1. Advanced (2.15 stars, 168 notes)
2. Enon's Normal (1.75 stars, 137 notes)

Revialink wrote:

Hi!~ From #modreqs

Try this timing ^^

Timing

[TimingPoints]
540,697.674418604651,4,2,1,50,1,0
5892,-100,4,2,1,0,0,0
6589,-100,4,2,1,50,0,0
85601,-125,4,2,1,50,0,0
90485,-100,4,2,1,50,0,0
90540,697.674418604651,4,2,1,50,1,0
100420,857.142857142857,4,2,1,50,1,0
101330,648.648648648649,4,2,1,50,1,0
101980,609.137055837563,4,2,1,50,1,0
102590,754.716981132075,4,2,1,50,1,0
105610,839.160839160839,4,2,1,50,1,0

Good Luck!

• 
  Normal

1. Try to improve this slider's shape 00:09:609 (1) - It looks umm..bad to me.(imo) Try sliders like these 00:26:353 (3) - but bend them better
2. 00:17:981 (1,2) - Space between therse objects are bigger compared to other.
3. 00:22:864 (3,1) - ^
4. 00:31:934 (1) - Looks bad (imo)
5. 00:45:190 (2) - start new combo here
6. 00:45:888 (1) - remove nc here
7. 00:50:771 (3,1) - a bit bigger space compared to 00:00:540 (1,1) -
8. 01:21:469 (2,1) - ^
9. 01:22:167 (1,2) - spacing is smaller
10. 01:24:260 (3,4,1) - not constant spacing
11. 01:32:981 (4,1) - Spacing
12. 01:38:912 (1,2,3) - ^

Blan_C wrote:

Hello,
NM from #modreqs

• 
  Normal

1. Try to improve this slider's shape 00:09:609 (1) - It looks umm..bad to me.(imo) Try sliders like these 00:26:353 (3) - but bend them better
2. 00:17:981 (1,2) - Space between therse objects are bigger compared to other. ok
3. 00:22:864 (3,1) - ^ fixed
4. 00:31:934 (1) - Looks bad (imo) ok fixed
5. 00:45:190 (2) - start new combo here I think it is better before.
6. 00:45:888 (1) - remove nc here ^
7. 00:50:771 (3,1) - a bit bigger space compared to 00:00:540 (1,1) - ^
8. 01:21:469 (2,1) - ^ ^
9. 01:22:167 (1,2) - spacing is smaller fixed
10. 01:24:260 (3,4,1) - not constant spacing fixed
11. 01:32:981 (4,1) - Spacing fixed
12. 01:38:912 (1,2,3) - ^ fixed

I think you shall work on slider shapes. You make these vertical or horizontal. It looks bad. I just apply Classic Style
I would increase CS a bit too.

Good luck!

-Sakurasaki wrote:

From my queue !!


[Metadata]

add tags

Date A Live OST Soundtrack Instrumental Piano Cover Encore First Half      

OK

[Normal]

open

00:11:702 - important note, map it Um ... ambiguous.
00:17:283 (3) - NC here I think it is better before.
00:45:190 (2) - same ^ ^
00:54:260 (1) - delete the NC here and add it in the following note. OK fixed
01:02:632 (1) - erase the nc, it's not going well. OK fixed
01:07:516 (2) - NC I think it is better before.
01:02:632 (1) - this slider I do not like, you should do it like 01:02:632 (1) - ? Please explain again.
01:16:585 (1,2) - the tail of (1) should go more in the direction of (2) OK fixed
01:24:260 (3,4,1) - It is not advisable to stack the notes, try to make them more straight towards 01:25:655 (2) - I will modify in a different way

[Hard]

Open

00:04:028 (1) - You snaps the end of this slider, and this one does not? 00:09:609 (4) - Oh fixed
00:11:702 - Important note that you do not map here, but if you do here 00:22:865 (2) -, basically they are the same sound, you should map it consistently so as not to have future errors. Um ... ambiguous.
01:32:632 (4) - NC here I think it is better before.
01:33:330 (1) - delete the NC I think it is better before.

