Apologies for the delay. I'm here now!
[Larghissimo]
[FreyBox's Adagio]
[Kalirink's Adantino]
In general your NCs are all over the place, you should make them more consistent like deciding whether to use 1-2 or 1-1 instead of both mixed heavily in almost identical parts (examples 01:03:596 (7) - Missing NC 01:29:056 (1) - Unnecessary NC)
Call me back when everyone's ready.
[Larghissimo]
- 01:47:704 (1,2) - Blanket fix
- 02:14:947 (4,1) - A tiny spacing error
- 03:30:839 (1) - Missing NC
- 00:12:515 (1) - This should end on red tick instead of blue imo.
- 00:36:353 (1,2) - This distance snap is too large since it's 1.38x while it should be 1.20x
- 02:13:650 (3) - Missing NC
- 02:18:191 (1,2) - Swap NCs around?
- 02:58:406 - Having this buildup not mapped feels a bit empty, consider mapping it
- 00:03:920 (1,2,3) - Spacing inconsistencies
- 00:06:515 (1,2) - ^
- 01:19:001 (1) - The final curve on this slider looks somewhat messy, you could adjust it a bit I think.
- 02:36:028 (1) - You should start this spinner at 02:35:704 - since the vocals and piano roll mix together anyways
- 02:47:866 (3) - Consider NC
- 03:03:271 (3) - There isn't a strong audible sound here so consider other options instead of this slider
- 03:46:244 (1) - Oh, this is cool.
- 00:24:677 - Maybe add 2 repeat sliders here as well?
- 00:50:623 (1,2) - Blanket xd.
- 01:12:028 (3) - NC for the 1/3 repeats would be nice for visual aid.
- 01:41:218 - Same as mentioned earlier
- 02:28:569 (3) - Same as mentioned earlier
- 00:06:353 (2) - I wouldn't recommend stacking just cuz the vocal has a noticeable pitch change. Also all this stacking can get rather confusing.
- 00:27:272 (1,2,3) - Don't do this pls, its so confusing lc. Even kuroko got confused. Most of your stacks are fine, but don't do head + tail + head stacks right after another.
- 00:43:650 (4,1) - This arrangement is okay, but it ends up not emphasizing 1 that well. If you aren't worried about that then its okay to keep tho.
- 01:10:083 (1,2) - This repeat is literally unreadable. You need to fix this xd
- 01:36:515 (2,3,4) - I woudl reduce spacing here a bit. It's quite spaced for a section that isn't that dense in rhythm or difficulty.
- 02:57:758 (1) - Yea this repeat is really hard to see too. Can you do something else. This is borderline readable and really wouldn't recommend leaving it as is.
- 03:15:596 (2,3) - And this repeat is impsosible to read so this needs to change.
[FreyBox's Adagio]
- 00:03:758 (3) - Consider NC
- 00:16:245 (1,2,3) - These are very hard to read as 1/3 circles so consider adding NC to all 3 to make it more obvious that it's different from the 1/4 rhythm
- 00:19:001 (2) - Maybe extend this to red tick to follow the long sound in the music more closely?
- 01:01:650 (4,1) - Consider adding a bit more distance so that these objects don't touch eachother or so that they overlap eachother more since this kind of barely touching looks messy
- 01:35:542 (4) - Again consider the possibility of extending this slider to red tick
- 02:15:272 (1) - Unnecessary NC
- 02:37:650 (1,2) - Maybe lower the distance a bit?
- 03:13:001 (1) - Unnecessary NC
- 00:22:083 (1,2) - I recommend not stacking here since you're going into some jumps after this, you want to have some momentum going in,
- 00:22:569 (1) - Make this a triplet instead for the kick on 00:22:731 - to be clickable.
- 00:22:893 (2,3) - Try using doubles instead? The kicks on 00:22:974 - and 00:23:218 - can be clicked too! Kicksliders are really passive in that regard, and you could use a more interesting rhythm that isn't confusing here lol. Usually when you see two kicksliders you think its two jumps that are 1/2 apart.
- 00:46:569 (4) - How about stacking on 00:45:596 (1) -'s head? creates a cleaner flow.
- 01:06:353 (2,3) - This is not a good stack cuz its red/white. Make 2>3 a jump please ;c.
- 01:09:758 (5,6) - I would unstack here too cuz the vocal shifts. but this is more up to you cuz its a calmer section,
- 01:38:623 (3,4) - unstack here for similar reasons to earlier on?
- 01:39:110 (6,7,8) - If you applied my recommendations from earlier,apply them here too. Also NC' 01:39:110 (6) - ?
- 01:41:866 (5) - I would NC so you have two sets of 4 note NC"s for the streams. looks cleaner.
