Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)
  4. Beatmap Graveyard

Reol x Giga x Okiku - No title -XFD-

posted
Total Posts
17
Otosaka-Yu
1,117 posts
Joined August 2013
Topic Starter
Otosaka-Yu
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2016年8月29日 at 2:16:28

Artist: Reol x Giga x Okiku
Title: No title -XFD-
Tags: C86 夏コミ C86 NatsuKomi Marathon reol gigap okiku no title+ no title - Miku GUMI ZOLA-KYO Rin Luka Len Kalto -Opening- ヒビカゼ オオエドランヴ drop pop candy -Interlude- No title Echo -BWW SCREAM- アシンメトリー ギガンティックO.T.N -Big Death Edition- -Ending- 1112deng
BPM: 133
Filesize: 29772kb
Play Time: 05:47
Difficulties Available:
  1. NatsuKomi (6.61 stars, 1402 notes)
Download: Reol x Giga x Okiku - No title -XFD-
Download: Reol x Giga x Okiku - No title -XFD- (no video)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Last edited by Otosaka-Yu , edited 43 times in total.
__Ag
597 posts
Joined July 2011
__Ag
沙发
Otosaka-Yu
1,117 posts
Joined August 2013
Topic Starter
Otosaka-Yu

__Ag wrote:

沙发
wa 是 琪琪
Last edited by Otosaka-Yu , edited 1 time in total.
_Yiiiii
464 posts
Joined February 2015
_Yiiiii
感觉前后难度变化太大了，打起来不是很舒服orz
Otosaka-Yu
1,117 posts
Joined August 2013
Topic Starter
Otosaka-Yu
This reply has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Last edited by Otosaka-Yu , edited 2 times in total.
_Yiiiii
464 posts
Joined February 2015
_Yiiiii
我还是来瞎摸一摸吧
首先6.7星的跳图用ar9是绝对不合适的，推荐9.3~9.6，否则no title那段跳太难读了。od8到9比较合适。长跳图用cs4.5简直是折磨人，往上撑死了4.2，个人感觉还是跳图标配cs4比较合适。
00:25:353 这里这个音前面接了，然而这里没接，建议把现在这个滑条去掉折返，加个新的滑条。
01:30:761(2) NC
01:42:299(3)(4) (5) 这里要么三个一起重叠，要么都不叠。
02:18:498(3)(4) 这里一个滑条就可以了。
02:23:598(4) 这个滑条再多拉1/4拍。
02:25:098(5) NC
02:28:984 这后面的跳漏音太多，建议remap一下，多加点滑条，折返跳少用一点。
03:05:898 这后面敲镲的音有些地方接了，有些却空过去了，推荐统一全接或者全不接。
03:27:488(3) unrankable
03:45:223(5) 这个镲的音是三下1/8，空一个1/8，然后一下，建议改成一下的折返加一个圈。
03:50:723(9) 这里用折返不合适，一个普通的滑条就够了。
这是细节，下面的是普遍问题
04:26:194和04:36:629 等处应该跟歌，不该跟bgm，因为前面这个地方你跟的是歌。
02:07:848、02:10:248和02:11:448 这里虽然把音控过去没啥问题，但是还是推荐找点东西补上。
02:05:448、02:09:348、02:11:74和03:58:185 等处漏音。
02:10:848、02:22:398和02:22:998 等处多余note。
总体难度还是推荐分的平均一点，现在所有的难度都是挤在no title那段，不太好。
大概就是这样(=・ω・=)
Otosaka-Yu
1,117 posts
Joined August 2013
Topic Starter
Otosaka-Yu
This reply has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Last edited by Otosaka-Yu , edited 1 time in total.
Otosaka-Yu
1,117 posts
Joined August 2013
Topic Starter
Otosaka-Yu
.
Last edited by Otosaka-Yu , edited 1 time in total.
Ametrin
717 posts
Joined May 2012
Ametrin
M4M from u q

风格不太适应……细节摸好了;w;不要怪我水

这曲子是C86哪碟的啊我居然没有听过qwq

marathon
- 难度名可以不叫马拉松吧 毕竟强行凑曲的是官方（咦
- 建议做个SB
- 00:30:817 02:08:969 - 类似这种绿线要解决
- Aimod已经爆炸 建议看看

