1. Hard (2.8 stars, 137 notes)
2. Insane (3.51 stars, 160 notes)
3. Normal (1.67 stars, 69 notes)

1. you need an Easy diff or at least an easier Normal diff.
   the current one is too hard, it has to have a rating of 3.27 stars or lower (iirc).
   it might be 3.1 or sth like this.

1. decrease AR and OD, it's too high for the easiest diff
   I'd suggest AR4 and OD3, up to you!
2. generally I guess it's better to avoid overlaps like the ones you have in your map.
   I mean the overlaps cause of DS. I know it's rather high already buuut I think it works better if you increase it anyway.
   
   comparison1

   
   comparison2

   
   on the right side it looks just more structured, cause you have clear borders and the objects aren't glued to each other.
3. I'd actually prefer if you decrease the SV as well. ><
   I don't want to sound rude in any way, it's just that I think it fits better. orz
   but all of that is up to you, I think I'd go with 0.9SV and 1,8DS.. which is ok for a Normal imo. if mapped correctly!
   
   that's just the more "general" stuff, moving on ~
4. 00:19:396 (1,2) - personally I like sliders that move oppsoite directions
   but for the easies diff it might not work that well
   cause it kinda breaks the flow, place 2 a bit further up, around 241|1 maybe? that's round out the movement
   the same here - 00:28:996 (3,4) - why not let them circle around each other like 00:30:596 (1,2)?
   and 00:47:196 (3,1) - place 1 further down maybe?
5. 00:25:796 - you could add break time here. it's not necessary,
   but it gives the player some kind of successful feeling. and I's like that as a beginner.
6. 00:32:196 (1,2,3,4,5) - there are 5 circles, you could include 1 into the pattern
   
   also, you could map the last bit of the song as well. It's not that long and totally mapable!
   just consider it, the song is really really short already! :c

Zentui wrote:

After mapping the ending, the star rating decreased to 3.04, so I guess it's fine now?

1. cause you've changed AR and OD for Normal you could decrease them here a bit, too
   maybe AR6, OR5, that way you have 3/4/3 for Normal, 6/6/5 for Hard and 7/8/7 for Insane
   and -imo- that's a nicer overall spread than 3/4/3, 6/7/7, 7/8/7!
2. next thing is: try to work as accurate as possible, take a look here for example: 00:06:596 (1,2,3)
   if you pay attention to the approach circles you can match the objects perfectly!
   
   comparison/suggestion1

   
   or 00:08:196 (1,2,3)
   comparison/suggestion2

   
   there are more, but I'll find them yourself. xD
3. 00:10:796 (3,4) and 00:12:396 (3,4) - imo it's nice if you keep the pattern,
   so either stack 00:10:796 (3,4) or move 00:12:596 (4) a bit to the left, next to 00:12:396 (3).
4. 00:16:396 (5) - Ctrl + G? moevement from 4 to 5 is better that way and the jump to 6 is fine as well
   
   btw, I just noticed, but did you use different DS at some parts?
   I mean, it's fine, but personally I prefer to stick to one and patterns like the one just now work perfectly fine with same DS
   screen

   
   or did the editor screw up again and DS is actually 1.0?
   
5. 00:18:596 (4,5,6) - remove 5? just sounds better to me
6. 00:20:196 (3) - the shape could need some work, it looks so random >:
   suggestions

   
   orthis one's just symmetrical. (pay attention to having the red anchor in the middle! (red tick))
   same goes for 00:21:596 (7) and 00:24:596 (9)
7. 00:39:796 (3,4) - match the slider somehow with the circle? it looks left out atm. :c

1. 00:16:596 (2) - Ctrl + G?
2. 00:28:996 (1,2,3) - round them out a bit?
   you could place a cirlce in the middle and use the approach cirlce as a guideline
   screen

   
   (4 is the circle I placed there, delete it afterwards!)
3. 00:36:796 (3) - same as in Hard - make sure the red anchor is either on a red tick or in this case the blue tick!
   it's not a rule or anything, but looks better imo, cause you have a clear 1/2 or 3/4 devision of the slider that way.
   (and that's more pleasing to the eye. >w<)
4. 00:42:796 (5) - match with 00:42:196 (3) or 00:41:796 (1)
5. 01:05:796 (1,2,3) - ctrl+g for 2 and move 3 to 240|312 (to create triangle with 1+2)

Squirrel wrote:

[General]

1. you need an Easy diff or at least an easier Normal diff.
   the current one is too hard, it has to have a rating of 3.27 stars or lower (iirc).
   it might be 3.1 or sth like this. Oh, I knew you could have no easy but didn't know the easiest difficulty had to be under a certain star rating. I can't seem to find anything too specific about it, but it seems like it should be lower than my normal is right now. I'll consider making an easier difficulty then. After mapping the ending, the star rating decreased to 3.04, so I guess it's fine now?

[Normal]
hmh, the way you intend this map to be is rather nice, I like it, but I think you've gotta fix some things here and there.

1. decrease AR and OD, it's too high for the easiest diff
   I'd suggest AR4 and OD3, up to you! Changed to AR4 and OD3 as suggested.
2. generally I guess it's better to avoid overlaps like the ones you have in your map.
   I mean the overlaps cause of DS. I know it's rather high already buuut I think it works better if you increase it anyway.
   
   comparison1

   
   comparison2

   
   on the right side it looks just more structured, cause you have clear borders and the objects aren't glued to each other.
3. I'd actually prefer if you decrease the SV as well. ><
   I don't want to sound rude in any way, it's just that I think it fits better. orz
   but all of that is up to you, I think I'd go with 0.9SV and 1,8DS.. which is ok for a Normal imo. if mapped correctly! I took your suggestion and changed it to 0.9SV and 1.8DS. Resnapped everything and minor changes to positioning. It's kinda nice this way.
   
   that's just the more "general" stuff, moving on ~
4. 00:19:396 (1,2) - personally I like sliders that move oppsoite directions
   but for the easies diff it might not work that well
   cause it kinda breaks the flow, place 2 a bit further up, around 241|1 maybe? that's round out the movement Moved this one while changing SV/DS, it's below now and it starts further than the first one ends, which creates a better flow, i hope at least.
   the same here - 00:28:996 (3,4) - why not let them circle around each other like 00:30:596 (1,2)? I'd prefer to keep these as they are, because it gives it a little more variety and the flow isn't broken imo. If more people complain I'll consider changing it.
   and 00:47:196 (3,1) - place 1 further down maybe? Repositioned these a little bit, similar to the ones on 00:19:396
5. 00:25:796 - you could add break time here. it's not necessary,
   but it gives the player some kind of successful feeling. and I's like that as a beginner. I feel like short breaks like these are confusing to beginners, I remember I never noticed the blinking arrows after the break was over so I'd prefer to keep it like this.
6. 00:32:196 (1,2,3,4,5) - there are 5 circles, you could include 1 into the pattern I intended it this way, wasn't trying to make a specific shape pattern, just a good flow.
   
   also, you could map the last bit of the song as well. It's not that long and totally mapable!
   just consider it, the song is really really short already! :c Decided to map the ending, included in all difficulties. It decreased the difficulty of normal to 3.04, now I'm not sure if I need an easy D:

but I definitely will come back to this map and mod the rest of it, hopefully I get it done tomorrow. I'll edit this post and include the rest then, I'll give you kd now since you already helped a lot!

