cRyo diff is not fun anymore
Hope you guys are happy ==/
and all fixed in my diffs (no tick rate 2)
Hope you guys are happy ==/
and all fixed in my diffs (no tick rate 2)
forum
Sakakibara Yui - Aqua Voice (Short Ver.)
posted
Total Posts
116
Topic Starter
Just started the recheck - need to go over some stuff for the Insane since the applications were done more literally instead of capturing the spirit. It's a little lop-sided right now. I'll edit the rest in when I get some time.
[Easy]
00:13:783 (1) - Still too soon after a spinner. You need much more time than that. It might be best to just go without the spinner.
01:15:851 (3) - New combo
Normal and Hard look good.
[Easy]
00:13:783 (1) - Still too soon after a spinner. You need much more time than that. It might be best to just go without the spinner.
01:15:851 (3) - New combo
Normal and Hard look good.
Topic Starter
Both points fixed on easy.
plz let cRyo keep some of her old patterns.. this new diff is now just like any other eroge map with nothing special
I asked cRyo cause she will make something unique and you guys are ruining this ==////////
if I wanted just a "rankable" diff I would have mapped it myself >.>
plz let cRyo keep some of her old patterns.. this new diff is now just like any other eroge map with nothing special
I asked cRyo cause she will make something unique and you guys are ruining this ==////////
if I wanted just a "rankable" diff I would have mapped it myself >.>
Your general attitude isn't exactly helpful towards me wanting to help the set out, that's for sure. You could say it's "ruining" my want to assist you.
As I have had to explain to cRyo many times before: most things here are suggestions in which I feel will make the map better and more true to the music. It seems a lot of the suggestions were taken without much thought to the rest of the map and the general quality is now much lower. I'm willing to work with her to get it up and running again, but please don't make it out to be us just forcing everything down your throats. It's the wrong attitude to take in the modding process and will only result in both sides being worse for the wear.
And honestly, the original map was more like most other eroge maps with the 1/4 spam everywhere. "Just rankable" is a foolish concept to pull out especially considering the points that have been raised for the map so far. If we were going for "just rankable" none of this would be here, and the ranked map pool would be downright abysmal.
As I have had to explain to cRyo many times before: most things here are suggestions in which I feel will make the map better and more true to the music. It seems a lot of the suggestions were taken without much thought to the rest of the map and the general quality is now much lower. I'm willing to work with her to get it up and running again, but please don't make it out to be us just forcing everything down your throats. It's the wrong attitude to take in the modding process and will only result in both sides being worse for the wear.
And honestly, the original map was more like most other eroge maps with the 1/4 spam everywhere. "Just rankable" is a foolish concept to pull out especially considering the points that have been raised for the map so far. If we were going for "just rankable" none of this would be here, and the ranked map pool would be downright abysmal.
I applied all of them and now you saying thatGarven wrote:
most things here are suggestions in which I feel will make the map better and more true to the music
general quality is now much lowerWhat does that supposed to mean \:D/ ?
The problem is not what you called *bad mappers attitude*, the problem is in something that you called *suggestion*
*Suggestions* is something that mapper can deny isnt it, unless there is some unrankable issue.
But your mods (especially those) isnt suggestion its more like ultimatum, fix or no bubble/rank
You simply trying to interfere your own patterns in our maps
p/1841574
absolutely same paterns, and absolutely same mod from those
same goes to Garven who always trying to remove this *overmap triplets*
If both of you dont like this patterns well just dont use it in ur own maps but dont forib us to use them
I saw hundreds maps in editor and i can say that this map doesnt have anything new, all this kind of patterns and overmaped triplets exist in hundreds ranked maps.
Im sure that Garven saw 10 times more maps then me, and i still surprised why he always against this triplets, if 2 years ago it was somekind of not ordinary patern, so today overmaping triplets its just something that exist in every 2nd map....
Also i want to mention that this drama treads always happenes with those mods, why no one complain about Niva, NatsumeRin, Andrea, Suzully because this moders give us choice, and those dont, Garven sometimes also doing the same but at least its possible to find compromise with him because he is not acting like robot.
And i was quite dissapointed to read such silly jokes from BAT member
those wrote:
It's a rhythm game; mapping is based on following rhythms in the music. The real question is, why are you choosing to let it stop at 00:21:455 - which follows the other sliders' patterns which actually have something in the music, instead of stopping it at 00:21:498 - 1/8 or 00:21:520 - 1/16 before the next object?
The typical view you have of us is that if something is ranked in the server, it is forever fine to use in every scenario. When you list BAT members like that, you're simply comparing our leniency; rest be assured that we are all trying to do our best in maintaining quality control. I haven't had the capacity to check your changes yet, but if you need a more in-depth explanation as to why stuff should be changed I can try to provide one.
However, here's some food for thought: a song that is fun mapped one way doesn't mean it won't be fun if it's mapped another way. We simply ask you keep up with ranking standards when you wish to have a map ranked on the server, and it is our responsibility to point out things that should be improved before ranking. If you're able to find a find way to map a song, surely you're able to find another - one which is more acceptable to our standards.
However, here's some food for thought: a song that is fun mapped one way doesn't mean it won't be fun if it's mapped another way. We simply ask you keep up with ranking standards when you wish to have a map ranked on the server, and it is our responsibility to point out things that should be improved before ranking. If you're able to find a find way to map a song, surely you're able to find another - one which is more acceptable to our standards.
if something is ranked in the server, it is forever fine to use in every scenario.Mostly yes, we dling maps checking them in editor and learning something new from other mappers
If map have not ordinary pattern/placement etc. we looking at map rating if its high that means that this kind of patterns can be used in our own maps and high rating says that players like it
we are all trying to do our best in maintaining quality control.All i can say that ur mods is quite offencive, and i simply dont understand ur point of view
I explained my reason why i dont want to change anything and i dont understand why you keep pushing me to make all this changes, because as i said they doesnt make any sence for me......
but if you need a more in-depth explanation as to why stuff should be changed I can try to provide one.ok
However, here's some food for thought: a song that is fun mapped one way doesn't mean it won't be fun if it's mapped another way.Yes, but if its mapped fun in one way why should i search another fun way to map it ?
