1. Akitoshi's Insane (4.06 stars, 282 notes)
2. Easy (1.39 stars, 105 notes)
3. Hard (3.09 stars, 243 notes)
4. Normal (2 stars, 176 notes)

Beatmap Banner by Shumpei

~Mapset~
Easy - by Ohwow
Normal - by Ohwow
Hard- by Ohwow
Insane - by Akitoshi

~Video provided by Bibbity Bill~

Plaudible
Pishifat
IamKwaN
Metadeta fix and Hitsounding changes
IamKwaN
Pishifat

Doug China wrote:

Hi! Random new modder passing through \:D/
(I'm not too good at modding easy diffs but ill try )

Easy

00:05:824 (4) - Maybe add a slider to next white tick here, it matches with this 00:08:961 (4) - one owo It's fine as it is right now, don't know how to change it. And the parts you mention don't match music-wise

00:20:138 (2) - Maybe add circle here, or do something like this with 2 sliders Sound is too soft compared to the sounds i mapped with the repeating slider.

00:40:922 (1) - The overlap with this 00:39:353 (2) - slider might be a bit confusing for newer players, so maybe something like this would be better Will consider

00:40:922 (1) - Imo, the rhythm should be like this instead of one long slider.it is to match 00:34:647 (1,2,1,2) -

Insane

T R I A N G L E Z

00:08:961 (4,5) - Should have a larger jump imo I think it's fine as it is, it already emphasizes a lot compared to the small spaced jumps (overlaps actually) at 00:07:785 (1,2,3,4) -

00:11:118 (1) - maybe add triangle here like this , you would have to move the sliders here 00:11:902 (5) - and here 00:11:902 (5) - to fit with the triangle tho. So like this
^^ honeslty the pattern imo is fine as it is
00:14:059 (6) - Move this farther from this 00:13:668 (5) - maybe Hmm i made it consistent with 00:10:530 (5,6) -

00:33:373 (2) - Move this closer to this 00:33:079 (1) - Same distance to make those 3 3/4 beats stand out

I think the jump from 01:10:922 (2) - to 01:11:118 (3) - should be emphasized more Don't see reason why, sry.

Good Luck! Thank you!!

dudehacker wrote:

shoot all my stars, such a good map.

I havent practiced std for 3 years since i started playing mania, now i finally found a map i want FC. holy shiet much love <3

Neoskylove wrote:

Q

[Insane]
00:20:138 - add a beat here? I think this part can be added a beat. Not really a sound here, skipping a note here is fine
00:33:863 (1) - doesn't need NC here NC'd the next note instead
01:04:255 (1) - looks weird slider since you didn't try this slider well. Will look into it
01:16:804 (1,1) - delete NC in here, either 01:16:804 (1) - or 01:17:196 (1) - K

GL

TheKingHenry wrote:

Hello mod from my queue~

Easy

1. 00:58:961 (3,1) - not like it's really wrong, but kinda unfitting overlap considering there's like no overlaps at all other than this Will look into it

Normal

1. looks p nice I guess

Hard

1. looks p nice too I guess

Insane

1. 00:09:157 (1) - I believe you didn't NC this in Hard, why NC it here (as in, when 00:09:549 (1) - is NCd too making it just combo of it's own) Fixed
2. 00:33:079 (1,2,3,4) - this kind of rhythm outta nowhere mapped like this doesn't play too intuitively, utilizing sliders atleast little would be recommended (basically with similar ideas as at 00:36:216 (1,2,3) - for example) Nah, i don't want sliders, circles fit the loud, distinguished noise. Although it's unfitting to play (not really), it fits the music better than 3 sliders imo
3. 00:53:667 (2,3,4) - what sounds is this (and the following ones) based on? Nothing to be heard. Now that I'm looking actually, there might be a lot of similar cases, since the song itself seems to have really minimal amount of actual 1/4 it's a small "gimmick" and it makes the repeated vocal lines stand out, mapping those with just sliders just seems underwhelming for those repeated vocals, let alone boring to play for an Insane diff.
4. 01:05:432 - other way here, the 1/4 begins already on the red tick instead of the current white can't really hear it that well starting on the red tick, it becomes a lot more noticeable on the white tick.

Good luck!