Squirrel wrote:

[Hard]
I like this diff, it has a nice feeling to it. o,o
some minor suggestions

1. cause you've changed AR and OD for Normal you could decrease them here a bit, too
   maybe AR6, OR5, that way you have 3/4/3 for Normal, 6/6/5 for Hard and 7/8/7 for Insane
   and -imo- that's a nicer overall spread than 3/4/3, 6/7/7, 7/8/7! Changed hard to 6/7/5, lowering AR seemed to feel too slow and confusing.
2. next thing is: try to work as accurate as possible, take a look here for example: 00:06:596 (1,2,3)
   if you pay attention to the approach circles you can match the objects perfectly!
   
   comparison/suggestion1

   
   or 00:08:196 (1,2,3)
   comparison/suggestion2

   
   there are more, but I'll find them yourself. xD Improved every such part I found, thanks!
3. 00:10:796 (3,4) and 00:12:396 (3,4) - imo it's nice if you keep the pattern,
   so either stack 00:10:796 (3,4) or move 00:12:596 (4) a bit to the left, next to 00:12:396 (3). Stacked 00:10:796 (3,4)
4. 00:16:396 (5) - Ctrl + G? moevement from 4 to 5 is better that way and the jump to 6 is fine as well Done.
   
   btw, I just noticed, but did you use different DS at some parts?
   I mean, it's fine, but personally I prefer to stick to one and patterns like the one just now work perfectly fine with same DS
   screen

   
   or did the editor screw up again and DS is actually 1.0?
   I did change the DS, imo the increase in SV makes the distance awkward and too fast, so lowering the DS balances it out better.
   
5. 00:18:596 (4,5,6) - remove 5? just sounds better to me Done.
6. 00:20:196 (3) - the shape could need some work, it looks so random >:
   suggestions

   
   orthis one's just symmetrical. (pay attention to having the red anchor in the middle! (red tick))
   same goes for 00:21:596 (7) and 00:24:596 (9) Changed 00:21:596 (7) to a wavy slider, but kept the other two as they were. They kinda fit the song and they don't break the flow at all. They don't look bad either.
7. 00:39:796 (3,4) - match the slider somehow with the circle? it looks left out atm. :c It feels like it follows the flow of the slider nicely, and not every circle needs to be blanketed D:

nice work with slider speed here! :3

[Insane]
I suck with Insanes, so apologies in advance,..!

1. 00:16:596 (2) - Ctrl + G? I prefer it this way because the start feels a bit too high and awkward if reversed.
2. 00:28:996 (1,2,3) - round them out a bit?
   you could place a cirlce in the middle and use the approach cirlce as a guideline Done, thanks for the tip!
   screen

   
   (4 is the circle I placed there, delete it afterwards!)
3. 00:36:796 (3) - same as in Hard - make sure the red anchor is either on a red tick or in this case the blue tick!
   it's not a rule or anything, but looks better imo, cause you have a clear 1/2 or 3/4 devision of the slider that way.
   (and that's more pleasing to the eye. >w<) Changed as suggested.
4. 00:42:796 (5) - match with 00:42:196 (3) or 00:41:796 (1) Made the end reach into 1.
5. 01:05:796 (1,2,3) - ctrl+g for 2 and move 3 to 240|312 (to create triangle with 1+2) Reversed 2, but moved 3 so 1 blankets it, it creates a better flow imo.

anddd that's all.

this really is a nice mapset! :3
good luck getting it ranked
and I hope I was of some help. >w<
if there are any questions left feel free to ask me!
Thanks, you helped a lot, especially with normal

neonat wrote:

Normal

00:25:796 - add a note Added.
00:35:396 (1) - the repeat at the blue tick sounds off, it would be better if it repeats at 00:35:996 and ends at 00:36:596 I think it's fine, it's more confusing if the next one is a red tick away as well.
00:48:196 (1) - ^ Same.
00:51:396 (2,2) - the overlap isn't really the most ideal, blocks the 2nd object Changed positioning a bit, no more overlap.

Hard

00:33:996 - add a note Added.

Insane

00:08:196 (1) - clap on start of slider I think you maybe meant on end? Because that way there's a clap every two white ticks, which makes more sense. Anyway, added on the end.
00:10:196 (2) - clap Added.
00:11:396 (1) - clap on end of slider, and continue this pattern for the rest of the song Added, and did this.
00:18:796 - add a note Added.
00:33:996 - ^ Added.
00:58:196 - ^ Added.

ikari_kyon wrote:

I can barely listen to the song...

I dont like this hitsounding (custom hitnormal), and the custom clap is almos unlistenable The clap is barely different than the actual music, I guess you just don't like the song.

[Insane]

1. 00:14:596 (1) - there are some weird overlaps with some objects, like this with 00:15:396 (4) - , dunno if that is a big deal with the new skin (I totally hate it), because I still use the old one, better check that Moved circle 1 so it's on the end of slider 4, if that helps any.
2. 00:28:196 (4,5,6,7) - I really dont see the point of the random spacing from here, tip: if you really want random spacing better make it symmetrical for it to be more simple to read on this AR I don't see any readability problems with this, and I like how it flows well without making a typical shape.
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:32:796 (4) - this is really hard to see like this, I was expecting it to be near to 00:33:196 (6) - for a kick stair with the other circles Changed this pattern completely, it's less jumpy now and still has nice flow, I think.
   SPOILER

   
   Or something like that
4. 00:34:796 (3) - move it near to 00:34:396 (1,2) - so they get a better triangle shape Adjusted to make a triangle, since it works better with the new pattern.
5. 00:35:396 - why is the kiai here? IMO this song does not need kiai Kiai is fun, why not?

Pointing hitsounding again: for this diff I would put a lots of whistles instead of that ulistenable clap I personally barely notice the clap because it blends well with the actual song.

[Hard]

1. 00:28:196 (3,4,5,6) - Im sorry, but, WHAT, make something more readable please I dislike traditional shape patterns like stars and squares etc and I don't feel there's anything wrong with readability of this pattern. Imo it flows well, but I'll see what other mods think before I consider changing it.
2. 00:43:596 (5) - overlaps 00:44:596 (1,2) - they are too close It doesn't block the view of 1 and 2, it doesn't make the flow awkward, it doesn't bother anything.

[Normal]

3,08 diff, some people with botter you with that extra number
The spacing is too high! It's a normal, for the overall speed of the song and sliders the spacing is fine, and the star rating is fine. It also reduced to 3.00 after a change below.

1. 00:09:796 (1,2) - changes like this increase your diff's difficulty rate, make (1) a single circle I always found circles more confusing than the beat changing a little bit. This is fine for normal and it works better than a circle.
2. 00:15:796 (1) - newbies will be like: "Oh god why there are two circles there and why one of them does not have number", this slider is too short, make it a single circle where it starts Changed this.
3. 00:17:396 (3) - ~ Same.
4. 00:20:996 (3,4) - dem changes, make (3) a single circle It doesn't break any flow, isn't particularly confusing and works well with the music. Doesn't make the map any harder either.
5. 00:28:196 (2) - consider make it only 2 circles or 1 long slider, profit? star rating decrease There is no need to forcefully change the map to decrease the star rating. The map isn't too hard for what it's supposed to by, and I don't intend to destroy the rhythm or make it any less fun just to change an already inaccurate number.
6. 00:30:596 (1) - make it single circle Breaks the rhythm and makes it confusing.
7. 00:32:196 (1,2,3,4,5) - too many circles in a row, plus is a complicated pattern for a [Normal] diff It's not too many and the pattern is nothing special or confusing. I'd prefer to keep it, but if more people complain, I'll consider changing it.
8. 00:36:796 (2,3) - make (2) a single circle Not changing, same reason as 00:30:596 (1)
9. 00:41:796 (1) - ^ ^
10. 00:43:596 (3) - ^ ^
11. 00:46:196 (2,3) - I have no suggest for this Thank you for being passive aggressive, always helpful in mods.
12. 01:02:596 (1,3,1) - erm circles Same reasons as above.

Witouth these red tick changes your diff rate will decrease till 2,66 Already said everything I had to say about this.

Edit: no hitsounding suggest cuz I really can't listen to them, just spam some whistles I think the hitsounds match the music, like I said, I guess you just don't like the song.

Winek wrote:

So yeah, the mod you requested.

