
I love how all of you are assuming there's a doctor and cop when one of the possible setups is mountainousBRBP wrote:
For the record, I'm mafia and I immediately had to explain what I do when I was voted.
Since OP wasn't clear enough if we could claim once or not , I'll do it without bold.
I claim to be: Mafia
or am I just getting lynched so that our doctor and cop will be safe, which would pay off in the long run?
So in one post you claim Mafia and go straight to a WIFOM argument.BRBP wrote:
For the record, I'm mafia and I immediately had to explain what I do when I was voted.
Since OP wasn't clear enough if we could claim once or not , I'll do it without bold.
I claim to be: Mafia
or am I just getting lynched so that our doctor and cop will be safe, which would pay off in the long run?
The self-vote you did was even more horrible. As town, you want more discussion (since discussion helps town to plan and hunt down scum) - not have the day end early. By self-voting, you bring yourself to one vote less to lynch - making it more likely for someone to hammer, ending the day early.Kanye West wrote:
I love how all of you are assuming there's a doctor and cop when one of the possible setups is mountainous
That's a pretty odd role...BRBP wrote:
For the record, I'm mafia and I immediately had to explain what I do when I was voted.
Yes. This is correct.NoHitter wrote:
Mod: Are the mafia roles pure vanilla? (i.e. Goon)
...? Explain?fartownik wrote:
Vote: Lybydose
Because I didn't die last night.
Putting this out so we can get some discussion instead of whatever this ping-ponging is supposed to achievethose wrote:
Iono, first one to stack votes?
I've already explained a bit more further. Also why aren't you asking Lybydose to explain as he posted less explanations than me? Stop being suspicious.JInxyjem wrote:
...? Explain?fartownik wrote:
Vote: Lybydose
Because I didn't die last night.
Making others support the suspicions on those is indirectly supporting Lybydose.JInxyjem wrote:
Putting this out so we can get some discussion instead of whatever this ping-ponging is supposed to achievethose wrote:
Iono, first one to stack votes?
Nope. NL D1 is bad. Heck... The very Idea of NL is bad. Except if it's MyLo/LyLothose wrote:
Vote: No-Lynch.BRBP wrote:
It's already been like 3 minutes and fartownik hasn't said anything, he seems really suspicious.
Obligatory first day nobody vote.
fartownik wrote:
Any reasoning behind this? Or am I just an attention magnet.Lybydose wrote:
Obligatory "voting no-lynch on the first day is not really beneficial for town in any way".
Vote: fartownik
Dunno if defending scum buddy, or whatthose wrote:
Probably a random choice
those wishy washy, unsure reads... Hmmmm...those wrote:
Unvote: No-Lynch
Vote: Nyquill
Iono, first one to stack votes?
Lybydose wrote:
unvote
vote: those
obvious scum right here
And again. Iunno if defending or something. What's with the indirect OMGUS?fartownik wrote:
Unvote
Vote: Lybydose
3 scum and too much people on the suspicious poolLybydose wrote:
@nohitter: we *could* do follow the cop, but since the doctor can't protect the same target every night, it wouldn't last very long
I've not asked Lyby to explain anything because I have nothing I don't understand about his posts, simple as that. He's suspicious of those, and you defending those so fervently by attacking him triggered his suspicion too I didn't know the correlation between you being alive and you voting Lyby, so I asked.fartownik wrote:
I've already explained a bit more further. Also why aren't you asking Lybydose to explain as he posted less explanations than me? Stop being suspicious.Making others support the suspicions on those is indirectly supporting Lybydose.JInxyjem wrote:
Putting this out so we can get some discussion instead of whatever this ping-ponging is supposed to achieve
Also I'm not saying I'm not suspicious about those, but they're lower every single post now.
Just my read here, but I doubt scum would make an OMGUS this obvious.Tsukasa wrote:
And again. Iunno if defending or something. What's with the indirect OMGUS?fartownik wrote:
Unvote
Vote: Lybydose
It's not a random person. Stacking votes is an easy to start heading toward the direction of the hammer, which mafia DOES want. It's also what you did to me day 1, and now you're trying to start that wagon.Lybydose wrote:
Kept his vote on some random person to not be seen voting on the townie wagon.
Must be scumslip.Nyquill wrote:
Just my read here, but I doubt scum would make an OMGUS this obvious.Tsukasa wrote:
And again. Iunno if defending or something. What's with the indirect OMGUS?
