1. Glitched Oni (5,99 stars, 2567 notes)

Infected Mushroom never dies!

_yu68 wrote:

Hello :3 mod via PM.

mod

[Glitched Oni]

1. 00:16:978 - add d? In order to show differences between 00:00:050 - ~ 00:13:764 - and 00:13:764 - ~. Also, It for diversity.
   
   • 
     Same as above.
   1. 00:20:407 -
   2. 00:23:835 -
   3. 00:27:264 -
   4. 00:30:692 -
   5. 00:34:121 -
   6. 00:37:550 -
2. 00:28:121 - add d? If you agree with above, consider increasing density even more than 00:13:764 - ~ 00:27:478 - .
   
   • 
     Same as above.
   1. 00:31:550 -
   2. 00:34:978 -
   3. 00:38:407 -
      really liked these suggestions, applied all :3
3. 01:06:478 (1,2,3) - change to dddd(1/6)? Sounds hear like 1/6 here. (Fix inherited points if you change it.) i was thinking to make a dddddk 1/6 but since kkkkkkkkkkkkkd it's a bit hard i'll keep this as ddddk 1/4 for now for less density
4. 01:45:621 (185) - delete? The sound is stopped at 01:45:478 - and started at 01:45:692 - again. changed to dd kk 1/8 instead as fits good imo
5. 03:14:300 (34) - or 03:14:728 (38) - change to d? 03:14:192 (33,34,35,36) - and 03:14:621 (37,38,39,40) - have different sounds each other. applied the second
6. 03:22:121 (94) - change to d? It will emphasis the next finisher and shows difference of pitch. good catch, fixed
7. 03:30:157 (55) - or 03:30:585 (59) - change to d? Similar reason to 03:14:300 (34) - 03:14:728 (38) - . as before, applied the second
8. 04:17:192 - ~ 04:32:621 - Consider reducing density step by step. I felt a little strange what 1/4s suddenly stop from 04:32:621 - .
9. 05:03:478 - ~ 05:10:335 - Same as above. Looking at the flow of the song, I recommend to increase density step by step. about these two last suggestions about the density of these sections i'll think about it as i like how is it now

Nice 1/4+1/6+1/8s. Good luck!

Raiden wrote:

red snakes

Surono wrote:

00:51:050 (159,160) - these notes are similar sound with 00:51:478 - , tho it could be fill with finish. maybe just 1 on 00:51:264 (160) - this it would be better having the three notes with finishers, but as i want consistency with previous finishers i'll keep as d d D for now

01:15:371 - i hear that beat, add notes not adding notes as i see (dddkkkd)kd a bit weird, also, flows better with only that 1/6 imo

01:20:264 - 01:20:335 - overdone, 01:20:407 - the flow are soundsable from here. you can delete 2notes or 01:20:300 - single note in here but it fits perfectly, at least for me, no change here

01:25:335 - high impact in here, dkdkdkd too monotone in here imo but 01:31:978 - here its oke. so ye kat that to emphasize that high beat changed to ddkkdkd instead as it fits better imo, also, changed 01:31:978 - too for consistency

01:49:121 - emphasize to stop is here, so 01:49:335 - delete this bcus u didnt 01:49:442 - 01:49:550 - follow these. hmm done

01:58:871 - 01:58:978 - swap, I think that kddk would more emphasized the different flow with 01:58:335 - this dddk fits nice, done

02:00:335 - kat bcus this white colors but I think you will like this yeah variation i understand that i would make variety, but stills better as dddk imo, no change here ><

02:02:300 - kat, 02:02:192 - similar and need 02:02:407 - alteration from here done

02:48:478 - ~ 02:48:907 - dkddk, bcus your the current pattern with flow are flat.. done

02:50:300 - / 02:52:121 - / 02:57:264 - / 03:05:728 - / 03:15:692 - the increasing range of sounds are high, kat these done all except the last, as i like kd more

03:00:585 - would don it bcus 03:00:478 - still a bit similar with range of sound, 03:00:692 - then yeah 03:00:692 - from this sound are high done

03:21:050 - 03:21:157 - swap, bcus you need to emphasize that drum/high flow than 03:21:157 - emphasize this low flow no change here for the flow, all the map goes d k d k d k d 1/2

03:17:300 - move 03:17:192 - here then 03:17:085 - change to don no change for now as with doublet fits good too imo

03:37:550 - kat, still 03:37:335 - similar sound done

03:55:121 - kdkdk and then 03:56:835 - dkdkd for variation? i'll keep current patterns for now

03:58:228 - don, i have no idea what i need to tell this xd but 03:58:121 - the only high just here i'll think about it as kdd dd it feels a bit uh..