00:14:836 (7) - 近了 拉右边点
00:24:496 (1) - 两次折返感觉有点奇怪？
00:31:031 (2,3) - 和后面近了 建议拉上面点
00:40:138 (1,3) - 贴紧点 这么搭着不美观
00:45:710 (3) - ctrl+h
00:45:924 (4) - ^
00:47:746 (3,1) - 和前面太开了 试试100|149
00:48:710 (1,2) - 叠在00:49:567 (1) - 尾巴上？
00:56:746 (2,1) - 别贴着

01:07:753 (1,2,3,4) - 间距不一样哇
01:16:708 (1,2,3,4) - 间距区别明显点吧 读图读不出节奏
01:39:991 (1,2,3) - 节奏和前面01:32:607 (1,2) - 最好保持一样
- 建议这一段作难一点 不然和后面notitle难度差距太大简直震撼orz

01:32:607 (1,2) - NC放4
02:34:222 (6,7) - 这空拍没法读 7NC可能好点
02:43:072 (7,8) - ^
02:29:322 - 和前面节奏保持一致

03:22:235 (5) - NC
03:40:872 (2,3,4) - 间距没理由不一样啊
03:54:185 (1,2,3) - ctrl+j 1放前面滑条的尾巴上
03:59:518 (1,2,3) - 干脆别和前面贴一块 试试做成1/4折返放到110|135
04:02:185 (1,2) - 贴上了
04:10:851 (5,6,7,8) - 各自ctrl+g

04:29:612 (1,2,3) - 间距控制下
04:29:612 (1,2,3) - ^
- ……这段音效小点声？其余美丽

05:05:540 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - 做成大跳
05:18:172 (1,2,3,4) - 这四个和后面不应该是同一个梗
05:18:172 (1,2,3,4) - 做成大跳
05:30:803 (7) - NC
05:31:435 (1,2,3) - 间距不一样
- 这一段整体做难一点 感觉除了那个人字大跳之外顶多5.3星……整体6.6星啊


长图果然越摸越水……

reol 好
真是好
Otosaka-Yu
1,117 posts
Joined August 2013
Topic Starter
Otosaka-Yu

Ametrin wrote:

M4M from u q

风格不太适应……细节摸好了;w;不要怪我水

这曲子是C86哪碟的啊我居然没有听过qwq喂喂这可是官方曲子，YouTube上扒过来的

marathon
- 难度名可以不叫马拉松吧 毕竟强行凑曲的是官方（咦 想不到比这更好的名字了（咦 其实就是官方强行把11首曲子强行凑的，5 min也算是马拉松（？
- 建议做个SB 有video了，再做SB我脑洞要爆了
- 00:30:817 02:08:969 - 类似这种绿线要解决 已改
- Aimod已经爆炸 建议看看 还真没发现，谢谢提醒！！！

00:14:836 (7) - 近了 拉右边点
00:24:496 (1) - 两次折返感觉有点奇怪？
00:31:031 (2,3) - 和后面近了 建议拉上面点
00:40:138 (1,3) - 贴紧点 这么搭着不美观自我感觉良好
00:45:710 (3) - ctrl+h 啥鬼
00:45:924 (4) - ^^
00:47:746 (3,1) - 和前面太开了 试试100|149不开啊
00:48:710 (1,2) - 叠在00:49:567 (1) - 尾巴上？
00:56:746 (2,1) - 别贴着

01:07:753 (1,2,3,4) - 间距不一样哇
01:16:708 (1,2,3,4) - 间距区别明显点吧 读图读不出节奏
01:39:991 (1,2,3) - 节奏和前面01:32:607 (1,2) - 最好保持一样
- 建议这一段作难一点 不然和后面notitle难度差距太大简直震撼orz哦呵呵这么一说我就做难点了

01:32:607 (1,2) - NC放4nope
02:34:222 (6,7) - 这空拍没法读 7NC可能好点你书得队
02:43:072 (7,8) - ^……，8NC
02:29:322 - 和前面节奏保持一致一直都是一致呀?