Kisses wrote:

Insane

1. 00:02:294 (1) - Because you've followed the piano from earlier it would feel more natural to follow the piano again here Drums too loud
2. 00:02:294 (1) - This is for if you don't do the above and still want to follow the drums. The way you've mapped the drums here is kinda weird. The drum beats land on circles as shown in the following screenshot http://puu.sh/wtyno/9ae808fcd8.jpg I do recommend have clickable objects on where the circles are in the screenshot. The way you have it now is you start with the drums then piano then back to drums which doesn't make you feel like you're following a distinctive rhythm in the song and doesn't make much sense to do it this way. Deleted the repeating slider and placed 2 circles instead.
3. 00:20:334 (1,2,1,2) - This feels really off to map it as 4 circles. There is nothing in the song to support notes on 00:20:530 (2,2) so it ends up feeling like you're playing ghost notes Sorry idk how to explain it but it just feels right to have those pair jumps there because the 2 sounds there are really loud and i want to emphasize like how i did it, and i feel like 2 sliders or 2 circles wouldn't emphasize it as much.
4. 00:22:981 (4) - I can't hear anything here Trying to map to the vocals
5. 00:25:922 - ^ ^
6. 00:25:628 - I feel like this rhythm would be better since you're following the vocals for the verses. http://puu.sh/wtyLs/4fb738b4d0.jpg or http://puu.sh/wtyPn/67cf4c0f85.jpg or http://puu.sh/wtyQe/46b9dd6da9.jpg Having a slider start on 00:25:824 doesn't really follow anything in the song at all Want to make the clap clickable
7. 00:52:687 (1,2) - The spacing here is really high and this part of the song is extremely soft in comparison to what comes after it. By having 2 as such a large jump you take away a lot of emphasis from 00:53:471 (1) Decreased spacing
8. 00:52:687 (1) - ^ alternatively you could just extend this to the red tick like so https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8431945 Nah i want to make it clickable
9. 01:18:765 (2,3,4) - If you're going to map to the vocals then making your adjust your hitsound pattern to follow the vocals so there's feedback on what your following, if not follow the drums. Tbh I would just follow the drums here since they stand out the most will look into it
10. 00:07:785 (1,2,3,4) - imho this pattern is a bit boring to play, especially because of how these notes are different pitches so it feels like a really forced stack patternthey are the same pitch... it's the reason why i stacked them.

Normal

1. 00:02:883 (8) - Turning this into a circle would create put more emphasis on the downbeat and would flow a lot better rhythmically K
2. 00:07:785 (1) - hitsound this object, such a predominant beat should have feedback. Hitsound these too 00:08:569 (3,4,5) K
3. 00:44:059 (1,2) - rhythm suggestion http://puu.sh/wtzuc/7fc58fb188.jpg This could do
4. 00:49:549 (6) - A circle would just flow better rhythmically to me
5. 00:53:471 (1,2) - In the kiai your object denisty reduces drastically. It's lower than the some of the calmer parts of the song (verse). Having the most emphatic part of the song (as well as the end of a map) comes off as a bit boring and badly made. Try increasing the object density, one way you can do this is by adding a circle in places such as 00:54:059 and 01:00:334 etc Yes, thanks for mentioning, changed
6. 01:19:941 (1) - delete NC, this strays away from your normal NC pattern u right
7. Some parts of your rhythm feel way too dense than they should be, for example 00:09:941 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) uses very high object density when it's a very calm part of the song and the density is higher than the intro which it transitions from Fixed

[]I hope this mod was useful, GL! Thanks!

• 
  <number>b=<number> beat between 2 objects
  <number>bs=<number> beat(s) slider
  +<number>r=with <number> return,If no <number>, The <number>=1
  
  Red word means <I very hope you do it,You should try to do>
  Blue word means <I don't think about if it possible,You can do or not do>
  normal color(black) between Red and Blue word, means <You'd better do>

1. 00:01:510(2,3) There can use <1.5bs--1b--1bs>
2. 00:33:079(3) use 2bs without return (I don't think 3/8+3/8+2/8 can use 1bs+r)
3. 00:34:647-00:43:667 use 3x<2bs+r--2b--note> (The last one can use <note-1b-note> or <1bs>)
4. 00:47:196(1,2,3,4,1,2,3) use note in each(old 3) instead of slider, add <Finish> or <Clap> in each (old 1/old 3), delete the each(2)
5. 00:52:093(1) same as 00:33:079(3) . And you'd better cancel <New combo>