04:07:121 - dkkkd, 04:08:835 - dkkdd. just minor to suggest the 5plet variation though its consistent on longstream. at least for now and as i said before, i'll keep current patterns

04:56:192 - dDK or DDK ,04:59:835 - DK, 07:19:550 - K. these suggestion finish bcus... variation or.. yeah idk. impact i think DDK xD second keep for consistency with 00:44:621 - and the third finisher i like as D D

Raiden wrote:

red snakes

Stefan wrote:

01:07:764 (4,5) - I wouldn't differ 01:07:764 (4) - from 01:07:335 (3) - sound-wise, also I find that the clash sound on 01:08:192 (5) - tends more to be K. change these two notes to d K. i really like more D instead of K, i'll keep for now

01:08:192 - to reduce the little overlap 01:08:192 (5,6) - currently have, you could reduce the SV here to 1.40x done here

01:11:621 - Hmm, I like the idea what effect you want to create with the finisher note. Maybe we could boost the SV to 1.30~.35x. it feels stronger if the SV is on an acceptable range without touching the upcoming note.

01:18:478 - a < applied both ^

01:19:550 (63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73) - the 1/6 stream could be improved if you map the "drop" (at 01:19:550 (63,64,65) - time) with 1/6 instead of 1/4. kddd or kkkd would be suitable. And for the 1/6 stream I'd suggest dddkkkd, so the higher and deeper sounds are clearer. applied both, accepted kkkd for the first

01:32:085 (73) - sounds to me more like dkkkdkd due the early light sound at 01:32:085 - . sounds good, applied

01:35:085 (95,96) - (95) sounds more obvious and noticeable to me, would go with kd instead. i'll think about it as i prefer a simpler pattern there and 01:35:192 - and 01:35:407 - sounds better as a k d.

01:37:550 (111,112) - This is 1/6 actually (sound appears on 01:37:478 - and 01:37:550 - ), using 1/8 is a pointless and incorrect rhythm usage if you want to accurately follow the sounds and effects. oh, fixed

01:39:692 (129) - To me, it sounds sorta plain that the previous stream ends with d and the next 1/6 starts with d too, while the sound here is significantely high. I'd change the note to k. didn't noticed that sound, fixed lol

01:40:550 (137,138,139,140,141,142,143) - should be kddkkkd (or kddkkdd): kd on 01:40:550 (137,138) - because 01:39:907 (130,131,132,133) - is mapped as single-colour 1/6 pattern and 01:40:335 (134,135,136,137) - works the same except it's a higher pitch, nothing on 01:40:550 (137) - sounds like to go deeper with d, on the other hand 01:40:657 (138) - sounds deep and d would be the better choice. for 01:40:764 (139,140,141,142,143) - dkkkd sounds to be better for the glitch sounds, either way dkkdd works too if you also agree that 01:41:085 - actually becomes deeper and may be mapped to d. changed to (kkkk)ddkdkd

01:42:121 (151,152,153) - Sound-wise the song would go with dddk, 01:42:050 (150,151,152) - is constant in the song, using both colours sounds weird when there's nothing that makes you change. 01:42:264 (153) - can be higher however. it would be a bit weird as 01:42:478 - it's different, i'll keep the actual pattern for now

01:51:264 (224,225,226,227) - Quite inconsistent rhythm usage: 01:51:264 (224,226,227) - are following very similar sounds and you only used an 1/8 doublet for the first one. If you want to make that right, 01:51:532 - and 01:51:746 - should be mapped too. i used only kk d because it plays better, but since it's not hard applied

01:53:835 (246) - Pitch's increasing like that's the case for 01:54:050 (247,248,249,250) - , would say to change it to k. sounds fine, applied

02:40:550 (109,111) - kat sounds to me a bit too late and should be moved 1/2 before, switch these two notes. done

