Kotori-Chan wrote:

Finally found some time for modding yay~
Why is this btw just od 8 i think for some 6* shit you could put 8.5-9 or something~ Yeah sure


We are u's!


00:20:424 (5) - you know~ you could make that µ slider alot better by using bit higher sv https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8179219 used 1.3 for that,
it just looks so squished how it is now D: Sure I'll try that
Oh and also why is the finish just the boring default finish, you could add such a nice custom cymbal~ its just meh with default ;w;
I can give you one if you dont have one :> Don't worry I have some ~
00:23:489 - same goes for this part, you hear all that awesome cymbals ? 00:24:779 - 00:26:070 - 00:27:360 - and so on, hurts me that they get lost ;; Rip cymbals, added hs ~
00:33:892 (1) - what about letting spinner end here 00:36:392 - and start new one right after 00:36:473 - i think that's pretty nicu~ and beautiful cymbal 00:36:392 - wouldnt get lost >.< Sure ~
00:48:328 - no slow slider for the sugoi ~ ? No, mapping vocals in that kind of breaks with the instrument is not something I like doing, "It's my style" :>
00:49:295 (2,3) - can be easily missread, maybe give more spacing Sure
00:42:844 - remember how you gave these vocals...idk how to call it...some special attention~ ? 00:53:166 - why not doing the same here, they are kinda getting lost ;w; That's a good idea, changed :3
00:57:521 (1,2,1,2,3) - this is tbh worse than sotarks 1-2 jumps :3 :>
01:02:360 (1,2,1,2,1) - on these jumps 01:04:941 (1,2,1,2,1) - you gave the last note some special emphatize 01:03:812 (2,3,4,5) - why not here too ? Idk, I feel like the two part are kinda different, cause the first one is a lyrics repetition, and the other one is a full sentence, so for it doesn't have the same emphasis
01:07:844 (4) - not sure if NC or not RemHmmm~ Idk either :thinking:
01:10:586 - why not add a long slider like 01:10:102 (2) - would suit alot better to vocals >.< 01:11:070 - and fill this with some jumps and stuff instead you filthy pp mapper~ Because there's a kick here 01:10:747 and I don't lkike ignoring that kinda of stuff ~ and that would be overmapping, this map is overdone not overmapped :3
01:19:941 - i would REALLY recommend putting here 1/2 slider and here 01:20:263 - 1/1 since that are some really strong and outstanding vocals, you dont want them to get lost For the 1/2 slider i think that the spacing here is already enough for represent the vocals Tough I agree that a 1/1 slider after that is better
01:22:521 - same here ofc Now it's consistent with the point above
01:27:199 - like i said earlier with the suggoooiiii~ maybe a slow slider ? Same reason as with the sugoi~
01:34:134 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - nice jump overmapping would fill this with sliders instead, there is no syllable on every note, so no jumps There are syllable of most notes, and I don't like putting snares on sliderends, so jump it is
01:37:521 (3,4,5,6,7) - again, why overmapping calm vocals with jumps ? and you better give some good answer and not just a meme :> because pls...... The "dakara" is pretty intense here, so I mapped it with jumps, and the same goes for the two snares just after that vocal line Though I reduce ds between 5 and 6
01:38:650 (2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - do i even need to explain :3... ?!?!?! 1/2 vocals spam, plus the variation in the jumps makes the variation in the vocals too
01:46:554 (2,3,1,2,1) - hello hai tai ~ More like Miraizu imo
02:07:199 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2) - that jump overmapping is slowly really pissing me off Lol idc
02:11:392 (5) - if you fix thingy on first µ slider, copy paste~ Yeah fixed
02:11:231 (4) - and also, i think making it a zig zag pattern is better than having this little jump back Nice idea with the zig zig
02:15:156 - sliders would be better instead doubles imo, kinda represent sound better The clap would be not played if I put sliders, and I don't want that, it's just a thing that I don't like doing, and yes in some parts some of the snares are on sliderend, that usually means that there's something better to emphsize here than the snare
02:22:360 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - didnt know sotarks joined the collab~ No he didn't, fuck that guy, "1-2 jumps -> Sotarks" piss off really
02:28:650 - remember what i said earlier about giving the vocals that special attention, would be pretty nicu here Not really possible with the triples, well it is but I don't want
02:58:005 (1,2) - nicu idea desu~ I'm almost sure that only love live fans will understand that
03:02:199 - a 1 shape slider would be funny :3 Idk maybe ~
03:16:715 - *takes out knife* Takes out.. piss off at least they are well organized and are now randomly placed jumps
03:22:037 (2,3,1,2,1) - oh come on.......now that is really too much instant super jumps big like the fucking galaxy outta nowhere It's the same ds as the one before, that one as even been decreased in ds
03:50:102 - i find it really fun how my part is really the only one that stands kinda out....rest isnt noticeable at all that its mapped by different people lmao I think Chaos' part really stands out cause of the sv changes
04:27:521 (1) - y+1 sexy sliders btw~ didnt even say something in description HMPF Fixed And you know that I'll always thank you in my heart no matter what <3

