1. Fiance's Catharsis (6.63 stars, 1629 notes)
2. Serendipity (5.78 stars, 1437 notes)

Fii wrote:

`L_`

Fii wrote:

`L_`

Ascendance wrote:

Fii wrote:

`L_`

Adore wrote:

mods plz

2017-03-21 17:29 Adore: carthasis
2017-03-21 17:29 Ascendance: u need to fix this
2017-03-21 17:29 Ascendance: ur hitsounds conflict with ours and it makes it sound really fuking bad
2017-03-21 17:30 Adore: FUK
2017-03-21 17:30 Ascendance: just look at the hitsounds from my mapset and make sure they dont conflict
2017-03-21 17:30 Adore: okay
2017-03-21 17:31 Adore: are there any unrankable stuff
2017-03-21 17:31 Adore: like bg size
2017-03-21 17:31 Adore: and such
2017-03-21 17:31 Ascendance: uh i can check 
2017-03-21 17:32 Ascendance: our diff doesnt need mods :d
2017-03-21 17:32 Adore: :d
2017-03-21 17:33 Ascendance: its perfect as always
2017-03-21 17:33 Adore: mine diff too
2017-03-21 17:33 Ascendance: besides the hitsounds u fukt up
2017-03-21 17:33 Ascendance: : )
2017-03-21 17:35 Ascendance: 04:36:919 (2) - can you move this to x:272 and tilt it like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7624049
2017-03-21 17:36 Adore: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7624056
2017-03-21 17:36 Adore: is this gud
2017-03-21 17:37 Ascendance: maybe tilt 1 or 2 more grids downwards
2017-03-21 17:37 Ascendance: just make sure it makes an hdash between 04:36:919 (2,3) - 
2017-03-21 17:37 Adore: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7624062
2017-03-21 17:37 Adore: how about now
2017-03-21 17:37 Ascendance: yea
2017-03-21 17:37 Adore: yea
2017-03-21 17:37 Ascendance: it keeps the hdash?
2017-03-21 17:38 Adore: yus
2017-03-21 17:38 Adore: glowing red fruit
2017-03-21 17:38 Ascendance: kk
2017-03-21 17:38 Ascendance: yea
2017-03-21 17:38 Ascendance: you've got some unrankable stuff
2017-03-21 17:38 Ascendance: 1: the preview points are inconsistent
2017-03-21 17:38 Adore: y do u guys not want the BUBUBUBUUBUBUBU
2017-03-21 17:38 Ascendance: we have ours at 04:13:988 - 
2017-03-21 17:39 Adore: ok fixed
2017-03-21 17:39 Adore: are diffs
2017-03-21 17:39 Adore: are 6ms off from each other
2017-03-21 17:39 Ascendance: unused hitsounds
2017-03-21 17:39 Ascendance: 04:13:988 - 
2017-03-21 17:39 Ascendance: oop
2017-03-21 17:39 Adore: our*
2017-03-21 17:39 Ascendance: normal-slidertick.wav
2017-03-21 17:39 Ascendance: normal-slidertick2.wav
2017-03-21 17:39 Ascendance: soft-slidertick3.wav
2017-03-21 17:40 Ascendance: ending time is irrelevant
2017-03-21 17:40 Adore: are you sure
2017-03-21 17:40 Ascendance: yes
2017-03-21 17:40 Ascendance: not unrankable
2017-03-21 17:40 Adore: why is it even offset to begin with
2017-03-21 17:40 Adore: didn't we both take from naitoshi
2017-03-21 17:40 Adore: ? ? ?
2017-03-21 17:40 Ascendance: ohhh
2017-03-21 17:40 Ascendance: the whole thing is off
2017-03-21 17:40 Ascendance: yeah we adjusted our offset to be more accurate
2017-03-21 17:40 Ascendance: use ours
2017-03-21 17:40 Adore: yes
2017-03-21 17:41 Adore: sheeit
2017-03-21 17:41 Ascendance: while ur at it
2017-03-21 17:41 Ascendance: 00:00:871 -
2017-03-21 17:41 Ascendance: in your diff
2017-03-21 17:41 Ascendance: is unrankable
2017-03-21 17:41 Ascendance: the two timing lines need to be the same volume
2017-03-21 17:41 Ascendance: or else u break osu
2017-03-21 17:41 Adore: o what the hell
2017-03-21 17:41 Adore: that wasn't intended
2017-03-21 17:41 Ascendance: ye XD
2017-03-21 17:42 Ascendance: ur map gives 290pp
2017-03-21 17:42 Adore: :gun:
2017-03-21 17:42 Ascendance: ours gives 630
2017-03-21 17:42 Ascendance: LOL
2017-03-21 17:42 Adore: nice one
2017-03-21 17:42 Ascendance: whoops
2017-03-21 17:42 Adore: uhh
2017-03-21 17:42 Adore: whats the fastest way
2017-03-21 17:42 Adore: to fix my offset
2017-03-21 17:42 Ascendance: select all timing points
2017-03-21 17:43 Adore: o true
2017-03-21 17:43 Ascendance: and move -6
2017-03-21 17:43 Ascendance: and then switch to 1/8 snap and click "resnap all objects"
2017-03-21 17:43 Ascendance: unless you used 1/3
2017-03-21 17:43 Ascendance: then ur fucked
2017-03-21 17:44 Adore: 00:00:871 00:00:885
2017-03-21 17:44 Adore: its actually 14 ms
2017-03-21 17:44 Adore: wtf
2017-03-21 17:44 Ascendance: well adjust it as needed
2017-03-21 17:45 Ascendance: until it matches ours
2017-03-21 17:45 Adore: OK
2017-03-21 17:45 Ascendance: 01:19:146 (7) - intimate with offscreen
2017-03-21 17:45 Ascendance: 01:20:871 (1) - intimate with my dik
2017-03-21 17:46 Adore: did you mean resnap all notes
2017-03-21 17:46 Adore: instead of resnap all objects
2017-03-21 17:46 Adore: dont want to click the wrong thing just making sure
2017-03-21 17:46 Ascendance: yes
2017-03-21 17:46 Adore: ok
2017-03-21 17:46 Ascendance: thef irst red option
2017-03-21 17:50 Adore: ok timing should be good
2017-03-21 17:50 Adore: off screen.
2017-03-21 17:50 Ascendance: intimate with anime
2017-03-21 17:51 Adore: post this in thread after i want sp
2017-03-21 17:51 Adore: sp looks good
2017-03-21 17:51 Ascendance: ok.