03:03:585 (291) - skipping 03:03:478 - while there's barely anything on 03:03:585 - doesn't look to me right. Move the note back to 03:03:478 - . Same case applies for 03:05:300 (303) - . Surono suggested this too, so applied

03:17:300 (58) - this one is even more strange because k here sounds almost too noisy. Having some Jiiro mapping is okay, won't question that. But I feel the song needs to suit from the atmosphere - which it doesn't here when the song itself is at this timestamp really quiet. Like the previous suggestion, move the note to 03:17:192 - and change it to d then. done

05:21:692 (48,49,50,51) - There is no 1/6 in this part. I understand that the song is really heavy with 1/6 and even 1/8 but forcing rhythm what's not provided by the song isn't right and shouldn't be done. Map this to 1/4. i know, but sounds good imo, i usually do improvised mapping if the pattern fits good and in this case it fits well i think, i'll keep for now

05:23:192 (62,63,64,65,66,67,68) - same here. The only non-1/4 that is properly used is 05:35:942 (171,172,173) - , anything else is 1/4. as i said, these patterns fits really good, and some aren't overmapped at all, if a lot of people suggests to remove i'll probably do, but for now i want to keep all these patterns

Not sure if Surono plans to give a bubble icon for the mapset (because he starred it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) but I don't think that'd be ideal to push the mapset that fast. just my 2ct

Stefan wrote:

Not sure if Surono plans to give a bubble icon for the mapset (because he starred it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) but I don't think that'd be ideal to push the mapset that fast. just my 2ct

LZD wrote:

lite irc mod

SPOILER

19:00 LZD: amo alla
19:00 Hanjamon: dem son
19:00 Hanjamon: al editoh
19:01 Hanjamon: ademas al menos por aqui uno se aclara mejor que por post
19:01 LZD: hombre y tanto
19:01 LZD: y ese hp?
19:01 LZD: xDDDD
19:02 Hanjamon: 4?
19:02 Hanjamon: como ruined le parecia alto 5 pues lo baje xD
19:02 LZD: 01:55:541 (168,169,170) - this no suena como 01:10:335 - this
19:02 Hanjamon: a que te refieres?
19:03 LZD: el triplete a 1/2
19:03 Hanjamon: creo que copiaste mal las notas xD
19:03 LZD: d k d kkd
19:03 LZD: si
19:03 LZD: xDDDDDDDDDDD
19:03 LZD: 01:08:621 - this to 01:10:335 - this
19:04 LZD: pero igual es porque antes era asi el patron en la intro
19:04 LZD: nvm, si cambias eso todo lo de alante tambien habria que mirarlo
19:04 LZD: y total solo es una nimiedad
19:04 Hanjamon: xDDDDD
19:07 LZD: te voy a decir las cosas que se me fueron ocurriendo mientras jugaba
19:07 Hanjamon: sure
19:07 Hanjamon: toda sugerencia bienvenida sea
19:07 LZD: 02:45:907 - en esta nota senti que necesitaba un k
19:07 LZD: osea modificar el patron para que ahi lleve el high pitch
19:08 Hanjamon: pues
19:08 Hanjamon: no me habia dado cuenta xD
19:08 Hanjamon: cambiado
19:08 LZD: 02:45:692 (151,153) - ctrl g?
19:08 LZD: dkkdkddkkdkdk
19:08 Hanjamon: a ver..
19:08 LZD: y al final de ese mismo patron el cuerpo me pedia un 1/6
19:08 LZD: xDDDD
19:09 Hanjamon: me gusta como queda, aceptado xD
19:09 Hanjamon: ya pero no noto algo que soporte un 1/6
19:09 LZD: wait wait
19:09 LZD: oki
19:09 LZD: aun asi hice ss
19:10 LZD: 02:46:550 (160) -
19:10 LZD: shiiiit
19:10 LZD: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8295160
19:10 LZD: eso
19:10 LZD: xDDD
19:11 Hanjamon: es decir
19:11 Hanjamon: usar el sonido que proporciona 02:46:335 - para hacer un 1/6
19:12 LZD: si xD
19:12 LZD: pero es muy sutil
19:12 LZD: nisiquera se oye el 1/6
19:12 Hanjamon: no, pero pega bien
19:12 LZD: 03:51:478 - preparate para esta seccion
19:12 LZD: bueno te queda como sugerencia
19:13 LZD: recapacita sobre ello
19:13 Hanjamon: lo he aceptado pero asi https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8295191
19:13 LZD: xD
19:13 LZD: te gusta enrevesar las cosas
19:13 LZD: xDDDDD
19:13 Hanjamon: hare lo mismo con los siguientes patterns para mantenerlo consistente, un momento
19:13 LZD: la verdad mucho mejor que lo mio
19:13 LZD: ok
19:13 LZD: depues de la seccion de 3:51 no creo que haya mucho mas que decir
19:13 LZD: se que algo se me ocurrio jugando pero se me ha olvidado ya
19:14 Hanjamon: lmao el sr
19:14 Hanjamon: ha aumentado
19:14 LZD: mucho?
19:14 LZD: XD
19:14 Hanjamon: 0.02 xDDDD
19:14 LZD: eso no es na
19:14 Hanjamon: tiene el mismo que loveless world
19:14 LZD: XDDDD
19:14 Hanjamon: justamente el mismo
19:14 LZD: y el mismo user rating(?)
19:14 Hanjamon: confirmed?
19:14 Hanjamon: xDDDDDDDDD
19:14 LZD: 02:46:121 (155) -
19:14 LZD: estos tripletes no me gustaron en la parte lenta
19:15 Hanjamon: voy
19:15 LZD: 02:46:121 (155) - lo que se me ocurrio ahora de primeras en el editor es poner un d aqui y eliminar los tripletes tal cual
19:15 Hanjamon: creo
19:15 LZD: osea de los tripletes borrar la del medio
19:15 Hanjamon: que esta copiando mal las cosas xD
19:15 LZD: 02:46:121 (155) - 02:46:121 (155) - delete thissssss
19:15 Hanjamon: es decir, copia el minuto pero sin seleccionar la nota
19:15 Hanjamon: que si no se bugea
19:15 LZD: FUCK
19:15 Hanjamon: xDDDDDDDDD
19:15 LZD: joder con tener seleccionadas las notas
19:15 Hanjamon: que te ha hecho esa nota
19:15 LZD: 03:52:228 - añadir d aqui por lo que he dicho arriba
19:16 LZD: 03:52:657 - delete
19:16 LZD: 03:53:085 - delete
19:16 Hanjamon: hmmmm
19:16 Hanjamon: los tripletes me gustaria conservarlos
19:17 Hanjamon: se siente raro sin ellos xD
19:17 LZD: hmmm
19:17 LZD: bueno es tu map
19:17 LZD: xD
19:17 Hanjamon: muy vacio
19:17 LZD: yo era para dar enfasis al patron que tenias el kkddk
19:17 LZD: 03:52:442 - sin los tripletes y con una k aqui?
19:18 Hanjamon: sigue sin convencerme mucho
19:18 LZD: donde esta el triplete
19:18 LZD: que yo lo vea
19:19 Hanjamon: los tripletes estan en 03:52:657 - y 03:53:085 - ,tu me dices de quitarlos y añadir nota en 03:52:442 -
19:19 Hanjamon: es decir, extender el 1/4
19:19 LZD: 03:52:228 - añadir nota ahi
19:20 LZD: pero estoy buscando soluciones por si lo ves muy vacio
19:20 Hanjamon: si, esa nota la he aceptado
19:20 Hanjamon: o eso creo
19:20 Hanjamon: es que no me decido por que
19:20 Hanjamon: esa parte habia pensado en hacerla "facil"
19:20 LZD: si la has aceptado, a ver que te parece esto
19:20 Hanjamon: debido a que es una parte mas calmada
19:20 LZD: mas facil es sin tripletes xD
19:21 LZD: 03:52:657 - delete y 03:52:871 - add k
19:21 Hanjamon: si lo se xD pero el 1/4 es largo
19:21 LZD: eso sin el 03:52:871 (11) - don
19:21 LZD: o con el don
19:21 LZD: como mejor lo veas
19:21 LZD: xD
19:21 Hanjamon: hmm
19:22 Hanjamon: creo que mejor lo pensare todo esto por que
19:22 Hanjamon: 04:19:121 - aqui todos estos streams usan los patterns de los 5plets y tripletes
19:22 Hanjamon: y claro, me quedaria un tanto inconsistente
19:22 LZD: uffff
19:22 LZD: vale
19:23 Hanjamon: pero igual la sugerencia la tendre bastante en cuenta xD
19:23 LZD: oki
19:23 LZD: xD
19:23 LZD: y creo que ya tengo que ir a badminton
19:24 Hanjamon: mierda
19:24 LZD: 05:11:407 -
19:24 LZD: esto me jodia mucho pero no creo que haga falta dar sugerencia ahi
19:24 Hanjamon: yo creo que todos fallan ahi xD
19:25 LZD: si xDD
19:25 LZD: es mas facil full 1/6 acabado en kdddk
19:26 Hanjamon: lo conservare con 1/4
19:26 Hanjamon: ya que el 1/6 es demasiado largo de por si xD
19:26 Hanjamon: es decir acabado en ddk
19:26 LZD: si ya te digo que no te diria nada ahi xD
19:27 LZD: me hice el stream final en el editor ahora xDDD
19:27 Hanjamon: lol
19:27 Hanjamon: realmente es tricky
19:27 Hanjamon: lo bueno que es 140 bpm
19:27 LZD: la verdad es que no tengo mas sugerencias
19:28 LZD: igual si lo miro en profundidad pero no creo que haya mucho mas para sacar