We simply ask you keep up with ranking standards when you wish to have a map ranked on the server, and it is our responsibility to point out things that should be improved before ranking.I agree that if BAT thinks that map quality is not good for him and mapper dont want to make any changes, this BAT shouldnt rank it, but still he should return bubble if map dont have any unrankable issue, we will just wait another BAT thats all
If you're able to find a find way to map a song, surely you're able to find another - one which is more acceptable to our standards.There is no such things as *our standarts* every mapper have his/her own standarts if something is not acceptable to you it doesnt mean that any other BAT member will have same problems.
It means that you didn't read my post. You just applied everything in the literal sense, and then ignored the line that said that there were other spots as well with similar issue, but you ignored it since I didn't specify where. I know you're proficient enough in English to be able to understand that. From what I'm seeing, it's more that you're just folding your arms and doing things to the letter in obstinance rather than working with the suggestions to see if they work for your map or not. Modding is a two-way communication. The way you're acting, this isn't happening and now you can see the result.cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
I applied all of them and now you saying thatGarven wrote:
most things here are suggestions in which I feel will make the map better and more true to the musicgeneral quality is now much lowerWhat does that supposed to mean \:D/ ?
>>The problem is not what you called *bad mappers attitude*, the problem is in something that you called *suggestion*
*Suggestions* is something that mapper can deny isnt it, unless there is some unrankable issue.
But your mods (especially those) isnt suggestion its more like ultimatum, fix or no bubble/rank
Where have I said that I am forcing mods for this particular issue? Once again, I wonder if you even actually read the posts...
>>You simply trying to interfere your own patterns in our maps
That's what modding is, cRyo. You're just putting a negative and slanted spin on it. Try to actually see why we make the suggestions instead of automatically going into this sort of back-lash. It's just making everything harder than it needs to be.
>>same goes to Garven who always trying to remove this *overmap triplets*
If both of you dont like this patterns well just dont use it in ur own maps but dont forib us to use them
If you can't see the gaping flaw in this statement, then there's no use in me pointing it out.
>>Im sure that Garven saw 10 times more maps then me, and i still surprised why he always against this triplets, if 2 years ago it was somekind of not ordinary patern, so today overmaping triplets its just something that exist in every 2nd map....
I'm sorry for being consistent in my views? I can accept the use of triple rhythms - I just found that your use of them was rather poorly placed and proposed a better placement guide to follow in which you ignored either by choice or by overlooking it.
Try to take a step back and see just what it is you're trying to say here. Right now it's mostly mudslinging with little aim or goal. I want to help you make the map better and get the set ranked. From what I've seen of this thread, I'm not really seeing anything positive coming from your statements.
To BATs and MATs,
What you think would make the map better isn't necessarily true for everyone else.
In the end it's just your opinion... don't force your opinion on others.
What you think would make the map better isn't necessarily true for everyone else.
In the end it's just your opinion... don't force your opinion on others.
Topic Starter
BAT opinion > all
those "i don't like this stack, i want to move cursor somewhere else"
cRyo " i like this stack, i want to keep cursor here"
guess who wins :/
also I lol'd pretty hard when I saw this
I guess BAT is truly boss now
follow orders or nuke
those "i don't like this stack, i want to move cursor somewhere else"
cRyo " i like this stack, i want to keep cursor here"
guess who wins :/
also I lol'd pretty hard when I saw this
I guess BAT is truly boss now
follow orders or nuke
^ this.mochi wrote:
To BATs and MATs,
What you think would make the map better isn't necessarily true for everyone else.
In the end it's just your opinion... don't force your opinion on others.
How you interpret music is not the only way of doing it, and that's only the first step to mapping.
How you TRANSFORM your music into YOUR beatmaps.. Now that has countless possibilities.
Modding is one thing.
Popping someone else's map and refusing to rebubble unless your (imperfect) suggestions are followed is another.
Where have I said that I am forcing mods for this particular issue? Once again, I wonder if you even actually read the posts...Currently here nope, i said overal, because sometimes you became very strict in such places where you shouldnt, like Tick rate - 2/ OD8/9 or B(☞ nuked (2 hours chat about tick rate -omg /==\)
That's what modding is, cRyo. You're just putting a negative and slanted spin on it. Try to actually see why we make the suggestions instead of automatically going into this sort of back-lash. It's just making everything harder than it needs to be.I saw ur maps, no triplets (that dont exist in music), always OD8/9
And all ur mods about this, remove triplet, increase od (and tickrate2 ofc), you simply trying to make this map to look like urs, and yes im strongly against this kind of mods
I'm sorry for being consistent in my views?i forgive you :333333333 wwwww
I can accept the use of triple rhythms - I just found that your use of them was rather poorly placed and proposed a better placement guide to follow in which you ignored either by choice or by overlooking it.All this triplets make sence for me, they not random, i know why do i put it.
Try to take a step back and see just what it is you're trying to say here.Well ok lets start from beginig
Those mod
00:21:196 (6) - Shorten to red or extend to white; this slider doesn't follow the same rhythm pattern as 00:19:300 (1) - where you actually hear drum in the background.Other words i cannot use this kind of patern because there is NO SOUND on blue tick
And 1 more time, this kind of patern dont depend on beat on blue tick, the reason of this patern is different, and those simply dont understand it
Lets take this map
http://osu.ppy.sh/b/182268
00:14:567 (1) -
00:17:459 (1) -
00:21:434 (3) - this one even have beat in the middle of slider
00:26:133 (1) -
and even more and more, and all of this sliders dont have any beat on blue tick, but i know the reason why they placed like that, i understand why they placed like that, i did absolutely same thing (exept that mine is folowing BGmusic not vocal), and those dont understand it.
Also such words as *this doesnt exist in music = must be removed* not an option
This is clicking game you can use anything if it clickssss well, sometimes its better to ignore the music just to make better clicking, sometimes its better add something to click.
I can show you a lot of high rating maps which have something that simply ignoring the music, where patern dont folowing music, but all this maps is high rated which means people like to click it no mater what they hear in music.
To those posting flamebait: Stop. You're not helping anything at all. Direct your conduct towards getting the map set for ranking.
