..If I recall the flavor correctly, I'd have to be part of the vote, else it won't work. Not too sure about it, though.
HEYSwiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
FoS O_o
I'm not gonna rest until I get a proper understanding of who the hell Quar is.
OH, OK, THANKS.UnderminE wrote:
He is not a jester.
Because I am- no I'm lying.0_o wrote:
OH, OK, THANKS.UnderminE wrote:
He is not a jester.
No! You suck!FisHie wrote:
Vote: LunaticMara
Oh yeah!?
Well... You suck!
LunaticMara wrote:
VOTE STATUS
FisHie (1) - LunaticMara
LunaticMara (1) - FisHie
Quaraezha wrote:
Such a sad world, indeed.
.ssucsid ot gnihtemos evah yam llits ew sa tey remmah ot ton elpoep gninraw yleniuneg ma I rOWojjan wrote:
Putting someone at L-1 but asking people to not lynching is hoping for someone to do that exactly while no blame falls on you yourself.
Way to cover your ass I guess, backwardsboy.
.erusnu llits era elpoep emos taht dna toohs =/= hcnyl ecniSWojjan wrote:
I mean, why would you even vote him if we haven't reached your "general consensus," which, mind, I actually think we already had. Didn't everyone pretty much agree that shooting Q would be good? Why not lynch him then?
If you don't want people to hammer him and if you're unsure if lynching him would do us good, why did you put him up to L-1?NoHItter wrote:
.ssucsid ot gnihtemos evah yam llits ew sa tey remmah ot ton elpoep gninraw yleniuneg ma I rOWojjan wrote:
Putting someone at L-1 but asking people to not lynching is hoping for someone to do that exactly while no blame falls on you yourself.
Way to cover your ass I guess, backwardsboy..erusnu llits era elpoep emos taht dna toohs =/= hcnyl ecniSWojjan wrote:
I mean, why would you even vote him if we haven't reached your "general consensus," which, mind, I actually think we already had. Didn't everyone pretty much agree that shooting Q would be good? Why not lynch him then?
Yes. I won't explain what was my farther plan was as it's irrelevant now.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
...so you purposely acted like you had a restriction? I knew something seemed strange about the 4 restriction claims.
Bloody hell, I checked IppE - so a no result there for me.0_o wrote:
AWESOME. AND YES, THAT WAS SO DIFFICULT TO DEDUCT.
ANY RESULTS RANTAI?
Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
...Good point. Salvage did mention it before he died.
COULD YOU POINT OUT THE POSTS YOU'RE REFERRING TO, BECAUSE I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT FOR EITHER OF THEM.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
Salvage's claim gave it away.
As in I didn't receive a PM at all.0_o wrote:
RANTAI: WHEN YOU SAY "NO RESULT", DO YOU MEAN THAT'S ACTUALLY THE RESULT THAT YOU RECEIVED?
This is the "claim" I speak of.Salvage wrote:
come on ippE602 it's clearly mafia, also i'm posting from work so i might not read this from a couple of hours now.
May I ask for your explanation of your role?UnderminE wrote:
Well, as you can see from my movements (voting for nohItter etc), I am a paranoiac townie.
Btw, I'm not "he". She, please.
I had a good chuckle from this.NoHItter wrote:
Also I have received AIDS and will die the next night if I don't get medicine from a someone I don't know.
It's not necessarily a scumtell, however, the Stallin' Defense points out that stalling a major wagon that can easily lead to a lynch is suspicious.NoHItter wrote:
Swift, what's so suspicious about that?
Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
It's not necessarily a scumtell, however, the Stallin' Defense points out that stalling a major wagon that can easily lead to a lynch is suspicious.NoHItter wrote:
Swift, what's so suspicious about that?
EDIT: Further investigation has indicated to Tarhalindur that this is a null tell and should not be trusted.RIGHT BELOW THE DEFINITION