03:22:235 (5) - NC
03:40:872 (2,3,4) - 间距没理由不一样啊间距没理由一样啊
03:54:185 (1,2,3) - ctrl+j 1放前面滑条的尾巴上
03:59:518 (1,2,3) - 干脆别和前面贴一块 试试做成1/4折返放到110|135
04:02:185 (1,2) - 贴上了
04:10:851 (5,6,7,8) - 各自ctrl+g我想到一个好方法233

04:29:612 (1,2,3) - 间距控制下
04:29:612 (1,2,3) - ^
- ……这段音效小点声？其余美丽小点了

05:05:540 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - 做成大跳
05:18:172 (1,2,3,4) - 这四个和后面不应该是同一个梗
05:18:172 (1,2,3,4) - 做成大跳
05:30:803 (7) - NC
05:31:435 (1,2,3) - 间距不一样
- 这一段整体做难一点 感觉除了那个人字大跳之外顶多5.3星……整体6.6星啊 是的做难了


长图果然越摸越水……

reol 好
真是好 osu! need more reol
no reply=fixed
怎么我这首歌发帖的人都是做过萤火虫之愿的
谢谢ametrinnnnnn的摸摸摸摸
MirinH
726 posts
Joined January 2013
MirinH
m4m from ur q
[General]
什麽屎BG（
[Marathon]
00:16:640 (2,1,2,3,4,5) - 總感覺這裏有點時間軸不對，建議查查timing
00:21:925 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - 這段 也是，建議做一下timing check
00:44:210 (7,8,1) - 突然一折有些難打
01:02:665 (1,2,3) - 難看w
01:21:185 (4,5) - https://puu.sh/qbpsG/999310bc50.jpg
01:22:081 (1,2,3,4) - 建議在 01:22:417 跟 01:23:312 加note補充原曲電音空隙
01:24:827 (1,2,1) - 其實我建議你這裏用note跳表達出音樂
01:26:673 (1,2,3,4,5) - https://puu.sh/qbpBq/201ec8f4a6.jpg
01:44:376 (3,4,5) - 比較獵奇
02:34:222 (6,1) - 這個空顯得空了
02:38:872 (6) - nc，玩的時候有大幾率飛到對面去
02:43:372 (1,2,3) - 這個三聯應該從 02:43:522 (3) - 開始
05:42:330 (5,6,7,8,9,1) - 這間距，醉了，不好看

gl，除了bg之外沒什麽大問題
Otosaka-Yu
1,117 posts
Joined August 2013
Topic Starter
Otosaka-Yu

Mackenzie wrote:

m4m from ur q
[General]
什麽屎BG（Nt 是我大天空！（好吧承认
[Marathon]
00:16:640 (2,1,2,3,4,5) - 總感覺這裏有點時間軸不對，建議查查timing
00:21:925 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - 這段 也是，建議做一下timing check
00:44:210 (7,8,1) - 突然一折有些難打
01:02:665 (1,2,3) - 難看w
01:21:185 (4,5) - https://puu.sh/qbpsG/999310bc50.jpg
01:22:081 (1,2,3,4) - 建議在 01:22:417 跟 01:23:312 加note補充原曲電音空隙
01:24:827 (1,2,1) - 其實我建議你這裏用note跳表達出音樂
01:26:673 (1,2,3,4,5) - https://puu.sh/qbpBq/201ec8f4a6.jpg
01:44:376 (3,4,5) - 比較獵奇 某上面的人叫我作难我就作难了（
02:34:222 (6,1) - 這個空顯得空了 他就是空，也不知放什么
02:38:872 (6) - nc，玩的時候有大幾率飛到對面去 又要重新做nc啦 哭.jpg
02:43:372 (1,2,3) - 這個三聯應該從 02:43:522 (3) - 開始 还好
05:42:330 (5,6,7,8,9,1) - 這間距，醉了，不好看 23333弄好了

gl，除了bg之外沒什麽大問題
no reply=fixed
谢Mackenzie摸
Monarch
213 posts
Joined July 2014
Monarch
mod
00:17:990 (5) - maybe should be placed higher up?

Be careful with combos, usually only do a combo every big white tick for consistency, stuff like this 00:34:996 (1) - should be removed since isnt not on the big white tick

maybe reduce spacing of 00:43:460 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - (reduce to like 0.7x DS) and then space this 00:44:424 (1) - out further as its a harder sound?

00:47:424 (2,1) - Blanket? (this too 00:48:174 (2) - )

00:50:424 (1,3,4) - ^

00:51:496 (1,2) - ^

00:55:888 (2,3) - not sure why you reduce DS here

this section 01:07:753 (1,2,3,4) - and onward is misstimed, change offset xd

01:14:917 (1,2,3,4) - increase DS? this is very energetic part :p

01:20:290 (1,2) - blanket?

