Nyan wrote:

[Kantan]

Increase accuracy to 2.5~3 For all : I'm ok with my settings, that's my standards
02:28:581 (165,166,167) - d d d Why? There's a clap here actually

[Futsuu]

Increase accuracy to 3.5~4
This is a suggestion that removes plenty of notes. You can ignore this suggestion. I'm gonna think about it and get more suggestions about these place if people notes about it, currently you're right since it doesn't follow the vocals, but the problem actually would be to the spread with muzukashi since there's triple here. So i have to balance a bit and make choices.
Delete 00:52:727 (69) , 00:56:629 (80) , 01:00:532 (91)
Delete 01:55:166 (227) , 01:59:068 (238) , 02:02:971 (249)
Delete 02:38:093 (3) , 02:41:995 (14) , 02:45:898 (25)

03:31:020 (162,163,164,165) - d ddK Seems legit

[Muzu]

Increase accuracy to 4.5~5
01:04:190 (136,137,138,139,140) - d k d d d k I prefer d ddd k d k instead for consistency with seamed patterns



[Oni]

00:32:483 (43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50) - k k ddd k k ddd What why? Why this sudden change?
01:04:434 - add a kat Fixed what i had to do.

[Inner Oni]

Increase accuracy to 5.5~6 Fixed to 6
00:22:483 - add a note
00:26:385 - add a note

01:26:873 - add a note
01:30:776 - add a note
Let these calm parts, calm patterns

PoPoii wrote:

Poii NM service
|d for don| D for Big Don| k for katsu| K for Big Katsu|

Futsuu

Mods

00:56:629 (80) - better bury this :v i mean kick it away Made some changes on the kiai but fixed at these places.
01:25:166 (163) - change to d, bass drum sound :v and same as oni Fixed on futsuu at least
01:27:117 (167) - same ^
01:34:922 (183,184,185,186) - k d k d ? how about d k d k ? I prefer my version, vocals and tense :V
01:59:068 (237) - kill this
01:59:068 (237) - miss this one ? Wat on these 2? Oo Made my changes tho'
02:41:263 (12) - k ? you place d here 00:56:385 (79) - and here 01:58:337 (235) - -_- -_-
02:41:995 (14) - delete this made same changes
02:56:142 (56) - say goodbye to this note, i mean just delete it :v Did on all wtf how
03:00:044 (68) - burn this :v i mean del
03:03:946 (80) - BUUURRRRNNN :v del this
03:09:068 - missing girlfriend ? i mean note :v
Break :V

Muzukashi

Mods

00:51:507 (91) - change to D "Geuraeyo nan" I like D K K D since the k are for the high vocals and the D as beats or filler
01:22:727 (208) - change to k, better sound (i think) :v That would make too much k for me :V
01:22:971 (209) - you can del this k, for a better sound, cause the snare and vocal is too weak :3 I'm fine with it
01:27:117 (221,222) - k d ? not d k Consitency with 01:31:020 sure
01:53:946 (302) - change to D bla
02:33:459 (441) - better d or k or D ? (i think D) that would make some problems with the next diff, even if K is legit for me.
02:36:873 (2) - change to D
02:44:434 (31) - Throw this :v Don't break my structures! D:
02:45:166 (32) - strong vocal, change it to K Not that much, i mean (32) was kinda important tho.

Oni

Mods

Oni
01:25:166 (257) - i dunno why sir, but its better when i changed it to d, you can ignore this, in another case, you place d, before triplet, so why you place k there ? Fixed
00:51:507 (91) - change to D, its better than K "Geuraeyo nan"
01:53:946 (301) - change to D
02:36:629 (1) - change to D
02:44:434 (31) - del, same pattern like previous Fixed yep
02:45:166 (33) - strong vocal, change it to K The rest is denied, same argues as other diffs so.

psssttt

Sorry i cant mods Inner oni and i cant find any problem with your kantan

8-) Free comment, Free reject

JessiChan wrote:

Hihi M4M request ^^

Note: My english is very bad and... i can mod muzu > oni > inner oni. Easiers diff are difficult for me (noob modder)

d Little Don
k Little Kat
D Big Don
K Big Kat

Muzukashii

00:25:166 (13) - k It was already from previous mod, guess you got the good intuition.
00:29:068 (24) - ^ Fixed Fixed
00:30:776 (29) - d
01:35:166 (245,246) - ctrl + g Fine with this pattern
01:40:288 (258) - k

Already

Oni

00:28:824 (31,32) - ctrl + g Beat at this place, won't change
01:02:117 (158) - d Keeping the contrast where the beats are.
01:06:873 (179,180) - k Double similar patterns part
01:10:776 (197) - ^ Fixed just because of next pattern for mirror style.
01:11:020 (199) - d Keeping for ^
01:14:678 (214) - k Keeping
01:14:922 (216) - d Keeping
01:33:946 (293) - Delethe this Waaat? Beats?
01:48:093 (342) - k Fixed
02:17:117 (470) - ^ Reverse patterns
02:19:068 (479) - ^ Vocals are not high
02:29:312 (521) - add a k here why?
02:29:800 (523) - d

Why?

