You can't really know what teams are being created but you can check the Team's list and look for one that doesn't have 8 players on its roster.N1nYo wrote:
how do we know what teams are being created and if they need players?
You can't really know what teams are being created but you can check the Team's list and look for one that doesn't have 8 players on its roster.N1nYo wrote:
how do we know what teams are being created and if they need players?
I just write 'em in the first post :pJintai wrote:
how do we know that our team is registered and onto the list?
I add both :pJintai wrote:
Do you add unofficial teams onto the list? or just official-Ryosuke wrote:
I just write 'em in the first post :p
Depends, right now I'm editing my post xDJintai wrote:
last question: how long does it take for the list of teams to update?-Ryosuke wrote:
I add both :p
looking forward to my first osu! tourney
I'm pretty sure no matches will be played on weekdays, so you should be okay.Jintai wrote:
man i hope my team doesn't play on weekdays, i got school and don't wanna break my commitment. really looking forward to be playing in my first osu! tourney
gather some guys and i'll join np (unofficial team pls)[AirCoN] wrote:
Synchrostar let's make a team!
raiku confirmed fake british guyMakan1 wrote:
team names are great.this is just great XD
You can join synchrostar and I if u want. We still looking for players thojackisgone wrote:
last call, trying to get a team,
[AirCoN] wrote:
You can join synchrostar and I if u want. We still looking for players thojackisgone wrote:
last call, trying to get a team,
Yes. Too many teams to add right now qqJintai wrote:
is it possible to back out the tourney and sign up as referee instead at this point?
Still looking for a team aswell. Would love to join you guys.[AirCoN] wrote:
You can join synchrostar and I if u want. We still looking for players thojackisgone wrote:
last call, trying to get a team,
minhtam1638 wrote:
I'd like to referee as well, if possible. I don't think I'm nowhere near as good to actually participate in the tournament, but I would love to be a part of this in anyway I can.
if dis is first grab first serve i'll grab u into our team._index wrote:
looking for unofficial team to participate 4 fun
im bored
[AirCoN] wrote:
Reserving this space for our team. Post will be edited in future:
Name of the team (TBD)
Player 1: Synchrostar
Player 2: [AirCoN]
Player 3: W3SON
Player 4: _index (need confirmation)
Backup1: -Tabzz-
Backup2: Plaatinum
Backup3: To be decided
Backup4: To be decided
Status: UNOFFICIAL
What do you think are the chances actually?- PrinZKittY- wrote:
I hope that SnowWhite or rrtyui will play at AntiBeat but nice teams anyway ♥
*cough*- PrinZKittY- wrote:
I hope that SnowWhite or rrtyui will play at AntiBeat but nice teams anyway ♥
No problem. Maybe next time.-Ryosuke wrote:
minhtam1638 wrote:
I'd like to referee as well, if possible. I don't think I'm nowhere near as good to actually participate in the tournament, but I would love to be a part of this in anyway I can.
Staff is currently full sorry :p
Added to the team.N1nYo wrote:
can u haz me as back-up player or do i lack the experience lawl (which i probably do)?
[AirCoN] wrote:
EDIT: Removed W3SON from the team. Looking for more members now!0
It's alright, looks like you secured a nice spot with your German brothers.W3SON wrote:
[AirCoN] wrote:
EDIT: Removed W3SON from the team. Looking for more members now!0wowowo. I told you most likely i'll withdraw from the team in the pm ._.
I will be available though so don't delete me yet.
scratch that. I'll apply with another team.
If we could avoid dramas, that would be cool.[AirCoN] wrote:
It's alright, looks like you secured a nice spot with your German brothers.W3SON wrote:
wowowo. I told you most likely i'll withdraw from the team in the pm ._.
I will be available though so don't delete me yet.
scratch that. I'll apply with another team.
Yea sorry looks like there was some miscommunication there but it looks as though the situation has resolved itself.-Ryosuke wrote:
If we could avoid dramas, that would be cool.
I was about to make one but with ranks instead.Yauxo wrote:
I couldnt sleep and did a thing.
