Why do people say that osu is genetics based? Like if you're born with certain genes, you will be strong at osu?
I see that...Naiad wrote:
Because it's true. It is readily apparent that two people who play the same exact maps for the same amount of time from the moment they install the game will not be at the exact same skill level. This isn't to say you can't be good if you have "bad" genetics or that every person with "good" genetics is a good player, but it obviously plays a factor, like it does in basically every other competitive game/sport etc,.
I agree that dwelling on genetics tends to be detrimental to a person's mindset, but the reality is that they do exist and I think that acting like no one is held back by genetics is disingenuous.Happy Satoko wrote:
People mostly say it because most people in life have a fixed mindset and think that you are either inherently good at something or you're not. It's the same thing as when people see someone that's good at art or math and assume it was a talent they were born with, and they say, "I could never draw like that," "I'm just not a math person." It's easier in the short-term to blame what you can't control. Most people I see talking about genetics are unlikely to have "bad genetics" physically but have terrible mindset.
Most people that say that they are held back by genetics are not, they are held back by mindset. I have seen a few people where I do think they're just fucked, but not nearly as often as I see people complaining about genetics because they don't want to put in the proper practice.Naiad wrote:
I agree that dwelling on genetics tends to be detrimental to a person's mindset, but the reality is that they do exist and I think that acting like no one is held back by genetics is disingenuous.
It's crazy to see some people saying "omg I'm trash I don't have genetics" then 2 days later they get a top play...Happy Satoko wrote:
Most people that say that they are held back by genetics are not, they are held back by mindset. I have seen a few people where I do think they're just fucked, but not nearly as often as I see people complaining about genetics because they don't want to put in the proper practice.Naiad wrote:
I agree that dwelling on genetics tends to be detrimental to a person's mindset, but the reality is that they do exist and I think that acting like no one is held back by genetics is disingenuous.
two people who install the game have differend skills that translate to osu! differendly, differend approach to playing/improving, differend mindsets etc, learned from things they did before. differend environmentNaiad wrote:
Because it's true. It is readily apparent that two people who play the same exact maps for the same amount of time from the moment they install the game will not be at the exact same skill level. This isn't to say you can't be good if you have "bad" genetics or that every person with "good" genetics is a good player, but it obviously plays a factor, like it does in basically every other competitive game/sport etc,.
You don't know if that variance between two players is caused by genetics. It could be caused by totally controllable factors and if you blame genetics you will never find those factors and lose without even trying. Not to mention pp is a very rough way to measure skill and comparing pp is not a very accurate way to compare improvement rate. Additionally people can play offline to improve without increasing playtime which gives the illusion of "talent".Naiad wrote:
Because it's true. It is readily apparent that two people who play the same exact maps for the same amount of time from the moment they install the game will not be at the exact same skill level. This isn't to say you can't be good if you have "bad" genetics or that every person with "good" genetics is a good player, but it obviously plays a factor, like it does in basically every other competitive game/sport etc,.
Yes, but none of that really negates what I said.dung eater wrote:
two people who install the game have differend skills that translate to osu! differendly, differend approach to playing/improving, differend mindsets etc, learned from things they did before. differend environmentNaiad wrote:
Because it's true. It is readily apparent that two people who play the same exact maps for the same amount of time from the moment they install the game will not be at the exact same skill level. This isn't to say you can't be good if you have "bad" genetics or that every person with "good" genetics is a good player, but it obviously plays a factor, like it does in basically every other competitive game/sport etc,.
Of course there are many factors, I made it very clear that I dont think genetics are the main or even the most important factor. Additionally, I never said anything about pp, but I will add that pp is a very good approximation of skill, even though it isnt perfect. I was speaking purely hypothetically, in a world where we know that two players did indeed do the exact same thing since the moment they installed, with no offline play etc,.Fxjlk wrote:
You don't know if that variance between two players is caused by genetics. It could be caused by totally controllable factors and if you blame genetics you will never find those factors and lose without even trying. Not to mention pp is a very rough way to measure skill and comparing pp is not a very accurate way to compare improvement rate. Additionally people can play offline to improve without increasing playtime which gives the illusion of "talent".Naiad wrote:
Because it's true. It is readily apparent that two people who play the same exact maps for the same amount of time from the moment they install the game will not be at the exact same skill level. This isn't to say you can't be good if you have "bad" genetics or that every person with "good" genetics is a good player, but it obviously plays a factor, like it does in basically every other competitive game/sport etc,.
Genetics could play a part but it could be really small (5%), you never know.
So basically, there are people who are born to be top players?WitherMite wrote:
my thought process:
you cant do anything about it or ever even know just how much and in what way it affects you -> you should ignore it.
this natural talent thing is true of everything, its not some new concept only osu has.
Naiad wrote:
I'll stress again that I agree that dwelling on genetics is unhelpful to an individual's improvement and that it isn't the most important factor in a person's improvement, but I simply don't think that someone like me can ever have 330 bpm stamina like Aetrna as an example. I don't let this get in the way of me playing/improving and I think my stamina is well above average, but I think my point is clear
It seems that your experience is different than mine, because I very often see people insist that anyone can deathstream 300 or whatever. ("with enough practice")Happy Satoko wrote:
Naiad wrote:
I'll stress again that I agree that dwelling on genetics is unhelpful to an individual's improvement and that it isn't the most important factor in a person's improvement, but I simply don't think that someone like me can ever have 330 bpm stamina like Aetrna as an example. I don't let this get in the way of me playing/improving and I think my stamina is well above average, but I think my point is clear
I mean maybe, sure, but I think there's a big difference between the "genetics" between a top 5k and a top 20 player for instance and the "genetics" most people talk about. I don't think anyone really doubts that not everyone can become a top player, you've got to have a special something to have an edge over other people in such high-level play. However, when people bring up "genetics", it's usually in reference to things like their friend improving faster than them, or them not being able to play a certain mod etc. In other words, they're blaming genetics way before they've actually hit high-level play, where a genetic difference might become significant. So I don't think necessarily that we're disagreeing here, just talking about two different things.
Well, YOU are one of the fastest improving cat I've ever seen with WhiteCatan actual cat wrote:
babe wake up its time to stroke anaxii's ego
you're literally one of the fastest improving players i've ever seen
please don't stop playing the game
Not just that but you discredit your own progress, too. If you've gotten where you are based on innate talent (or lack of), then good days are "just how you're supposed to be playing" and bad days mean you're just a bad player, rather than both just being you putting in the effort.aveil wrote:
Everyone is playing differently, so it leads to a lot of variation in people’s results. Talent is just a word we use for people who naturally use more optimal processes. People blame genetics because it’s a lot easier than taking responsibility for your results and being proactive.
I find it really frustrating when I hear people blame genetics or talent for their lack of progress. Not only do you limit your own progress by creating an "us" and "them" mentality, you also discredit much of the effort which top players have put in to reach their level.