Inner Oni

00:38:824 (76) - k
00:39:556 (80) - d
00:40:288 (84) - Delete This
00:47:971 (118) - k
00:48:093 (119) - Delete This
01:02:117 (190) - d
01:05:288 (205,206) - ctrl + g
01:06:873 (215) - k
01:10:166 (232,233) - ctrl + g
01:33:946 (345) - Delete this
01:36:995 (357,358) - ctrl + g
01:37:361 (360) - k
01:48:581 (408) - Delete this
01:50:410 (418) - k
01:50:532 (419) - Delete this
02:29:312 (615) - add a d
02:50:654 (81,82) - ctrl + g
02:58:824 (130,131) - ^
02:59:190 (133,134) - ^

All denied, you're deleting at non-sense part just to follow vocals and completely forgot the beats and you're changing patterns where i used reverse style, some patterns a made to create a music and play style and it has to be kept.

Good Look ^^

Aloda wrote:

Hey. Looks like previous modders have gone for the higher diffs, so I'm gonna focus on the lower ones. as you wish

Metadata

I'm not 100% sure about this but after a bit of research it seems like the official Korean song title is "소원을 말해봐 (Genie)". You might want to do some research of your own to make sure though. Wikipedia seems a safe one, applied

Also, some things you might want to add to the tags:

• Oh! (the name of the album the song is from) Hmmm since it's also a song, i prefer note, the argue is decent, but the result behind may not be ok.
  SNSD (common abbreviation of the group's Korean name) Yup
  Since you have the Romanised member names, you might also want to add their Korean names: 태연, 써니, 티파니, 효연, 유리, 수영, 윤아, 서현 and 제시카 and yep

General

Your preview point isn't snapped correctly It doesn't need to be snapped by what i know ( unless you prove me wrong)
For 03:08:581 - 03:24:190, the two other times this rhythm happens you've made it Kiai, so why not this time? tbh I think you'd be better off removing the Kiai from the other sections to make more of a contrast between them and the stronger sections preceding them. Hmmm nice ideas but for now i'll refuse, by order : I'll keep 03:08:581 as non kiai because after taeyeon solo, it feels weird to keep this as kiai also if you looked at the dance it looks like an ending (even tho that's not the most decent argue to give i admit haha). The two others are still on kiai since it's the collective part song and not solo or duo, it seems logic to group in the kiai. However if it's compromising to the ranking, i'll do the changes but for now i'll keep how it is

It looks like the song only has 3 or 4 different rhythms that it repeats through the song, My suggestions below only mention the first time a rhythm occurs, but note that they apply to all instances of that rhythm. Yep you've described well, it's a pop song so there's no multiple rythm, i'm just doing dense parts depending on how important/calm the music is.

Kantan

I think your structure in the 00:36:385 - 00:51:995 section is a little weird. You've placed most of your 1/1 patterns so they cover the first half of each bar, but, imo, both the music and the vocals are stronger in the second half. I think this section would play a lot better if you changed it around to match this (move 00:38:824 (22) to 00:37:849 etc). If you're worried about the becoming too similar to the previous section, I think it's okay since the music here is basically just a more intense version of the same thing. Tbh i don't see much difference on the changes (i mean what it gives more). HOWEVER, there's something you've may ommit, is the density, if i do the changed, i've to do this 00:45:654 - right? But what's just before? A quint with finisher as end. That would be a bit too dense to play for new players right? Let's keep a clean start part

There's something a little off about the first half of your Kiai section(s). It seems like you're trying to map to the vocals, but I think you're missing some of the more important vocal sounds. Try removing 00:52:483 (41) and adding a note at 00:54:434. I think this matches the vocals a little better and plays better too. Yes but have you analised well the first kiai part? All my quints suits because they scale on 1/1 lyrics, just listen again the chorus, there's no 1/2 lyrics on where i mapped, it's between them and i strongly think it's easier for new players to focus on not dense lyrics, the other 1/1 are decent since it's the main beat and easy to follow and look by the white bar

Futsuu

I don't really understand the 1/2 patterns you've used at the start. (00:21:751 (2,3,4) etc). Many of them don't really seem to be mapped to anything, and there are some really strong drum sounds that you've ignored. I also think that this density of 1/2 patterns doesn't contrast well with the following section. It has a very similar density to this one, yet the music is much more intense. For this section, you have a couple of options. You could try some simple 1/1 patterns, similar to what you've done in the Kantan, but with the gaps filled in, or, you could map more closely to the rhythm - like this
I think that having 3/4 spacing like this in a Futsuu would be okay here since the bpm is quite low. You could continue with patterns like this throughout the section. Yep, it sounds good, changed in that way except for 00:31:507 (22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31) - which i want to keep that way.