Dawnsday wrote:

someone say free iphone 4

ya

yeet

00:00:885 (1,2) - distance between slider and note is 1.27x here but 1.26x for every other time. fix it OK
also fix the spacing between each (2,1) since they switch a lot 00:01:229 (2) - is 2.68x for example whereas 00:01:747 (2) - is 2.65x OK

00:06:057 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - this plays fucking dreadfully why is 00:06:229 (1) - this spaced after 00:06:287 (1) - but hits before it AASSSDASF Changed the stream into a repeat slider and fixed spinner yaya

00:12:264 (2,3,4) - aids to read moved it down

00:23:298 (2,3,4) - stop okay dad

01:17:781 (1) - spacing from 1,2 is 2.04x 01:17:436 (1) - this is 2.03x pixel nazi #2 thx

01:38:126 (5) - nc? probably


i cba to look at the rest of this but it's good keep it up cirl su

Skeep wrote:

mod

00:01:402 (1,2) - 00:01:919 (1,2) - 00:02:436 (1,2) - sound is EVer SO slightly getting a little louder on these so u could maybe increase spacing and sv on each of them just a little if u want no need
00:23:298 (2) - NC? Nope it belongs on 00:22:953 (1) -
00:31:229 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - why are these getting smaller whnn the sound is getn ing louder?? ur write. fixedx
00:55:367 (9,10,11,12) - sound is getting increasingly louder on these and it might start on the note beforei dk if im deaf but yh. also u should NC when u increase the spcaing!! spacing is fine
01:46:057 (1) - remove NC here mby bcz it sounds like it's just a continutation of the sound in thep revious slider so u ccould have them obth on the same combo butidk
02:33:816 (1) - idk fi it's a good idea bu t u could make this into a red anchor point cos the sound is prertty sHARP sure
02:45:540 (1) - u should amake the SV slower bcz it sounds to me like the slidr is oln a weaker sound. its a lower note in the song and the intensity is about the same so no changes
02:51:057 - 02:53:643 - 02:53:816 - ur missing sounds in these parts and a lot of other similar parts later on but it's intentional so. i dont mind but ij ust want to know why if u dont mind ! the beats are barely audible and i like having the pauses
03:22:953 (3) - 03:23:643 (6) - 03:24:505 (10) - imo i'd put an NC on these to emphasise the sounds okey
03:42:953 (1) - 03:44:333 (1) - 03:45:712 (1) - i think these should all hvae sepearte higher svs cos the sound is getting loudER nah
ok i tyhink that's it hopefull y i could hlep and btw send free iphone to 10 downing street in london i'll be wating thx