1. 00:02:294(3,4) use <note--0.5b--<0.25bs+2r>--0.25b--<0.25bs+2r>>
2. 00:07:785(1,2,3,4) set distance
3. 00:20:334(1,2,3) add <clap> in each one. And set green line with 5%volume in (1,2) sliders'ending
4. 00:29:941(1,2,3,1,2,3,4) set distance in each(1,2)&each(2,3) and add <clap> in all (1) and all(3),set the purple(3) to 0.75bs then add green line with 5%volume in slider ending. You can also delete brown(4) to set the brown(3) to 0.75bs and needn't set 5%volume in ending
5. 00:47:196(1,2,3,4,5,6) use 2*<note--1b--note--1b--1bs--1b> so do in 00:50:334(1,2,3,4,5,6)
6. 01:05:628(4) pls use whistle
7. 01:12:883(3,4,5,6,1) You can change the position to avoid overlap
8. 01:19:157(2) use 4 or above point's slider. And delete(3) to set (2) in 1.5bs
9. 01:20:922(3) use something to instead of 0.25bs+2r. such as <0.25bs+1r>+change its position,or <note-0.5b-note>
10. 01:28:177(1,2) Set Distance (Normal diff needn't)

1. 00:04:451 (4,5,1) - 00:05:824 (4,5,1) - Nowdays players don't like 90 degree patterns, perhaps, strong "line" based mechanic of cursor movement make it a bit harder to aim (idk). Anyway my opinion in current map: it's a bit off of your overall structure and will be better to make more sharp flow to down beats (NCed beats i mean), in this way these beats will be emphasised better and fits your more soft structure of the map. (smthing like 70 degree i guess). Current pattern works fine, just suggestion.
2. 00:20:334 (1,2,1,2) - about spacing. What did You prioritize more strected sound 1 wich flows into 2 or strong beat on 1? This is important for me since i don't really feels difference between 00:20:334 (1,2) - and 00:20:530 (2,1) - jumps, it's looks like similar back-front jumps, so a natural question arises: why did You decide use NC? So, my main consern is your one consept for emphasis different stuff (big jumps for strong sounds and same big jumps for stretched sounds)
   Not fun of 1-2 jumps tbh, but if You use these, perhaps You may folow different consepts for show defference for player and reason for this NC. I think about something like https://puu.sh/wu1kC.jpg for spacing, but yeah again it's up for You...
3. 00:22:981 - i agree here with Kisses... I think it's too forced for tap imo. Thre isn't any sound and vocal more fits structure like http://puu.sh/wu29O.jpg https://puu.sh/wu2bK.jpg same thing as You use in the beggening, wich make structure of map more consistent. What do You think?
   00:25:824 - ^ same for rhythm
4. 00:29:549 (5,1) - too close (ds), it's important beat right? So, give more space, also it should be similar to 00:30:726 (1) - as it repetitive thing (again ds i mean) ...
5. 00:31:510 (5,1) - Swap NC, suggestion -> http://puu.sh/wu2BA.jpg
6. 00:37:785 (6) - You foget NC i guess, since You use it every down beat. (every 4 white ticks)
7. 00:47:196 - NC again, to be consistant with 00:50:334 (1) -
8. 00:59:549 (7,1) - should't it use same thythm as 01:12:098 (7,1) - for consistancy? (imo with kick slider better)
9. 01:19:745 (3,1) - better blanket?

1. 00:29:941 (1,2) - imo it's too forced click bait . 00:29:941 - 00:30:137 - beats not even close to be equal, 1st much stronger, also it's off vocals a bit imo... And I think vocals here become more calm (words becomes streched instead of default, wich use more time and less letters, sounds like slider's mechanic, right? (less clickable objects with same time needed) So, i suggest to use less tense rhytm with emphasis on only for strong beats. What do You think about pattern like https://puu.sh/wu5gj.jpg ?
   Btw, 00:30:726 (1,2) - 00:31:412 (4,1) - i don't recommend use stacks for different rhythm gaps, which placed so nearly, it is confusing for players.
2. 00:32:098 (2,3) - fix blanket pls
3. 01:06:020 (1,2,4,5) - can You structure these a bit more similar, for be more recognizable for players as a repetitive thing (i guess You folow vocal right?), from a first look? Right it was questionable before i rechecked it in editor. I suggest make bigger curve flow for that, just a bit.