[General]
Don't know for you, but i'd rather do an Easy because this song is rather short. I don't think it's necessary, regardless of song length, as normal is already pretty easy. Also I hate mapping easy

[Normal]
00:32:212 (1,2,3,4,5) - Just a suggestion? The acttual shape is not the prettiest. Why not make a star? I don't really like star patterns that much, and I really like this pattern.
00:35:412 (1) - Think you should expend of one tick, it sound better. This has been suggested already, decided to change it. Rearranged a little bit to stay correct with the DS.
00:40:212 (2) - Maybe this note could have symetry with (1) , even if it ignore DS Changed this slider, it's more symmetrical now, DS is correct, and it looks good.
00:48:212 (1) - Expend one tick? The actual reverse arrow sound a bit space Same as 00:35:412 (1)

[Hard]
00:17:296 (7) - This note is note really good there. Maybe remove it? There is practically no 1/4 in this song. I Mena like this 00:23:696 (5) - one feels kind of good. I think 00:17:296 (7) works fine here.
00:21:496 (6) - Same as upper Decided to remove this one, makes it a little more consistent.

[Insane]
00:27:896 (2) - This note doesn't feel again, you should remove it. Removed this and rearranged the pattern because it no longer worked without that note.

Yeah sorry, My mod is kinda short, but your map is great Thanks, helpful despite the length!

baraatje123 wrote:

Requested Testplay from my queue.
I like the diffs, but not the hitsounds, sorry. I also dislike the music, but that is personal opinion

Normal

Hard

Insane

The diffs are all not that hard. Slow song
Like it.

Good Luck!

Zentui wrote:

baraatje123 wrote:

Requested Testplay from my queue.
I like the diffs, but not the hitsounds, sorry. I also dislike the music, but that is personal opinion

Normal

Hard

Insane

The diffs are all not that hard. Slow song
Like it.

Good Luck!

Thanks, the insane link is the same as hard though, could you please fix that?

Sieg wrote:

Hallo

http://puu.sh/6MWbj.osr

SPOILER

pretty fine hard

http://puu.sh/6MWbD.osr

SPOILER

and insane, well made

IamKwaN wrote:

Hi, from my modding queue here.

General

1. Um.. It seems quite rare for such a short song lacking an Easy, why not create one? Normal is already really easy, I don't really see the need for an easy difficulty. I kinda suck at mapping easy too D:
2. Another thing which bothers me is the hitsound. The soft-hit in the prelude is really not appropriate imo. Why I say this? The lyrics seem quite relaxed but the hit sounds a bit heavy. Try something like soft whistle? Feel free to ignore this. The whole song feels sort of heavy to me, so I'd prefer to keep the hitsounds. I wouldn't like the map to be filled with hitsounds like the whistle, it doesn't really fit the song.

Insane

1. Honestly, I think those triplets are overmapping, eg. 00:15:896 (6) - 00:17:496 (5), etc. When delete all those notes, especially circles on blue lines, I cannot clearly hear there are any vocal or instruments! So, maybe I think you want to increase difficulty of this Insane. However, I don't recommend you to do so, instead, try make spacing more challenging at suitable places. I skip those triplets from now on. I like the triplets because they fit the beat the song has, similar to the sound of clap I used. Those parts really stand out and sort of demand attention.
2. 00:25:196 - I would prefer adding a circle here for better flow. Added, and moved 7 a bit cause it felt weird after that.
3. 00:47:596 (5) - NC for indicating you are doing some tricky 1/2 patterns instead of streams. Added.

Hard

1. 00:20:796 (4,5,6) - Try placing (4) at somewhere goes through (3) like this, of course, alternating the position of stuff behind. I really like this, changed as suggested.
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:23:696 (5) - Same as Insane, please refer to the point in the above session. Same here, I feel certain parts needed accentuation, I'd prefer to keep it as it is.
3. 00:31:696 (3) - ^ Same as above.
4. 00:42:396 (2,3,4,5) - The placement is a bit messy imo. 00:43:196 (4) stacking with tail of (1) and having blooming trapezium: Did something similar. Moved 3 further right, stacked 4 with 00:41:396 (5) and put 00:43:596 (5) so it mirrors 2 and 4, creating a trapezium as well.
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:49:196 (3,1) - Try stacking them by placing 00:50:396 (5) at (140,100) and also having a better flow! Did this.
6. 00:51:396 (3) - Replace this with a reversed slider? Coz I hear a vocal sound at the middle of the slider and seems your style is to follow vocals. Isn't it? lol I prefer the long slider over reverse here, maybe reverse follows the vocals more, but the long slider feels much better imo and creates a nice flow.

Normal

1. Can I say that the DS is really large to see in a Normal? ;__; Try sth lower, say, 1.3x, since this diff is the lowest one among your beatmap set. This was a suggestion by a previous modder, personally I liked it and it doesn't feel too fast or hard.
2. 00:32:196 (1,2,3,4,5) - Making a star shape or pentagon would be great! The current pattern is messy and overlapping of 00:32:196 (1,4) is a bit ugly, frankly speaking. Made a star here.
   
   Making a pentagon

   Reduce the beat snap divisor to 1/1 --> CTRL+SHIFT+D --> Increase points to 5 --> DONE (You may use CTRL+R to rotate these circles to better fit the positions.

That's all. Good Luck!

IamKwaN wrote:

No Dap wrote:

Hi mod from modding Q

Well made

[General]
It's a pretty short map, I suggest making an easy diff Explained this before, but with so many modders saying it, I'll consider making one or requesting a GD.
Fill out source Not sure there's anything to list as source. Unless Nico counts?

[Normal]
00:11:396 (3,4) - blanket properly It's the same as 1 and 2, seems like a perfect blanket to me. Care to elaborate?

[Hard]
OD+1
00:20:796 (4,5) - blanket properly Nice catch, fixed.
00:28:796 (6,1) - too far, move the whole thing 00:28:996 (1,2,3) and stack 1 on 00:28:596 (5) Changed.
00:31:696 (3,4) - stack on 2 Changed.
01:06:196 (2) - add a circle Added + rearranged.

[Insane]
00:17:396 (4,5,6) - stack I'd prefer to keep it the way it is now, sorry.
00:18:796 (3,4,5,6) - http://puu.sh/6Swpt.jpg Changed as suggested, nice.
00:22:196 (3,4,5) - stack Same as 00:17:396 (4.5.6)
00:25:596 (5,6,7) - jump fits well here imo http://puu.sh/6SwvH.jpg It was already a bit of a jump, too small I guess D: Changed as suggested.
00:27:196 (3) - stack on 00:26:396 (1) I think it fits better the way it is now, tbh.
00:30:196 (4,5,6) - stack As mentioned before.
00:45:196 (5) - stack on 00:44:596 (4) tail Instead moved to 188,138, making a circle with 4 and 6.

addicting song and good map! Thanks! First mod to actually like the song!

