, this is outside the scope of the subject I am discussing today.
ABraker's osu! Standard Skin v1.2: Get it here!
ABraker's Mania Skin v1.65: Get it here!
osu!Skills - Compare your skills in a slightly different way
ImageImage

Quick Reply: Type your message here and hit Ctrl+Enter to send!
Reply 18 posts jump | 1, 2 next
Users browsing this forum: DaddyCoolVipper, Mahogany

Index » Other » Off-Topic » How Do Emotions Trigger Quality? (Sadness)
Search for:
Go
Jump to: Go
ppy powered 2007-2017
General
Home
Changelog
Beatmap Listing
Download osu!
Wiki

Help and Community
Frequently Asked Questions
Community Forums
Live Streams
Report an Issue

Support osu!
Supporter Tags
Merchandise

Legal & Status
Terms of Service
Copyright (DMCA)
Server Status
@osustatus
Lost? Looking for something? Maybe need some help?
johnmedina999

abraker wrote:

You are aware that you can add two different equations, right?

..(b + i = q)
+(b - i = t)
..(2*b + i - i = q + t)

2*b = q + t
I was gonna say that it doesn't make sense, but I did the math. If you take your equation and solve for q, you get q = 2b - t.

q = 2b - t
q = 2i + t (from my previous post)

2b - t = 2i + t
2b = 2i + 2t
b = i + t (your equation)

I was mistaken; carry on.
kai99
uguu it's still long on pc screen may god save my soul
abraker
Wew the thread just underwent a rollercoaster of good and shit quality. Blitztoad, you taking notes?
Fhaye
give me back my few minutes of time :(
kai99
2*b = q + t
if you're 2 bored you're a qt
Topic Starter
Blitzfrog

abraker wrote:

Wew the thread just underwent a rollercoaster of good and shit quality. Blitztoad, you taking notes?

You're supposed to be the one recording
Wth?
Meah
abraker

Blitzfrog wrote:

abraker wrote:

Wew the thread just underwent a rollercoaster of good and shit quality. Blitztoad, you taking notes?

You're supposed to be the one recording
Wth?
I has automated data gathering. I know you don't since one would never come up with a completely uneducated hypothesis as sadness triggering quality if you had the data.
Topic Starter
Blitzfrog

abraker wrote:

I has automated data gathering. I know you don't since one would never come up with a completely uneducated hypothesis as sadness triggering quality if you had the data.
You see abraker, I wrote this thread due to the sadness of finding that a beaker-dropping scientist like you exist in the world.
johnmedina999
Aww, father-son experiments!!
ColdTooth
I'm an expert at this field, and it seems like everytime you don't care about something, someone will get fucking triggered.
Topic Starter
Blitzfrog

ColdTooth wrote:

I'm an expert at this field, and it seems like everytime you don't care about something, someone will get fucking triggered.

This shall be the next study
kai99

johnmedina999 wrote:

Aww, father-son experiments!!
abraker

Blitzfrog wrote:

abraker wrote:

I has automated data gathering. I know you don't since one would never come up with a completely uneducated hypothesis as sadness triggering quality if you had the data.
You see abraker, I wrote this thread due to the sadness of finding that a beaker-dropping scientist like you exist in the world.
You envy me much, yes
Topic Starter
Blitzfrog

abraker wrote:

You envy me much, yes
It's only natural to envy ones dad

Also natural to surpass them
abraker

Blitzfrog wrote:

Also natural to surpass them
Until then, you have much to learn
Topic Starter
Blitzfrog

abraker wrote:

Blitzfrog wrote:

Also natural to surpass them
Until then, you have much to learn
Yes dad ;-;
Please sign in to reply.

New reply