1. 4K Beginner - 4Key (0.97 stars, 177 notes)
2. 4K Easy - 4Key (1.4 stars, 287 notes)
3. 4K Hard - 4Key (2.95 stars, 711 notes)
4. 4K Normal - 4Key (2.07 stars, 473 notes)
5. 4K Poco! - 4Key (4.03 stars, 882 notes)
6. 6K Beginner - 6Key (1.15 stars, 241 notes)
7. 6K Easy - 6Key (1.48 stars, 342 notes)
8. 6K Hard - 6Key (3.14 stars, 808 notes)
9. 6K Normal - 6Key (2.3 stars, 555 notes)
10. 6K Udon! - 6Key (4.77 stars, 864 notes)

1. wrong keymode (5k would have been better)
2. cruddy hs :^)
3. get better bg that isnt a screencap
4. diff name is about as stupid as my rock BG
5. spread is more uneven than when I spread peanut butter
6. change mapper

Minseo2000 wrote:

Udon






it's a city in thailand

1. 00:43:298 - should be triple like 00:43:170 -

1. 00:47:336 - I think this should be single only
2. 00:07:016 (7016|1) - I think this LN should stop at 00:07:272 -
3. 00:31:631 (31631|0) - I think this LN should stop at 00:31:888 -
4. 00:34:836 (34836|3,35093|2) - ghost ? (6k too)
5. 00:48:298 - This shud be hand ( same sound as 00:46:247 - )
6. 00:48:811 - ^
7. 00:49:580 - i dont think this part fit with jumpjack tbh, the sound didnt that strong i think normal , i think like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8883541 shud be enough
8. 00:54:067 (54067|1) - this shud end at 00:54:195 - , same like 00:58:170 (58170|1) - , 01:02:272 (62272|2) - ,01:10:477 (70477|3) - and so on

1. 00:12:144 - Double here
2. 00:35:221 - Quad here?
3. 01:07:272 (67272|2,67272|1,67272|0,67401|5,67401|3,67401|4,67529|1,67529|2,67529|0,67657|5,67657|3,67657|4,67785|0,67785|1,67785|2,67913|5,67913|3,67913|4,68042|1,68042|0,68042|2) - ayy

1. 01:10:862 (70862|2) - delete

1. 00:12:144 - double here

Mentholzzz wrote:

First ?
[6K Udon]uggh LN are overrated af

1. 00:43:298 - should be triple like 00:43:170 - Was debating about that lol

[4K Poco]

1. 00:47:336 - I think this should be single only Done
2. 00:07:016 (7016|1) - I think this LN should stop at 00:07:272 - A fair point, though I think it works either way, so I'll keep as is. (The echo kinda covers for the final 1/4)
3. 00:31:631 (31631|0) - I think this LN should stop at 00:31:888 - A little more isolated, but same reason as above.
4. 00:34:836 (34836|3,35093|2) - ghost ? (6k too) Bass guitar has a (barely audible) scalar movement, which these represent.
5. 00:48:298 - This shud be hand ( same sound as 00:46:247 - ) Had to change the layering slightly here. Definitely, this is a triple earlier,
   but it's still a little weaker than the other triples in this section. (Didn't wanna use quads so these became doubles instead.)
6. 00:48:811 - ^ ^
7. 00:49:580 - i dont think this part fit with jumpjack tbh, the sound didnt that strong i think normal , i think like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8883541 shud be enough Seems good to me.
8. 00:54:067 (54067|1) - this shud end at 00:54:195 - , same like 00:58:170 (58170|1) - , 01:02:272 (62272|2) - ,01:10:477 (70477|3) - and so on Whoops oversight lol

[6K Hard]

1. 00:12:144 - Double here B-B-But it already is a double...
2. 00:35:221 - Quad here? Avoiding quads in this diff
3. 01:07:272 (67272|2,67272|1,67272|0,67401|5,67401|3,67401|4,67529|1,67529|2,67529|0,67657|5,67657|3,67657|4,67785|0,67785|1,67785|2,67913|5,67913|3,67913|4,68042|1,68042|0,68042|2) - ayy pls suggest better pattern qwq

[4K Hard]

1. 01:10:862 (70862|2) - delete Whoops

[4K Normal]

1. 00:12:144 - double here aaaaaaaaaaaaaa how'd I miss that...