I tbh dont even want to check the rest, because well yeah~ you know why~ :>
But anynyahhh~
Still good luck with this =w= ♥

Neoskylove wrote:

Q


[afd]
00:08:812 (2,1) - why this part has antijump? looks weird for me Cause the vocals says "love live" and I feel like putting anti jumps here emphasize that sound
00:12:602 - overmapping, this part doesn't need beat imo. others are, too There is a triple that is kinda hard to hear, but it's here, also the hs show that there's something here and it is to stay consistent in rhythm with this whole part
00:28:489 (7,8,1) - overlap with HP bar Fixed
02:55:424 (1,2) - looks weird shape for seeing It's supposed to be the "love live" vocals, it's to emphasize them, also, if you rememebered that slider I think it's a good thing for the map
03:22:037 (2,3,1,2,1) - overspacing imo Yeah maybe

gl

Lulu- wrote:

here's my super delayed nm™ (now 20% more detailed)

part 1/2 because i don't feel like modding atm but i feel bad for delaying it for so long so i'm modding one third now and the other two thids some other time

[We are u's!]
You could increase the HP drain by .5 or 1, HP5 seems a bit too low to me HP9 okay I'll change thjat

The hitsounds are very loud compared to other maps, so I'd like them to be ~15-20% lower if possible. The vast majority of your target audience has set their hitsounds much louder than the music, which could potentially overpower the hitsounds a bit too much. (30% part can stay the same) Sure

00:02:037 (2) - This angle is really sharp, which kinda contradicts your idea of having this part depend on flowy patterns, even though you decide to stick to circular flow right after 2 like before. You should definitely find a fix for this, as there is nothing in your music or your map to justify it. Using CTRL+H on the following objects would work just fine. Fixed but didn't do like you recommended

00:03:973 (3,4,1) - Now this is a very uncomfortable angle for a 1/4 beat gap. Consider reducing the spacing to the same spacing as the other doubles have before this one and placing it on the left side of the playfield to avoid snaps this forced. The spacing here is the same as the other 1/4 gap in this part, it just visualy looks different imo

00:12:521 (3,4) - In my opinion, the first jump in your 1/4 slider -> circle patterns feel out of place, because the vocals don't quite support it like the "Come on" does. There is a pretty strong drum beat on the blue tick, which is stronger than the red tick, which makes this part of the pattern really questionable, so my suggestion for these is to just replace the 1/4 sliders like this one with a triple, or when there is no drum to back a triple up to just map a 3/4 slider for a more "correct" emphasis.I think that the spacing plays on the "come on" vocal, and changing the 1/4 slider would mean changing all of the other sliders like that which would be a hassle :v

00:14:295 (6,7) - These are placed a tiny bit off, but are easy to correct by copy-pasting and CTRL+H ing 2+4 for 6 and 3+5 for 7. This was already copy paste, it's already perfect

00:15:908 (1) - You seem to be running out of space for the next set of jumps, so you should consider rotating this slider by something like -30° to prevent having your next jumps packed together this tightly. Changed

00:20:424 (5) - The slider shape could be polished a bit more, if you move the second last white sliderpoint a tiny bit further to the left, so the sliderbody doesn't overlap with itself at the red sliderpoint Fixed

00:36:473 (1) - This spinner currently ends on a very strong beat, leaving an awkward gap between it and the next object. To make this feel more natural, you could make the spinner end on the blue tick before, when the electronic 1/4 sounds end and place a slider on this tick to capture the buildup even better. I think that putting this spinner like that is okay cause in your suggestion, the gap between the end spinner and the next object is kinda small and with how the next pattern is placed it would be kinda awkward to play imo

00:38:973 (7) - Instead of breaking flow and having a more momentum-based jump, I would align this circle with 2 and 6 to continue circular flow and make the pattern build up together with the music I like the way it is, I think that the sound is kinda snapy so break flow is nice here

00:41:231 (5) - Is there a reason to map this with a 1/4 reverse slider instead of a regular triple? This is a 6* difficulty, so there is no real need to simplify this sound and you don't use this often enough to be really noticable, so you'd be best off changing these into regular stacked triples. Hint : this is not a real 6*. But yeah changed

00:43:489 (3) - With you prioritizing vocals over instruments here, adding a reverse to this slider would in my opinion do a better job at capturing the held vocals for this slider in particular. Sure that a good idea