1. 00:04:647 (3,4) - for me feels bad while i should change my attention from filler rhytm to main (drums). Usually mapper force to keep smthing one for low diff... i suggest https://puu.sh/wu6Fw.jpg , 00:04:647 - this beat more important for rhythmic complexity then clap as intro, imo
2. 00:37:000 (4,1) - blanket coud be cleaner
3. 01:11:314 (5,1) - blanket coud be cleaner
4. 01:28:177 (4) - i guess it should be NCed, like You did in higher diff?
5. other looks fine, pretty neat diff

1. 00:17:392 (1) - This Nc breaks Nc inheritance.. why?
2. Nothing usefull for You, good diff

Mcen314 wrote:

This is my first mod.

Mean:

• 
  <number>b=<number> beat between 2 objects
  <number>bs=<number> beat(s) slider
  +<number>r=with <number> return,If no <number>, The <number>=1
  
  Red word means <I very hope you do it,You should try to do>
  Blue word means <I don't think about if it possible,You can do or not do>
  normal color(black) between Red and Blue word, means <You'd better do>

You can also use ending spinner to <01:29:157> or <01:29:549>. But it is too short, Don't use in Easy or Normal. No ending spinner, the ending is too short

First,Your normal's volume always 100%,Maybe you forget to set it.pls set it again Fixed

Easy

1. 00:01:510(2,3) There can use <1.5bs--1b--1bs>
2. 00:33:079(3) use 2bs without return (I don't think 3/8+3/8+2/8 can use 1bs+r)
3. 00:34:647-00:43:667 use 3x<2bs+r--2b--note> (The last one can use <note-1b-note> or <1bs>)
4. 00:47:196(1,2,3,4,1,2,3) use note in each(old 3) instead of slider, add <Finish> or <Clap> in each (old 1/old 3), delete the each(2)
5. 00:52:093(1) same as 00:33:079(3) . And you'd better cancel <New combo> They are not the same... they are in 2 totally different parts of the song

===============================

Hard

1. 00:02:294(3,4) use <note--0.5b--<0.25bs+2r>--0.25b--<0.25bs+2r>>
2. 00:07:785(1,2,3,4) set distance Why? I want them to stack
3. 00:20:334(1,2,3) add <clap> in each one. And set green line with 5%volume in (1,2) sliders'ending They already have claps. And I don't want to make the ending sliders 5% volume
4. 00:29:941(1,2,3,1,2,3,4) set distance in each(1,2)&each(2,3) and add <clap> in all (1) and all(3),set the purple(3) to 0.75bs then add green line with 5%volume in slider ending. You can also delete brown(4) to set the brown(3) to 0.75bs and needn't set 5%volume in ending There is a triple that starts on the red tick, & I don't want to miss that beat
5. 00:47:196(1,2,3,4,5,6) use 2*<note--1b--note--1b--1bs--1b> so do in 00:50:334(1,2,3,4,5,6)
6. 01:05:628(4) pls use whistle It's already using the clap sound.
7. 01:12:883(3,4,5,6,1) You can change the position to avoid overlap They are stacking, not overlapping
8. 01:19:157(2) use 4 or above point's slider. And delete(3) to set (2) in 1.5bs
9. 01:20:922(3) use something to instead of 0.25bs+2r. such as <0.25bs+1r>+change its position,or <note-0.5b-note>
10. 01:28:177(1,2) Set Distance (Normal diff needn't) It already is?

Good luck for your map! I hope the mod is helpful

_Meep_ wrote:

wao copied bg meme inc
use a different bg pls
i will shoot all my stars if its kato only and original :^)

Mitkoff wrote:

Hello, O/
NM from q.