Sorry for short mod, im bad D: dw dw

3stan wrote:

Hi.. i requested an M4M you already mod mine ty

Im bc doin necessary things in mah life Sorry For Late Mod np I have that a lot lol

SPOILER

4k Easy


00:35:734 (35734|2) - double here if u think doubling this is newbie friendly..
00:36:247 (36247|1) - double this
00:37:272 (37272|1) - double
00:36:760 (36760|3) - double?
00:37:272 (37272|2) - double
00:37:785 (37785|1) - double
00:38:298 (38298|0) - double It was a progressive layering decision not to make any of these doubles.
00:39:324 (39324|3) - Ln ? till here 00:39:836 (39836|1)
00:40:349 (40349|0) - Ln till 00:40:862 (40862|3)
00:41:375 (41375|2) - Ln till 00:41:888 (41888|0)
00:42:401 (42401|2) - Ln till 00:42:913 (42913|0) I went for a stylistic choice of not putting any LNs in this 4-measure section. There's enough LNs about as it is.
00:35:221 (35221|0) - clear this one and make this 00:35:221 (35221|3) - LN that ends here 00:35:734 (35734|2) - some one gave me an advice not to put triples in easy diff This ain't a triple. LN releases aren't generally considered as notes, thus I don't really see any reason to change.

00:36:247 (36247|1) - Double
00:36:760 (36760|3) - Double
00:37:272 (37272|2) - Double

00:37:785 (37785|1) - Double
00:38:298 (38298|0) - Double

00:39:324 (39324|3) - make this Ln that ends here 00:39:836 (39836|1)
00:40:349 (40349|0) - Ln this that ends here 00:40:862 (40862|3) -

00:41:375 (41375|2) - yes another Ln end it here 00:41:888 (41888|0) -
00:42:401 (42401|2) - LN this that ends here 00:42:913 (42913|0) - You... repeated yourself?
00:47:529 (47529|1) - No triple pls
00:59:836 (59836|1) - Clear this one No triple

01:16:247 (76247|0) - pressing triples iin easy aint easy for newbie Those aren't triples though.


tbh i wanted to mod all diff but unfortunately im bz as of now and this is all i can mod for today :c
Goodluck

Antalf wrote:

lalalalalalalalalalalalala procrastinated this waaay to long, HS check weeeeeee :thinking:

So im going to use as refference the diff i previously checked which was poco, lego! yey c:

W= Whistle, C= Clap, F= Finish, just in case

You never told me how to cook it

[6K Udon!]

• 00:26:503 - Missing W crud

• 00:36:760 (36760|4) - Remove W, no need for the snap, use clap Perhaps so, but it is consistently present throughout that section. (plus the clap's already there)

• 00:37:785 (37785|3) - Same with this one. (read above)

• 00:38:811 (38811|2) - ^

• 00:40:862 (40862|1) - ^

• 00:42:913 (42913|3) - ^

• 00:47:336 - Missing 1/8 "Normal" C minor change to accomodate this

• 01:15:606 (75606|2) - Add normal W here Going to assume you mean soft W bc normal definitely doesn't appear to fit here.

[6K Hard]

• Do the same here as i said with the 6k udon, change the W for a clap starting at 00:35:734 - till it ends. But

Pretty much thar for that diff.

[4K Hard]

• Do the same here as i said with the 6k udon, change the W for a clap starting at 00:35:734 - till it ends. claps

Same here clean.

[6K Normal]

• Do the same here as i said with the 6k udon, change the W for a clap starting at 00:35:734 - till it ends.are

Cleaaaan.

[4K Normal]

• Do the same here as i said with the 6k udon, change the W for a clap starting at 00:35:734 - till it ends.there

You really didi a good job applying this.

[4K and 6K Easy]

• Do the same here as i said with the 6k udon, change the W for a clap starting at 00:35:734 - till it ends.already Except in 4k ez bc there weren't enough notes to apply hs to

Good!