Edit:
I never forced tick rate 2. I simply explained why I suggest it. You obviously don't like to have it set to fit the music, and that is fine. It won't stop me from suggesting it still. Even in that 2 hour chat we had, I did not once say that you -had- to change it.
All of your other examples are in the same boat: I suggest it, but I don't force it. if I was trying to make others' maps into my own, my mods would be -very- different. The triples weren't random - I didn't say that. I simply felt that they weren't applied in the best place. I'll let those reply to your concerns about his mods though.
Rating doesn't mean much and you know it. Rating is more about the song than anything, unless the map is abysmal ('07/'08 maps).
Edit:
I never forced tick rate 2. I simply explained why I suggest it. You obviously don't like to have it set to fit the music, and that is fine. It won't stop me from suggesting it still. Even in that 2 hour chat we had, I did not once say that you -had- to change it.
All of your other examples are in the same boat: I suggest it, but I don't force it. if I was trying to make others' maps into my own, my mods would be -very- different. The triples weren't random - I didn't say that. I simply felt that they weren't applied in the best place. I'll let those reply to your concerns about his mods though.
Rating doesn't mean much and you know it. Rating is more about the song than anything, unless the map is abysmal ('07/'08 maps).
k, rebubble please.Garven wrote:
I suggest it, but I don't force it.
Topic Starter
Maybe you should talk to those
i've given up trying to convince him many months ago that not everyone's opinion is the same
and there is no opinion superior to another (concept he cannot seem to understand)
You saw what happened Garven
cRyo denied his mods, so he calls his BAT friends and threatens to nuke
clearly anything we say won't achieve anything so maybe you can help us?
i've given up trying to convince him many months ago that not everyone's opinion is the same
and there is no opinion superior to another (concept he cannot seem to understand)
You saw what happened Garven
cRyo denied his mods, so he calls his BAT friends and threatens to nuke
clearly anything we say won't achieve anything so maybe you can help us?
I never forced tick rate 2. I simply explained why I suggest it. You obviously don't like to have it set to fit the music, and that is fine. It won't stop me from suggesting it still. Even in that 2 hour chat we had, I did not once say that you -had- to change it.No it was exactly like *you must change it* tick rate chat and OD-8/9 chat
If it was just simple suggestion that i can deny we wouldn have this 2 hours chat !
Or you just wanted to talk to me :3333 ?
The triples weren't random - I didn't say that. I simply felt that they weren't applied in the best place. I'll let those reply to your concerns about his mods though.Such things as *this triplet plays bad* i cannot accept from you, sory but we both know that ur osu level is not that good (yes i spected you! :3)
If such thing came from Andrea/Chewin/MiLu (BAT/MAT/any High skill player) i would think twice before rejecting it, because all of them quite skilful players and there suggestions came during the playing, and im sure if they cannot play it well, then other lower skill players would have even more problems.
Rating doesn't mean much and you know it.Nope it depends on the overal difficulty of the map.
If its easy 1pc fc map then yes, rating not saying anything
If map is difficult and have high rating that means that map is good, and all this overmaping works well here.
Please remind this, guys ._.
From all I read here, all what Garven did was giving suggestions and trying to explain them.
Topic Starter
Mapping IS a happy thing. Us MAT/BAT aren't simply trying to shove suggestions down your throat and force you to swallow them, and in this metaphorical case, change them; that's not it at all. We are giving you our best general input on them. I haven't read this entire thread yet, so go ahead and laugh at me if i sound like a complete and utter idiot, but this is simply my opinion on this: You all have to calm down and relax. Some opinions may not be changed because they are a single person's opinions, and hey: not everybody has to agree on them. Generally, in the mapper's standpoint, it may not be the ideal thing you want to change in this case saying you have a mod that makes sense but you think your way is better, but you have to be considerate and realize sometimes that your way isn't always the best way. You can learn from other's ideas as well as your own. MAT and BAT members aren't fucking evil. It makes me cringe when I see insults to the team. We give our inputs and help the ranking process and we get bullshit insults? Ridiculous. Grow up ((aimed at the general community who thinks this)). At least try to get along; stop the rude insults and stuff that I assume has been happening in this thread so far. We're all human, and we all make mistakes and have our own opinions; now, swallow that. As I've said before, mapping is a happy thing. Remember that, mmkay?
tl;dr: be considerate of other's opinions (mods); just because you may not think they're the absolute best or you're just too stubborn to change them because you think your way is the best doesn't mean that their points may not be sensibleALSO THIS IS FOR QUALITY CONTROL UGUU. Simply ignore this post if it has no relevance whatsoever to this thread's discussion; i haven't read the full fourth page of this thread.
tl;dr: be considerate of other's opinions (mods); just because you may not think they're the absolute best or you're just too stubborn to change them because you think your way is the best doesn't mean that their points may not be sensible
I prefer a pic that shows "Mapping is a happy thing" by Elly to the NTR one xD
anyways, I think mapping is something that you have to compromise each other.
Sometimes I got a mod and I didn't want to change anything (not suited my concept) but I tried to find ways to fix and kudo them back because he/she tried to help me.
I saw cRyo explained clearly that she wants to keep them. Is it bad ?
And cRyo has proved that her maps are nice. I see many players&mappers add her as a favorite mapper on their userpage.
So I do believe that her sense is not bad at all(I didn't check her map yet but I do believe).
About the Rating, You can say that it depends on songs but at least, she didn't rank a bad map to the whole community.
I can say honestly that there are many good songs which are mapped badly and got rating not too high. So Rating is still something that can imply the quality how you feel while playing though.
to those : This game you can't send your emotion through the letter that you typed (maybe in real life, you are the moe one and saying extremely politely xD)
but a forum thread doesn't allow you to reply an emotion like that, and it's sad that we still do have a barrier of the language. So this is why you have to compromise each other , like other BATs MATs, they won't care much if mappers don't want to fix because those are "Suggestions".
to Mythol&cRyo : Good luck on the beatmap xD , I am looking forward to play this when it's ranked !!
anyways, I think mapping is something that you have to compromise each other.
Sometimes I got a mod and I didn't want to change anything (not suited my concept) but I tried to find ways to fix and kudo them back because he/she tried to help me.
I saw cRyo explained clearly that she wants to keep them. Is it bad ?
