I'll play
I startsded it!animask wrote:
Mafia is populr now gaiz
Also, do you want to play?animask wrote:
Mafia is populr now gaiz
I love you, yes.LadySuburu wrote:
Also, do you want to play?animask wrote:
Mafia is populr now gaiz
holy shitRolled wrote:
Oh hey I'm here on time finally.
in
omgomgomg JoinRolled wrote:
Oh hey I'm here on time finally.
Playing via PS3?Rolled wrote:
Oh hey I'm here on time finally.
in
Either, bro. (I actually confirm someone once I see the PM has been read.)Ph0X wrote:
ROLLED ROLLED ROLLED ROLLED ROLLED ROLLED
;P
WHERE DO I CONFIRM? I DON'T SEE IT IN MY PM OR IN THE RULES!
animask wrote:
Can we unvote before the last 24 hours or same rules as the last HNM?
Rules wrote:
8. Votes are reset 24 hours before lynch deadline. At that point, votes may no longer be changed once they've been placed.
I'm gonna say 10-15? All of them here, though I'm not sure how many of those were cancelled. Definitely 10+ completed games though.Rolled wrote:
How many games of Mafia/WWG has everybody played, here? Not necessarily on these forums, but a rough total count.
I've played probably like 5 total, not including the ones that got canceled, remade, all that jazz. This is my first Mafia that I remember, though (I may have died n1 of another one or something)
Priest (aka Doctor) and Doctor (aka Doctor).Rolled wrote:
animask, what roles did you get? Which did you prefer more?
I won't get mad about idle commentary as such, but I prefer spectators not post generally.Rolled wrote:
Why do you always take replacement positions, faceman?
Better success rate of roles you like?
(I'm assuming spectators, or at least replacements, can talk in mafia games? Sorry if I'm getting OT)
edit: animask, what roles did you get? Which did you prefer more?
Maybe five? I've hosted a few, too. Also made a Dethy bot (anyone remember that?).Rolled wrote:
How many games of Mafia/WWG has everybody played, here? Not necessarily on these forums, but a rough total count.
Why, is he your scum buddy?Ph0X wrote:
I hope Chris isn't a dumbass this game like in the last game I remember playing with him.
;P
I don't know how you do it.Rolled wrote:
Why, is he your scum buddy?Ph0X wrote:
I hope Chris isn't a dumbass this game like in the last game I remember playing with him.
;P
Uneasy in a threatening way or..?bmin11 wrote:
Knowing Two - Rolled - Chris friend alignment makes me feel uneasy >_>
About 5? I'm not gonna go back and check but it sounds right to me.Rolled wrote:
How many games of Mafia/WWG has everybody played, here? Not necessarily on these forums, but a rough total count.
rust45 wrote:
UnvoteAbout 5? I'm not gonna go back and check but it sounds right to me.Rolled wrote:
How many games of Mafia/WWG has everybody played, here? Not necessarily on these forums, but a rough total count.
Anyway Rolled, I think you're making hasty judgements, which is pretty scummy to me.
What?rust45, the first post of day 1 wrote:
Vote: Chris
I don't know you, you seem pretty shady to me.
Since when were RVS posts to be taken seriously?Rolled wrote:
rust45 wrote:
Anyway Rolled, I think you're making hasty judgements, which is pretty scummy to me.What?rust45, the first post of day 1 wrote:
Vote: Chris
I don't know you, you seem pretty shady to me.
You gave reasoning for your vote, saying Chris was "shady." Maybe that wasn't to be taken seriously, but truth is, it was hasty judgement. You then stated hasty judgement is a scumtell, and you unvoted, which sounded like an "I'm coming for you, Rolled."rust45 wrote:
Since when were RVS posts to be taken seriously?
I'm not certain as of right now anybody's role but my own. That being said, I'm going to place my scum vote on people who have given me scum tells. Not really much else to go on.animask wrote:
A scum tell doesn't always mark scum
About 5, I'm getting better at this game as I play more, really.Rolled wrote:
How many games of Mafia/WWG has everybody played, here? Not necessarily on these forums, but a rough total count.