01:33:068 (2,3,4,5) - ds changes are very random

01:35:837 (7,8,1) - more random ds

01:44:376 (3,4,5) -this is awkward to play

01:50:145 (1,2) - blanket
03:04:194 (2,3) - ^
03:25:417 (6,1,3) - ^
01:59:722 (6,7) - ^

02:07:694 (4) - slider doesn't look nice, maybe just make normal slight curve?

02:25:019 (5,1,2,3,4) - to 03:02:544 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - the jumps in this section onward are much much harder than in the sections before, maybe look to making the other sections harder, or this section easier

03:13:144 (1,2) - blanket

03:27:690 (1) - this looks very ugly :o

03:59:518 (1,2,3) - more DS, maybe use combos to show different spacing?

04:20:488 (4,5,6) - make it a normal straight triple and this too 04:36:303 (5,6,7) - doesnt look nice with this bend

04:24:727 (8,1) - jump is wayyyy too big

05:06:172 (1,2,3,4,5) - awkward flow

05:11:856 (1,2,3,4,5) - shape like this isnt needed :o

05:18:172 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - very very the top imo, doenst need to be this big :P

05:27:882 (2,3) - 05:28:198 (4,5) - 05:28:514 (6,7) - space pairs closer together, hard to read otherwise

All i can say is work on distance spacing xd
Otosaka-Yu
1,117 posts
Joined August 2013
Topic Starter
Otosaka-Yu

Monarch wrote:

mod
00:17:990 (5) - maybe should be placed higher up? look like good

Be careful with combos, usually only do a combo every big white tick for consistency, stuff like this 00:34:996 (1) - should be removed since isnt not on the big white tick BPM140 Be allowed

maybe reduce spacing of 00:43:460 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - (reduce to like 0.7x DS) and then space this 00:44:424 (1) - out further as its a harder sound? 00:44:424 (1) - is harder sound

00:47:424 (2,1) - Blanket? (this too 00:48:174 (2) - )

00:50:424 (1,3,4) - ^

00:51:496 (1,2) - ^

00:55:888 (2,3) - not sure why you reduce DS here

this section 01:07:753 (1,2,3,4) - and onward is misstimed, change offset xd offset look like good XD

01:14:917 (1,2,3,4) - increase DS? this is very energetic part :p OK :)

01:20:290 (1,2) - blanket?

01:33:068 (2,3,4,5) - ds changes are very random look like good

01:35:837 (7,8,1) - more random ds ^

01:44:376 (3,4,5) -this is awkward to play ^

01:50:145 (1,2) - blanket
03:04:194 (2,3) - ^
03:25:417 (6,1,3) - ^
01:59:722 (6,7) - ^

02:07:694 (4) - slider doesn't look nice, maybe just make normal slight curve? I think this is normal slight curve :p

02:25:019 (5,1,2,3,4) - to 03:02:544 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - the jumps in this section onward are much much harder than in the sections before, maybe look to making the other sections harder, or this section easier 02:25:019 (5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4) - I changed to easy and, -Interlude- ≠ No title.

03:13:144 (1,2) - blanket look like good

03:27:690 (1) - this looks very ugly :o okay ;w;

03:59:518 (1,2,3) - more DS, maybe use combos to show different spacing?

04:20:488 (4,5,6) - make it a normal straight triple and this too 04:36:303 (5,6,7) - doesnt look nice with this bend

04:24:727 (8,1) - jump is wayyyy too big

05:06:172 (1,2,3,4,5) - awkward flow look like good

05:11:856 (1,2,3,4,5) - shape like this isnt needed :o oh :o

05:18:172 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - very very the top imo, doenst need to be this big :P fixed

05:27:882 (2,3) - 05:28:198 (4,5) - 05:28:514 (6,7) - space pairs closer together, hard to read otherwise look like ggod

All i can say is work on distance spacing xd
Thank you so much XD
Otosaka-Yu
1,117 posts
Joined August 2013
Topic Starter
Otosaka-Yu
Remap オオエドランヴ ~
DeviLxDragon
21 posts
Joined October 2013
DeviLxDragon
Masterpiece :)
Otosaka-Yu
1,117 posts
Joined August 2013
Topic Starter
Otosaka-Yu

DeviLxDragon wrote:

Masterpiece :)
Thank you for your support :)
BanchoBot
w00t p00t
34,830 posts
Here since the beginning
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 17