And cRyo has proved that her maps are nice. I see many players&mappers add her as a favorite mapper on their userpage.
So I do believe that her sense is not bad at all(I didn't check her map yet but I do believe).
About the Rating, You can say that it depends on songs but at least, she didn't rank a bad map to the whole community.
I can say honestly that there are many good songs which are mapped badly and got rating not too high. So Rating is still something that can imply the quality how you feel while playing though.
to those : This game you can't send your emotion through the letter that you typed (maybe in real life, you are the moe one and saying extremely politely xD)
but a forum thread doesn't allow you to reply an emotion like that, and it's sad that we still do have a barrier of the language. So this is why you have to compromise each other , like other BATs MATs, they won't care much if mappers don't want to fix because those are "Suggestions".
to Mythol&cRyo : Good luck on the beatmap xD , I am looking forward to play this when it's ranked !!
I wonder. How could such map get into argument?
Pokie wrote:
I wonder. How could such map get into argument?
While moderators should mod maps regardless of mapper, mappers should read/apply/reject mods regardless of moderator.
If you're wondering how these arguments start, there are two major issues in this: mappers taking ranking for granted then getting upset when a stricter BAT comes along (Contact a BAT that ranks just because, get a lenient mod and easy rank following, profit), and mappers thinking mods target the mapper instead of the map (e.g. "you're not a really good mapper because" vs. "this isn't mapped really well because").
I'd like to stress again:
If you're wondering how these arguments start, there are two major issues in this: mappers taking ranking for granted then getting upset when a stricter BAT comes along (Contact a BAT that ranks just because, get a lenient mod and easy rank following, profit), and mappers thinking mods target the mapper instead of the map (e.g. "you're not a really good mapper because" vs. "this isn't mapped really well because").
I'll use this opportunity to explain the three main points thoroughly so you can see why keeping them exactly the way the mapper had it is bad.Frostmourne wrote:
I saw cRyo explained clearly that she wants to keep them. Is it bad ?
- 00:21:196 (6) - This is a matter of consistency. By using a 3/4 slider and a circle following, the mapper is suggesting that this represents the same thing in the music as 00:19:300 (1) - , regarding both melody and drums. Also keeping in mind: if 00:21:196 (6) - was made 3/4, why wasn't 00:15:679 (3) - made 3/4? Why wasn't 00:17:748 (3) - made 3/4 + circle? This is more of a consistency issue; if 00:21:196 (6) - was shortened or extended it would eliminate this problem.
- 01:05:507 (3,1) - This is a matter of object approach. This particular one was pointed out, whereas 00:38:610 (7,1) - and 00:41:886 (4,1) - were not. The difference between these is the usage of spacing before the stack is played. With a smaller spacing, there is less momentum and in turn, the stack after a small break will not feel as awkward. However, before the latest updated version, 01:04:817 (1,2,3) - was made of two very large jumps compared to the other objects around it. As a result, after 01:05:507 (3) - is played, a break may or may not be anticipated, but if the next object 01:05:851 (1) - is made a similar spacing as 01:04:817 (1,2,3) - , the momentum keeps the flow going. This is evident through thorough testing; even after many plays and knowing that the stack was there, I found myself moving the cursor away after I played 01:05:507 (3) - , and then the cursor moved back to the same location for 01:05:851 (1) - which felt very strange.
- 01:39:817 (1,2) - This is a matter of spacing. Simply put, because certain objects had to be stacked and certain objects were meant to be a reflection, the places in which 01:39:817 (1) - can be placed are limited. By inspection, 01:39:817 (1,2,3) - should be as close to an equilateral triangle as possible to preserve spacing. All it takes is a little time to move 01:39:817 (1) - around and reflect it to get an appropriate spacing; at the state it was in (1,2) had 20% less spacing than (2,3), and it had 16% less spacing than 01:39:645 (3,1) - . This large margin of inaccuracy caused a not so comfortable movement for 01:39:817 (1,2,3) - , and this seems to be a result of an object just arbitrarily placed on the screen.
Except...only you're not doing the same thing. I understand why this was done this way, and I actually more or less approve of it, even though I believe it was only accidentally done the way it was (the only mistake regarding the current 3/4 sliders was at 01:23:422 (1) - ). Good try, though. Oh, and the cursor for that map isn't centered.cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
Lets take this map
http://osu.ppy.sh/b/182268
00:14:567 (1) -
00:17:459 (1) -
00:21:434 (3) - this one even have beat in the middle of slider
00:26:133 (1) -
and even more and more, and all of this sliders dont have any beat on blue tick, but i know the reason why they placed like that, i understand why they placed like that, i did absolutely same thing (exept that mine is folowing BGmusic not vocal), and those dont understand it.
Are you trying to tell me that I care too much about the ranking process, or are you trying to tell me that other BAT/MATs don't care enough?Frostmourne wrote:
like other BATs MATs, they won't care much if mappers don't want to fix because those are "Suggestions".
I'd like to stress again:
Drop this view. Not every BAT has the time to mod every map, so if things slip past certain members of the team it doesn't automatically make it fine. Call me one of the strictest BATs if you want, but that's all I am. I am not critiquing you; I am critiquing your map. I want to agree with you, I want you to agree with me, but if I've given my reasons you better do your part; it's your map anyway.those wrote:
The typical view you have of us is that if something is ranked in the server, it is forever fine to use in every scenario.
OK i understand, to use this kind of patern i need drum sound (any sound) on blue tick
http://osu.ppy.sh/b/177362
00:52:567 (8) - no sound on blue tick
01:08:039 (1) - no sound on blue tick
01:09:548 (1) - no sound on blue tick
01:11:058 (1) - no sound on blue tick
01:07:096 (6) - beat apperas at 01:07:284
Ur mod is like - YOU MUST follow music precisely, otherwise nuked
so
00:14:265 (3) - should ends 1 tick earlier
00:17:284 (3) - should ends 1 tick earlier
00:20:303 (3) - should ends 1 tick earlier
00:23:322 (4,5,6) - not exist in music
00:43:888 (1,2,3) - not exist in music
etc. etc. etc. etc.