Kaifin wrote:

yea

1. why use stack leniency so high when you have so many stack if you use like 3 itll make a lot of the stacks look so much better stack leniency daddy :weary:
2. 00:27:781 (5) - NC cause u NCd here 00:17:091 or just dont NC at that one, i know theres a different amount of time between them but i noticed it while playing so it seems inconsistent OKAY
3. 00:52:781 (5) - NC this one too for consistency with 00:47:264 (1) - OKAY
4. 01:04:333 (1,1) - not like this
   SPOILER

   
   ya
5. 01:07:091 (1,1) - gah
   SPOILER

   
   yah
6. 01:16:402 (3) - i dont think this counts as burai especially with the new RC but im not sure
7. 01:17:609 (2) and 01:18:298 (2) - can u avoid this cause ur structure is good until its not with this sure made them overlap cuz i tried other methods but they all look bad :d
8. 01:19:678 (2,3,4,5,6) - you could make this a proper triangle or make 01:20:022 (4,5,6) - go straight down from 01:19:850 (3) - for a cleaner look rn its off triangle
9. 01:21:229 (3,6,2) - WTF HAPPENEd life
10. 01:26:574 (2,3,4) - this flow is weird and also isnt a proper line, if you're keeping the line make it a proper line but maybe just change it to be a zig zag like the others and move the 01:27:436 (7,8) to correspond with this
    SPOILER

    
    made it a zig zag and moved things to correspond with it
11. 01:31:919 - why do you NC spam here? i get that the velocity is slightly different for each one but NC spam isn't needed to read it and it would look a lot better with pairs of 2 i really like the rainbow coloured rice krispys
12. 01:38:126 (1,2,3,4) - surprised this doesnt increase in spacing as well, maybe you could keep this spacing the same and make the 01:37:781 (1,2,3,4) - spacing less to transition it a bit better? then you could also seperate the 01:38:471 (1) - even further for emphasis I will go with your suggestion
13. theres a lot of NC suggestions in this part because i think the NC spam ruins the emphasis if you do it a lot
14. 01:43:471 (1) - if your stack leniency was just higher shit like this would look way nicer it is now!
15. 01:43:471 (1) - also for consistency you shouldnt NC this ok
16. 01:46:057 (1) - imo this NC is unnecessary ok
17. 01:47:091 (1) - same ok
18. 01:49:333 (1) - personally i think this one could be not NC'd too for more emphasis on the 01:49:505 (1) - ok
19. 01:50:885 (1,2,1) - cute but it would be cuter if you could set it up so 01:51:229 (1) - stacks on the slider end of 01:49:505 (1) - im not sure if that would make the stream spacing weird but it feels a little high for the angle rn regardless stacked and also moved 01:51:143 (2) - to the left a bit to form a < pattern, ur cute too btw
20. 01:51:574 (1) - no NC if you took the other one for consistency ya
21. 01:52:609 (2,2) - actually stack these they were stacked idk why they fell apart like my life lol.
22. go through the NCs and make sure they're consistent if you change them: NC spam lowers emphasis so much unless literally everything needs it to be readable: which it really doesnt here because you have intuitive slider design
23. 01:56:402 - is it just me or are these hitsounds a little loud compared to the others? kind of jarring and weird sounding its the same volume but its probably cuz i hitsounded the entire stream
24. 02:00:885 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - see what you did here is what i was talking about at 01:38:126 (1,2,3,4) in the earlier point if you didnt get it from my explanation got it now
25. 02:02:609 (1,2) - these aren't the same angle shit
26. 02:03:988 (1) - or 02:04:160 (1) - no NC removed NC on 02:03:988 (2) -
27. 02:05:540 (1) - no NC okey
28. 02:06:919 (1) - 02:07:264 (1) - 02:07:609 (1) - this would be more emphasis if NCd in pairs of 2, so no NC on these notes imo ye
29. 02:07:781 (1,1) -
    SPOILER

    
    nut
30. 02:08:126 (1) - no NC okey
31. 02:08:298 (1,1,2,3) - why not structure this as a proper shape? like make the rectangle even so it doesnt look fuckd
32. 02:11:574 (3) - this SHOuld be NC'd if you applied the point at 02:06:919
33. 02:13:643 (1) - 02:13:816 (2) - swap these NCs for consistency if you applied before
34. 02:15:022 (2) - no NC
35. 02:16:402 (1,1) - this flow is pretty ???? to me, also no NC on 02:16:402 (1) -
36. 02:18:126 (1) - same as before with these 3 yes
37. 02:22:609 (3) - NC done
38. 02:23:298 (1,2,1) - this flow is kind of gross, moving 02:23:643 (1,2) - down and to the left would improve it a lot, maybe something like this
    SPOILER