Nofool wrote:

ey

[SV changes]
In my point of view there could be more SV changes (easy ones since it’s for rank tho...):

* - from the very beginning to - 00:41:192 (121) – or - 00:40:764 (119) -, use a slower SV? 0.8 or 0.9 would do, if you chose the first option you can use some speed up on the 2 previous notes. i did some changes

* - 01:20:835 (75,76,1,2,3,4,5) – would be cool with some slow down here, normal speed coming back on the following note:
- 01:20:835 (75) – x0.92; - 01:21:050 (76) – x0.86; - 01:21:478 (1) – x0.80; - 01:21:907 (2) – x0.76; - 01:21:978 (3) – x0.80; - 01:22:050 (4) – x0.84; - 01:22:121 (5) – x0.88; - 01:22:335 (1) – x1.00; i like the idea, but not adding sv changes as 01:21:907 - with increasing sv it looks a bit confuse ):

* - 01:34:335 (87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98) – either try a smooth slow down or make all of them slower like x0.9 or x0.8? then you can emphasize the kiai’s start by starting back at x1. Just like you somewhat did at - 01:48:050 (203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213) -. same as ^, i really like the idea, but the start of the pattern with the 1/6 it looks a bit confuse with slow motion sv.

* - 03:22:335 (1) – to - 03:24:050 (2) -: there could be some smooth slow down there, to emphasize a bit more the start of the second kiai part. applied as i look how it looks

* - 04:32:621 (289) – try an higher SV here? At least x1.5, go back to x1 at - 04:47:621 (300) -. x1.5 again at - 04:49:335 (307) – then x1 again at - 04:51:050 (310) – etc (I think you got my point). No need to keep this going after - 04:57:907 (1) -. i got your idea, and isn't bad, but for now i'll kep without sv as it's a "calm" section and i want that players can rest, anyway i'll think about it.

* - 05:20:621 (39) – such a long part at that SV makes that map uncool for HR players. I would suggest using a slow down for the whole pattern - 05:19:121 (26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38) -: starting off at x1.3, - 0.02 par notes so you end the pattern at around x1.1, then you can start the kiai with x1.2 or 1.3 which is better for HR players. i already played it with HR and it's readable and fun to play imo, also, i didn't hear complains of others about this high sv, so i'll keep atm

* - 05:54:907 (326) – this is wasting the stream potential to me in term of SV, it would look much better with a smooth speed up through the whole pattern. You can easily add an SV change every 2 notes or so, starting up at the normal kiai SV and ending at the SV you want depending on how much you add per note. i know what do you mean, i added some svs so it looks smoth

* - 06:31:764 (16,17,18) – you could a speed up on those to go back on x1.2 on the following note: - 06:31:764 (16) – x0.95; - 06:32:085 (17) – x1; - 06:32:407 (18) – x 1.1; - 06:32:621 (1) – x 1.2; added them as looks nice, but 06:31:764 (16) – changed to x0.90 instead


[Structure]
* - 00:51:050 (159) – shouldn’t this be a finisher too? surono suggested something similar, changed to DDK then it looks consistent with 04:56:621 - .

