1. Fly (2.75 stars, 238 notes)
2. Hover (1.64 stars, 131 notes)
3. Soar (4.21 stars, 461 notes)

Neoskylove wrote:

Q m4m.

[Soar]
00:20:072 (10,1) - swap Nc Done

[fly]
Gap is too big comparing to soar diff. hmm you think so? I think it's the best that can be done without making it a 5 diff set
00:08:176 - Unnecessary beat here ehhh I hear a drum cymbal there though
00:24:831 (1,2) - blanket nazi Adjusted
00:35:590 (3,4,5) - 00:42:521 (4,5,6) - beats are different with others? not good for consistency imo. it's because they follow different sounds

[Hover]
Nothing specially, but I think you used too many 1/2s in lowest diff. you're not wrong but i think it's more than possible to fit this as the lowest diff, anything more simple than this is super bland

GL Thanks for the mod

b00 wrote:

From my modding queue
Soar
00:01:245 (1,4) - diagonal straight sliders like this look kinda ugly. You've actually used this quite a lot in your map so :/ Because I like diagonal straight sliders :c
00:02:486 (7) - try making the red anchor go in the middle so it looks more aesthetic That's to emphasize the 3/4 nature of the slider,
anything that's not 3/4 has the red anchor in the center
00:03:521 (2,3,4) - why is this a triple. I think a 1/2 slider would work here I hear a guitar triple there
your kiai seems to be rather low in spacing especially when compared to the start. It isn't though....
00:44:693 (1,3) - these sounds in the stream stand out more to me but their not being empathised in any way. Maybe use 1/4 slider here They do kind of have a different sound? But 1/4 sliders are used for other purposes right before that pattern, so I don't think it would help emphasize anything as it would just blend in with the other 1/4 sliders
00:47:073 (3,4) - this has the same sounds as ^ but its mapped in a different way :/ Listen carefully, the instrument is doing something different here

Everything else seems pretty good
Fly
00:03:521 (2) - there is no sound in the middle of this. isn't there? I hear something there
00:10:349 - missing a note here This is where the slider starts, maybe you typo'd?
not much you can do when ds is limiting you. Your patterning is fine.
00:42:521 (4,5,6) - imo this seems a little undermapped It is, that pattern will be changed
00:47:072 (2) - same with this, make it a reverse? This too
01:12:831 (1) - missing sound on the red tick. Yeah, changed this
01:13:953 - uhh. Notes pls Nothing there worth mapping imo

Hover
I appreciate the curved sliders wooo
This is an easy so please do not use so much 1/2 rhythm. Pretty much all easy's should be straight up 1/1 mapping. Except in certain situations.
00:00:004 (1,2,3,4) - making all these 1/1 sliders would work then.
examples of overused 1/2 rhythm: 00:08:900 (2) - 00:12:210 (2) -
Just map it with a slider end or ignore those sounds.
00:13:452 (1) - this should be a 1/1 slider too
honestly these problems are all through out the map so im not gonna point every one out. Just be careful with rhythm.
your patterning is fine too It's a Normal not an Easy though, which is why there's so much 1/2. At this BPM a 1/1 Easy would be a pretty pointless difficulty imo, there's no need, no one is bad enough at the game to require such a thing. There's no way such a diff would be anything but tedious. The spread was mapped with the mindset that it would be three diffs, and the gap between them would be a bit larger than most people are maybe used to,
but still within acceptable ranking boundaries, and I think that has been achieved as closely as can be done. I hate Easy difficulties, I never enjoyed playing them nor mapping them, and if ever I can avoid making a boring map, I will. The Normal was meant to follow the main melody of the song as closely as possible while still being beginner friendly and honestly I think that has been achieved as well.

I appreciate your mod and thoughts, and you have a very friendly outlook even when you dislike something, which I respect. Please don't take this as a harsh attack of any sort, it just happens that our ideas on lower diffs are a bit different.

TheKingHenry wrote:

Hello mod from my queue~

Hover

1. 00:09:107 (3,1) - not really liking how there is now strong sound under the sliderend of 00:09:107 (3) - , also causing the NC to be on red tick. With NCing like 00:18:210 (1,2,3,4,5) - it bothers less though
2. 00:28:969 (2,1) - same thing with these
3. Actually these structure things aside it's pretty much fine. This song's NC rhythms are funky, and not in a fun way. It frequently deviates from the downbeat for some reason, so I had to wing it kinda.....

Fly

1. 00:09:521 (5,1) - same thing as in the earlier diff.
2. 00:35:900 (4,5) - with longer gap like this it'd work better if you used slider to cover the gap (sliderhead on the sliderend of 00:35:900 (4) - and slidertail on the head of 00:36:314 (5) - ) It'd feel better with the unintuitive break removed, and also in this case it'd fortunately happen so that the points where you click with that pattern would be fairly logical as well. Same drill with others patterned the same way (for example 00:42:521 (4,5) - and so on when the section repeats in the end )Applied this as best I could, I think I got what you meant

Soar

1. 00:09:935 (9) - NC this instead of 00:10:141 (1) - since it's the actual leading sound. Same thing with others later on, next time at 00:13:245 (9,1) - 00:16:555 (9,1) - and so on, done a lot. (Note that for patterns like 00:16:555 (9) - you might wanna change it a lil with the NC since with pattern like that the NC is kinda buried. Also stuff like 00:19:866 (9,10,11,1,2,3) - is kinda fine the way it is unless you wanna cut 00:19:866 (9,10,11) - up to shorten the combo Is it actually the leading sound? I know it's on the downbeat but when following the melody it doesn't make a lot of sense to NC that note in my opinion. I'll ask around about this because I don't know how this particular instance works very well
2. Actually aside these slight tunings to the structure this diff (like the rest) looks pretty good.

Good luck! Thanks for the mod!

• 00:08:279 (1,2,3) - So I would suggest to set the angle of whole pattern same as the angle of first slider (like you did in 00:30:624 (2,3,1) - ) (not a problem, just suggestion)
  00:28:969 (2,1,2) - Like before, the angle between first 2 objects is similar to slider's angle, but then comes the seconds slider with different angle. If you change this it will look more symmetrical

• 00:00:624 (3) - I didn't mention it in first diff but here I'll do. I think the sound you wanted to represent by this note is 00:00:521 - here. If you have some reason why you placed it here - sorry I couldn't find any
  00:03:935 (3) - ^
  00:09:521 (5) - If you compare this slider to objects you placed before it's kinda strange to slow the map here. I would make it a reversed slider (as you did in 00:12:831 (5) - )
  00:16:141 (5) - ^
  00:34:141 - Well, I have no idea why you left it empty, placing a cirlce would also help to keep the pace
  00:58:555 (3) - I suggest making it reveresed 1/4 slider
  01:06:521 (2,6) - With such a low AR this stack is very hard to read

• 00:00:624 (5) - Same as in previous diff, I would move it onto 00:00:521 -
  00:03:935 (5) - ^