Funny thing is
00:21:190 (6) - you saying this slider can be either shorten to 00:21:363, or extended until 00:21:535
Its like right way to fix this patern !
But how can i shorten it if there is NO DRUM SOUND at 00:21:363 ?
Isnt it against ur own rules ?
Why I dont need drum sound to end slider 00:21:363, but i need it if i want to end slider at 00:21:449 ?
About my stacks they plays absolutely fine for me, you cannot call it spacing error, unreadable patern etc
So that means i can simply reject ur suggestion about moving them to other places.
You saying they plays not good, well i want them to plays like that.
This is Insane, i can use any kind of spacing here, the only thing that it MUST be readable, and current one is clearly readable, i dont see any good reason to make this patern easier, if i want easy map i would use 1.0ds everywhere
But there was some *lolno* mod, did you saw it ?
Oh yeah it was urs
Seems like you enjoing this kind of threads dont you ?
first sound - 00:21:196
second sound - 00:21:541
nothing between them
use long slider, fits ? YES
why did i end it on blue tick ?
to make second sound 00:21:541 clickable, emphasize this sound
NTR
first sound - 00:14:567
second sound - 00:14:928 (sound = vocal)
emphasize
use long slider, fits ? YES
why did i end it on blue tick ?
to start vocal with clickable patern, emphasize
those
first sound - 01:08:039
second sound - 01:08:416
nothing between them
use long slider, fits ? YES
why did i end it on blue tick ?
And your answer is ?!?!?!?
http://osu.ppy.sh/b/177362
00:52:567 (8) - no sound on blue tick
01:08:039 (1) - no sound on blue tick
01:09:548 (1) - no sound on blue tick
01:11:058 (1) - no sound on blue tick
01:07:096 (6) - beat apperas at 01:07:284
Ur mod is like - YOU MUST follow music precisely, otherwise nuked
so
00:14:265 (3) - should ends 1 tick earlier
00:17:284 (3) - should ends 1 tick earlier
00:20:303 (3) - should ends 1 tick earlier
00:23:322 (4,5,6) - not exist in music
00:43:888 (1,2,3) - not exist in music
etc. etc. etc. etc.
Funny thing is
00:21:190 (6) - you saying this slider can be either shorten to 00:21:363, or extended until 00:21:535
Its like right way to fix this patern !
But how can i shorten it if there is NO DRUM SOUND at 00:21:363 ?
Isnt it against ur own rules ?
Why I dont need drum sound to end slider 00:21:363, but i need it if i want to end slider at 00:21:449 ?
Also keeping in mind: if 00:21:196 (6) - was made 3/4, why wasn't 00:15:679 (3) - made 3/4? Why wasn't 00:17:748 (3) - made 3/4 + circle?Oh its very simple, that what we call *different variety of paterns*
About my stacks they plays absolutely fine for me, you cannot call it spacing error, unreadable patern etc
So that means i can simply reject ur suggestion about moving them to other places.
You saying they plays not good, well i want them to plays like that.
This is Insane, i can use any kind of spacing here, the only thing that it MUST be readable, and current one is clearly readable, i dont see any good reason to make this patern easier, if i want easy map i would use 1.0ds everywhere
I just didn't want to spend unnecessary time due to the history of "lolno" repliesThere wasnt any *lolno* replies, i clearly explained everything in my first post
But there was some *lolno* mod, did you saw it ?
Oh yeah it was urs
Are you trying to tell me that I care too much about the ranking process, or are you trying to tell me that other BAT/MATs don't care enough?You dont care you simply like to create drama from nothing.
Seems like you enjoing this kind of threads dont you ?
Call me one of the strictest BATs if you want, but that's all I am.You acting like you know everything better then anyone else, thats all you are.
Except...only you're not doing the same thing.KK
first sound - 00:21:196
second sound - 00:21:541
nothing between them
use long slider, fits ? YES
why did i end it on blue tick ?
to make second sound 00:21:541 clickable, emphasize this sound
NTR
first sound - 00:14:567
second sound - 00:14:928 (sound = vocal)
emphasize
use long slider, fits ? YES
why did i end it on blue tick ?
to start vocal with clickable patern, emphasize
those
first sound - 01:08:039
second sound - 01:08:416
nothing between them
use long slider, fits ? YES
why did i end it on blue tick ?
And your answer is ?!?!?!?
cRyo, please note, that every BAT/MAT wants to help improving this map :<cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
You acting like you know everything better then anyone else, thats all you are.
I think those is just suggesting things of which he think could get improved.
But if you don't want to change with a valid reason it's your own decission.
So please end this drama and let's just try to find compromises instead of going wild on each other.
Either I'm not following the right map, or your audio output device isn't clear enough for you.cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
OK i understand, to use this kind of patern i need drum sound (any sound) on blue tick
http://osu.ppy.sh/b/177362
00:52:567 (8) - no sound on blue tick This one is a mistake.
01:08:039 (1) - no sound on blue tick Listen for the bass note before the snare is played at 01:08:416 (2) - .
01:09:548 (1) - no sound on blue tick
01:11:058 (1) - no sound on blue tick
01:07:096 (6) - beat apperas at 01:07:284 Beat appears at both times, I could have done it either way but I chose this way.
Ur mod is like - YOU MUST follow music precisely, otherwise nuked
so
00:14:265 (3) - should ends 1 tick earlier
00:17:284 (3) - should ends 1 tick earlier
00:20:303 (3) - should ends 1 tick earlier
00:23:322 (4,5,6) - not exist in music
00:43:888 (1,2,3) - not exist in music Hi-hats. Perhaps you should turn up your speakers.
etc. etc. etc. etc.
You're trying to shove "inconsistency" off as "variety". I don't think that's the right way to approach it.cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
Oh its very simple, that what we call *different variety of paterns*
There's a key difference that you seem to have missed. A place to start would be to wonder why I mentioned that 01:23:422 (1) - in Alicemagic wasn't done right. To give you a very obvious example:cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
Except...only you're not doing the same thing.KK
first sound - 00:21:196
second sound - 00:21:541
nothing between them
use long slider, fits ? YES
why did i end it on blue tick ?
to make second sound 00:21:541 clickable, emphasize this sound
NTR
first sound - 00:14:567
second sound - 00:14:928 (sound = vocal)
emphasize
use long slider, fits ? YES
why did i end it on blue tick ?
to start vocal with clickable patern, emphasize
http://osu.ppy.sh/b/192106 Compare00:30:058 (1) - and 00:31:904 (1) - .