I've played probably like 5 total, not including the ones that got canceled, remade, all that jazz. This is my first Mafia that I remember, though (I may have died n1 of another one or something)
My name isn't phox.Rolled wrote:
Hi my name is phox. I accidentally scumtell'd a page ago but I'm just going to brush it off as sarcasm, and plant heavy sarcasm in every sequential post to make my OP's "sarcasm" seem more legitimate.
vote: ph0xPh0X wrote:
Also, I will find it highly amusing if you manage a bandwagon against me.
or just not dealing it seriously with it. Accusing for meta relationship is weak and proven to be dangerous on the previous HNM game. So ya, I'm not weighing at all tbhRolled wrote:
Uneasy in a threatening way or..?
He was hoping no one (not even LS) would notice.bmin11 wrote:
and you can't vote Ph0X twice even your name is "Two" >_>
I don't know what post of mine gave you the impression that I don't think you're mafia. Maybe the lack of a post?Rolled wrote:
Two: I feel that Two is trusting me more in this game than in the past (lolmeta).
lolwut? The only thing you mentioned was my first post calling it hasty judgment as I accused you of. As I mentioned RVS votes aren't meant to be taken seriously and reasoning for RVS votes should be treated the same.Rolled wrote:
Rust: hypocrite
Not always~Rolled wrote:
oh and Q is always mafia.
Why not Rolled or Ph0X? Just wondering why since rust45 isn't holding much attention by the othersTwo wrote:
if I were mafia, I would night kill rust45
Where did I complain? animask, please don't refer my actions on the other game (plus, how the other game meta game'd was really getting no where but just biting eachother for personal feeling. Unnecessary)animask wrote:
bmin11, if you're going to complain about metagaming, don't do it yourself.
It's a political term, such as when someone tries to run for public office but lacks the community ties which often times is criticized for not having. So I used the term to refer to Chris who doesn't know this community very well.bmin11 wrote:
P.S. What's a carpetbagger?
you wishDeathxShinigami wrote:
Have a feeling it'll just be Rolled/Two/Chris vs. everyone else
Some people like to play differently. I'm a townie so everybody else isn't mafia. You should get to learn how people play beforeRolled wrote:
I'm pretty sure I'm the only member of town and everybody else is mafia.
Is that why this is experimental LS? Do I win for figuring it out?
Seriously town, stop looking so suspicious.
edit: To elaborate, stop defending people you have no reason to defend. People should be fully capable of defending themselves. The fact that everybody is defending people other than themselves is not a pro-town trait.
animask wrote:
They seem to be the most offensive/annoying and use insufficient logic to back their thoughts.
You seem pressured for some reason and that is why I voted for you.
Oh, I know I'll be unvoting you~
Congratulations. You skipped over two possible obvious and not-strictly-mafia causes of my actions.Rolled wrote:
Ph0x: There are two situations where you would hope Chris isn't a dumbass.
Situation 1: He is your scum partner. This is less likely than situation 2, as you wouldn't associate yourself with fellow scum d1.
Situation 2: You know he is town, and you are attempting to associate yourself with another townie.
There's only two roles you can possess that let you know Chris is town d1. Both are scum.
I would recommend not including that as a factor. (That goes for you too, animask.) Then again, if you really want to use meta like that, go ahead.Rolled wrote:
I won't FoS or anything though because I'm pretty sure you died d1 in the last mafia. That would be mean to do it twice
It really, really irks me when people sheep like this (when I realize full well Rolled's "what", if taken as "you're being hypocritical", is complete bullshit). It makes me concerned that the shepherd will have no problems herding other players. It also makes me concerned that the sheep (DxS) is unable to be analytical. I would understand DxS's comment if it was his first game, but it is not, and he is making a derogatory comment against another player due to their (seeming) inexperience. So, to me, we lost a player (for the moment; not for the entire game, of course).DeathxShinigami wrote:
We got problems, rust doesn't know how to play this game.