(Yes, I know that I didnt have to write that long if formula, but as I said, I was tired .-. I DIDNT THINK ABOUT THE POSSIBILITIES)
Please dont spam me with "omg but pp doesnt say anything about how good the team is" - I dont care, I did this because I couldnt sleep and wanted to know the avg PP of all the participants.
Feel free to add data from mine if you need any-Ryosuke wrote:
I was about to make one but with ranks instead.Yauxo wrote:
I couldnt sleep and did a thing.
(Yes, I know that I didnt have to write that long if formula, but as I said, I was tired .-. I DIDNT THINK ABOUT THE POSSIBILITIES)
Please dont spam me with "omg but pp doesnt say anything about how good the team is" - I dont care, I did this because I couldnt sleep and wanted to know the avg PP of all the participants.
Alright thanks.Yauxo wrote:
Feel free to add data from mine if you need any-Ryosuke wrote:
I was about to make one but with ranks instead.
Anroyz wrote:
No Name yet
Player 1: Anroyz
Player 2: imagaK
Player 3: Fatee
Player 4: MarthXT
Back-up 1: monomosc
Back-up 2: Mlzu
Back-up 3: W3son
Status: UNOFFICIAL
post is going to be edited
I'm sorry for both of you, but we did reach 32 teams before you signed up to the tournament.Thunderbolt235 wrote:
Fi(r)st us Senpai
Player 1: Thunderbolt235
Player 2: sevensens
Player 3: Katziezi
Player 4: Firstus
Back-up 1: doggywoof
Back-up 2: Zanian01
Status: UNOFFICIAL
Obviously represents each team's overall power level, fear FLAT IS JUSTICE cause it's over ... 1337x the powerlevel of the 2nd team.Azer wrote:
Did this out of boredom
[AirCoN] wrote:
Are we allowed to switch players in the middle of a match?
oh hi uzzi i remember you from the osu!challengers tournament lol.- [ U z z I ] - wrote:
[AirCoN] wrote:
Are we allowed to switch players in the middle of a match?
There are Teams like Team Kappa b or Team AZER-SENPAI AND AZER'S CAT PLS NOTICE US in that list, while they're not in the list of participants. Probably just an error/test.[Toy] wrote:
So is this real? http://challonge.com/osuantibeat
Or are the actual drawings still on the 6th
I personally like the map pool, there are only a few that I think could be easier :pAzer wrote:
Out of curiosity what would you guys think of moving the round 1 pool to round 2 and making one thats slightly easier for the first round?
Just gathering opinions, nothing official yet or anything.
First round pool is fine, just inconsistent. HR picks are a bit harder than the rest of the pool and that's about it. The HD picks are really good though imo and I like the wild card maps like Magnolia & Move That Body in there.Azer wrote:
Out of curiosity what would you guys think of moving the round 1 pool to round 2 and making one thats slightly easier for the first round?
Just gathering opinions, nothing official yet or anything.
MiruHong wrote:
First round pool is fine, just inconsistent. HR picks are a bit harder than the rest of the pool and that's about it. The HD picks are really good though imo and I like the wild card maps like Magnolia & Move That Body in there.Azer wrote:
Out of curiosity what would you guys think of moving the round 1 pool to round 2 and making one thats slightly easier for the first round?
Just gathering opinions, nothing official yet or anything.
Also just wondering:
-Can we ban maps
-How are you seeding teams
80% of all the teams can at least FC 60% of all the maps. So that should be good, imo.you are pretty wrote:
In my opinion the maps are a bit too difficult for a first round, but with the quality of the players on the team it might not matter.
Imo, for a Round one it's pretty tough and maybe even too difficult here and there (keep in mind that all teams together have a avg of 4844pp, which is roughly in the area where you can FC 170 pp* maps easily, 190 pp* maps with maybe some tries and 220 pp* maps with more focus). Iam not quite sure what kind of diffs you guys would want to put for the future rounds. I mean, we're currently at 5.0 - 5.4 Star diff maps. What are we supposed to play in Round 2, 3 etc? Would the Final include 6.5 diff maps? There arent too many good and fitting maps out there.Azer wrote:
Out of curiosity what would you guys think of moving the round 1 pool to round 2 and making one thats slightly easier for the first round?
Just gathering opinions, nothing official yet or anything.