You're mapping to the vocals in 00:36:385 - 00:51:995? I think it would match the vocals a lot better if you moved 00:37:849 (35,36,37) and 00:45:654 (53,54,55) a beat backwards Agree, it sounds better..

I can kind of see what you're mapping to 01:07:605 - 01:23:215, but it plays very strangely imo. I think this section would benefit from mapping closely to the rhythm, since the vocals here aren't really suited to being mapped. Tried different things, but i'm not happier. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate

Muzukashii

Like with the Futsuu, I don't really understand your structure at the start. I think you could build on my suggestion to map to the rhythm by including the strong drum beats too. Like with the Futsuu, this structure would be repeated through the section. Changed in that way

For 00:36:385 - 00:51:995, I think you could map a little more closely to the vocals, including some of the 1/4 vocal sounds, like at 00:38:093. As is, your structure seems to be halfway between mapping to the vocals and the rhythm, and it feels very strange to play. Look at the oni before

I feel that many of the 1/4 triplet you've used in the Kiai are a little over the top. There are some 1/4 sounds in the background, but you're mapping to the vocals, so you should let that be the main thing that influences your mapping. Particularly in the second half (01:07:605 - 01:23:215), patterns like 01:08:824 (154,155,156,157) are fine since they match nicely with the vocals, but 01:09:800 (158,159,160) and 01:10:776 (162,163,164) feel [i]very[/i/] forced to me. I think you should go through the Kiai sections and try to remove the 1/4 patterns that aren't necessary for the flow of the map. The gap with the oni would be meh after.

gl with the map

Arrival wrote:

salu pierre yves thomas :japanese_goblin:

[General]

Rajoute k-pop et SM Entertainment (leur label) dans les tags oké

Peut etre OD 2.5 / 3 pour la Kantan / 3.5 pour la Futsuu / 4.5 pour la Muzu ?
Considère vivement 5.5 pour la Inner. OD 6 123 BPM ça fait du OD 9 185BPM en DT..... Ok pour le 5.5 Pour le reste, je garde mes standards (TG yael)


[Kantan]

00:49:556 - Rajoute une note ici ? Sachant que tu as un break 4/1 après, et que a correspond au pattern 00:42:239 (27,28,29,30,31) - (et ici aussi du coup 01:51:995 - )

02:35:410 - Spinner ici ? On a deja un bon break 4/1 avant, le joueur connait la musique, c'est que bénéfique.

All fixed

[Futsuu]

00:37:605 (35) - A déplacer a 00:38:093 - plutot ? Ca rend mieux imo

01:08:581 (113,114,115,116) - A la place de ça qui est un peu boring a jouer, pourquoi pas un 3/2 ? Peut etre pas obligé de le mettre pour chaque autre pattern, mais genre 1 fois sur 2 c'est peut etre intéréssant.

All Denied, pour le premier, les deux sont décents, mais je préfère éviter la confusion du aux vocals qui sont un peu 1/4 dans les endroits mentionnés. Et pour le second, ca va over exploser le SR et tout le monde va QQ.


[Muzukashii]

01:22:483 (207) - Triplet ici ? Ca fait un peu tout much, à voir selon les avis.

02:29:312 - Rajouter un kat ici rendrait bien. Yee

03:06:385 (120) - J'aime pas trop ce genre de suggestions, mais change ça en k, car ça va vraiment mieux avec le vocal, et synergise bien avec le pattern k k ddd juste avant. Aussi d'accord

03:31:385 (212) - Je conseille un doublet dk ici. Mais simple suggestion A voir ouais, c'est décent mais pas nécéssaire.

[Oni]

00:21:751 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - Que dis tu de ceci a la place ? Je pense que ça colle mieux au rythme général.

Tu met a des endroits k_hand: pour en enlver à des endroits :japanese_goblin:, en vrai ca aurait pu être correct sauf que tu veux délete la ou y'a du triple vocal a sniper ez.

01:05:898 (169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179) - Faire ddk k ddddk rend mieux a mon avis.