Hope my mod helped >~<

1. Is there any specific reason you started mapping at 00:06:596 - instead of 00:00:196 - ? Since there's no change in music in this part, and it's a really short song, I think you should start mapping at 00:00:196 -

1. 00:06:596 (1) - Starting off with a whistle sound kind of weird in my opinion
2. 00:12:996 (1) - Instead of having a whistle here, it would be more fitting to have a finish
3. 00:18:196 (2,3) - This flows kind of bad, how about putting (3) at x328 y240 and 00:18:996 (4,5,6) - at x192 y144, This way you keep the jump here and create a nice flow
4. 00:19:396 (1) - Same as before, a finish sounds a ton better than a whistle in this song
5. 00:25:396 (3,4,5,6,7) - I think the spacing here should be equal, both of the last 2 notes sound equally powerful, so having a jump on both is a nice idea http://puu.sh/6SwxG.jpg (To be honest I think it would be best if the spacing between 00:25:196 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - is all equal )
6. 00:28:996 (1,2,3) - Having a tripple here doesn't fit that well, I suggest to remove (2)
7. 00:33:796 (1,2) - This plays really bad after having all those jumps before it, Try stacking them (Also remove the NC on 00:33:796 (1) - )
8. 00:35:396 (1) - Same as before, finish
9. 00:41:796 (1) - ^
10. 00:42:796 (5) - This slider starts and ends where a new word starts, it would be better to have a new object at 00:43:196 - (Try making this a 1/2 rhythm?)
11. 00:44:596 (4) - Same goes for this, + it's usually a bad idea to end a slider where a new measure starts(the big white line indicates a new measure)
12. 00:46:396 (1) - ^
13. 00:48:196 (1) - Finish again
14. 00:49:596 (3,4,5) - For the same reason, these sliders should be changed too, try this? http://puu.sh/6Sx3T.jpg
15. 00:58:196 (2) - You need to add an NC here, it's a note after a spinner
16. 01:06:996 (3) - Would be cool to add a finish to the last note here

• 
  The same hitsound suggestions go for this diff

1. 00:20:796 (4,5) - You could make a way better blanket here :c
2. 00:28:796 (6,1) - This is too extreme for a hard diff right after a star jump, how about stacking this with 00:28:596 (5) - ? (Move the whole pattern up, of course)
3. 00:34:396 (1,2) - This doesn't flow that well, make (2) curve downwards to make it better
4. 00:49:596 (4) - This slider should end 1/2 earlier, it's length is confusing to play because the vocals change at 00:49:996 - (And you should add a note at 00:50:196 - )
5. 00:53:596 (2,4) - I dislike this overlap :c
6. 01:06:196 - This place needs a circle, it's weird to skip this (Mind the spacing if you add one)

• 
  The same hitsound suggestions go for this diff
  
  I think you're using way too much spacing here :c
  Apart from the spacing there's nothing wrong with this diff

Zentui wrote:

No Dap wrote:

[General]
Fill out source Not sure there's anything to list as source. Unless Nico counts?
It does count

[Normal]
00:11:396 (3,4) - blanket properly It's the same as 1 and 2, seems like a perfect blanket to me. Care to elaborate?
Maybe I moved it by an accident. Sorry lol looks fine.

Thank you for modding!

No Dap wrote:

[General]
Fill out source Not sure there's anything to list as source. Unless Nico counts?
It does count Changed source to Nico Nico Douga.

[Normal]
00:11:396 (3,4) - blanket properly It's the same as 1 and 2, seems like a perfect blanket to me. Care to elaborate?
Maybe I moved it by an accident. Sorry lol looks fine.

Thank you for modding!

Kyshiro wrote:

Hi

General

1. Is there any specific reason you started mapping at 00:06:596 - instead of 00:00:196 - ? Since there's no change in music in this part, and it's a really short song, I think you should start mapping at 00:00:196 - Started mapping that late because it's too repetitive to start at the very beginning. Even though it's short, the start wouldn't add too much to the length as a number, but it would feel somewhat boring and long play-wise.

Insane

1. 00:06:596 (1) - Starting off with a whistle sound kind of weird in my opinion Starts off with a whistle because it leads into the whole thing, same reason why the spinner has a whistle. Though as suggested below, changed to a finish.
2. 00:12:996 (1) - Instead of having a whistle here, it would be more fitting to have a finish Changed. I was sitting here wondering how this made any sense at first, then I realized I had custom hitsounds that made whistle and finish the same. My bad, and indeed it sounds better.
3. 00:18:196 (2,3) - This flows kind of bad, how about putting (3) at x328 y240 and 00:18:996 (4,5,6) - at x192 y144, This way you keep the jump here and create a nice flow Already changed with No Dap's mod, keeping it the way it was changed because I prefer that suggestion.
4. 00:19:396 (1) - Same as before, a finish sounds a ton better than a whistle in this song
5. 00:25:396 (3,4,5,6,7) - I think the spacing here should be equal, both of the last 2 notes sound equally powerful, so having a jump on both is a nice idea http://puu.sh/6SwxG.jpg (To be honest I think it would be best if the spacing between 00:25:196 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - is all equal )
6. 00:28:996 (1,2,3) - Having a tripple here doesn't fit that well, I suggest to remove (2) Removed.
7. 00:33:796 (1,2) - This plays really bad after having all those jumps before it, Try stacking them (Also remove the NC on 00:33:796 (1) - ) Removed NC, stacked, moved 1 2 3 after it so 1 is stacked on 10, 2 is on 8 and 3 is on 4.
8. 00:35:396 (1) - Same as before, finish Changed.
9. 00:41:796 (1) - ^ Same.
10. 00:42:796 (5) - This slider starts and ends where a new word starts, it would be better to have a new object at 00:43:196 - (Try making this a 1/2 rhythm?) This was intentional, I feel it sounds much better than spamming to many 1/2, and doesn't create any problems in playing.
11. 00:44:596 (4) - Same goes for this, + it's usually a bad idea to end a slider where a new measure starts(the big white line indicates a new measure) Maybe, but it feels right here. I tried 1/2s but they just don't feel as good.
12. 00:46:396 (1) - ^ Same.
13. 00:48:196 (1) - Finish again Changed.
14. 00:49:596 (3,4,5) - For the same reason, these sliders should be changed too, try this? http://puu.sh/6Sx3T.jpg Also just doesn't sound right to me with your change, sorry.
15. 00:58:196 (2) - You need to add an NC here, it's a note after a spinner Added, but isn't it auto NC anyway?
16. 01:06:996 (3) - Would be cool to add a finish to the last note here Added.

Hard

• 
  The same hitsound suggestions go for this diff Changed hitsounds as suggested.

1. 00:20:796 (4,5) - You could make a way better blanket here :c Fixed already with No Dap's mod
2. 00:28:796 (6,1) - This is too extreme for a hard diff right after a star jump, how about stacking this with 00:28:596 (5) - ? (Move the whole pattern up, of course) Same as above.
3. 00:34:396 (1,2) - This doesn't flow that well, make (2) curve downwards to make it better Blanketed instead.
4. 00:49:596 (4) - This slider should end 1/2 earlier, it's length is confusing to play because the vocals change at 00:49:996 - (And you should add a note at 00:50:196 - ) Changed as suggested.
5. 00:53:596 (2,4) - I dislike this overlap :c I really love it tho D:
6. 01:06:196 - This place needs a circle, it's weird to skip this (Mind the spacing if you add one) Changed with previous mod as well.

Normal

• 
  The same hitsound suggestions go for this diff Changed hitsounds as suggested.
  
  I think you're using way too much spacing here :c
  Apart from the spacing there's nothing wrong with this diff I really think the spacing is fine considering the pace. Also changing the DS would mean pretty much remapping since a lot of the patterns don't work with lower DS >.<

Zekmer wrote:

From my queue.

Normal

No problems in patterns and rhythm.

Hard

Same as Normal.

Insane

Same as Hard.

Sorry to dissappoint but I can't help you with this one as I think it's as good as it can get.



Cools song and great map! Good luck on getting this ranked!

Swayzo wrote:

Insane:
00:12:996 I don't think slider 1 has to be slow at the start, maybe remove the slider and add 2 notes at 00:12:996 and 00:13:196 I think it leads well into the difference in the song. The added instrumental part starts there and it sort of puts emphasis on it.
00:15:396 Flip vertically/rotate 180 degrees Instead changed it similarly to 00:22:596 (1,2)
00:24:196 slider 1 plays weird because it is further, maybe remove 3 @ 00:23:896 then move notes to a diff spot. Fixed distance on slider 1, rotated it slightly and placed it more downwards, so it still blankets the circles and doesn't feel so out of place. Also rotated the following square pattern because it felt weird after the slider.
00:25:996 move 7 further for emphasis on the song (pref 2x distance) After the change above, moved it slightly so it's the same distance away from 6 and the following slider 1.
00:35:996 change to 1 beat slider, no repeat, and add note 00:36:596 Imo this breaks the rhythm, the extra note doesnt fit at all.
00:49:396 add note Same here.