To add: if I didn't know that I knew better than you, I wouldn't be going on about this map.Konei wrote:
cRyo, please note, that every BAT/MAT wants to help improving this map :<cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
You acting like you know everything better then anyone else, thats all you are.
I think those is just suggesting things of which he think could get improved.
But if you don't want to change with a valid reason it's your own decission.
So please end this drama and let's just try to find compromises instead of going wild on each other.
Btw, firstly nobody said your reply was a "lolno" reply and second those had good reasoning for his points, so yeah.cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
There wasnt any *lolno* replies, i clearly explained everything in my first post
But there was some *lolno* mod, did you saw it ?
Oh yeah it was urs
and mappers thinking mods target the mapper instead of the map (e.g. "you're not a really good mapper because" vs. "this isn't mapped really well because").maybe it's just me
but when mods say something isn't mapped well when it's specifically the intention of the mapper to map it that way, that's more like an insult to the mapper and his/her style. For good mappers like cRyo, do you ever stop to think "okay, xxx is a good mapper, maybe they know what they're doing and what's best for their own map and I'm the one who's wrong?". Then you ask the mapper to think that way.
when I would mod maps, if someone denied a suggestion, I always figured they had a reason to keep it that way and hopefully I could look back and learn from what got denied. Sometimes I wouldn't understand it, but other times I would. Even a reason like "it's my style" or "I wanted it like this" could help me to learn a bit because I now know the mapper has some unexplainable reason for it based off feeling or something else. There is not just your own way to map a song, people have different ways of mapping based off their own feeling, and to actually improve a map mods need to understand that. What you're doing is more like "change it or nuke" which implies that you're the only one who knows what you're doing. The fact that so many people defended this map means most people find the way it was mapped makes sense and is fun to play, and so your attitude of "change it or nuke" when you can't understand how something is mapped just doesn't improve anything.
normally I would keep quiet. but i've seen enough of this > <//
EDIT:
those wrote:
I've seen enough of this, too. But my "this" refers to "mapping with no justification".
The fact that so many people defended this map means most people find the way it was mapped makes senseif people can understand it, it means there has to be something to be understood, e.g. the justification for mapping it that way.
I've seen enough of this, too. But my "this" refers to "mapping with no justification".
Sorry, but I don't really understand where you got this idea at all.pieguy1372 wrote:
change it or nuke
When those actually said he would nuke if cRyo wouldn't fix his points?
I guess he would only nuke if this thread becomes to massive flaming insulting etc. (Which I can rather feel coming..)
So calm down a bit everyone and take your time to let things get settled.
Topic Starter
Konei if you don't know it tells me you haven't really read the thread...
and pieguy we have been trying to tell those what you said many times, but he will never understand...
I'm pretty sure even if the whole world disagrees with him, he'll still think his opinion is superior
and pieguy we have been trying to tell those what you said many times, but he will never understand...
I'm pretty sure even if the whole world disagrees with him, he'll still think his opinion is superior
It stops being a matter of opinion when there's music to back it up.
Topic Starter
this matter of "no music" is your opinion. we all see how it fits, but you don't
have you even read cRyo's reply?
have you even read cRyo's reply?
Yes, but it seems she hasn't read mine. In addition, I make an effort in trying to understand your point, whereas my points get ignored with excuses.
Topic Starter
It's not ignored with excuses, its denied with reasons
I don't understand why you're pushing so hard with this
there are many people who support cRyo's use of patterns and she backed them up with her reasons
it's the same with both sides
you don't understand why she would use them, and she doesn't understand why you won't let her after she explains it
I think you're over stepping your boundaries as BAT
you can suggest things but you shouldn't be able to force something the mapper doesn't want, unless it's clearly unrankable which in this case it isn't
I don't understand why you're pushing so hard with this
there are many people who support cRyo's use of patterns and she backed them up with her reasons
it's the same with both sides
you don't understand why she would use them, and she doesn't understand why you won't let her after she explains it
I think you're over stepping your boundaries as BAT
you can suggest things but you shouldn't be able to force something the mapper doesn't want, unless it's clearly unrankable which in this case it isn't
01:08:039 (1) - no sound on blue tick Listen for the bass note before the snare is played at 01:08:416 (2) - .no sound, if you think there is try to change sliders tail (blue tick) to N sound and you will hear that its sounds terrible
There's a key difference that you seem to have missed. A place to start would be to wonder why I mentioned that 01:23:422 (1) - in Alicemagic wasn't done right. To give you a very obvious example:so ur meaning is
http://osu.ppy.sh/b/192106 Compare00:30:058 (1) - and 00:31:904 (1) - .
If use 5% volume for my slider tail patern suddenly became fine for you ?
I will tell you why this kind of patern is fine in Alicemagic
Because 01:23:422 - 01:24:145 there is nothing in music between them, no beat no vocal simply nothing, so mapper can put his own rhytm here, simply because he thinks that its more interesting to play this sliders instead of holding super looong thing (slider) or watching at letterbox
And again there is no difference in this paters, oh no there is one, mine blue ticks slider tails have N sound while Ntr's and urs have soft, so that was the main problem?
I can make it soft
http://osu.ppy.sh/b/185761
00:15:683 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1) - no drums in music, why stream ? because maper prefer to play current patern instead of holding Looong slider or spin spiner, simply because its boring.
You're trying to shove "inconsistency" off as "variety". I don't think that's the right way to approach it.Thats it, current one is *variety* if i can create 2 different paterns in similar parts why should i reject it ?
Isnt it more interesting to clicking something new instead playing old stuff over and over again ?
And in my opinion both paterns fits with music, and i dont need any consistency here.
About consistency duelist
01:21:624 (6) - this one should end at blue tick, to keep consistency with 01:08:039 (1,2) - , 01:09:548 (1,2) - , 01:20:114 (1,2) -
But do you really need that consistency ?