They are easier.Tshemmp wrote:
Wait, the new HR Maps are supposed to be easier? For some reason I find them way harder than the previous ones, is that just me?
Best comment everAzer wrote:
another one bites de_dust
All hail seedingHumiliation wrote:
my friend's team (20k - 50k) is going against happystick, elysion, nitro, and more. What the fuck?
Don't be like that honey.jackisgone wrote:
Take me off the rosterI'm quitting osu
The point is to not have a rank 32 vs rank 1 semi-finals or some shit.Tshemmp wrote:
Mh, I don't like how Challonge puts the #1 team vs the #32 team and so on. Wouldn't it be more exciting if #1 would play #17, #2 vs #18 and so on? This would make sure the best 16 team still advance but prevent shit like #1 vs #32 were the results are totally clear from the very beginning (not saying #1 vs #17 wouldn't be clear either but it would be a bit more interesting to watch). I doubt these matches would be very fun for anybody.
Wont happen. If Seed 32 would win against Seed 18 for example, Seed 32 would still be #rekt in the next match, when they play against Seed 4 or whatever[AirCoN] wrote:
The point is to not have a rank 32 vs rank 1 semi-finals or some shit.Tshemmp wrote:
Mh, I don't like how Challonge puts the #1 team vs the #32 team and so on. Wouldn't it be more exciting if #1 would play #17, #2 vs #18 and so on? This would make sure the best 16 team still advance but prevent shit like #1 vs #32 were the results are totally clear from the very beginning (not saying #1 vs #17 wouldn't be clear either but it would be a bit more interesting to watch). I doubt these matches would be very fun for anybody.
If worse comes to hand I'll commentateAthrun_Yamato wrote:
Just want to say that my timetable does not look good.
I probably may have to drop out of commentator/referee due to family issues as well as scehduling issues
I'll update as I go.
With your system there would be NO interesting games. A seeding system like this is meant to ensure that the teams that deserve to get into the next round do, while creating heated contests among the teams that are in the middle of the pack. Obviously first seed should pretty much always be expected to go through barring a miracle or freak occurrence. But now the games that are most interesting are #16 v. #17, #15 v. #18, etc., and part of the exciting thing is to see how far up the chain the matches will be close, like whether or not a #21 will be able to upset a #12, or a #25 upset a #8. With the system you propose, all teams that are higher seeded should always advance, since there is a considerable skill gap in every single match.Tshemmp wrote:
Mh, I don't like how Challonge puts the #1 team vs the #32 team and so on. Wouldn't it be more exciting if #1 would play #17, #2 vs #18 and so on? This would make sure the best 16 team still advance but prevent shit like #1 vs #32 were the results are totally clear from the very beginning (not saying #1 vs #17 wouldn't be clear either but it would be a bit more interesting to watch). I doubt these matches would be very fun for anybody.
+ That would mean the final would be THEORICALLY #1 vs #16. I guess nobody wants that. Of course the first round wouldn't be the most interesting with my system but ALL the other rounds would be interesting.CptHampton wrote:
With your system there would be NO interesting games. A seeding system like this is meant to ensure that the teams that deserve to get into the next round do, while creating heated contests among the teams that are in the middle of the pack. Obviously first seed should pretty much always be expected to go through barring a miracle or freak occurrence. But now the games that are most interesting are #16 v. #17, #14 v. #18, etc., and part of the exciting thing is to see how far up the chain the matches will be close, like whether or not a #21 will be able to upset a #12, or a #25 upset a #8. With the system you propose, all teams that are higher seeded should always advance, since there is a considerable skill gap in every single match.Tshemmp wrote:
Mh, I don't like how Challonge puts the #1 team vs the #32 team and so on. Wouldn't it be more exciting if #1 would play #17, #2 vs #18 and so on? This would make sure the best 16 team still advance but prevent shit like #1 vs #32 were the results are totally clear from the very beginning (not saying #1 vs #17 wouldn't be clear either but it would be a bit more interesting to watch). I doubt these matches would be very fun for anybody.
This live drawings will happen. "Top-seed1" just mean that a top-seeded hold this place. It will determine who will be put against who on later rounds.mayank0 wrote:
Are the challonge brackets final or the live drawing thing on 6th is happening?