I guess your other diffs are alright, there's nothing in particular I want to change

10crystalmask01 wrote:

Ello, mod as requested o̿ ̭ o̿

[General]
*Offset: 198 I don't really hear the difference, but I'm not that good at this kind of stuff, so I'll trust you on it. Changed.
*This map could have an Easy diff, but that's up to you I still don't think that's really necessary D:
[Normal]
00:20:996 (3) - Try to move this slider in such a way that its tail covers 00:18:996 (5) - better. It will continue the head,overlapping flow style you've made. Changed.
00:42:396 (2) - Can blanket 00:41:796 (1) - 's tail better Fixed.

4,68,42396,2,0,P|20:108|72:132,2,90

[Hard]
00:20:196 (3) - Err, this slider may be looking a bit too funky. Changed it to a similar style as 00:09:798 (1) because I think it flows nicer and fits the song better if it moves downwards, sending you up for the 4 and 5.
I meddled around with the slider, and here's what I think might look better:

44,180,20196,2,0,B|48:128|92:120|104:120|104:120|184:140,1,155.999995239258

[Insane]
00:55:196 (1) - I'd consider mapping this part. There's the same spinner, at the exact spot on all your diffs, which kind of kills the difficulty spread out. I like to keep spinners somewhat similar throughout difficulties, because they have a point being where they are. They don't make insanes any easier and they don't make normals any harder, their purpose is to accompany the song where no other object would do such a good job.

Nice mapset. I like how the jumps are all smooth, and not overdone
Good luck!

1. It's normal DS 1.8 is not good for normal i think
2. 00:15:398 (5,1) - add 5 NC remove 1 NC

1. 00:20:998 (5) - little overlapped fix plz

1. 00:27:998 (2,3,4,5,6) - better make a star this pattern is not good

Neta wrote:

HI~ From my Modding Queue

All my mod is suggestion

[Normal]

1. It's normal DS 1.8 is not good for normal i think Given the amount of mods pointing this out, I'm still considering whether to change this or map an easy difficulty to balance it out.
2. 00:15:398 (5,1) - add 5 NC remove 1 NC I think it puts better emphasis if NC is where it is now.

[Hard]

1. 00:20:998 (5) - little overlapped fix plz The overlap with 6? That's intentional, sorry.

[Insane]

1. 00:27:998 (2,3,4,5,6) - better make a star this pattern is not good The pattern is a pentagon that flows similarly to a star but instead of steady jumps it changes between jumps and normal DS. Imo it flows well with the part of the song it's on, so I'd prefer keeping it this way.

OK not many things to fix

GOOD LUCK

Raszero wrote:

Regular mod from my thread

Normal
00:25:798 (6) - I prefer this as a 3 tick slider I think the break fits here nicely, gives the player some time to rest and the song comes to a slight pause so the lack of objects puts an emphasis on the singing just like the lack of instruments in the song does.
00:33:798 (5) - Prefer this as a 4 tick slider Changed, the halt fits here as well but for a normal difficulty steady rhythm is probably easier to play.
00:34:598 (6) - Same as above Changed as well.
Hard
00:14:598 (5) - Sounds to me like this should be the start of the combo Added NC here, removed NC on 00:14:998 and added NC on 00:15:998
00:17:298 (7) - This note doesn't really fit in, threw me off a bit As mentioned in some mod before, I feel like certain parts need emphasis and a blue tick note is a perfect fit in it. It's similar to insane, which has triples in those places, but given Hard's current rhythm this is a better choice and it's only occasional because some parts need the emphasis more and flooding with triples wouldn't be okay for Hard.
00:23:698 (5) - Same here Same point as above.
00:31:698 (3) - I think this sounds better without this note Also here for emphasis, I think it fits.
01:01:598 (2) - Feels better as a 2 tick slider It's the same case as the start, the change from slider-slider-circle into slider-circle-double circle, it also leads into the following patterns which are of the same type, I feel like putting a slider here would break the rhythm created.

I like this map so good luck with it, feels really nice and not much to edit for me so I hope this is ok Thank you!

Kibbleru wrote:

Drawing 4 Mod from our queue

btw nice drawing its cute Thanks

[Insane]
Some Suggestions to where you can ctrl + g to improve flow. (dw about spacing too much, should be fine since its insane, jumps are normal)
00:10:398 (3) - This one feels odd reverted, the following circles don't match at all and the previous circles already lead upwards.
00:14:198 (4) - Changed, I like this one.
00:16:598 (2) - Going up for the slider feels a little out of place and the following circles feel wrong as well.
00:20:998 (1) - Changed this one, it fits really well with the current placement and really follows the spinning and flipping idea I had with the general flow of the map.
01:06:398 (2) - I think this one is nicer the way it is now.

00:12:998 (1) - not sure if these are rankable, read somwhere that sliders that change speed aren't rankable anymore I'd really prefer to keep this one as it is, but I guess I'll see if it's unrankable once some BATs come in here.
00:32:198 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - this is wayy too messy i suggest you rearrange them into a triangle or something They already are a triangle without the edge on one side. It used to be a full triangle, but as suggested by a previous modder, I stacked the last two for better gameplay. My 5 was a little off, so I fixed that, and put the 1,5 stack in the middle, I'll see how that works out though.

SPOILER

00:35:998 (2,3) - doesn't flow well, i suggest rearrange (2) or just take out the repeat and add a circle Made 2 face upwards instead.
00:40:198 (4) - ctrl g? I think it's fine the way it is.


[Hard]
00:31:198 (2) - ctrl g? I prefer the way it flows right now, kinda suits the song better. The alternative would be to put it under 1 and make it go up, circling around 1's end, but then it wouldn't lead well into the following sliders.
00:32:598 (2) - ^ The blooming feels better than alternating here imo.
00:33:398 (4) - ^ then rearrange (5) and (6) Same reason as above.
00:38:598 (2) - ^ I think it feels better starting at the top, because the previous circles (4 and 5), plus the short slider and 1 all climb up, preparing well for the slider.
00:41:798 (1) - ^ This doesn't flow very well after a ctrl g because the jump doesn't fit and the slider in general is not very suited for it. Another thing that would fit is if the slider was on the left side of 5 and ctrl h, which would however require all the following circles to be rearranged.
00:49:598 (4) - ^ Jump after the slider would also feel a little odd, and the sliders current placement isn't bad, it picks up well and leads into the following circle and slider.
00:20:998 (5,6) - i don't really like this overlap, overlap it more maybe? Overlapped it a little more.


[Normal]
00:49:598 (2) - ctrl h this Changed.
00:50:198 (3) - ^ Changed.


bleh sry couldn't find much ur map is good That's a positive thing!

• Good
  
  [Normal]
  
  • 00:14:598 (3,4,5,1,2) - not good pattern.
    ┗ 00:15:798 (1) - move to (300,244)
    ┗ 00:16:198 (2) - move to (200,280)
    ┗ If you follow this, 00:15:798 (1,3) - try overlap this.
    00:26:398 - add 4/4 slider with 1 reverse.
    00:35:398 (1) - bad flow. move to (376,172)
    
    [Hard]
    
    • 00:11:398 (1,2,3,4) - same like 00:09:798 (1,2,3,4) -
      00:26:398 - same as Normal
      00:31:198 (2,3,4) - stack completely
      00:38:598 (2,3,4) - blanket?
      00:52:598 (5) - move to (148,116). it is touching 00:50:998 (1) -
      ┗ If you follow this, 00:52:798 (6) - move to (152,40)
      
      [Insane]
      
      • 00:14:598 (1,2) - try overlap
        00:25:998 (7) - move to (209,240) for follow jump.
        00:27:998 (2) - move to (196,240)
        ┗ 00:28:198 (3) - move to (336,152)
        00:33:798 (9,10,1) - move to (268,256). it is touching 00:33:398 (7) -
        00:45:198 (5) - move to (168,132). it is touching 00:44:198 (3) -
        00:45:398 (6,3) - overlap
        ┗ 00:47:198 (4) - move to (96,48)
        00:47:598 (1,2,3,1) - distance
        00:51:198 (3) - bad jump. move to (212,68)
        
        hope this helps

[ Raphael ] wrote:

Hi~! from my queue!