Either I'm not following the right mapExactly
because
00:14:265 (3) - should ends 1 tick earlier
00:17:284 (3) - should ends 1 tick earlier
00:20:303 (3) - should ends 1 tick earlier
UGUUUU
This map was popped based on opinions right? Why hold it back?
Map's fun and rankable. Consistency of beats isn't an unrankable issue, in fact, too much consistency makes it boring.
Map's fun and rankable. Consistency of beats isn't an unrankable issue, in fact, too much consistency makes it boring.
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/55537
Duelist I have listened all of them as 25% playback and I am not deaf.
01:03:416 (5) - no sound in the music
01:08:888 (4) - ^
01:09:548 (1) - should end 1/4 later because there has no sound on blue tick
01:10:398 (3) - no sound in the music
01:12:662 (7) - ^
01:13:511 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - what is this supposed to be ? , there has no sound on every blue ticks
01:23:228 (2) - no sound in the music
01:23:982 (2) - ^
01:24:737 (2) - ^
01:31:530 (8) - oh this one is ok because you have sound xD
01:32:850 (4) - no sound in the music
01:34:548 (10) - this one has no sound too , you fake the real music by adding clap , good job : )
01:38:699 (3) - no sound in the music
01:39:265 (6) - ^
no offense but.. why are you so serious , even your map still has this kind of inconsistency but NO ONE complaint at you.
I didn't check the others
but I'm sure that you will make some random triplets like this too.
If you are sure that you mod map based on music and consistency, you should unrank your map and remove them.
Duelist I have listened all of them as 25% playback and I am not deaf.
01:03:416 (5) - no sound in the music
01:08:888 (4) - ^
01:09:548 (1) - should end 1/4 later because there has no sound on blue tick
01:10:398 (3) - no sound in the music
01:12:662 (7) - ^
01:13:511 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - what is this supposed to be ? , there has no sound on every blue ticks
01:23:228 (2) - no sound in the music
01:23:982 (2) - ^
01:24:737 (2) - ^
01:31:530 (8) - oh this one is ok because you have sound xD
01:32:850 (4) - no sound in the music
01:34:548 (10) - this one has no sound too , you fake the real music by adding clap , good job : )
01:38:699 (3) - no sound in the music
01:39:265 (6) - ^
no offense but.. why are you so serious , even your map still has this kind of inconsistency but NO ONE complaint at you.
I didn't check the others
but I'm sure that you will make some random triplets like this too.
Do you have anything to say ?those wrote:
It stops being a matter of opinion when there's music to back it up.
If you are sure that you mod map based on music and consistency, you should unrank your map and remove them.
I'm definitely telling you that you care too much about the ranking processthose wrote:
Are you trying to tell me that I care too much about the ranking process, or are you trying to tell me that other BAT/MATs don't care enough?Frostmourne wrote:
like other BATs MATs, they won't care much if mappers don't want to fix because those are "Suggestions".
This is your best reply so far. Made me turn around.cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
so ur meaning is
If use 5% volume for my slider tail patern suddenly became fine for you ?
With the way you had it, you're saying both beginning and end of slider are equally stressed, while in reality only the beginning actually counts since the ending isn't played. A hitsound change/hitsound volume change is another way to represent the music.
bubble pop checklist:
is this a clearly outlined, criteria violating occurrence? y [ ] n [x]
does the suggested issue seriously affect the playability of the map? y [ ] n [x]
does the suggested improvement significantly improve the quality of the map? y [ ] n [x]
i think you may have gone a little overboard this time, those. maps are supposed to go alongside the music yes, but a measure of artistic license is perfectly acceptable as well. there is a little inconsistency, but it isn't really evident unless you really try to hear it.
i'm restoring this bubble under that premise - if you can find another BAT which agrees with you that this is a significant, structural issue with the map that inherently affects its playability, by all means, feel free to pop it.
is this a clearly outlined, criteria violating occurrence? y [ ] n [x]
does the suggested issue seriously affect the playability of the map? y [ ] n [x]
does the suggested improvement significantly improve the quality of the map? y [ ] n [x]
i think you may have gone a little overboard this time, those. maps are supposed to go alongside the music yes, but a measure of artistic license is perfectly acceptable as well. there is a little inconsistency, but it isn't really evident unless you really try to hear it.
i'm restoring this bubble under that premise - if you can find another BAT which agrees with you that this is a significant, structural issue with the map that inherently affects its playability, by all means, feel free to pop it.
Topic Starter
well, this bubble is self popped because the current diff had every mod fixed from those/garven out of anger
diff is now reverted back to original state when Rika bubbled~
edit: fixed the first spinner suggestion from Garven's mod
I hope that someone can repair the bubble T.T
diff is now reverted back to original state when Rika bubbled~
edit: fixed the first spinner suggestion from Garven's mod
I hope that someone can repair the bubble T.T
Useless drama could be avoided next time, really.
Don't force mappers to change what they do not want, those.
I've already told you about that many times, but you still don't want to listen me.
Don't force mappers to change what they do not want, those.
I've already told you about that many times, but you still don't want to listen me.
I have already talked with cryo via IRC about this drama and I don't want to set off it again.
But really.. I have no words how those was forcing cryo to change her patterns although were playable without problems.
Modders (users, MATs, BATs, Admins etc., it isn't important of who we are talking about) have just to give suggestions to how improve maps without forcing mappers. Just unrankable issues MUST be fixed, not suggestions. Okay, I will stop it here too.
I just wanted to check this map since it has been selfpopped, and also I have nothing to do, so ~
[General]
[Easy]
But really.. I have no words how those was forcing cryo to change her patterns although were playable without problems.
Modders (users, MATs, BATs, Admins etc., it isn't important of who we are talking about) have just to give suggestions to how improve maps without forcing mappers. Just unrankable issues MUST be fixed, not suggestions. Okay, I will stop it here too.
I just wanted to check this map since it has been selfpopped, and also I have nothing to do, so ~
[General]
- There is inconsistency in uninherited red timing sections.
You must set 1196, BPM 75 in cryo's diff like the other diffs. - Unsnapped (due to the wrong red line I wrote above) kiai time's end in cryo's diff.