Rubiha wrote:

Hi from Space lel


[I DONT KNOW(General)]

SPOILER

Work with HS and NC
I dont like combo colors, change it (1or2) OK

[Normal]

SPOILER

00:01:237 (1) - make HS louder I think it is better before.
00:04:027 (1) - OK
00:06:818 (1) - I think it is better before.
00:15:190 (1) - OK
00:19:376 (3) - I think 00:20:771 (1) - is better that make HS
00:54:957 (1) - color=#008000]I think 00:55:655 (2) - is better that make HS[/color]
01:24:260 (3) - I think it is better before.
and other place same.

00:01:237 (1) - why NC here? Because it's the beginning of the first bar.
In my opinion NC
00:06:818 (1) - Here Already NC
00:14:492 (2) - I think it is better before.
00:17:283 (3) - ^
00:22:864 (3) - ^
00:36:818 (2) - ^
00:39:609 (3) - ^
01:18:678 (2) - ^
01:21:469 (2) - ^
01:24:260 (3) - ^

01:40:420 (3,4,1) - want try made this sliders slowers? OK fixed

[HARD]

SPOILER

00:01:237 (1) - why NC here? if here 00:06:819 (1) - fine Because it's the beginning of the first bar.

in my opinion NC
00:03:330 (2) - here I think it is better before.

00:14:493 (2) - ^
00:17:284 (6) - ^
00:22:865 (2) - ^
00:25:656 (4) - ^
00:39:609 (6) - ^
01:18:678 (2) - ^
01:24:261 (6) - ^

Make HS louder like i said in normals.

00:35:423 (2) - want try sliders here? I think it is better before.

01:40:420 (1,1,1) - make sliders slower? OK fixed

nice SONG, but i really dont like your map, he he, GL dude Because it's Classic Style :^)

SLM wrote:

의도하신건진 모르겠지만 굉장히 옛날 스타일 맵같네요
CS를 너무 작게 쓰신 것 같은데 ^ 의도하신게 아니라면 노말은 3~4 하드는 4~5 정도로 쓰시길 추천
쿠도스는 안주셔도 되요. 노래 잘 듣고 갑니다.

Enon wrote:

https://osu.ppy.sh/b/681203
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/878561

이런 맵들이 있기도 하고, 곡도 잔잔해서 패턴들이 어려운 것도 아니니 이 정도 CS는 문제될 거 없다고 생각해요.

맵 셋팅들이 랭킹 크리테리아 가이드라인에도 어느 정도 맞아서 이대로 두시면 될 듯.

맵 정말 마음에 듭니다. 랭크 시키기까지 화이팅입니다.

1. 00:04:725 - 00:05:423 - You need to remove the sound of ticks.
2. 01:01:237 (4) - NC?
3. 01:31:935 (3) - NC, because these sounds are the same 01:31:935 (3,1) - . 01:34:726 (3) - 01:37:516 (3) - too.
4. 01:41:330 (1) - I think here seems better with the rounded slider.
5. 01:45:610 - Bpm 53,500?

1. 01:30:539 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ^

Lama Poluna wrote:

hai~

[Hard]

1. 00:04:725 - 00:05:423 - You need to remove the sound of ticks. OK,I will add soft-slidertick.wav
2. 01:01:237 (4) - NC? Good, fixed
3. 01:31:935 (3) - NC, because these sounds are the same 01:31:935 (3,1) - . 01:34:726 (3) - 01:37:516 (3) - too. OK fixed
4. 01:41:330 (1) - I think here seems better with the rounded slider. OK fixed
5. 01:45:610 - Bpm 53,500? Nice, fixed

[Normal]

1. 01:30:539 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ^ OK all fixed

nice map, gl <3

(I'm sorry that it is short, just have nothing to say, good map)

_Shironeko_ wrote:

hard:
1.00:01:237 (1) - change 1-->3 00:00:540 (1,2,3) - better I think it is better before.
2.00:00:540 (1,2,3) - new combo ? Already New combo
3.00:04:028 (1) - change 1-->3 I think it is better before.
4.00:09:609 (4,1,2,3) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7171204 better Good, fixed
5.00:14:493 (2,3,1,2,3,4,5) - change the combo to this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7171210 I think it is better before.
6.00:17:284 (6,1,2) - change to this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7171219 umm it's strange
7.00:19:028 (3) - new combo I think it is better before.
8.00:39:609 (6,1,2,3,4) - same with 6,7 I think it is better before.
this is my opinion,you can do the same at different places
normal:seems good
PLS GIVE ME KUDOSU
PLS GIVE ME KUDOSU OKay, xD

Phyloukz wrote:

Helloo, from #modreqs
cute map you got there, osu! needs definetly more of this kind so i try to help you!

