Neruell wrote:

Neruell wrote:

Nice program but has nothing to do with streams in osu!.

More like your post doesn't make any sense. This program shows how fast you can click on 2 buttons. Streaming in osu! is something completely different than just spamm-clicking 2 buttons. Just a pure fact that you must "aim" where you click is already enough to make a 300+ streambpmer fail at 160 bpm.

I know a lot of people who "can" spamm click 300 + bpm with this program but can't even manage a 200 stream in osu!. According to this program I can only handle max of 180 bpm but I do play dragonforce song's with 220 bpm streams pretty easy and I do make big combos with a very good accuracy.

-Soba- wrote:

This program is only meant to give a rough estimate of where your max is. It's not there to measure your exact max speed.

Also, why don't you try doing the stream test while listening to a song and try to match the bpm of it like most people do durp.

Neruell wrote:

-Soba- wrote:

This program is only meant to give a rough estimate of where your max is. It's not there to measure your exact max speed.

Also, why don't you try doing the stream test while listening to a song and try to match the bpm of it like most people do durp.

Thx that you agree with my opinion

stickmeister wrote:

Okay so let's all never use Norton Antivirus ever because it detects executable files as trojan horses

god dammit

what

ragelewa wrote:

it's all about training or being born with the mightiest fingers in the universe

in fastest streamers it's the latter and normal people can't reach their level through training

ragelewa wrote:

it's all about training or being born with the mightiest fingers in the universe

in fastest streamers it's the latter and normal people can't reach their level through training

Noobita wrote:

o.o"

Noobita wrote:

o.o"

silmarilen wrote:

i press 2 buttons at the same time with 1 hand, so its like single tap.

YodaSnipe wrote:

Why would anyone ever press two keys at the same time?

On another note, I find these to be kinda inaccurate simply because you may be able to tap that fast, but can your cursor keep up? I know mine can't

-hys wrote:

everytime i finish it keeps closing --;

billy96 wrote:

uhh, "can your cursor keep up?" test app?

YodaSnipe wrote:

Why would anyone ever press two keys at the same time?

On another note, I find these to be kinda inaccurate simply because you may be able to tap that fast, but can your cursor keep up? I know mine can't

YodaSnipe wrote:

Why would anyone ever press two keys at the same time?

On another note, I find these to be kinda inaccurate simply because you may be able to tap that fast, but can your cursor keep up? I know mine can't

YodaSnipe wrote:

OK I think I am misunderstanding something. Pressing two keys at the same time to me means pressing Z AND X at the EXACT same time for EVERY NOTE. That's what that one dude stated. Which is different than 2keying ie. swapping between Z and X for every note.

Liutprando wrote:

YodaSnipe wrote:

OK I think I am misunderstanding something. Pressing two keys at the same time to me means pressing Z AND X at the EXACT same time for EVERY NOTE. That's what that one dude stated. Which is different than 2keying ie. swapping between Z and X for every note.

and there is nothing against swapping z e x for every note right ? the fact that you can "single tap" faster doesn't mean it's spam

YodaSnipe wrote:

I find 20 hits is not really all that accurate for testing speed + endurance. 40 is much better imo.

RaneFire wrote:

I dunno why but I just felt I should remind people that trying any "vibrate" technique with this program is inaccurate since if you hold a key down permanently it still calculates at about 400 bpm.

reuben2011 wrote:

RaneFire wrote:

I dunno why but I just felt I should remind people that trying any "vibrate" technique with this program is inaccurate since if you hold a key down permanently it still calculates at about 400 bpm.

But vibrating =/= holding down the key :/

RaneFire wrote:

I was just pointing out something despite what the program says it doesn't do.

This program is only for your information as far as I'm concerned, posting screenshots of your speed here is pointless since you can just hold down 1 button and get 400+ bpm, and noone knows or cares what you really did. And tapping in rhythm ofc. but I won't start that 1 again.

Jordan wrote:

RaneFire wrote:

I was just pointing out something despite what the program says it doesn't do.

This program is only for your information as far as I'm concerned, posting screenshots of your speed here is pointless since you can just hold down 1 button and get 400+ bpm, and noone knows or cares what you really did. And tapping in rhythm ofc. but I won't start that 1 again.

+1

lol @random unknown people with over 300 bpm speed xD

JAKACHAN wrote:

Also this test isn't the most accurate. It's a lot harder to stream 250 while controlling a cursor because it's more to process at once.

- Pizzicato - wrote:

how can u guys even stream above 300 i cant even pass 250 ._.

silmarilen wrote:

JAKACHAN wrote:

Also this test isn't the most accurate. It's a lot harder to stream 250 while controlling a cursor because it's more to process at once.

i can stream faster ingame than i can in the program.

silmarilen wrote:

i dont double tap, but its not really impressive anyway as i can only stream about 180-185 for not too long ingame still. (compared to 170~ in the program)

ragelewa wrote:

- Pizzicato - wrote:

how can u guys even stream above 300 i cant even pass 250 ._.

I can't even pass 150, I have to use magic and secret spells to stream faster and even those cap at 200

stop whining

Valentiino wrote:

OK YOU EVERYONE WHO HAS ÜBER STREAM SPEEDS; WHY HAVENT YOU ALREADY FCD MAD MACHINE OR CHIPSCAPE?!

ragelewa wrote:

Valentiino wrote:

OK YOU EVERYONE WHO HAS ÜBER STREAM SPEEDS; WHY HAVENT YOU ALREADY FCD MAD MACHINE OR CHIPSCAPE?!

because apparently they all have bad endurance

Teddiursa wrote:

http://puu.sh/rEvn

Awesome.

http://puu.sh/rEwN brb crying.

Teddiursa wrote:

Awesome.