T'es pas en accord avec ton image mais ce que tu me donne me va parce que j'ai fait un peu trop dans ces endroits comparé aux kiai.

02:58:946 (109) - Pourquoi pas déplacer cette note a 02:58:459 - ? Un quintuplet qui overlap sur le gros tick blanc rend pas ouf je trouve, et casse un peu le rythme crée avant. Ca permettrait aussi d'accentuer ces deux notes 02:59:068 (110,111) - Alors le coup du tick blanc, j'en ai un peu partout ici :joy:, par contre le coup du double k en valeur me va.

[Inner Oni]

00:41:629 (93) - Supprime cette note et met un d a 00:41:873 - ? Non, j'aime ces kkd kkd stuffs. Ca va bien avec ma vision de la choré (AYY AYY LMAO COREE GET IT?)

01:22:483 (295,296,297,298,299,300,301) - Un peu moche ce pattern ça me fait penser a Verdi Kappa. kdkkdkd a la place me parait mieux C'toi le verdi, actually ca colle avec la song xd

02:55:044 (107) - Supprime cette note ? Je pense qu'avoir un quintuplet avant un stream de plus de 5 notes dessert un peu ce dernier. T'as mieux fait d'avoir triplet + une note 1/2 + stream pour de la mise en valeur. (03:06:020 (175) - Ici aussi par exemple etc) J'ai fais ce que j'ai pu, par contre j'ai agrandi le stream de fin parce que tu la mérité.


Bon la quasi totalité de mes suggestions sont valables pour d'autres endroits de la musique oublie pas.

Bonne chance

Fantazy wrote:

hihi~~~

Inner Oni

00:31:020 (44) - d>k
00:32:483 (50,51,52,53) - kkd k
00:33:459 (54,55,56,57) - ddd k or dkd k
00:38:093 - just kd?
00:40:044 - dk
00:45:898 - kd
00:46:385 - dkd or kdk
00:47:849 - kd
00:55:410 (154) - k>d
00:55:898 (155) - k>d
00:59:312 (174) - k>d
01:04:190 (196) - k>d

01:31:507 (330) - k>d
01:34:922 (346,347,348,349) - kdd k
01:35:898 (350,351,352,353) - kkd k
01:36:873 (354,355,356,357,358) - kdddk

01:40:532 - kd
01:42:483 - dk
01:42:971 - dkd kdk kdd
01:48:093 - kkdk
01:50:044 - kdkd
01:57:849 (453,454) - k>d

02:01:507 (473,474,475) - ddk?
02:06:629 (501) - k>d

02:40:776 (23,24) - k>d
02:49:556 (73) - k>d
03:04:068 (161) - d>k
03:06:385 (175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186) - kdddkdkdkkdd
03:07:849 (187,188,189,190,191) - kkddk or kdkdk or ddkdk
03:18:580 (241,242,243,244,245) - dkkdk

03:26:873 (281) - k>d
03:27:361 (282,283,284) - k d k

All denied, some parts would have been changed without considering how the patterns are made (you may have not noticed that patterns like 01:09:800 (229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239) - are mirrored every time and you're gonna break it).

Oni , Muzu

*you can put more note for this diff (oni) ?_? and Muzu little more?_?_?_?_?
(( feel tooo easy DX

This is why an Inner Oni has been made, else -> DT since the BPM is low 8)

Fustuu

01:37:361 (189) - k>d
02:12:239 (275,276,277) - 02:16:142 (287,288,289) - d k d?
01:00:288 (90,91,92) - 02:02:727 (248,249,250) - 02:45:654 (24,25,26) - k k d

Not felt the utility

gooood luck and EXPLOSION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1. 00:40:044 (82,83,84) - since you're following the vocal, I think it should be better to have the emphasis on this note 00:40:166 (83) - instead of this one 00:40:288 (84) - . So, how about changing into dkd ? (you also used it here 01:42:483 (381,382,383) - )
2. if you've fixed it ^ : also same thing here 00:47:849 (118,119,120) - . Since the music is also the same & you're using the same mimic.
3. 00:54:190 (150,151,152,153,154) - I'd suggest kdkdd since your pattern was following the vocal, but I think you want to make it different from this 00:58:093 (170,171,172,173,174) -
4. 01:01:995 (190,191,192,193,194) - I think changing this into a kkdkd or another pattern which have this note 01:02:483 (194) - as a d ; would enhance the emphasis here 01:02:727 (195) -
5. I think, it'd be better to make those 2 notes 01:52:361 (429,430) - different. I'll make 01:52:483 (430) - more emphasized.
6. 03:19:556 (247,248,249,250,251) - I really prefer the ddkdk pattern here instead of kdddk. You used a lot this pattern to represent this kind of vocal. (tho, i can understand you want to change some pattern to have a more unique map)

1. 01:04:434 (166,167,168,169,170,171) - Maybe change it to kkddk d instead of kkd kkd ? I think it goes better with the vocal.
2. 02:44:922 (39) - maybe delete this note ? Since you have an 1/1 break here 02:42:483 -

1. 01:25:654 (217) - maybe just me, but I think this one as k flow better.