Hard

You can use a cutsom diffulty name for "Hard". Maybe you find something appropriate, having only "Hard" is kinda meh imo... would be really cool with a custom name
00:05:946 - you can move this green line exact on the slidertail on 00:06:120 - to silence the tail. i think its not really necessary but it looks cleaner in the editor fixed
00:06:643 - same for all green lines, the effect of the green line gets into force on the tick it is placed.
00:15:191 (1) - maybe add a very little distance snap increase here to emphasize the special sound. i think it would fit pretty well because as for now the special sound has the same value like the neutral ones If I increase the distance, it becomes rather strange.
00:26:354 (1) - same for this and many others, you get the idea i think not bad
00:19:028 (3,4) - try to make your blankets a bit cleaner, not gonna mention this again because its a general advice OK fixed
01:11:005 (1) - make both sliderhead and slidertail parallel to the horizontal axis OK fixed
01:16:586 (1) - and this parallel to vertical axis please it just looks rather neat that way OK fixed
01:13:795 (1) - ctrl + j for to flip the slidershape, its betetr flow that way fixed
01:24:958 (1) - make a 1/4 slider at 01:24:783 - to represent the song bit better Not good
01:43:344 - the break here doesnt seem appropriate imo. either just delete the break and let the HP drain or make a spinner instead, a spinenr would fit ebcause of that expiring sound. i would end it at 01:44:476 - this point then (uhhh also it is recommended by the ranking guideline (i guess, not 100% sure) that you shoudl use at least 1 spinner in your map, exception is only if there really is no appropriate place) OK fixed


I think the current HP is too high, its not really cool to see your HP drain that much in such a calm song. So i would decrease the HP from 6 to like 3
The OD is also too high imo because it is such an easy map and a calm song, the first time i played it i got like 4 100's because i had to get used to the song and map, and thats not really a good thing. So i think OD 4 would look cool to me I'll change AR6 OD5 HP5
Maybe add a 3rd combo colour that is a bit darker to make a contrast? idk its personal preference would look better to me at least because the existing 2 colours are kinda bright IDK lel

Normal

Technically the Normal is an Easy difficulty (accoridng to the star rating and the map itself). with the (maybe) custom diff name in Hard the nametag Easy would fit. ort you can also call it "Simple" which looks cooler to me for a low sr 2 diffs spread. (I got that advice on my own map and indeed it looks nicer with that name (also with the custom diff)

Check AiMod for Distance Snap issues (ctrl + shift + a) and fix them Fixed
00:26:353 (3) - yes it is in the palyfield area but i think this sldier should be rather in the center or at least somewhere here because for very newbies it might be awkward to hold their cursor that long (the slider is very long and so much time the player spends in that outher area) in the very very right of the playfield area. OK fixed
01:42:590 (1) - would make a 1/4 slider at 01:42:590 - (even though it is an Easy difficulty i think 1/4 sldier looks okay here) and a spinner right after for the expiring sound. (same spinner thing i mentione din Hard) Good, fixed

I think the AR should be around 3 instead of 5. AR5 is way too high for a 1.2* difficulty (and slow bpm)
HP around 2
and OD definetely below 3! i tihnk OD 2 would be good I'll change AR4 OD4 HP4 xD
really liked the slidershapes here in the beginning!

Okay, thats it for me, I hope i could help you a little bit. Id like to shoot a star but i have no kudo left XD
Please keep on working i wanna see this in ranked section :3

Good Luck on ranking process and happy mapping!:)

• [Light]

1. 00:52:864 (3,4,5) - It is not very beautiful. I would change.
   Everything else is great
   
   [Heavy]
2. It is worth noting that for the normal difficulty too small elements, but it is not critical.
3. 00:57:051 (1) - This slider can be slightly bend. It looks better in my opinion.
   Everything else is great too.
   
   Really good map. Even I could not find anything about. I hope you get it rank. Good luck!