* - 01:02:407 (44) – k? sounds cooler to emphasize that one too, you usualy had k D k on those part and since here it’s kdddk (1/4 instead of ½) i’d use a k instead. sounds good, changed

* - 01:08:192 (5) – deserves an higher SV change tbh, id use at least x2.0, in this case overlap should be ok since there is a break before the following notes. i'll keep the actual sv, as probably x2.0 would be too fast and 1.40 looks more consistent with next Ds?

* - 01:11:835 – I would add a d here and remove the SV change on the previous D, doesn’t sound quite as high as for the previous “ninja” D. Same at - 01:18:692 -. for that reason i'm using a 1.30 sv instead of 1.40, anyways, i really like that "ninja" note, so i'll keep for now

* - 01:38:514 – d could be added there, same at - 01:40:228 -. not adding as it plays and flows better with only xxxx xxxx 1/6 instead of a 1/4 in the middle

* - 02:06:585 (38,39) – change to d? => dddkd, so you don’t get 2 dkkkd in a row, also dddkd sounds good there. sounds nice, applied

* - 03:03:371 (300) – remove that one to emphasize the previous k? sounds more like it. i'll think about it, as there are some 1/4 sounds in the background

* - 03:08:621 (1,2,3) – good choice I guess. :3

* - 03:17:085 (57) – refer to - 03:03:371 (300) –. same

* - 03:32:621 – add something? Sounds like it and won’t make it play worse tbh. added a k as (kkd)k, following as d it plays a bit weird but following the "glitch" sound of the background as k flows and it plays better.

* - 03:54:800 (24) – d? better reverse color style (also sounds better to me). - 03:58:228 (48) – this is ok because it sounds slightly different. keeping for consistency, also kkd sounds good too

* - 04:09:478 (119) – d? this specific one sounds lower than other k at similar spot, alss there goes the different thing just for this part that won’t make my previous suggestion weird. i'll think about this one, as i'm keeping for consistency
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _



cool song cool map, even tho some snapping are not 100% respecting the song id say the result is cool and still represents the song well so good luck,
might be hard to rank with some of the current BNs (and some specific QAT) :////////
just looking at stefans mod full of suggestions about blindly following the song (since he probably can't try patterns and see how they play ) gives an idea of what might happen haha....... if some people suggest i'll turn some patterns back

Hanjamoon wrote:

but it fits perfectly

Surono wrote:

preppy was still watching!1


pls both of you lmao

Hanjamoon wrote:

but it fits perfectly

fixed 1 unsnap sv 02:43:121 - to here.

edit:
yeah same nofool, lul pls. xd

zigizigiefe wrote:

i forgot to mod it,kill me pls.apply them when next bn came

*00:01:978 (6) - Pitch changes here and the sound is same as 00:02:621 (8) - .d d d doesn't fit here imo,so change it as kat.You tried to make various patterns but at least use kkd.Change others for consistency. d k d would be too repititive, for that reason i'm doing variety
*01:37:550 (111,112) - 1/3 doublets looks really weird.I heard only 1/4 sound. wut, these are 1/6 doublets and it follows the glitch sound of 01:37:621 -
*01:42:621 (157) - I suggest kat here.The sound intensifies here,and for variety ofc xD (ddkk)kd it plays a bit weird, so i'm doing dddk for a better flow
*01:45:478 (183,184,185,186) - As I said,I didn't hear any 1/6 sound.If you want to emphasize that sounds,use 1/8 notes.Apply at other parts for consistency. they are already 1/8....
*02:25:550 (11,12) - How about 1/6 4plet to highlight this sound xd Apply at 02:32:407 - and other parts where there's that sound. not adding as this is a "calm" part and i want all more simple
*06:35:085 (20,21) - I suggest Ctrl+G to represent weird sound at 06:35:192 (21) -.06:38:514 (43,44) - , 06:48:800 (21,22) - , 06:52:228 (47,48) - for consistency. 06:35:192 - it's different from 06:35:514 - and fits better as d
*07:18:907 (1,2) - Why not a ninja note which have higher SV xD.Ninja note can represent the sounds which appear suddenly imo.So you should use higher SV. that would be bad for players, missing after fcing all the hard part, i prefer progressive sv like i already have.

dem that was fun,good luck :*