- 02:02:461 (1,2,3) - Sounds rather overmapped for me ;c.
- 02:08:056 (2) - This is like 1 pixel offscreen i think. Move it up if you can.
- 02:50:622 (3) - NC? Seems like an important beat
- 02:55:812 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,1,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - Really nice set up! I like it.
- 02:56:785 (1,1) - My one complaint is probably these two sliders. You could integrate the better into one pattern imo, and reduce the NC spam here. Also they map the same sound so doing something more similar would make this pattern 10/10
- 03:00:028 (2) - This is quite random. Continue with your gaps. Make 03:00:352 - clickable too ;c
- 03:13:244 (7,1,2) - Not really liking this arrangement since the transition is on a blue tick xP.
- 03:20:460 (1) - Odd rhythm choice. I think slider > circle is better.
- 03:35:866 (2) - Unnecessarily hidden imo.
- 03:46:244 (1) - The head could be adjusted slightly.
- 00:03:758 (3) - NC for downbeat. Actually your NC pattern is a bit messed up xP For example, 00:05:056 (7,1) - NC should be swapped to include downbeat. Same with 00:07:650 (5,1) - etc..
- 00:28:569 (1,2) - I don't think this jump is necessary. 2 isn't really emphasizing anything in the music.
- 00:29:704 (5) - NC for downbeat?
- 01:12:028 (7) - NC for 1/3 rhythm?
- 01:13:326 (3,4) - This jump is suddenly really big for no reason ;c
- 01:19:001 (6) - NC? New measure and this is a long slider
- 01:21:596 (6,1) - Swap NC's same with all other places where the NC occurs after downbeat. If you see rhythms like this, its known as a syncopated rhythm and the strong beat is usually the beat before the white tick (downbeat) NC on the red tick instead of on the white tick after. Applies to 01:22:893 (5,1) - 01:26:785 (6,1) - 01:28:083 (5,1) -
- 02:07:812 (3,4,5) - This should be 3/4 rhythm.
- 02:22:569 (7,1) - NC swap etc.. 02:27:758 (4,1) - etc..
- 02:47:866 (3) - NC here too?
- 03:04:731 (5,1) - 03:06:028 (5,1) - etc...
- 03:22:406 (5) - This is a really random slider... Also jumping to 03:22:406 (5,6) - with that kind of a snapping will just result in sliderbreaks.
[Kalirink's Adantino]
- 00:16:678 (1) - Not sure what this is following. The vocal is slightly off since its on red tick. 02:50:407 (1) - same
- 00:41:705 (1,2) - I wish you had Ctrl+G'ed this movement instead.
- 01:25:651 (1) - Since you're doing a double blanket, it would be nice if you could make this slider more evne.
- 01:45:921 (5,1) - Slightly triggering that these aren't parallel
- 02:47:380 (1,1) - Blanket's kinda off.
- 02:57:109 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - This arrangement is quite questionable imo. People are going to play the kickslider rhythms like 3/4's but they are arranged similarly to 1/2 jumps. Tbh i'd add a repeat to 02:58:001 (2) - and do a smaller jump to 3.
- 03:24:352 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Kinda odd that the stream gets less spaced as the 1/4's become louder.
- 00:13:650 (5) - I'd NC this for emphasis.
- 01:12:272 (1) - This isn't snapped right. these should be 1/3.
- 01:12:461 (1) - ^
- 01:52:812 (1) - Could probably be positioned nicer
- 02:28:812 (1,1) - Snapping should be 1/3.
- 03:22:407 (5,6,7) - Not liking this flow. It's really linear and doesn't allow for good snapping xP. It ends up making the jump to 8 really awkward imo.
- 00:06:191 (3) - This is actually 1/3 snap
- 00:46:569 (2,1) - This distance between such a slow sv slider and a circle will lead to many sliderbreaks. Consider nerfing the jump.
- 00:51:921 (2) - This slidershape feels out of place here since it's used as a very emphasizing slider otherwise throughout the difficulty, here it looks much too fancy relative to the music imo.
- 02:37:325 (1) - Just pointing out how this wave slider is different from the one used otherwise in this difficulty.
- 00:25:488 (4,1) - It's really easy to break here due to the 1/8 repeat. It doesn't help that theres a flowbreak from 4>1 so imo either angle 4 in a way that makes it easier to land, or remove a repeat.
- 00:41:056 (2,1) - A bit odd that this gets the lowest spacing. Do you not want to emphasize that high note on 1?
- 01:35:542 (1) - I think this sould just me a 1/1 slider. Map that red tick? As well, the current 1/4 jump overemphasizes 1 especially since you've mapped these sliders to reduced SV's.
