1. BG has to be 800*600 or 1024*768.
2. Do you always needs at least five points for each slider? It's not really an issue but i think there are a lot of points that isn't really useful.
3. I think you can end all the final spinner 1 beat earlier.

1. 00:30:009 (3) - This slider looks really weird, you should change it. Maybe somethin more normal like 00:52:597 (3).
2. 00:32:126 (1) - I don't think the spinner is really necessary here. Maybe replace it with
   
3. 00:34:950 - Add a note.
4. 01:22:950 (1) - Remove NC.
5. 01:30:714 - Maybe you could increse the hitsounds volume here.
6. 01:40:950 (3) - Whistle at the end? (like you did in your Insane Diff)
7. 02:03:891 (1) - ^
8. 02:13:773 (1) - Same suggestion than at 00:32:126 (1).
9. 02:16:597 - Add a note.
10. 02:56:832 (3) - Move it one grid down in order to be as the same high than 02:55:420 (1).

1. I find the circles a little bit small for such a diff. Maybe Circle Size -1.
2. 00:10:950 (1) - Whistle at the end?
3. 00:16:597 (1) - ^
4. 00:27:891 (1) - ^
5. 00:34:244 (2) - Whistle (and so on.....)
6. 01:04:950 - Add a note?
7. 01:40:950 (1) - It's a rather short spinner. Maybe a slider would be better.
8. 02:01:773 (5,7) - I don't like this overlapping. Try something where the slider on top doesn't overlap with the start and the end of the slider on the bottom.
9. 02:32:126 (1) - Move it to x=204 y=112 in order to be as the same high as the previous slider.
10. 02:51:185 (3) - Move it one grid down in order to be as the same high as 02:49:773 (1).

1. You've just put a Whistle every 4 beats at the beggining? I think you could do better. Above all you have a lot of notes here and so a lot of possibilities for hitsounds.
2. 00:13:067 (5) - You should end it 1/4 beat earlier. Otherwise it sounds very weird when playing.
3. 00:15:891 (5) - ^
4. 00:20:126 (3) - ^
5. 00:26:479 (1) - I don't think the NC is really useful here.
6. 00:44:126 (6) - I don't know why but in this case i think that it sounds good. You can let it. (But i persist whit the previous)
7. 00:53:656 (5) - If you move the slider 1/2 beat later and add a note here i think it fits better the music (and smooth the jump a little).
   
   
8. 01:07:420 (4) - Remove the whistle. It sounds weird here.
9. 01:27:891 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - They really look random. Try making some pattern here. You have twelves notes. Imagine the possibilities ^^.
10. 01:40:244 (3) - One or two grid up looks better.
11. 01:55:773 (1) - The five following notes are symmetrical. Try putting it to the central axis.
12. 02:01:773 (2,3) - The jump is a little bit violent.
13. 02:17:303 (5,1) - The overlapping doesn't look good.
14. 02:36:009 (5,6,7,8) - I think that it's the four previous notes rotated by 45° but they really look random.
15. 02:43:244 (4) - It doesn't seem necessary.
16. 02:51:891 (6,7) - Why so much hate?

1. 01:15:433 (4) - 往下移一點讓他好看點吧

1. 02:01:420 (1,2,3,4,5) - 畫個星星也好，這樣擺實在…
   
   
2. 02:36:009 (5) - 你這是要放在Y軸上的…？

Entreal wrote:

Hello. Random Mod from Popner's queue. Hope this helps.

General
You can ignore this, but if you hate the slider slide noise in each slider i suggest getting a blank .wav and rename it to soft-sliderslide.wav
You can find it here

Stella

Don't you hear like instruments being strung? (ex: 00:11:656) I suggest putting a whistle or something on those. It can emphasize the music more.
00:20:126 - Move a tiny bit due to distance snapping
00:36:361 - Tiny bit down ^
01:15:538 - NC here, not only because of the change in music but you did the (1,2) combo in the previous parts.
01:56:126 - Move the final point to x:312 y:308, better blanket for the previous slider - All here and above fixed
02:08:126 - Instead of a repeat why not delete it and add a full slider? Like this: [img]
02:15:185 - ^ - no thanks
02:56:832 - Delete this and put a note 02:57:254, for that leading tune i believe. - will check later

Sana

You have some distance errors i believe (ex 00:16:597).
00:25:773 - Maybe have this slider blanket the previous slider, you can ignore this if you want.
00:49:773 - Add whistle since you made like a pattern i believe.
01:34:597 - Move this slightly up to be symmetrical with the previous slider
02:25:420 - Move the second to last point to x:348 y:164 (slider points), better blanket i believe - all done
02:38:832 - Woah, i don't think this slider is necessary, use a slider instead - it was a bug due to previous slider tick rate change, thanks for pointing out
02:39:891 - This note is too close to the last one, may confuse people. - related to previous bug

Arche
No changelog for this due to me being silly with updating D.N.Angel's and own parts in, but the last slider actually is snapped in 1/8.

AGH TAKE MY STAR, MY HEART, THE MUSIC HURTS. I just love editing my post 20,000 times to add unnecessary things

t73697 wrote:

Sana

1. 01:15:433 (4) - 往下移一點讓他好看點吧 - 修复

Hellzero wrote:

Also you need someone who can help you with timing, because it's bad

smallboat wrote:

嗨 您好~來幫你MOD:D
我從我們的Queue接你的case：）
稍微晚回 不好意思@@a

整體
無錯誤 沒什麼問題 下的音都有在拍子上 不錯

Easy
OK

Sana
01:04:950 (5) - +note - 插入的

Hard

SPOILER

00:13:773 (1) - +whistle - 修好的
00:16:597 (1) - ^ - ^
00:20:832 (4) - ^ - ^
00:26:126 (2) - +note - 不修好
00:44:832 (1) - +whistle - 修好的
00:47:656 (1) - ^ - ^
00:49:067 (4) - ^ - ^
00:50:479 (1) - ^ - ^
02:40:597 (4) - 尾端拿掉whistle應該比較好? - 却我喜欢它

Ok 先mod這些 斟酌使用 如有問題可PM給我 謝謝:)

1. the minimum resolution of background is 800*600

1. 00:51:185 (3,4,5) - here's a "misplacement beat" that i would suggest to make the beat around here like this:
   
2. 01:00:361 (2) - weird repeat tick...split it and try this beat?
   
3. 01:03:185 (3) - change to a 1/1 slider?
4. 01:14:479 (3) - similar to 01:00:261 -

1. a general suggestion: try to avoid stop slider on long-white ticks
2. 00:52:597 (3,4,5) - two 1/2 sliders may be better than current
3. 01:52:597 (1,2) - try this beat?
   

1. 02:57:700 (4) - unsnapped

Kawayi Rika wrote:

[Arche]

[*]02:36:361 (6) - Stack on 02:36:361 (6) -,looks much better.

//because 02:36:009 (5) should be y-axis, and 02:35:656 (4,5,6,7,8) should be pentagon, I cannot move this note.
btw,I think time between 02:34:597 (1,6) are large enough so there is no difference between none stacking and stacked perfectly.
[/list]

Kurowolfe wrote:

I don't understand, why is the user ranking so low? The maps fit the song just fine, and apart from some far jumps in the Arche difficulty, I have no trouble passing all three maps, and I'm not even a good Hard level osu player.

Don't let the score mislead you, give this song a go before deciding.