The kiai time must end on 01:40:507
[Easy]
- 00:18:610 (3) - If I was you I'd change this slider removing that repeat because there should be new combo on that downbeat. I mean to use this rhythm than the actual one: http://puu.sh/1rCGE
- 00:22:058 (1) - What about to add a whisle on this slider end? It would fit pretty nice with instrumental sound
- 00:41:886 (2) - To keep consistency maybe add finish also on reverse arrow?
- 01:06:886 (1) - Finish on downbeat? It fits nice
- 01:37:920 (1) - I suggest you to reduce the volume of this spinner end till 30%. It sounds too loud at the moment in my opinion
- 00:14:989 (2,3,4,1,2) - I think that adding finishes on (2), on (3)'s tail, on (1)'s head and on (2)'s head would match the cymbals in the song much better. It'd be amazing.
- 00:19:817 (2) - Here too, add finishes on (2)'s head and tail for the same reason ;3
- 00:23:955 (4) - What about to reduce this slider by 1/2 (instead to use that slidertick) adding a circle on 00:24:472 ? It fits this part much better
- 01:37:920 (1) - Same thing I suggested in the easy diff
- 00:15:507 (2,3) - I don't see a reason to increase the spacing here since the combo is still the same. Use 1.22x spacing to keep consistency with previous and the next part too 00:16:024 (4,5)
- 00:41:024 (1,2) - You should switch new combo here, it'd fit better if you used NC on 00:41:369 (2) according to the hitsound pattern
- 01:07:576 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Nice pattern >w<
- 00:37:231 (1) - I'd reverte this slider curve in this way, so that it flows better together with 00:36:886 (3,1) IMO: http://puu.sh/1rDcP
- 00:43:955 (2) - What about to move this circle to x:152 y:192? The jump would be more enjoyable to play, yup. And it's also overlapped with 00:45:162 (5)'s end
- 01:05:851 (1,2) - I'd switch new combo here (remove it from (1) adding it instead on (2)) according to finish hitsound and also to advice about the jump/spacing change
- 01:07:576 (1) and on 01:08:610 (1) - Add finishes to fit that clash in the cymbals?
- 01:20:851 (1,2) - Same of 01:05:851 (1,2)
- 01:34:300 (3) - Same of the first point about the curve. I would change it in this way: http://puu.sh/1rDkx
:>
very nice
いいね~
I finally got a kd!
very nice
いいね~
I finally got a kd!
Thanks modding ~ chewin ~ ^^/Chewin wrote:
[alacat's Hard]
- 00:15:507 (2,3) - I don't see a reason to increase the spacing here since the combo is still the same. Use 1.22x spacing to keep consistency with previous and the next part too 00:16:024 (4,5) ok,fixed :3
- 00:41:024 (1,2) - You should switch new combo here, it'd fit better if you used NC on 00:41:369 (2) according to the hitsound pattern ah , ok ><
- 01:07:576 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Nice pattern >w< >w< Thank you so much !
http://puu.sh/1rEbz
Chewin
Also changed some stuff with Garven's modChewin wrote:
[cRyo's Insane]
- 00:37:231 (1) - I'd reverte this slider curve in this way, so that it flows better together with 00:36:886 (3,1) IMO: http://puu.sh/1rDcP ok!
- 00:43:955 (2) - What about to move this circle to x:152 y:192? The jump would be more enjoyable to play, yup. And it's also overlapped with 00:45:162 (5)'s end ok, but i also changed placement of previous note a bit
- 01:05:851 (1,2) - I'd switch new combo here (remove it from (1) adding it instead on (2)) according to finish hitsound and also to advice about the jump/spacing change i think current one is better to read, i dont like sudden jumps on NC, also it fits with vocal here ^^
- 01:07:576 (1) and on 01:08:610 (1) - Add finishes to fit that clash in the cymbals? a bit loud for me, just clap also fine !
- 01:20:851 (1,2) - Same of 01:05:851 (1,2) sudden jump on NC again ^^
- 01:34:300 (3) - Same of the first point about the curve. I would change it in this way: http://puu.sh/1rDkx ok~
00:54:472 (3,4) -
01:07:576 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4) -
Thx Chewin !
Topic Starter
Everything else is fixed, thank you Chewin~Chewin wrote:
[Easy][Normal]
- 00:18:610 (3) - If I was you I'd change this slider removing that repeat because there should be new combo on that downbeat. I mean to use this rhythm than the actual one: http://puu.sh/1rCGE I used a little different pattern but fixed for the NC
- 01:37:920 (1) - I suggest you to reduce the volume of this spinner end till 30%. It sounds too loud at the moment in my opinion Garven wants 60%, you want 30% \==/ I GO 45% BOTH HAPPY? ww
Fix those unrankable issues I wrote in general and call me back for a rebubble
- 00:23:955 (4) - What about to reduce this slider by 1/2 (instead to use that slidertick) adding a circle on 00:24:472 ? It fits this part much betterI think this is a little too complicated, so no change
- 01:37:920 (1) - Same thing I suggested in the easy diff 45% ><b
/me eats soup
Rechecked via IRC :3
We have fixed the wrong BPM on the first red line in moe cryo's diff and the unsnapped (by 1ms) kiai time's start and end.
Finally, rebubbled. Let rank this mapset now, good luck >w<
We have fixed the wrong BPM on the first red line in moe cryo's diff and the unsnapped (by 1ms) kiai time's start and end.
Finally, rebubbled. Let rank this mapset now, good luck >w<
Did a small pattern change in the Insane. Let's do this.
Topic Starter
Ranked!♥ ><
ty Garven xD
ty Garven xD
Yay, thx everyone for support !
Finally:3
congrats Mythol and cRyoand me 
congrats Mythol and cRyo
Yeah that was well earned ^^
Congratz all the mappers ^-^
Congratz all the mappers ^-^
gratz !!
Gratz <3
No need for me to check it heh
Gratz :3
Gratz :3
Congratz alacRythol
gratz Aquathol
I'm glad this mapset has been ranked, after all ;3
Congratulations!
Congratulations!
gratztarg~
♥
gratz!
finally gratz and happy end ~
congrats !
un un ~
very good :>
very good :>
CongratulationsCongrats~></
Kawayi Rika wrote:
finally gratz and happy end ~
Topic Starter
happy end :3