Tfw i thought i was going to find more stuff... Welp drop me some kds if this was helpful!

error_exe777 wrote:

ugh i owe you so much after your mods i will do as much as i can Not probs. I just do what I can and I'm glad you've done the same

1|2|3|4 & 1|2|3|4|5|6

also why is the timing point there? shouldn't it be here? 00:00:349 - The first measure I'd consider an "lead-in measure", which is commonly used, so it's not too much of a problem (plus NC aligns better with where it is at the moment.

4K Easy

00:25:990 (25990|0) - you represented that 1/8 as a LN here, but not here 00:25:990 (25990|0) - ? i understand it would be hard to map but eh What's that second hl meant to be?

00:29:836 - i don't see why you can't add a note for the bass thing I mean I could, but it was just a stylistic/progression choice not to map these here.

6K Easy

i rarely play 6K so forgive me if i make some stupid remarks dw dw thanks for taking a look c:

00:17:785 - add a LN for the 1/8 thing. it would be easier to map here than the 4K one because there is more space andddd you there is no LN there in the first place I mapped the 4K a little while after the 6K set (so my inital ideas were here lol) Again, just a personal decision not to map it.

00:20:349 (20349|5,20477|3) - these patterns are inconsistent. here it's spaced by one note,
00:22:401 (22401|3,22529|4) - here it isn't
00:24:452 (24452|2,24580|1) - here it isn't
00:28:554 (28554|4,28683|3) - here it isn't
00:30:606 (30606|3,30734|4) - here it isn't
00:32:657 (32657|5,32785|3) - here it is

anyway i'm trying to say, there is no pattern to them. as there are more that are in adjacent columns, maybe just move the ones that are not, closer I wasn't intentionally trying for a pattern, which is why there doesn't appear to be one lol. It's a nice idea though; I'll keep it in mind if I decide to change it.

00:37:272 (37272|1,37785|0) - of all the columns, you pick the two closest to the edge. its fine but eh maybe you'll want to change it

00:40:349 (40349|1,40862|0) - ^^ Should be ok? Will keep in mind.

00:42:913 (42913|5) - why not turn this into a 1/2 LN? it's not bad to play. if i had to say a column, it would be 4 probably Progression-wise I haven't included this in the Normal diff, so might look a little odd putting it here and not in Normal.

01:07:272 (67272|3,67401|4,67529|2,67657|1) - seems a bit too centre-ed. i mean, for an EZ it is probably fine, but i would do this:
I mean you enter the fill with cols 1 and 6 occupied and leave it with a [16] chord, so this should be fine.

6K Normal

00:10:093 (10093|4,10093|3,10221|1,10221|0) - these two are strong and represented by doubles yet,
00:10:349 (10349|5,10349|3,10477|1,10477|2) - these aren't as strong, and are doubles? Fair enough. Just noticed it's different later on so I'll change it.

00:37:785 (37785|2,38042|3,38298|2,38554|3) - eh you have 5 other columns you can use, unless it was intended Not intentional, but the patterns were made with maximising playability in mind. So I don't think it's too much of an issue, unless someone else thinks it's also a good idea to change it.

00:59:324 (59324|4,59324|5,59452|1,59452|0,59580|4,59580|5,59708|1,59708|0) - i've got the same problem as before, and this pattern is boring. all the other 1/2 jumps don't repeat like this

4K Hard

01:03:939 (63939|0,64580|0) - this anchor is weird, maybe avoid it Was avoiding making the notes too biased towards one hand, so I opted to do this instead. It happens a couple more times around here, so it's not completely random.

6K Udon!

00:59:644 (59644|5,59836|5) - ouch, is this avoidable at all? ...not really. The layering that I have in place requires quads for crashes, while at the same time I don't really want to break the structure of the 1/4 overlapped LNs. I mean I could rearrange it so that it happens in a different column, but I'll struggle hugely to remove it entirely.

01:28:042 - you completely ignored the drums, which for the pattern being used makes it hard to implement, but maybe you'll want to consider it. Yeah, I thought about this too. I tried before I submitted it, and it just made the playfield far too cluttered for the concepts I had in place,
thus why I had to ignore it.

i looked at every diff so the ones that i didn't mention, means i couldn't see any problems with it.

best of luck o/

Kivicat wrote:

Hi! Random modding here

|1|2|3|4|5|6|

6K Udon!