[General]

• Good
  
  [Normal]
  
  • 00:14:598 (3,4,5,1,2) - not good pattern.
    ┗ 00:15:798 (1) - move to (300,244)
    ┗ 00:16:198 (2) - move to (200,280)
    ┗ If you follow this, 00:15:798 (1,3) - try overlap this. Did all of the above.
    00:26:398 - add 4/4 slider with 1 reverse. I prefer a full halt here, it fits well and gives the player some time to rest.
    00:35:398 (1) - bad flow. move to (376,172) Moved and rotated slightly to follow the previous slider better.
    
    [Hard]
    
    • 00:11:398 (1,2,3,4) - same like 00:09:798 (1,2,3,4) - I prefer the variety.
      00:26:398 - same as Normal Also prefer a break in Hard.
      00:31:198 (2,3,4) - stack completely It is stacked completely.
      00:38:598 (2,3,4) - blanket? It's a distanced blanket, so to speak. Bringing it any closer would ruin the flow and probably confuse the player.
      00:52:598 (5) - move to (148,116). it is touching 00:50:998 (1) - Moved to 140,100 instead, stacking with 00:50:198 (5)
      ┗ If you follow this, 00:52:798 (6) - move to (152,40) Adjusted 4 and 6 accordingly to the change above, as well as the following pattern.
      
      [Insane]
      
      • 00:14:598 (1,2) - try overlap It's nicer if it goes up, as the whole pattern goes back and forth.
        00:25:998 (7) - move to (209,240) for follow jump. The idea is that it has an extra jump for emphasis, and the distance is equal from 6 and 1.
        00:27:998 (2) - move to (196,240)
        ┗ 00:28:198 (3) - move to (336,152) This breaks the pentagon and removes the blanket, not to mention 2 overlaps with 1 that way D:
        00:33:798 (9,10,1) - move to (268,256). it is touching 00:33:398 (7) - Moved to 276,260 and fixed a few other ones for a nicer shape and no overlaps.
        00:45:198 (5) - move to (168,132). it is touching 00:44:198 (3) -
        00:45:398 (6,3) - overlap
        ┗ 00:47:198 (4) - move to (96,48) ^ These three suggestions, I moved 00:44:198 (3) to stack with 00:42:398, moved the following formation of 4, 5 and 6 further down, adjusted 1 ofc, stacked 00:45:398 (6,3) and fixed 2 and 4, making a trapezoid out of 1, 2, 3 and 4.
        00:47:598 (1,2,3,1) - distance Seems fine to me. They're meant to be that close if that's what you mean.
        00:51:198 (3) - bad jump. move to (212,68) Moved.
        
        hope this helps It does!

[_Crystal] wrote:

Hi~ from my queue~~~

[General]
Fine. :3

[Normal]
01:06:598 (2) - use a clap at the end? It has a nice impact with a finish at the end.

[Hard]
00:20:198 (3,4,5,6) - not look very nice, blanket 5 and 6 in this way? (and don't let 3 hide 6) In the actual gameplay it's not an issue at all, 3 and 6 are far away playwise and don't come into an overlap at all, and 5 and 6 play much better being overlapped as they are right now.

SPOILER

00:24:598 (9) - I think it's nicer the way it is, I like smoother sliders over the really sharp red point ones.

SPOILER

00:28:798 (6) - touched the HP drain? I don't see the problem with default skin, might be just yours, but I moved it slightly so hopefully it's fine now.
00:36:598 - add a circle? I don't think it really fits here.
00:51:398 (3) - no slidertick hitsound? add one which fits the kiai I don't feel it's really necessary overall, but I don't know, I'll see what more mods say about this.
01:06:998 (5) - use a clap instead? Same as in normal.

[Insane]
00:10:398 (3) - in order to be fit with 00:07:198 (2), i suggest to use a 1/2 slider with 1 reverse instead I feel a 1/1 fits better here as the patterns constantly change, sort of 'slowing down' to longer sliders just before the singing starts.
00:13:198 - missed a beat? for insane, here should be a note The idea behind this is that it puts an emphasis on the change in melody, hence the shape of the slider as well, and it also continues on the change from 1/2s to 1/1 sliders as the sliders before, finally before the rest speeds up to 1/2s again, including triplets for the first time.
00:25:998 (7) - "prev" is twice bigger than "next", so i thought they're 1/2 circles when i played it the 1st time. this made the pattern hard to understand. so keeping them both 1.5x (or other) is better Eh, made them same distance now.
00:27:998 (2,3,4,5,6) - it's not really star-shaped, adjust 00:28:398 (4), pls Fixed.
00:36:598 - add a circle? I think the slight pause fits well here.
01:06:998 (3) - use a clap instead? Same as already mentioned.

nice mapset~ good luck~ Thanks!

Caffe_[Latte] wrote:

as your req from my modding quere

[General]

Uncheck "Letterbox during Break, Widescreen Support" cuz you don have any SB and Break time Fixed.

[Insane]

00:10:398 (3) - 3rd point to 264 l 264 Changed.

00:10:998 (4) - 268 l 348 Changed.

00:11:198 (5) - 344 l 300 Changed.

00:12:998 (1,2,3) - http://puu.sh/7a0nD.jpg how about this? It doesn't really help the flow imo, it kinda disturbs it.

00:16:598 (2) - ctrl g is better flow I strongly disagree with this one, but as many mods didn't like it, I decided to change it. I switched 1 and 2, ctrl g on the new 00:16:598 (2) and ctrl g on 00:17:798 (1) because of the new adjustments. I'll see what some new opinions on this arrangement are.

00:19:798 (2) - ctrl g is much better flow Agree, changed.

00:23:598 (3) - 156 l 160 (00:22:598 (1) - is blank this) Changed.

00:24:198 (1) - ctrl g I think it's nicer as it is right now.

00:28:398 (4,5) - ^ It's not a standard star on purpose and fits better as it is right now.

00:28:998 (1) - 128 l 136 It doesn't need to blanket 2 like the previous slider did.

00:35:398 (1) - http://puu.sh/7a0D4.jpg Adjusted.

00:37:798 (5) - ctrl g? (00:43:798 (2,3) - match with these) It's better the way it is right now imo.

00:47:598 (1,2,3) - more far distance. players can be confused I think it fits the music being placed like it is, and it's not overly confusing either.

00:49:998 (4) - ctrl g Doesn't really fit.

01:06:398 (2) - ^ I think it flows nicer this way.

[Hard]

00:07:198 (2) - http://puu.sh/7a0KV.jpg blank more (2nd point to 160 l 288, 3rd point to 236 l 292) Changed.

00:30:598 (1,2) - http://puu.sh/7a0Qy.jpg use same slider to make blanket perfect Fixed.

00:41:398 (5) - stack with 00:39:798 (3) and rematch after notes I prefer it where it is right now.

00:53:598 (2) - ctrl g I think it flows nicer the way it is now.

01:05:798 (1,2,3,4,5) - http://puu.sh/7a0XR.jpg Prefer to keep it the way it is.

[Normal]

00:18:998 (5) - stack with 00:17:398 (3,5) or , point to 104 l 140 It's blanketed by the slider and leads into the following sliders, I think it's fine. Maybe changes the flow slightly, but I'll see what more mods say.