1. I've seen, you're really mapping the vocal. So, maybe don't skip this vocal ? 01:08:337 - or add a k here 01:08:093 - since you use it here : 01:11:995 (124) - 01:15:898 (136) - 01:19:800 (148) -

Kin wrote:

cc, le revive

[Inner Oni]

1. 00:40:044 (82,83,84) - since you're following the vocal, I think it should be better to have the emphasis on this note 00:40:166 (83) - instead of this one 00:40:288 (84) - . So, how about changing into dkd ? (you also used it here 01:42:483 (381,382,383) - )
2. if you've fixed it ^ : also same thing here 00:47:849 (118,119,120) - . Since the music is also the same & you're using the same mimic. Agreed, but also the next triple (as you may see, i use twice similar triples on these sections).
3. 00:54:190 (150,151,152,153,154) - I'd suggest kdkdd since your pattern was following the vocal, but I think you want to make it different from this 00:58:093 (170,171,172,173,174) - It's ok
4. 01:01:995 (190,191,192,193,194) - I think changing this into a kkdkd or another pattern which have this note 01:02:483 (194) - as a d ; would enhance the emphasis here 01:02:727 (195) - Totally agreed
5. I think, it'd be better to make those 2 notes 01:52:361 (429,430) - different. I'll make 01:52:483 (430) - more emphasized. Yep, kkdkd then
6. 03:19:556 (247,248,249,250,251) - I really prefer the ddkdk pattern here instead of kdddk. You used a lot this pattern to represent this kind of vocal. (tho, i can understand you want to change some pattern to have a more unique map)
   Nope, i'll keep the mirors patterns until the end.

[Oni]

1. 01:04:434 (166,167,168,169,170,171) - Maybe change it to kkddk d instead of kkd kkd ? I think it goes better with the vocal. Looks better yeah
2. 02:44:922 (39) - maybe delete this note ? Since you have an 1/1 break here 02:42:483 - Done

[Muzukashii]

1. 01:25:654 (217) - maybe just me, but I think this one as k flow better. It shoould have been since the others are k.

[Futsuu]

1. I've seen, you're really mapping the vocal. So, maybe don't skip this vocal ? 01:08:337 - or add a k here 01:08:093 - since you use it here : 01:11:995 (124) - 01:15:898 (136) - 01:19:800 (148) - The breaks boi : ok_hand : :100:
   
   

Bon, après, sur la Kantan, y a genre pas grand chose à dire. C'est une kantan quoi.
jtm bb.

Surono wrote:

no kd

OD2 for what in nowadays...... kantan change to OD 3 then Futsuu change to OD 3.5 OD 2 in 2k17 lulz

* for oni, 00:28:581 - kkd k, need variation here. nye i agree
* for futsuu, 00:47:361 - don this, same reason above and here I think is overdone with emphasize Dem clap in the song ' L_'
* 00:33:946 - add don for kantan, see the futsuu Only if i don 00:32:971 - here aswell ' L_'
* 01:40:044 - no clap, don it for futsuu don
* 02:32:483 - try slider for muzukashii? Why nut, but i keep 02:33:459 (440) -
* 03:29:312 - delete for muzukashii Should be weird to read.
* 02:56:629 - for kantan, try to add here notes and similar spot? since its slow bpm and futsuu has lonnngg pattern. would be challenging for babies~ Don't feel it necessary, also it should be odd having 1/2 at final part, it's like adding 1/4 on futsuu too

dkk loverz :tank:

Aldwych wrote:

Korean loli train inc!

Maxus wrote:

Wikipedia isn't official though, it is a website where literally anyone can edit the information, hence why it's unofficial.
While the youtube link provided by KwaN is directly from the producer company (look at the channel, it has "verified" status in it) and cannot be edited by anyone except the official people , hence why it's official.

Aldwych wrote:

So according to your logic, Youtube is more official than Wikipedia.

Why shouldn't it be, may I ask? The people who uploaded that video (and therefore decided the title) are either the record label/company or artist themselves.

Aldwych wrote:

@Natsu, you can find it on every translated lyrics site, google translate, osu Genie map ranked, my Korean teacher back in the days. Tho' they are not """"""""""""""""""""official"""""""""""""""""""""", i don't think it's an incorrect one.