[Insane]

1. 00:04:451 (4,5,1) - 00:05:824 (4,5,1) - Nowdays players don't like 90 degree patterns, perhaps, strong "line" based mechanic of cursor movement make it a bit harder to aim (idk). Anyway my opinion in current map: it's a bit off of your overall structure and will be better to make more sharp flow to down beats (NCed beats i mean), in this way these beats will be emphasised better and fits your more soft structure of the map. (smthing like 70 degree i guess). Current pattern works fine, just suggestion. Will consider
2. 00:20:334 (1,2,1,2) - about spacing. What did You prioritize more strected sound 1 wich flows into 2 or strong beat on 1? This is important for me since i don't really feels difference between 00:20:334 (1,2) - and 00:20:530 (2,1) - jumps, it's looks like similar back-front jumps, so a natural question arises: why did You decide use NC? So, my main consern is your one consept for emphasis different stuff (big jumps for strong sounds and same big jumps for stretched sounds)
   Not fun of 1-2 jumps tbh, but if You use these, perhaps You may folow different consepts for show defference for player and reason for this NC. I think about something like https://puu.sh/wu1kC.jpg for spacing, but yeah again it's up for You... Not a big fan of the small spacing between the NC
3. 00:22:981 - i agree here with Kisses... I think it's too forced for tap imo. Thre isn't any sound and vocal more fits structure like http://puu.sh/wu29O.jpg https://puu.sh/wu2bK.jpg same thing as You use in the beggening, wich make structure of map more consistent. What do You think? I actually like this. Changed
   00:25:824 - ^ same for rhythm
4. 00:29:549 (5,1) - too close (ds), it's important beat right? So, give more space, also it should be similar to 00:30:726 (1) - as it repetitive thing (again ds i mean) ... Fixed
5. 00:31:510 (5,1) - Swap NC, suggestion -> http://puu.sh/wu2BA.jpg Swapped NC, didn't take suggestion though cauz i want the slider to start on the vocal
6. 00:37:785 (6) - You foget NC i guess, since You use it every down beat. (every 4 white ticks) My bad
7. 00:47:196 - NC again, to be consistant with 00:50:334 (1) - K
8. 00:59:549 (7,1) - should't it use same thythm as 01:12:098 (7,1) - for consistancy? (imo with kick slider better) Used a kick there cause there's a beat on the blue tick
9. 01:19:745 (3,1) - better blanket? Fixed

[Hard]

1. 00:29:941 (1,2) - imo it's too forced click bait . 00:29:941 - 00:30:137 - beats not even close to be equal, 1st much stronger, also it's off vocals a bit imo... And I think vocals here become more calm (words becomes streched instead of default, wich use more time and less letters, sounds like slider's mechanic, right? (less clickable objects with same time needed) So, i suggest to use less tense rhytm with emphasis on only for strong beats. What do You think about pattern like https://puu.sh/wu5gj.jpg ? Changed to something different. Similar to the way you have it, but yours have too big of a spac between the purple 2 and brown 1. I do agree with what you said though
   Btw, 00:30:726 (1,2) - 00:31:412 (4,1) - i don't recommend use stacks for different rhythm gaps, which placed so nearly, it is confusing for players. K
2. 00:32:098 (2,3) - fix blanket pls
3. 01:06:020 (1,2,4,5) - can You structure these a bit more similar, for be more recognizable for players as a repetitive thing (i guess You folow vocal right?), from a first look? Right it was questionable before i rechecked it in editor. I suggest make bigger curve flow for that, just a bit. Ehh, it is kinda similar; it's mirrored horizontally (actually it was suppose to be, but wasn't, so fixed i guess xD

[Normal]

1. 00:04:647 (3,4) - for me feels bad while i should change my attention from filler rhytm to main (drums). Usually mapper force to keep smthing one for low diff... i suggest https://puu.sh/wu6Fw.jpg , 00:04:647 - this beat more important for rhythmic complexity then clap as intro, imo if i change it to how yours looks, then the melody at 00:05:432 - would be skipped. I'd rather skip 00:04:647 - cause it feels better to click on the big white tick at 00:04:843 -
2. 00:37:000 (4,1) - blanket coud be cleaner Fixed
3. 01:11:314 (5,1) - blanket coud be cleaner Fixed
4. 01:28:177 (4) - i guess it should be NCed, like You did in higher diff? Yeah
5. other looks fine, pretty neat diff

[Easy]

1. 00:17:392 (1) - This Nc breaks Nc inheritance.. why? deleted NC
2. Nothing usefull for You, good diff

[]
I guess that's it. Hope You'll find smthing usefull.
GL~

Underforest wrote:

haha I also mapped this song
this map is great to be mapped by someone with no ranked maps but your metadata is incorrect

according to seakano flat website and group website, title should be "Sakura-iro Diary (TV-Size)" (in red what should be deleted)

I hope I helped you out :3 ofc no kds