    
    used your suggestion
39. 02:28:471 (1,2) - really nazi one
    SPOILER

    
    reminds me of the time when my calc teacher gave me 39.75/40 on a quiz
40. 02:31:229 (3) - NC this and no NC 02:31:919 (1) - this for consistency ok
41. 02:31:574 (2) - is there a reason this specific slider isnt extended? the same sound has an extended slider when it occurs later and this is the only non extended slider not really. changed the slider
42. 02:33:298 - consider not using the NC spam until 02:33:988 - for emphasis ok
43. 02:34:850 (1,2,3,4,5) - this flow is icky i know you wanna stack it but like doing this or something similar is 10x better flow
    SPOILER

    
    yeah, it probably plays bad. fixed it
44. 02:43:643 - can you unfuck the structure in this part? here is an example of a structured possible solution cause ur current pattern kinda ruins your whole structure you have going on through all the slider wubs
    SPOILER

    
    SPOILER

    
    see it makes a triangle just do some shit lik that so its not icky as heLL done
45. 02:57:953 (2,3) - move this 2 up a bit so the overlap is better? i also moved the whole pattern including 02:57:953 (2,3,4) - to the side a little in the screenshot to keep the same flow
    SPOILER

    
    okay
46. 03:00:195 (1,2,3) - triangle ▶
47. 03:05:195 (7,2) - avoid this overlap u have all the space in the world to avoid it
48. 03:10:712 (9,1) - pretty surprised this isnt a blanket, i know suggesting blankets where they arent is a bad suggestion but like this seems pretty obvious considering the structure/patterning of the last 15 seconds blanketed
49. 03:13:298 (4,5) - nazi
    SPOILER

    
    not rlly nazi thats pretty visible but thanks!
50. 03:14:505 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - if ur gonna do this hexagon grid shit please make it a proper grid with proper spacing remapped this part
51. 03:15:712 (3,4) -
    SPOILER

    
    ded
52. 03:17:091 - the note is clearly here if you want it to be extended then just make it a triplet im deaf
53. 03:18:816 (1,2,3,4,1) - this is fuckd
    SPOILER

    
    unfuckd
54. 03:20:885 - should be NCd ye
55. 03:33:988 (5,6,7,8,9) -
    SPOILER

    
    ya
56. 03:34:678 (1,2) - make straight because the line and flow of 03:35:367 (5) - makes it look really off cause its not straight okay!
57. 03:36:057 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is not a proper line, how i noticed i will never know but its not right LOL fixd
58. 03:37:436 (1,2) - this one is much more straight than the last i say that about my friends too
59. 03:53:298 - im not sure why throughout this section you ignore this note, its like the most important note in the whole rhythm and its not clickable ever, and since its never clickable the whole section feels fuckd rhythm wise ez solution
60. 03:55:367 - why is this stream kinda fucked up like this when all the others aren't? since its the first one its super weird to read, i think you should make it just like any of the other ones like at 04:05:712 - fixed
61. 03:57:264 (3,1) - i know you're blanketing but it would just look a lot better if you fully seperated 03:57:436 (1,2,3,4) - from 03:57:005 (2) - (the 1 is stacked on the slider end of 03:55:540 (3) - in the screenshot for reference
    SPOILER

    
    done
62. 03:58:816 - these should def be clickablethey are now
63. 04:04:419 - see the note you're trying to hold for with 04:04:333 (4) - actually starts here, which is why there is that awkward disconnect and it feels funny to play fixed!
64. 04:08:729 (1) - no NC ok
65. 04:08:816 (2) - NC (this was probably a mistake) indeed
66. 04:09:936 - how come u do it properly here i'll fix the others using this rhythm :0
67. 04:13:298 (1,2,3,4) - make the spacing higher if you're gonna not stack them because it just kinda looks fucked by accident like this, not cool sorrie it was meant to be stacked
68. 04:14:678 - NCing stuff applies here too, but i think maybe the NC spam is okay in this kiai? idk just use your own discretion and look over it for what you'd change for consistency nah i'll fix the NC spams
69. 04:24:333 - when u copy ur streams from lesjuh lesjuh is blu dragon backwards
70. 04:34:333 (1) - can u nudge this up so it doesnt have the overlap with 04:33:643 (1,2,3,4) yes
71. 04:35:195 (2) - and 04:34:505 (2) - why whenever u do 1-2 jumps does it ruin your structure please make this good structur suk at jumpz
72. 04:37:436 - same not clickable complaint clickable now
73. 04:42:953 - these slider ends are just as important as the held note cause if you make it not lead in with it being clickable the held note feels so bad lol ^
74. 04:48:471 - you do it correct here
75. 04:53:988 - a b
76. 05:07:781 (7) - this should be NC'd based on your other NCs

okey

short mod

Dunois wrote:

mod from discord spam

map plays bad delete

give kudOsu