Should we call Euny/Spectator to be sure at 15641631546456456% it's correct?

I was just wonder if the romanized way would be better? Sowoneul Malhaebwa (Genie)

Doyak wrote:

Unused green lines are not issues, as they just do nothing and don't cause any problems. There could be very slight improvement on performance but that's not worth to DQ only to fix that.

• [General]

1. 02:52:849 - please consider removing this kind of kiai break for all difficulties as it looks rather unnecessary due to its extremely short length as well as the fact that the song pace keeps constant till 03:08:581 -

• [Kantan]

1. From 02:35:410 to 03:22:239 - patterns are densely mapped in a consecutive manner without 4/1 breaks. You may remove 02:51:995 (23) - for a longer rest in between the pattern chain.

• [Futsuu]

1. From 02:37:361 to 03:08:581 - patterns are densely mapped in a consecutive manner without 2/1 breaks. I would suggest deleting 02:49:556 (35,37) - for a rest in the middle of the last kiai so that beginners could make use of it to prepare for next patterns.
2. 02:56:142 (56) - 1/2 patterns like this are too long for this level of difficulty, so I would suggest removing this note to shorten the 1/2 pattern a bit. The current note density is in fact rather close to Muzukashii, resulting in a noticeable difficulty gap with Kantan.
3. 03:00:044 (69) - 03:03:946 (82) - 03:05:898 (89) - same as ^

• [Muzukashii]

1. From 00:36:385 to 01:37:361 - the shortage of rest moments exists here like Futsuu. 00:51:263 (90,92) - could be removed for a 2/1 break before the kiai starts. In this way the difficulty transition from Futsuu to Oni could also be improved.
2. From 01:38:824 to 02:33:459 - similar to ^ , you may delete 01:53:703 (299,301) - as well.
3. From 02:35:410 to 03:31:995 - again, 03:09:068 (131) - could be removed in order to avoid continuous mapping.

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

Hello, I would like to point out some difficulty issues regarding pattern length and rest moments in lower difficulties.

• [General]

1. 02:52:849 - please consider removing this kind of kiai break for all difficulties as it looks rather unnecessary due to its extremely short length as well as the fact that the song pace keeps constant till 03:08:581 - Hmmmm no, honestly it is 2 different part since the second sequence is more intense (solo taeyeon but still same "peace" ((??!?))), a reset is here for the stars which i feel needed.

• [Kantan]

1. From 02:35:410 to 03:22:239 - patterns are densely mapped in a consecutive manner without 4/1 breaks. You may remove 02:51:995 (23) - for a longer rest in between the pattern chain.hhmmm ye

• [Futsuu]

1. From 02:37:361 to 03:08:581 - patterns are densely mapped in a consecutive manner without 2/1 breaks. I would suggest deleting 02:49:556 (35,37) - for a rest in the middle of the last kiai so that beginners could make use of it to prepare for next patterns. yes and no, i made a break but not at your point since it's not the best place to be and not consitent with kantan.
2. 02:56:142 (56) - 1/2 patterns like this are too long for this level of difficulty, so I would suggest removing this note to shorten the 1/2 pattern a bit. The current note density is in fact rather close to Muzukashii, resulting in a noticeable difficulty gap with Kantan.
3. 03:00:044 (69) - 03:03:946 (82) - 03:05:898 (89) - same as ^ Yes for all except the last one*
   
   For the rest, yes and no again, i split the 6 length patterns, but used 5 length patterns instead at different place (due to taeyeon solo vocals), you may omit the fact the last part has more peace, so i consider that i have to make a harder part, so also for the sake of final solo part and consitency overall the set 03:04:678 (79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86) - will be kept .

• [Muzukashii]

1. From 00:36:385 to 01:37:361 - the shortage of rest moments exists here like Futsuu. 00:51:263 (90,92) - could be removed for a 2/1 break before the kiai starts. In this way the difficulty transition from Futsuu to Oni could also be improved.
2. From 01:38:824 to 02:33:459 - similar to ^ , you may delete 01:53:703 (299,301) - as well. And ^ I dont find the utility, tbh what in the world 00:51:507 (91) in solo - would mean?
3. From 02:35:410 to 03:31:995 - again, 03:09:068 (131) - could be removed in order to avoid continuous mapping.
   Really? fgezzefzefef

Additionally it is indeed questionable to have at 02:52:849 - a kiai break since the chorus does not cut here.

