i'm not sure if serious or notBRBP wrote:
For the record, I'm mafia and I immediately had to explain what I do when I was voted.
Since OP wasn't clear enough if we could claim once or not , I'll do it without bold.
I claim to be: Mafia
or am I just getting lynched so that our doctor and cop will be safe, which would pay off in the long run?
If they are threatened they will claim on their own, all you did is to make the mafia safe too, if you're town and we waste a lynch on you.BRBP wrote:
or am I just getting lynched so that our doctor and cop will be safe, which would pay off in the long run?
"Acting like you know" may be suspicious, I can give you that. However, it is completely irrelevant to NH's quote and "Explaining everything you do" is not suspicious, it helps others understand why you're doing whatever, assuming the reason makes sense. (e.g. NOT lol sacrifice myself for power roles, and indirectly mafia too)BRBP wrote:
Explaining everything you do and acting like you know if a person mafia or not based on a couple of posts is even more suspicious.NoHitter wrote:
Bandwagon votes w/o explanations are really suspicious now.
I love how all of you are assuming there's a doctor and cop when one of the possible setups is mountainousBRBP wrote:
For the record, I'm mafia and I immediately had to explain what I do when I was voted.
Since OP wasn't clear enough if we could claim once or not , I'll do it without bold.
I claim to be: Mafia
or am I just getting lynched so that our doctor and cop will be safe, which would pay off in the long run?
So in one post you claim Mafia and go straight to a WIFOM argument.BRBP wrote:
For the record, I'm mafia and I immediately had to explain what I do when I was voted.
Since OP wasn't clear enough if we could claim once or not , I'll do it without bold.
I claim to be: Mafia
or am I just getting lynched so that our doctor and cop will be safe, which would pay off in the long run?
The self-vote you did was even more horrible. As town, you want more discussion (since discussion helps town to plan and hunt down scum) - not have the day end early. By self-voting, you bring yourself to one vote less to lynch - making it more likely for someone to hammer, ending the day early.Kanye West wrote:
I love how all of you are assuming there's a doctor and cop when one of the possible setups is mountainous
That's a pretty odd role...BRBP wrote:
For the record, I'm mafia and I immediately had to explain what I do when I was voted.
Yes. This is correct.NoHitter wrote:
Mod: Are the mafia roles pure vanilla? (i.e. Goon)
...? Explain?fartownik wrote:
Vote: Lybydose
Because I didn't die last night.
Putting this out so we can get some discussion instead of whatever this ping-ponging is supposed to achievethose wrote:
Iono, first one to stack votes?
I've already explained a bit more further. Also why aren't you asking Lybydose to explain as he posted less explanations than me? Stop being suspicious.JInxyjem wrote:
...? Explain?fartownik wrote:
Vote: Lybydose
Because I didn't die last night.
Making others support the suspicions on those is indirectly supporting Lybydose.JInxyjem wrote:
Putting this out so we can get some discussion instead of whatever this ping-ponging is supposed to achievethose wrote:
Iono, first one to stack votes?
Nope. NL D1 is bad. Heck... The very Idea of NL is bad. Except if it's MyLo/LyLothose wrote:
Vote: No-Lynch.BRBP wrote:
It's already been like 3 minutes and fartownik hasn't said anything, he seems really suspicious.
Obligatory first day nobody vote.
fartownik wrote:
Any reasoning behind this? Or am I just an attention magnet.Lybydose wrote:
Obligatory "voting no-lynch on the first day is not really beneficial for town in any way".
Vote: fartownik
Dunno if defending scum buddy, or whatthose wrote:
Probably a random choice
those wishy washy, unsure reads... Hmmmm...those wrote:
Unvote: No-Lynch
Vote: Nyquill
Iono, first one to stack votes?
Lybydose wrote:
unvote
vote: those
obvious scum right here
And again. Iunno if defending or something. What's with the indirect OMGUS?fartownik wrote:
Unvote
Vote: Lybydose
3 scum and too much people on the suspicious poolLybydose wrote:
@nohitter: we *could* do follow the cop, but since the doctor can't protect the same target every night, it wouldn't last very long
I've not asked Lyby to explain anything because I have nothing I don't understand about his posts, simple as that. He's suspicious of those, and you defending those so fervently by attacking him triggered his suspicion too I didn't know the correlation between you being alive and you voting Lyby, so I asked.fartownik wrote:
I've already explained a bit more further. Also why aren't you asking Lybydose to explain as he posted less explanations than me? Stop being suspicious.Making others support the suspicions on those is indirectly supporting Lybydose.JInxyjem wrote:
Putting this out so we can get some discussion instead of whatever this ping-ponging is supposed to achieve
Also I'm not saying I'm not suspicious about those, but they're lower every single post now.
Just my read here, but I doubt scum would make an OMGUS this obvious.Tsukasa wrote:
And again. Iunno if defending or something. What's with the indirect OMGUS?fartownik wrote:
Unvote
Vote: Lybydose
It's not a random person. Stacking votes is an easy to start heading toward the direction of the hammer, which mafia DOES want. It's also what you did to me day 1, and now you're trying to start that wagon.Lybydose wrote:
Kept his vote on some random person to not be seen voting on the townie wagon.
Must be scumslip.Nyquill wrote:
Just my read here, but I doubt scum would make an OMGUS this obvious.Tsukasa wrote:
And again. Iunno if defending or something. What's with the indirect OMGUS?