Lol who are you referring to again? I got confused with thisJInxyjem wrote:
I like how you conveniently forgot about the whole NL wagon when giving your reason for voting Nyquill
NL wagon is hardly a wagon when it's only ever seen the beginning of day 1, then is never seen again in this format. I really don't know what you're referring to here...JInxyjem wrote:
I like how you conveniently forgot about the whole NL wagon when giving your reason for voting Nyquill
7 NL votes is not a band wagon?those wrote:
NL wagon is hardly a wagon when it's only ever seen the beginning of day 1, then is never seen again in this format. I really don't know what you're referring to here...JInxyjem wrote:
I like how you conveniently forgot about the whole NL wagon when giving your reason for voting Nyquill
Okay yeah I said the same thing D1. Looking back, I should have voted for those, but not like it mattered anyway because of that whole BRBP fiasco. And now I understand Lybydose's instavoting at the beginning of today.Tsukasa wrote:
Nope. NL D1 is bad. Heck... The very Idea of NL is bad. Except if it's MyLo/LyLo
It's only good for scum.
You scum bro?
If you're talking about the BRBP wagon from yesterday, I don't think so. Maybe scum decided to ignore the wagon because BRBP made such an absurd anti-town claim anyways. Why would scum need to look scummy by joining a wagon that was definitely going to hammer a fakeclaimed scum?Lybydose wrote:
It's likely there's at least one scum on that wagon.
I'm not following to those, he's obviously following me with a vote on Lybydose not to get lynched this day, as he already gets most of the votes. Seems like a normal act of defense. Well, the most reasonable thing from me is this.Tsukasa wrote:
Must be scumslip.
P-edit: That or fart is following too closely to those. So if those really is mafia, then fart is buddy. While the 3rd mafia is between kanye and seph IMO
Nope... Easy mislynch was easy mislynch.Kanye West wrote:
If you're talking about the BRBP wagon from yesterday, I don't think so. Maybe scum decided to ignore the wagon because BRBP made such an absurd anti-town claim anyways. Why would scum need to look scummy by joining a wagon that was definitely going to hammer a fakeclaimed scum?
Not my fault both of you look scummyfartownik wrote:
If those dies and is not a scum then Tsukasa is playing around with us. He knows how this game works, I highly doubt he could go that far and be that wrong in his accusations.
One of them simply needs to think "hey I'll drop a vote on this really obvious wagon to blend in". It's pretty likely.Kanye West wrote:
If you're talking about the BRBP wagon from yesterday, I don't think so. Maybe scum decided to ignore the wagon because BRBP made such an absurd anti-town claim anyways. Why would scum need to look scummy by joining a wagon that was definitely going to hammer a fakeclaimed scum?
I just noticed how mafia have day talk and out doc can't protect the same target every night...dkun wrote:
waiting on four more people.Lybydose wrote:
questions for the mod:
can mafia daychat? Y
can the doctor self-protect? Y
can the doctor protect the same target every night? N
I second the motionLybydose wrote:
Could you prod Sync or something? He hasn't posted at all.
I'm going to take a wild guess that our setup isn't mountainous. I mean why would dkun come up with creative role names and not use them?Tsukasa wrote:
Oh well... If we have no PR then scum are frigging OP
I'm playing this game first time and thought like it'd be a reasonable idea. Not really sure why.Kanye West wrote:
So D1, fartownik, Meatstick, Hika and Seph jumped the nolynch bandwagon with little/no explanation. Seph seems especially scummy because he voted nylo even after it was explained that it was a stupid idea to begin with. My vote's still on those for today though.
Unlikely. This is really bad scumplay.Tsukasa wrote:
Either they believe the obligatory no-lynch thing,
Or they have daychat with those and he told them to follow what he does.
Lybydose or those. If one is a scum, the other is not. Not sure about the 3rd one yet.Tsukasa wrote:
@fart: Who are your suspects then?
Lemme guess... Me?
...Soooo... who's 2nd? Looks like a slip...fartownik wrote:
Lybydose or those. If one is a scum, the other is not. Not sure about the 3rd one yet.
Ah, yeah. Not sure about the 2nd and 3rd one yet. But it depends on the results of the lynch today.JInxyjem wrote:
...Soooo... who's 2nd? Looks like a slip...fartownik wrote:
Lybydose or those. If one is a scum, the other is not. Not sure about the 3rd one yet.
f uTsukasa wrote:
It's ok hika.
