Insane:Please.Use.Gridsnap.So.Much.More.Comfortable.To.Mod.Thanks.These NC:2 sections seem too high volume to me... (i generally dislike the default soft-hitnormal; maybe just use a way more quite version of the normal-hitnormal?)00:18:129 (2,3) - place 3's whistle on 2 like in the other patterns? (sounds as if it was by accident)
00:21:509 (2,3) - y u no continue 1's direction? °^°
00:23:199 (3,4) - that angle feels awkward imo, use less ° from 1-3 so you can put 4 in the row aswell?
00:30:776 (1,2,3,4) - curvy slider and straight stream crash each others flow imo (+ 1 doesn't overlap 5's borders exactly, but that's me being bitchy)
00:32:466 (1) - move it a little to the right to keep the curvyness of previous elements
00:35:424 (6) - i don't see where this note is put on, vocals end on the blue tick
00:35:635 - you could add a note here (fits imo, even though there's no vocals)
00:37:325 - ^
00:37:536 (1,2,3,4,5) - 3 being on the same heigth as 2 feels awkward in adition with 3-5 creating a (nearly) straight line, please redesign these, maybe place and rearrange 6 somehow to that then
00:39:226 (1,2,3,4,5) - same here (except with 6)
00:50:021 (3) - feels better when put down a bit since 2's direction seems awkward with a "slider on same heigth that just points downwards"
(SOSHTJPD!)00:51:077 (1,2,3) - i generally dislike elements which are just placed in a straight row (meaning exactly same heigth/width), suggestion to move 2 a bit up and let the reverse arrow point a bit into 3
00:53:824 (6,7) - the angle between these feels awkward and i don't see a flow in it, 6 feels better when continuing the way 4 and 5 point while 7-9 could then do that way back (just putten down)
01:11:982 (2) - feels better along with 1 and 3 when putten a bit higher, feels like there has to be a... "drop of heigth" if that's understandable
01:14:200 (7) - put sliderpoint 2 grids (lvl4) down *nazi of the day \:D/ - anyways it feels better that way*01:16:418 (1,2,3,4,5) - "streams" combined with 1-time-reverse-sliders feel very awkward (not just to me), please use either no-reversing ones, 2-times-reversing ones or none
01:20:855 (4,5,6) - well, these build a straight line which I don't like but... up to you, I'd totally prefer if you changed it to something more curvy and flowy (since straight elements rarely keep a flow imo)
01:23:179 (1,2,3,4) - first, the angle between 1 and 2 is too high imo, especcially when compared to these of 2-4; a balanced curve feels way better to me
01:26:559 (1,2,3) - well i guess these are okay but... still that "straight line - HUGE ANGLE - straight line" feels awkward to me
01:28:672 (2) - adjust it's shape more to 1's approach circle *nazinazinazinazi - anyways it feels better and that's what counts imo*01:29:939 (1,2,3) - y u so straight-straight °^°
01:33:350 (1,2,3,4,5) - again, a balanced curve feels better here
01:48:118 (5,6) - that overlap might be "little" but... it still pokes me, it pokes my eye; why? *please move it so these don't overlap anymore*
02:02:062 - i don't see the point why you're using whistles here
02:18:224 (8) - again a little nazi, move it down a bit please; circles at the same heigth/width in a stream feel awkward, especcially when the stream is originally/mostly curvy
02:19:808 (3,4) - move 4 a bit further away, feels too close (as if it was compressed of a once more outspaced version)
02:23:400 (4) - move it a little to the upper left, right now it feels to close to 2's ending
02:25:090 (4) - ^
02:36:287 (2,3,4,5,6) - adjust these a little to get a better flowing curve
02:40:724 (6) - too much down-right placed imo, breaks 5's flow; place it higher
02:49:597 (2) - way too close to 5, it's totally cutting the approach circle and creating a "please move it away"-feeling *I know I'm bitchy but that's the feeling it gives me*