AccountWontWork wrote:
manishmathur wrote:
lets go let me join in the argument
i think you should not say that you are x rank or y rank so you dont know anything. To be honest rank will not tell how much knowledge do a player have.
lets take an example-
I want to know something about osu and I have two top player from which I can ask "
iryn" and "
futtomy"
both player are top players but iryn have 15days of play time and futtomy have 30days so of course iryn improve at faster rate but futtomy will have more knowledge because he has spend more time in the game.
so in total I am saying that rank does not represented your knowledge in the game the thing tell how much a player knows thing is his time spend in game
Yeah, this dude(maniaCmiC) is obsessed with ranks, even though he's a farmer and most likely a jump one trick.
I barely farm
AccountWontWork wrote:
maniaCmiC wrote:
AccountWontWork wrote:
RuSMaN177 wrote:
So I got 6* Kira Kira days 92% acc 250 combo play as 6 digit, but this play is pretty much same as many of my 4* plays. What am I doing wrong in those 4* ?
Your consistency is probably your problem.
you are rank 530k
Dumbass... "you are rank 530k"
Yes I am ranked 530K, But what is the correlation with being ranked 530K and knowing what the solution to the problem is?
I know his problem is consistency Because I am also the same, and when I trained my consistency my problem was fixed.
Please stop being an Asshole.
The reason I'm pointing out that you're 530k, is because you're telling him to work on his consistency, while having no consistency yourself. "When I trained my consistency my problem was fixed", like dude, you're 530k. You haven't trained anything. You're not "consistent" by any metric.
Zelzatter Zero wrote:
Yes I get that the given advice is pretty shallow (they're mid 5-digit but in mania, ofc their perpective will be different), but why choosing rank out of all possible thing you can use as your counterargument?
Even if rank matters here their intention is just to help others, rather than pulling their rank out towards their face maybe give actual inputs on how they're wrong with their advice?
also upon finishing this I suddenly have a feeling that the pulling rank post was sarcastic, correct me if I'm wrong.
I pointed out the guys rank because he was saying "mainly for new players" while literally being 730k.
I'm sorry--but the irony of all these responses is just overwhelming.
Also--to the original post. Playing for passes, having 6-digit 7* player illness or whatever, is not a problem. You can improve whilst doing this.
I was told all over this forum that I would never improve, but I've definitely improved in every facet of the game whilst playing for only passes.
For example: When I struggled with CS5.2 (I wanted to be able to FC 6*'s with HR), I just started playing 8*+ maps with HR for passes, net result was significant improvement.. This map, which before I could barely touch a note on, I eventually 2 missed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiEvmH8Ur4sI struggled with longer jump sections, because I didn't have the stamina to tap or hold rhythm and maintain acc.. but then I played long jump maps for passes.. and improved:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RESTTNWwN3wAnd.. the maps I once wished I could pass, eventually became maps I could consistently A Rank with single digit miss counts:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SD3z342JWsAll the people that say you can't improve by playing for passes are full of shit. I'm still not a god at this game by any metric--but I definitely improved, regardless of how I played.