00:01:375 - How about this: http://puu.sh/yvt0h/ed5a1dbaa2.png? General idea was to make notes for bass kick symmetric with 00:00:862 (862|1,862|2) - , but then the pattern itself appeared to be more consistent too. I think that generating minijacks in the central columns given the rest of the chart is a little bit too mean... then again, what's there right now isn't any good either lol. I've changed it to something a little different.
00:03:298 (3298|0,3426|1) - A bit strange to see close arrangement here after you place these 00:03:170 (3170|4,3298|0) - to 5 and 1. There's plenty of alternatives, so i'll leave the choice to you in order to keep your style. I'm not really seeing too much of a problem here? I mean, the idea is kinda used again at 00:07:401 (7401|4,7529|5)...
00:07:016 (7016|1) - Ends at 00:07:272 - (a bit later actually, but it's not enough to keep LN) Fixed, LN in for the bass again
00:09:452 - Missed hihat sound. Added
00:12:144 (12144|5,12144|2) - Why 2 notes? You use 3 for clap in this section. 00:14:195 (14195|1,14195|5) - Same here, but i think, you can keep it to avoid awkward pattern and diff spike. Fixed the first one, but the second one's already 3 counting the LN.
00:31:631 (31631|1) - The sound ends earlier and i can hear clearly that there's a silent gap between this and 00:32:016 (32016|0) -, so that's a bit awkward to play. End the first LN 1/4 earlier. Like earlier, huh?
00:33:170 - Here starts another long sound, so you could add LN till 00:35:221 - since it's Udon diff, lol. I could, but I wanted those LNs to focus on the bass. I was also trying to keep the layering but adding the LN for that sound at the earliest possible opportunity, which ended up being 00:33:683 (33683|0).
00:43:683 - 00:44:708 - 00:45:734 - I suggest not ignoring cymbals here since LNs become sparse and you really need more notes to compensate difficulty (brakes are for the weak, hehe). Buffed the LNs a bit. The cymbals weren't that significant to be "mappable" in my eyes, so I did something different.
00:47:336 (47336|2) - lul what lol
00:49:644 (49644|1,49644|4) - 1/16 earlier. I think this was more of a simplification issue than anything, since I thought using 1/16 for this looked a little odd.
01:02:529 (62529|2) - This lonely note seems a bit strange cause there's the whole stream (from 01:02:144 - , i suppose). I mean it was the sound I heard the most so... there it is? I mean, all of the others seem to blend in whereas this one is isolated, so I think we're okay.
01:04:580 (64580|2) - Shouldn't it be 1/4 LN too? Yes it should, nice catch
01:12:657 (72657|5) - This should end 1/4 earlier. Yep, minor rearrangement for that bass.
01:20:477 (80477|3) - Try 1. Right hand seems a bit overwhelmed here. Sure.
01:26:247 - Here should be another 1/4 LN since you map the whole stream here 01:25:093 (85093|2,85221|5,85349|0,85477|4,85606|2) Whoops

6K Hard

00:02:913 (2913|2,2913|5) - Why 2 notes? You use 3 for following claps. Oops lol
00:07:016 (7016|0) - Same with Udon diff, and i think, you should add another LN at 00:07:401 - as well. Different inconsistency also spotted here, so fixed that as well.
00:09:452 - Missed hihat. ^^
00:09:452 - Why LN here? It should be simple note for hihat. ...wrong timestamp?
00:15:349 (15349|3) - I suppose, it moved from 00:15:477 - somehow. I can't remember what I was thinking lol
00:17:657 - Missed hihat. ^^
00:26:503 (26503|2,26631|3,26760|0,26888|5) - I suppose, those are still 1/2, the pitch is just slowly changing. mhm
00:46:760 (46760|3,47016|0) - Maybe 1-4 instead? Dunno, i just have a feeling, lol. At least, this would add some variety. tfw no inspiration
00:47:272 (47272|5) - Oh god, how did this happen? There's a quiet snare on that 1/8 you know
00:48:298 (48298|4,48298|3,48298|5,48554|2,48554|0,48554|1,48811|5,48811|4,48811|3) - Try to make more variety here too. It's boring, seriously. And alternation here 00:49:836 - is completely unexpected after so easy pattern. See what I mean lol
00:49:644 (49644|1,49644|4) - Same with Udon. Definitely a simplification at this level.
00:56:631 (56631|0) - It feels more like simple note, cause there's just not enough length even for 1/4 LN. (If it's supposed to be for bass, then make this 00:56:503 (56503|2) - LN too). It's for the open hihat. Not helping that that idea hasn't been consistent lol
00:58:683 - Missed hihat. Added
01:08:811 (68811|1,68939|3) - Better follow hat/bell here. Those sounds you're probably following with LNs start at 01:08:554 - and that's not what you need here for a nice pattern. It was for highlighting just those two bass notes, much like, say, 01:00:606 (60606|5,60734|0).
01:12:657 (72657|5) - Same with Udon. Done
01:23:683 (83683|3,83811|1) - You could use 1/2 LN like here 01:15:477 (75477|3) -Nice spot