• [Kantan]

1. 00:20:776 - you may delete this timing point as it is unused.
2. 00:43:703 (30) - this note could be removed so as to simplify the 1/1 pattern. Current note density is quite similar to that in the kiais, lacking proper emphasis on certain parts.
3. 01:04:190 (22) - similar to ^ , you may remove this note as well as the vocal is less significant here.
4. 01:23:703 - same as 00:20:776 -
5. 01:46:142 (72) - same as 00:43:703 (30) -
6. 01:53:703 - same as 00:20:776 -
7. 02:06:629 (101) - same as 01:04:190 (22) -
8. 02:49:556 (20) - ^
9. 02:51:995 (22) - I think you need to delete this note as mentioned in the previous post for a 4/1 break.
10. 03:05:166 (41) - seven 1/1 notes are in fact quite demanding for Kantan. I would suggest moving this note to 03:07:117 - and changing to k for simplicity as well as pattern variety.

• [Futsuu]

1. 00:20:776 - same as Kantan
2. 00:54:678 (75) - you may delete this note for a better spread from Kantan to Muzukashii. Current note density is rather close to Muzukashii, causing a big gap with Kantan.
3. 00:58:581 (85) - 01:02:483 (95) - same as ^
4. 01:06:142 (104) - 01:07:361 (108) - same as ^ considering that you have a 4/1 break in Kantan. Then you may change 01:07:117 (106) - to k for the snare.
5. 01:10:044 (113) - 01:11:263 (117) - 01:13:946 (123) - 01:15:166 (127) - 01:17:849 (133) - 01:19:068 (137) - same as ^
6. 01:14:922 (125) - 01:18:824 (135) - same as 01:07:117 (106) -
7. 01:17:605 (132) - this note could be d to cohere with 01:09:800 (112) -
8. 01:21:751 (143) - you should remove this note at least since the difficulty jump from Kantan is too big here.
9. 01:23:703 - sane as Kantan
10. 01:53:703 - ^
11. 01:57:117 (222) - 02:01:020 (232) - 02:04:922 (242) - same as 00:54:678 (75) -
12. 02:08:581 (251) - 02:09:800 (255) - same as 01:06:142 (104) - while 02:09:556 (253) - could be changed to k.
13. 02:12:483 (260) - 02:13:703 (264) - 02:16:385 (270) - 02:17:605 (274) - 02:20:288 (280) - 02:21:507 (284) - same as ^
14. 02:21:263 (282) - same as 01:07:117 (106) -
15. 02:25:410 (294) - same as 01:21:751 (143) -
16. 02:26:142 (295) - it would be better to remove this note for a 2/1 rest after the dense kiai.
17. 02:40:044 (9) - 02:43:946 (19) - 02:47:849 (29) - same as 00:54:678 (75) -
18. 02:51:507 (38) - ^
19. 02:56:629 (51) - 03:00:532 (62) - again, I think you need to remove these notes as the use of 1/2 patterns is too dense and continuous in this session.
20. 03:04:678 (73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80) - eight 1/2 notes are too hard for Futsuu if you ask me. 03:05:898 (78) - should be deleted.
21. 03:08:337 (85) - same as 02:25:410 (294) -
22. 03:11:020 (91) - 03:12:239 (95) - 03:14:922 (101) - 03:16:142 (105) - 03:18:824 (111) - 03:20:044 (115) - same as 01:06:142 (104) -
23. 03:15:898 (103) - 03:19:800 (113) - same as 01:07:117 (106) -
24. 03:23:946 (125) - 03:27:849 (134) - same as 02:25:410 (294) -
25. 03:24:678 (127) - same as 02:26:142 (295) -

• [Muzukashii]

1. 00:20:776 - same as Kantan
2. 00:51:263 (90,92) - please reconsider deleting these notes for the spread's sake as well as a 2/1 rest. In fact you should not follow all vocals like Oni as this is only an intermediate difficulty, especially when you have a 3/1 break in Futsuu.
3. 01:53:703 (299,301) - same as ^ . The big note is in fact not alone as there is a close connection among 01:53:946 (299,300) -

• [Oni]

1. 00:20:776 - same as Kantan

• [Inner Oni]
  
  HP could be 6 here for a better transition from Oni.

1. 00:20:776 - same as Kantan

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

Here is a follow-through mod for lower difficulties. You may kudosu this post instead of p/6044768 due to exemption.