00:53:166 (1,2,3) - This set of sliders lacks the visual context the previous one has, making it feel a little weird. Try incorporating some symmetry like you did before, to make it feel more solid. Yep it's fixed

01:07:360 (1) - This NC should be moved to 01:07:199 (8) - , as you can hear the drums already changing on the white tick, if you listen closely enough. Changed

01:31:715 (4,1) - Wouldn't it make more sense to have the slider on 01:31:715 - and the circle on 01:32:037 - , because they sing "nai" from 01:31:715 - to the next red tick, leaving nothing for the current slider to catch, which really lacks logic to me. It would also let you NC the downbeat which is significantly stronger than the red tick you currently have your NC on and would be unrankable either way. Fixed

01:39:618 (1) - Why is the spacing on this circle so overdone? Your NC does not make much sense either with the next words beginning on the following downbeat, which is even supported by a very strong drum beat, leaving nothing to justify such a big jump in spacing. Changed this pattern entirely cause everyone hates that pattern

01:42:199 (1) - Same as above ^

01:46:070 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - I do understand your reasoning for this, but the spacing on these jumps is a little bit too high to me and should be toned down slightly. Maybe

01:48:489 (5,1) - Do you really have to create such uncomfortable cursor movement? The transition between these two objects in the song is smooth, so I don't see why you would force the player to snap like this, instead of maintaining flow.I like the way it is cause I wanna emphasize that guitar here

That's all for now, I'll do the rest some other time
Good luck!

CucumberCuc wrote:

Hi :3

[We are u's!]
00:17:521 (2) move to x:180 y:180 Sure
00:18:973 (3) can move it left 1 and put between the sliders and so it will be a little more better to jump? Fixed
00:19:941 (2) I'm not sure that is the location of the circle good for him - move to x:132 y:336 Changed
00:21:392 - 00:21:876 i think be better, if you put circles for vocal I don't map vocals in that kind of break in the middle are between two part of a song, It's not something I usually like to do
00:23:973 (2) make this slider slightly more curve? Sure
00:26:876 (3) like for 00:19:941 (2) - move to x:40 y:84 okay
00:28:650 (1,3) overlap Fixed
00:31:715 (2) end slider move down for he stared the circle 5 This one is good I think, everything is perfectly allign and stacked imo
00:38:328 (2) move left Changed
00:40:263 put circle and stack with end slider on 00:42:037 (2)? I mainly prioritize the drum in this map, so no circle here
00:41:554 (1) start slider move left I don't see any problem here
00:43:973 (5) move to x:4 y:228? No ause it's supposed the follow the pattern from before
00:49:134 (1) - 00:52:199 (2) stack Fixed
00:58:166 (3) overlapped with 00:56:876 (5) maybe move to x:180 y:324? I stacked them instead
00:58:812 - 00:59:134 i think be better, if you put circles for vocal Same reason as the other point a little higher, so no change
01:03:328 - 01:05:908 ^ (but here you can not put circles if you not accept this) I didn't wanted to map the "go" because I wanted little breaks between each pattern
01:13:650 - 01:16:231 ^ (^) ^
01:16:715 (2) move up Sure
01:23:650 (3) I'm not sure that is the location of the circle good for him - move right Changed
01:27:199 - 01:27:683 i think be better, if you put circles for vocal Same reason as before
01:31:715 (4,4) stack? The pattern has been changed so idk
02:02:521 (5) move this circle left and up for not overlapping with 02:01:231 (3,4) Moved the stream instead
02:08:328 (2) stack 02:04:618 (2) How did you even noticed that Owo altough it's not a big deal, fixed anyway xd
02:13:812 (3,4) maybe better if you stack with end previous slider and circle 4 move down for triangle form? I like the way it is no
02:23:973 - 02:24:295 i think be better, if you put circles for vocal Same as above here, It's personnal preference
02:34:295 - 02:34:618 ^ ^
02:38:812 - 02:41:392 ^ ^
03:02:683 - 03:03:166 ^ ^
03:04:457 (3) move right for better flow? I think the flow is pretty good here
03:18:812 (4) move right? ]Reworked part, so idk
03:23:973 (6) move to x:496 y:112 I like the way it is, no change
03:27:521 (4) end slider move up Fixed
03:32:521 (4,5,7,8) maybe should make them the same distance? Fixed
03:36:070 (2) move right and down for better flow? I think the flow is okay here
04:11:070 - 04:11:554 i think be better, if you put circles for vocal Again with that, same reason a before xd
04:39:457 - 04:39:941 ^ ^
04:43:973 (4) move right Sure
04:55:586 (4) maybe stack with 04:53:650 (2)? Reworked part
05:27:199 - 05:27:683 i think be better, if you put circles for vocal No need imo
if you not follow vocal - can ignore