00:38:598 (1) - 136 l 184 Changed.

1. offset: 200, sound more accurate for me
2. 00:00:198 why you didn't start mapping from 00:00:198

1. 00:07:098 add a circle? there is a clearly sound from music
2. 00:07:798 (3,4) - probably a slider fit better the song, since there isn't sound at 00:07:998 (4) -
3. 00:09:398 (3) - ending sliders on stanzas is not ok, since there is where the music change, try this:
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:10:998 (6,7) - same as 00:07:798
5. 00:12:598 (3,4) - ^
6. 00:12:998 (1) - this slider shape is not rankable anymore, try a normal one instead.
7. 00:13:798 (3) - 2 circles fit better the music, since there are two vocals.
8. 00:16:498 should be a circle here following the vocals being consistent with the one at 00:15:898 (6) -
9. 00:17:498 this beat sound really overmapped, since there is not sound in the music but yes in 00:17:698 -, try this:
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 00:19:398 (1) - 1/2 slider fit the music better, since there is not sound at 1/4
11. 00:19:798 (2) - maybe use 2 circles? they are different vocals tought
12. 00:24:198 (1) - not a fan of the long slider, mainly cuz you are ignoring the sound at 00:24:398, that vocal is important imo and should be mapped
13. 00:25:198 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - try to make a perfect square use the tool: compose > create polygon circles
14. 00:28:598 (5,6) - a slider fit better the music, since not vocal at 6 that's why
15. 00:33:798 (9) - finish fit better the music
16. 00:32:998 (5) - add NC for better readability
17. 00:38:198 (1) - same as 00:09:398
18. 00:40:198 (4) - missing NC
19. 00:46:398 (1) - Similar to 00:09:398
20. 00:49:598 (3) - ^
21. 00:49:998 (4,5) - sliders should start on downbeats (whiste ticks) cuz there is where the music is stronger.
22. 00:51:398 (4,1) - swap NC, following your every stanza pattern
23. 00:52:998 (2) - if you apply the previous one should be a NC here too
24. 01:07:298 -, 01:07:498 -, you should map this two spots.

1. 00:10:798 (3,4) - not a fan of the stack, since it kill the flow of the diff imo, consider to unstack them.
2. 00:11:398 (1,2) - actually they are too close each other, consider to move 00:11:998 (2) - 1 grid up.
3. 00:12:398 (3,4) - same as the other one, personally I'm not a fan, but if you feel they fit for you keep them c:
4. 00:15:998 (1) - same with insane sliders doesn't sound nice starting on upbeats (red ticks) try to change to:
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:17:298 (4) - remove this beat is clearly overmaped
6. 00:17:398 (1,2,3) - use the same distance between them, actually is confuse to play.
7. 00:23:698 (5) - same as 00:17:298
8. 00:31:198 (2,3,4) - stack this properly
9. 00:35:998 (2,4) - try to avoid the overlap
10. 00:53:598 (2,4) - ^
11. 01:07:298 -, 01:07:498 -, you should map this two spots.

1. 00:06:598 (1) - should be better if you follow the drums like 00:06:998
2. 00:08:198 same as above
3. 00:12:998 (1,2) - try to make a better blanket
4. 00:20:198 (2,3) - same as above
5. 00:25:798 (6) - finish fit better the music
6. 00:54:198 (3) - 2 circles represent better the music.

Natsu wrote:

Hi hi hi ~

[General]

1. offset: 200, sound more accurate for me Changed, don't hear much difference but I'll trust you on it.
2. 00:00:198 why you didn't start mapping from 00:00:198 Already mentioned before, I think it makes the start a bit too repetitive.

[Insane]

1. 00:07:098 add a circle? there is a clearly sound from music Doesn't really fit, imo.
2. 00:07:798 (3,4) - probably a slider fit better the song, since there isn't sound at 00:07:998 (4) - I prefer the circles here, they add up to the pace.
3. 00:09:398 (3) - ending sliders on stanzas is not ok, since there is where the music change, try this: I don't see why it wouldn't be okay, as long as it's fitting, which it is here imo.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:10:998 (6,7) - same as 00:07:798 As mentioned already.
5. 00:12:598 (3,4) - ^ Same.
6. 00:12:998 (1) - this slider shape is not rankable anymore, try a normal one instead. That's too bad. Changed.
7. 00:13:798 (3) - 2 circles fit better the music, since there are two vocals. I prefer it the way it is now, the slider fits well.
8. 00:16:498 should be a circle here following the vocals being consistent with the one at 00:15:898 (6) - Don't really like the way that sounds or plays.
9. 00:17:498 this beat sound really overmapped, since there is not sound in the music but yes in 00:17:698 -, try this:
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 00:19:398 (1) - 1/2 slider fit the music better, since there is not sound at 1/4 I prefer the way it works as a 1/4.
11. 00:19:798 (2) - maybe use 2 circles? they are different vocals tought I prefer the way a slider works here, since it follows the slider theme on this part.
12. 00:24:198 (1) - not a fan of the long slider, mainly cuz you are ignoring the sound at 00:24:398, that vocal is important imo and should be mapped Personally, I really like the way the slider fits into this part.
13. 00:25:198 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - try to make a perfect square use the tool: compose > create polygon circles Fixed.
14. 00:28:598 (5,6) - a slider fit better the music, since not vocal at 6 that's why I prefer the way circles work play wise though.
15. 00:33:798 (9) - finish fit better the music Finish feels a little too overwhelming for this part.
16. 00:32:998 (5) - add NC for better readability Added.
17. 00:38:198 (1) - same as 00:09:398 I still think it's fine if done properly, which this is imo.
18. 00:40:198 (4) - missing NC Added.
19. 00:46:398 (1) - Similar to 00:09:398 Fine here as well.
20. 00:49:598 (3) - ^ Same.
21. 00:49:998 (4,5) - sliders should start on downbeats (whiste ticks) cuz there is where the music is stronger. With the rhythm strangeness of this part, I think this is fine, it fits it well.
22. 00:51:398 (4,1) - swap NC, following your every stanza pattern I mostly put NC where the music changes somewhat, and where it's fitting. I prefer it the way it is here, since there's a bigger change on 1 than on 4.
23. 00:52:998 (2) - if you apply the previous one should be a NC here too
24. 01:07:298 -, 01:07:498 -, you should map this two spots. I don't see why, it doesn't really fit, it's just a fadeout and the ending is already achieved with the last note and its finish.

[Hard]

1. 00:10:798 (3,4) - not a fan of the stack, since it kill the flow of the diff imo, consider to unstack them. I think it fits better than having them unstacked, since it gives a small fitting pause.
2. 00:11:398 (1,2) - actually they are too close each other, consider to move 00:11:998 (2) - 1 grid up. Fixed.
3. 00:12:398 (3,4) - same as the other one, personally I'm not a fan, but if you feel they fit for you keep them c: As mentioned already.
4. 00:15:998 (1) - same with insane sliders doesn't sound nice starting on upbeats (red ticks) try to change to: The vocal starts on the red tick, there's no problem with this.
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:17:298 (4) - remove this beat is clearly overmaped Mentioned in some mods before, I think it fits for emphasis.
6. 00:17:398 (1,2,3) - use the same distance between them, actually is confuse to play. It's already the same distance.
7. 00:23:698 (5) - same as 00:17:298 Same.
8. 00:31:198 (2,3,4) - stack this properly It is properly stacked.
9. 00:35:998 (2,4) - try to avoid the overlap It's not really a troublesome overlap, it doesn't look bad and the flow created is nice.
10. 00:53:598 (2,4) - ^ Intentional overlap, and I really like it.
11. 01:07:298 -, 01:07:498 -, you should map this two spots. Same as on insane.