• [Kantan]

1. 00:20:776 - you may delete this timing point as it is unused. Done
2. 00:43:703 (30) - this note could be removed so as to simplify the 1/1 pattern. Current note density is quite similar to that in the kiais, lacking proper emphasis on certain parts. Ok, changed the triplet to kdk due to vocals
3. 01:04:190 (22) - similar to ^ , you may remove this note as well as the vocal is less significant here. If it's terms of vocals volume yes, but about the vocal it self it's a repetition of "Ship eun", so i felt using half of the second it a bit weird.
4. 01:23:703 - same as 00:20:776 -
5. 01:46:142 (72) - same as 00:43:703 (30) -
6. 01:53:703 - same as 00:20:776 -
7. 02:06:629 (101) - same as 01:04:190 (22) -
8. 02:49:556 (20) - ^
9. 02:51:995 (22) - I think you need to delete this note as mentioned in the previous post for a 4/1 break. Yep, good point
10. 03:05:166 (41) - seven 1/1 notes are in fact quite demanding for Kantan. I would suggest moving this note to 03:07:117 - and changing to k for simplicity as well as pattern variety. Hmmm ok. Let's on futsuu about this part then

• [Futsuu]

1. 00:20:776 - same as Kantan
2. 00:54:678 (75) - you may delete this note for a better spread from Kantan to Muzukashii. Current note density is rather close to Muzukashii, causing a big gap with Kantan. Fine
3. 00:58:581 (85) - 01:02:483 (95) - same as ^ ^ + Changed 00:58:337 (84) - as d
4. 01:06:142 (104) - 01:07:361 (108) - same as ^ considering that you have a 4/1 break in Kantan. Then you may change 01:07:117 (106) - to k for the snare. Yep
5. 01:10:044 (113) - 01:11:263 (117) - 01:13:946 (123) - 01:15:166 (127) - 01:17:849 (133) - 01:19:068 (137) - same as ^ If posible i want to keep 01:19:068 (137) - because of the context (well it's about dance context because on their clip they do a faster leg move here, and i want to reproduce as this 4plet) The others are ok
6. 01:14:922 (125) - 01:18:824 (135) - same as 01:07:117 (106) - Done
7. 01:17:605 (132) - this note could be d to cohere with 01:09:800 (112) - Done
8. 01:21:751 (143) - you should remove this note at least since the difficulty jump from Kantan is too big here. 01:22:727 - Deleted as well for break
9. 01:23:703 - sane as Kantan
10. 01:53:703 - ^
11. 01:57:117 (222) - 02:01:020 (232) - 02:04:922 (242) - same as 00:54:678 (75) -
12. 02:08:581 (251) - 02:09:800 (255) - same as 01:06:142 (104) - while 02:09:556 (253) - could be changed to k.
13. 02:12:483 (260) - 02:13:703 (264) - 02:16:385 (270) - 02:17:605 (274) - 02:20:288 (280) - 02:21:507 (284) - same as ^
14. 02:21:263 (282) - same as 01:07:117 (106) -
15. 02:25:410 (294) - same as 01:21:751 (143) -
16. 02:26:142 (295) - it would be better to remove this note for a 2/1 rest after the dense kiai.
17. 02:40:044 (9) - 02:43:946 (19) - 02:47:849 (29) - same as 00:54:678 (75) -
18. 02:51:507 (38) - ^
19. 02:56:629 (51) - 03:00:532 (62) - again, I think you need to remove these notes as the use of 1/2 patterns is too dense and continuous in this session.
20. 03:04:678 (73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80) - eight 1/2 notes are too hard for Futsuu if you ask me. 03:05:898 (78) - should be deleted.
21. 03:08:337 (85) - same as 02:25:410 (294) -
22. 03:11:020 (91) - 03:12:239 (95) - 03:14:922 (101) - 03:16:142 (105) - 03:18:824 (111) - 03:20:044 (115) - same as 01:06:142 (104) -
23. 03:15:898 (103) - 03:19:800 (113) - same as 01:07:117 (106) -
24. 03:23:946 (125) - 03:27:849 (134) - same as 02:25:410 (294) -
25. 03:24:678 (127) - same as 02:26:142 (295) -

• [Muzukashii]

1. 00:20:776 - same as Kantan
2. 00:51:263 (90,92) - please reconsider deleting these notes for the spread's sake as well as a 2/1 rest. In fact you should not follow all vocals like Oni as this is only an intermediate difficulty, especially when you have a 3/1 break in Futsuu. efezfzefzefe
3. 01:53:703 (299,301) - same as ^ . The big note is in fact not alone as there is a close connection among 01:53:946 (299,300) -

• [Oni]

1. 00:20:776 - same as Kantan

• [Inner Oni]
  
  HP could be 6 here for a better transition from Oni.

1. 00:20:776 - same as Kantan

In short, Futsuu should be simplified if you want to fix the imbalanced spread among lower difficulties. You may call me back after that~

Surono wrote:

hei, so.