6K Normal

00:09:836 - Add 1/2 LN for consistency with 00:05:734 (5734|5) - good catch
00:59:452 (59452|1,59452|0,59580|4,59580|3,59708|0,59708|2) - Leave one note per line. Double stream is too difficult for normal, even at 117 bpm.
01:07:657 (67657|5,67657|3,67785|0,67785|1,67913|4,67913|5) - Same. And move 01:07:529 (67529|0) - to 2 to make it easier. I mean,
they're just jumptrills in disguise, so I don't think they're going to be too much of an issue, if I'm honest.
01:15:862 (75862|0,75862|1) - Delete one too. There's just a tom, like at following notes: 01:15:990 (75990|5,76118|2) - True, but I think this one's slightly louder than the other two, hence why this one's a double
01:21:118 (81118|3) - Why not LN for bass? Good question lol

6K Easy

I'm not really good at easy diffs, but i'll point out some things in general:

1. Easy diff is not a place for any streams. You should name it Normal if you want to keep them. Also, your Normal can be renamed to Hard and Hard can be renamed to Hard+ or Insane. Then there's no difficulty issue. I mean
2. I'd rather make notes instead of 1/4 LNs than stretch them too much. It's not good to teach novice players wrong LN snaps.

The first mod for me in a long time... I hope it's useful
Good luck!

Rivals_7 wrote:

1234
drum hitnormal sounds too blend imo But I don't have a drum-hitnormal?

[4K Easy]

1. 00:00:394 (394|0,522|2) - swap position. right hand seems a little bit cluttered with odd spacing between them - 00:00:522 (522|2,779|3,1035|2) - which is might be quite troubleome for noob Sure thing
   
2. 00:12:317 (12317|0) - dont really get why is this becoming an LN. why not just stay as SNs? the noise doesnt have that extension after all Good question. Answer is I don't really know lol

[4K Normal]

1. 00:14:497 (14497|0) - i would rather see this extended to correlates the piano tbh. same thing like you did on EZ Hmm... I dunno.
   I think Easy was focusing on the bass for the transition which this LN is shorter because it catches just the final note of the piano. (I mapped this so long ago I'm kinda trying to figure this out myself too lul

[4K Hard]

1. 00:07:317 (7317|1,7574|1,7830|1) - kinda uncomfortable to see this so would just 123 - 00:07:317 (7317|1,7446|0,7574|1) - this thing Sure. (213 tho cus minimising unnecessary shields or something)
   
2. 00:36:548 (36548|0) - i cant heard any of the instruments playing behind those 1/4 LNs tbf. the only thing prominent is only vocals so i would rather focus with vocals instead. or maybe if there's any, could've differentiated with insane so theres variation p sure this was for a piano focus (not too prominent but still there)

[Poco]
jumptrill memes 4k set was a pure afterthought because otherwise like 10 people would play the set lul

1. 00:06:035 (6035|2) - could've extend to downbeat for piano Might look a little odd for just this one to have overlapped(?) LNs
   
2. 00:49:753 (49753|2,49881|2,50010|3,50138|3,50266|2,50394|2,50522|3,50651|3) - smh. maybe try http://puu.sh/z7S0q/fcdd8043cf.png muh col 2 mini tho

6k soon