[Normal]

1. 00:06:598 (1) - should be better if you follow the drums like 00:06:998 I prefer it the way it is right now.
2. 00:08:198 same as above Same.
3. 00:12:998 (1,2) - try to make a better blanket Fixed the blanket.
4. 00:20:198 (2,3) - same as above Fixed.
5. 00:25:798 (6) - finish fit better the music I think whistle fits better.
6. 00:54:198 (3) - 2 circles represent better the music. Changed to two circles.

good luck

luxoDeh wrote:

Hi, mod from my queue.

NORMAL

- 00:08:198 (2,1) - here make a better blancket. I suggest to use the approach circle of the next slider as reference: try something like this (I make a before-after, to make you see what I mean exactly) Fixed the blanket.

SPOILER

(this is mostly just for precision, but I think it will give the map a better look in some parts :3)
- 00:10:398 (2) - also here: look at the form of this slider: Changed as suggested, I really like this one.

SPOILER

I moved one of the thick of the slider to make the curve more soft. I think you can try it sometimes, just to give the map that little incentive, because I think the map itself is good
- 00:11:998 (4) - ^ Same.
- 00:12:998 (1,2) - here for blancket Fixed as mentioned already in the mod above.
- 00:21:598 (4) - here for the slider curve Toned down the curve a bit, still more curve than the earlier sliders though, I like how it fits here.
- 00:25:798 (6) - what do you think of adding a little slider from 00:25:798 - to 00:25:998 - . I don't think it will be too hard for a normal diff, but I think that is important to hit the beat at 00:25:998 - . anyway you can do what you want, it's just a suggestion. A short slider like that might be confusing to new players, since they could barely tell it's a slider probably, and I kinda like it the way it is anyway.
- 00:31:198 (2,1) - here for the blancket Fixed.

HARD

- 00:06:598 (1,2) - here the blancket should be more like this imo: As in more distanced? I don't know, seems good to me the way it is.

SPOILER

- 00:07:198 (2,3) - also here. Same.
- 00:33:698 - what do you think of adding a note here? Hmm, feels a little strange to me, doesn't seem to play well.
- 01:06:998 (5) - move this one grid down to have the exactly same inclination of 01:06:198 (2,3) - Fixed.

INSANE

- 00:08:198 (1,3) - blancket can be improved, just like in the hard diff. Again, seems fine to me.
- 00:11:998 (2,3) - here the same Fixed this one.
- 00:17:798 (1,2) - ^ Fixed.
- 00:19:398 (1) - hm... I'm not convinced here the reverse slider fit. maybe is better delete the reverse... anyway is just a suggestion. It follows the triple theme from before, it's a pretty convenient place for it and I think it fits rather well.

ok, nice map, good luck for rank Thanks!

Zentui wrote:

[*]00:09:398 (3) - ending sliders on stanzas is not ok, since there is where the music change, try this: I don't see why it wouldn't be okay, as long as it's fitting, which it is here imo.

Tsukuyomi wrote:

hi~hi~from my queue

Normal
http://puu.sh/7g5LB.wav
this clap fits the music better Changed the clap, not bad.
than you can add the claps you missed
00:09:798 (1) - tail
00:11:398 (3) - ^
00:12:998 (1,2) - ^
00:14:998 (4) -
00:16:198 (2) - reverse
and so on I prefer staying at the current distribution of claps, because for normal they seem overwhelming in every other beat.
00:35:400 about kiai, i think you can add more whistles(follow the vocal) Added whistles, the ones below and more that felt right.
for example:
00:36:798 (2) -head
00:38:598 (1,2) - head

Hard
check the hitsound i mentioned in easy if you use that clap Also prefer fewer claps in hard.
and same hitsound suggestion about kiai Did the same in kiai.
00:12:998 (1) - this is awful, shorten it to 00:13:400 Oops, this happened while changing the offset, fixed.
00:35:398 (1,2) - incorrect spacing,this is a general spacing of 1/2 rhythm you used before, but this isn't a 1/2 rhythm, so people will be misdirect, you should increase there spacing Also happened while changing the offset, the slider was snapped to previous slider velocity section, it's supposed to be the same length as 2. Fixed.

Insane
same hitsound suggestion about kiai Did the same here.
00:06:600 (1) - miss clap Added.
00:58:200 (1) - miss clap Added.
00:26:000 (7,1) - incrase spacing is better,since you jump before. this is an empty,a 1/1 rhythm,different from 1/2 jump before,so a more different spacing is suggested,it can help players read this pattern more comfortably It had an extra jump before, but some mods were saying it's harder to read that way. Personally, same spacing is easier to read for me here, so I think I'll just keep it this way.
00:47:200 (4,1) - ^ Increased spacing here.

that's all
good luck

• 
  Good!

1. 00:11:400 (1,2,3,4) - how about using the symmetric pattern with 00:09:800 (1,2,3,4) - ? for example...
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:29:000 (1,3) - cross correctly ?
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   379,135,29000,6,0,B|391:187|295:188|296:257,1,155.999995239258
   347,315,29600,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   389,250,29800,2,0,B|381:181|286:194|291:141,1,155.999995239258

3. 00:43:800 (6,1) - avoid overlap
4. 00:50:200 (5,6,1) - I prefer this
   
5. 00:52:600 (6) - stack on not 00:50:800 (1) - but 00:51:000 (2) - for smoother cursor moving
6. 00:53:600 (2,4) - avoid overlap

1. 00:08:200 (1) - stack slider's end on the head of 00:06:600 (1) -
2. 00:25:800 (6) - NC?
3. 00:32:000 (5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - how about symmetric pyramid?
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   232,184,32000,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   232,184,32200,5,8,0:0:0:0:
   240,43,32400,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   108,248,32600,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   277,116,32800,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   189,252,33000,5,8,0:0:0:0:
   196,111,33200,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   313,188,33400,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   151,180,33600,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   269,256,33800,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   269,256,34000,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   350,260,34400,5,0,0:0:0:0:
   151,180,34600,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   277,116,34800,1,0,0:0:0:0:

RandomEffect wrote:

From my queue~

[Normal]

• 
  Good!

[Hard]

1. 00:11:400 (1,2,3,4) - how about using the symmetric pattern with 00:09:800 (1,2,3,4) - ? for example... I prefer some variety, not a huge fan of full symmetry.
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:29:000 (1,3) - cross correctly ? I kinda like the imperfect sliders and how they allow the circle to be between them, instead of under. I'll think about changing it if more people point it out.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   379,135,29000,6,0,B|391:187|295:188|296:257,1,155.999995239258
   347,315,29600,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   389,250,29800,2,0,B|381:181|286:194|291:141,1,155.999995239258

3. 00:43:800 (6,1) - avoid overlap It's intentional but I'll think about this one as well, if more people point it out.
4. 00:50:200 (5,6,1) - I prefer this I like this, changed.
   
5. 00:52:600 (6) - stack on not 00:50:800 (1) - but 00:51:000 (2) - for smoother cursor moving I like better how it works with the music with some alternating like that instead of just an arch.
6. 00:53:600 (2,4) - avoid overlap D: I really like this overlap

[Insane]

1. 00:08:200 (1) - stack slider's end on the head of 00:06:600 (1) - Done.
2. 00:25:800 (6) - NC? Added.
3. 00:32:000 (5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - how about symmetric pyramid? Nice, thanks! stacked the 6 and 1 tho, I prefer it that way, even though it's missing an edge.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   232,184,32000,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   232,184,32200,5,8,0:0:0:0:
   240,43,32400,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   108,248,32600,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   277,116,32800,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   189,252,33000,5,8,0:0:0:0:
   196,111,33200,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   313,188,33400,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   151,180,33600,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   269,256,33800,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   269,256,34000,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   350,260,34400,5,0,0:0:0:0:
   151,180,34600,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   277,116,34800,1,0,0:0:0:0:

~Good Luck~