It's ok to sheep us like this. :3
K Hika is so town
Wow I didn't notice that bull asked for copping BRBP.NoHitter wrote:
Raging Bull: Why did you vote for brbp when you said that cop should scan him in an earlier post?
explain why -- how do these two connect together? the OMGUS is soooooooo strongfartownik wrote:
Lybydose or those. If one is a scum, the other is not. Not sure about the 3rd one yet.Tsukasa wrote:
@fart: Who are your suspects then?
Lemme guess... Me?
Oh... and this...fartownik wrote:
I'm not following to those, he's obviously following me with a vote on Lybydose not to get lynched this day, as he already gets most of the votes. Seems like a normal act of defense. Well, the most reasonable thing from me is this.
Unvote
Vote: those
Lol wot, those was my suspicion as well as Lybydose. People started to say I'm a scum buddy with him, simple change to prove them wrong.Tsukasa wrote:
Oh... and this...fartownik wrote:
I'm not following to those, he's obviously following me with a vote on Lybydose not to get lynched this day, as he already gets most of the votes. Seems like a normal act of defense. Well, the most reasonable thing from me is this.
Unvote
Vote: those
After reading this more, I kinda want to sheep lyby now.
THAT VOTE ON THOSE
But I'll stick to those for now and wait for a response from him
So you voted him because you wanted to lynch a vanilla townie? That's how this post is reading to me. There's no reason to vote for someone you simply want a cop scan on.Raging Bull wrote:
I voted for BRBP because of what you said about lynching vanilla townie > power role, but lynching mafia instead of town is still better. He could have claimed a power role, but somehow went for mafia. If he truly was pro-town then he would have helped us and not confuse us even more by claiming mafia.
From my perspective (judging how I know you, how you would react in my opinion) that action would be the right move if YOU were scum.Lybydose wrote:
because I can't edit:
The 'OMGUS' is strong with those. fartownik on the other hand has shown the chainsaw defense twice, although the first could be dismissed as RVS. You (fartownik) also say that moving votes in a certain way is the 'right' move to make for scum, but the same can be said about the way you moved your vote to the wagon on "those".
Lybydose wrote:
So you voted him because you wanted to lynch a vanilla townie? That's how this post is reading to me. There's no reason to vote for someone you simply want a cop scan on.Raging Bull wrote:
I voted for BRBP because of what you said about lynching vanilla townie > power role, but lynching mafia instead of town is still better. He could have claimed a power role, but somehow went for mafia. If he truly was pro-town then he would have helped us and not confuse us even more by claiming mafia.
Though I do see the logic behind voting people who are playing anti-town, regardless of what faction they actually are.
@fartownik: I'm not even sure what you're trying to say. Are you thinking that I'm scum, or those is? Or both of us?
From my perspective, your action would also be the 'right' move if YOU were scum. It goes both ways here. Except I'm not sure how me voting those at the start of the day is the right move if I'm scum. Explain please.fartownik wrote:
From my perspective (judging how I know you, how you would react in my opinion) that action would be the right move if YOU were scum.Lybydose wrote:
because I can't edit:
The 'OMGUS' is strong with those. fartownik on the other hand has shown the chainsaw defense twice, although the first could be dismissed as RVS. You (fartownik) also say that moving votes in a certain way is the 'right' move to make for scum, but the same can be said about the way you moved your vote to the wagon on "those".
Or you could check the stickied iso threaddkun wrote:
n. please bold if you request something from me.
Also sorry for the delay, but I'll be coming out with a player ISO later tonight.
Tsukasa wrote:
Well throwing WIFOM may or may not be a good idea.
icwudtTsukasa wrote:
may or may not be
I thought about that but thought the doctor could protect him without revealing their identity. And i did not vote for BRBP without thinking about it first.Nyquill wrote:
kanye prodding me EXACTLY 24 hours after I last posted... what a man.
Raging Bull: The problem is that asking for a cop scan in the first place was a huge nono, and is something scum would want to do, as forcing the cop onto who scum would know is innocent means one night where cop is wasted. In addition, cop will still have to reveal his identity to confirm BRBP, since we cannot be sure the cop actually exists.
It also doesn't help that you jumped on the BRBP wagon after one has been started.
But the doctor can't protect the same target every night, if there exists one.Raging Bull wrote:
I thought about that but thought the doctor could protect him without revealing their identity. And i did not vote for BRBP without thinking about it first.