Discuss.
Ignoring the light-hearted(-ish?) sarcasm in Rolled's post here, I am trying to look for the source of the "scumtell" exactly. How is a statement which is WIFOMly sarcasm (note the ";P") and completely meta (in intent; I can obviously see the gameplay affects) a scum tell? Basically, Rolled is just scumpainting me here. Setting me up for a day 2 lynch, I presume. (Typical Rolled play style, right?)Rolled wrote:
Hi my name is phox. I accidentally scumtell'd a page ago but I'm just going to brush it off as sarcasm, and plant heavy sarcasm in every sequential post to make my OP's "sarcasm" seem more legitimate.
Freudian slip? Rolled could be saying he's vanilla here.Rolled wrote:
... I'm going to place my scum vote on people who have given me scum tells. Not really much else to go on.
After, what, even a year, Two still holds this opinion. Break out of your comfort zone; you joined an osu! mafia game, so you participate in the osu! mafia metagame. RVS is standard practice in many mafia circles, and is effective (for all sides). Of course, as I'm sure have been told several times before, RVS ends when real discussion starts. Real discussion has already started. Hey, look! A random vote (by rust against Chris) sparked discussion! RVS is a great kickstarter, but it's not a stand-alone solution. Just ... deal with it. =\ (After writing this, I saw your comment on RVS which I must have missed earlier. Sorry if I came across as calling you a close-minded idiot. I still feel that way deep inside, but I didn't want to communicate it that harshly.)Two wrote:
the "lets all vote for random people ^__^" sentiment is horrible if you actually are town, since it 100% guarantees town dies day 1
I said this because of the shepherding and faulty logic (intentional or not) I noticed earlier (but could not thoroughly comment on, until now). Plus, it would be really amusing if I had a bandwagon on me, especially due to the faulty claims against me. No, I am not shivering under pressure, or whatever you (Rolled, Two, and everyone else) may have thought.Ph0X wrote:
Also, I will find it highly amusing if you manage a bandwagon against me.
Too much bookworming, dude. (You're showing your lack of experience, in short.) Think of the ways a double-voter would be played (in Two's shoes or even your own); I think you'd gain a lot from it.rust45 wrote:
Two could be this. I mean it is Experimental so basically anything goes.
Again with this meta. Vote for me if you want. If I was mafia, I could sabotage the game for you townies, so your line of thinking turns meaningless.Rolled wrote:
ph0x, I'd rather not have you lynched d1 because you are one of the stronger minds, and with the most experience, in this game. That's the logistic side of me. If I went with my gut, I would vote for you.
But truth is, you getting lynched d1 as pro-town is a huge win for mafia. It's not worthwhile to take that chance on a gut feeling.
Sorry I haven't been active; I have been busy the two days. I already kinda explained the reasoning behind my attitude, and I am sure you can fill in the blanks.Rolled wrote:
But at the same time, I wish you'd be giving me more reason to think you're pro-town. You've yet to say anything in this thread constructive towards the game. All you've been doing is trying to evade pressure by shrugging everything off as sarcasm.
Yeah; your sarcasmdar is totally screwy. Go re-read animask's voting post.Rolled wrote:
[FoS] animask: You gave no reason for voting for me other than that you thought my logic was wrong. You didn't mention anything I did specifically that you thought was scummy.
I can see why you're discouraging DxS for his reasoning (and I completely agree), but I don't see why you're trying to get the vote off of Chris and "somewhere else". Why aren't you telling Chris to change his vote? In addition, DxS's reasoning is a "good cop-out" if DxS is a town (or of any alignment, really) who has nothing to go on, too. (Again with the scumpainting, yeah?)Rolled wrote:
DxS: Making personal votes doesn't benefit town. Chris is in the game whether you like it or not, so place your vote somewhere else unless there's a reason you're voting Chris that we don't know. It's a good cop-out if you're mafia, though.