- 03:18:677 (1,1) - ^
- 00:07:651 (1,2) - This kind of spacing feels out of place seeing how small spacing you used here otherwise, I'd also go for 1/4 sliders instead of extending them to blue ticks on these parts in general.
- 00:35:218 (4) - Since you use very heavy NCing in the part prior to this I feel like a NC would fit here nicely
- 01:47:380 (5) - Consider mapping this stream too since you don't particularly follow vocals prior to this anyways
- 01:51:759 (4) - Same NC suggestion as mentioned earlier
- 03:28:568 - I feel like this should be a clickable beat considering how heavy usage of blue tick slider this difficulty has had overall
- 03:30:514 - This feels very undermapped, consider mapping the melody here
- 03:38:461 (1) - Unnecessary NC
- 03:46:244 - Consider adding a clickable object here and add the spinner afterwards
In general your NCs are all over the place, you should make them more consistent like deciding whether to use 1-2 or 1-1 instead of both mixed heavily in almost identical parts (examples 01:03:596 (7) - Missing NC 01:29:056 (1) - Unnecessary NC)
- 00:20:056 - Ignoring a very strong beat here which you still map at 00:21:353 - ?
- 00:42:515 (3,5) - Minor misplaced stack
- 00:44:785 (1,1,1) - Do all of these really need a NC? Makes it harder to read than it needs to be considering the cs7 even
- 00:55:812 (1,2) - I feel like this would play better if the (1) was directly above the tail of (2) instead of being stacked on the tail
- 01:08:623 (3,4) - Blanket
- 01:33:110 (3,4) - I feel like this movement plays bad compared to the movements you have in this difficulty otherwise
- 01:38:137 (5,2,3) - Not sure if intentional
- 01:42:191 (1) - ctrl + g for more predictable movement
- 02:19:488 (3,5) - Not sure if intentional, won't point out any more of these in case they are
- 02:37:650 - Only difficulty that mapped this part, nice!
- 03:21:758 (8) - Missing NC
- 00:38:947 (1,6) - Consider stacking for the sake of stacking
- 01:34:569 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe add NC to all of these emphasize the breaks they have in between despite the low spacing?
- 01:36:515 (2,3,4,1) - I feel like this is tricky to read since my instincts tell me to play as triple + hold but it's actually triple - break - hold. Having a slider start at 01:36:677 - feels more natural than having it start at 01:36:839 - is what I'm trying to say I guess.
- 02:04:488 - I don't think this break is necessary
- 02:50:137 (1,2) - These need to be more audible, please remove the silences on these
- 03:24:191 (1,2) - Not necessary imo
- 01:20:137 (1) - If this was a circle instead of a slider I think it would emphasize the music better, that tiny little break would fit really well imo since there is nothing that the sliderend is mapped to
- 01:41:867 (9,10) - I'd move the (10) up a bit more to keep the same playability but to make it less "overkill" compared to the small spaced stream before this
- 01:47:380 (1,2,3) - ctrl + g could work nicely here, but you'd might want to reposition the (4) further to keep it as emphasized as it is now
- 02:37:813 (2) - Maybe stack this on the head of 02:37:326 (1) - for a really powerful emphasizement
- 02:47:056 (2,3,1) - This feels out of place. Maybe stack 02:46:731 (1,2) - on top of 02:47:380 (1) - or atleast somewhere around there? If you do decide to do that then angling 02:47:218 (3) - so that it directly points towards 02:47:380 (1) - would be a nice addition I think.
- 03:03:434 (2) - Consider silencing the end of this slider to match the silence in music
- 03:25:002 (9,10) - Same as mentioned earlier, although for some reason this feels less out of place don't know why xd
- 03:46:244 (1) - Quite easy to break on imo, such a drastic sv change and I can feel the pain of someone who sliderbreaks here. Consider lowering distance to previous object (although there isn't much to lower i know) or making it a tiny bit faster.
- 00:37:488 (2,1,2) - Consider making the distance on these more similiar so that it doesn't emphasize one bit too much
- 01:38:299 (3,1) - Check blanket
- 02:15:272 (2,1) - Consider stacking these
- 02:26:299 (1,2) - Lower spacing here would be better I think
- 02:36:353 (1,2,3,4) - The shape on this could be better so that it forms a proper circular stream
- 02:50:622 (1) - Ending this on blue tick and replacing the triplet with a single circle follows music better and is better to read
- 03:25:325 (1,1) - Consider placing the latter circle so that it follows the sliders movement better
- 03:42:352 (1,2) - Unstacking these would be better imo
- 03:39:758 (1,2,1,2,1) - This arrangement ends up not getting good emphasis onto 03:41:055 (1) - .
Call me back when everyone's ready.