Translation: if I was looking to lynch whoever is least active, I would lynch Chris.Two wrote:
ignoring all other factors, my ideal lynch as town is chris cause he isn't that active
As I have stated, Rolled's general scumpainting and "extreme" scumhunting behaviour is part of his meta, in my opinion.animask wrote:
Rolled, you seem to be pressuring players a bit by lightly accusing them of being mafia. Seems like a Cop sort of thing. Aux/Mafia
Can you elaborate upon this? What information has rust provided, in your opinion?animask wrote:
rust45, information without much accusation. Seems kind of townie.
Don't tunnel me as superhelpfultownieperson so much...animask wrote:
Two, a bit annoying, but why vote for Ph0X? If Ph0X survives another day we might have a lead.
These two are not mutually exclusive. Also, "knowing" the latter wouldn't mean anything, because lurking is a behaviour, and not strictly a player or role trait or tell. (It is a tell circumstantially, but in 99% of scenarios that isn't important now.)animask wrote:
Chris, newbie or lurker. Which one could it be?
Typo? Did you mean "most likely to be pro-mafia"?Rolled wrote:
Alright, at this point in time we are going nowhere and town has a 0% chance of getting a mafia lynch d1.
Instead of gathering your own biased opinions (myself included) that nobody is likely to agree on, I think the best play right now is to find the person you feel most likely to be pro-town and hop on the wagon.
Take away the random and not-serious votes and you have Two voting against me, Rolled voting against rust, and (I guess; reasoning is super-weak even if I believed Chris; more OMGUS than anything) Chris voting against DxS.Rolled wrote:
That said, the people currently voting are:
Chris (DxS)
DxS (Chris)
Two (Ph0x)
Rolled (rust)
animask (Rolled)
There's a 5 way tie for 1 vote, 4 are not voting.
Then contribute and stop being such a faggot? Mafia is a game where you need to be involved and participate. Clues don't just come to you; you have to go out and seek them. One way to do this is to re-read posts. Another is to look at social and voting graphs. Just do something besides waiting for a bandwagon. I have a feeling you're scum at this point, if not a harmful townie.Quaraezha wrote:
Anyway, not sure who to vote yet.
What, so admitting you (DxS) were wrong and your logic was flawed is scum behaviour now?Two wrote:
It's one thing to be like "I was rolefishing", but to do a 180 with halfassed logic isn't cutting it for me. Especially right after you were voted for.
unvote, vote: deathxshinigami
Well, if you want to think that way, yes. It would definitely be that way if this was a WWG. But this is mafia, which is a very different game, so I don't think such harm like you suggest will happen.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Have a feeling it'll just be Rolled/Two/Chris vs. everyone else
I think Two just hates everyone who disrupts the SNR negatively.bmin11 wrote:
Why not Rolled or Ph0X? Just wondering why since rust45 isn't holding much attention by the othersTwo wrote:
if I were mafia, I would night kill rust45
Yeah, well, you guys naturally gravitate toward each other. You and Rolled have similar play styles. And, of course, there's meta history. Do you really think people are dumb enough (given the meta information) not to make (at some point) the association DxS made?Two wrote:
you wishDeathxShinigami wrote:
Have a feeling it'll just be Rolled/Two/Chris vs. everyone else
do you really think people are dumb enough to not notice you trying to paint us as a team? you've done it twice now, with what reason I wonder?
In my experience, that's not true.Rolled wrote:
edit: To elaborate, stop defending people you have no reason to defend. People should be fully capable of defending themselves. The fact that everybody is defending people other than themselves is not a pro-town trait.
lololol. I am. ;PRolled wrote:
ph0x you better be fucking posting
Good point! (Bravo!) I didn't see that myself; I was looking at it more from the "hopeless townie" angle.animask wrote:
The reason I think you're sus(s) is because you are accusing almost everyone of being mafia.
That is actually a scum tell. You seem pressured for some reason and that is why I voted for you.
I wonder if this post disproves your stupidly retarded theory. I didn't expect myself to post a wall of over 1500 words, but shit happens. I love mafia. ;PTwo wrote:
well, it's good to know that animask and ph0x are mafia day 1