1. Easy (1.13 stars, 40 notes)
2. Fizz's Advanced (2.75 stars, 128 notes)
3. Hard (3.23 stars, 157 notes)
4. Insane (4.06 stars, 177 notes)
5. Normal (1.98 stars, 87 notes)

Renumi wrote:

shakrie is cu et
why do you want a mod from me i'm bad at this (as per request)

this'll be nitpicky so deny what you want >.>
i haven't modded in a good while and i can see the main theme of the map is an "uncomfortable" (suggestive!!) style map for an "uncomfortable" (strong youknow) song and so i don't want to point something out that was actually intentional; but i can't quite find the line between what's intentional and what could be fixed with such a theme,, and so, sorry for not pointing out that many things that could be fixed; i'm sorry if you expected moreNo you're Great :3

[ General]

1. Remove the tag "coldrain" as it's already included in the map and proves redundancy. Also, I'm not too sure how much you should have the tags "english" and "japanese", however, that's just my standpoint.
   Yeah, changed and fixed that. wtf was I thinking
2. Modding Assistant picks up that you have quite a lot of unused hitsounds; might want to get that checked.
   
   http://puu.sh/tnaz7/acca229ee8.png wtf I don't see any drum hitsounds? If they magically pop up, I'll remove them.
   
   also overall spread is somewhat concerning, according to such
   
   Ya I'll make another diff between Insane and Extra.
3. Remove widescreen support as there's no storyboard?

Yup! Forgot to do that.
[ Easy]

ar4 is abit suspect in my opinion

• 
  Chnaged to ar 3.

1. 00:18:666 - Useless green
   Removed.
2. 00:10:704 (4,2) - Improperly stacked?
   Fixed asdf.
3. 00:19:935 - Useless green
   Yea, fixed.
4. 00:25:473 (2,3) - Only other overlap in the song?
   I think its okay because I didn't want to use too many overlaps (and there's not much room to do that since its such a short song) Just wanted to introduce players to overlaps, because it's possible for longer songs to do more of them in other mapsets, so its not super confusing.
5. 00:42:089 (4,1) - This feels kind of anti-flow, in my opinion. Place '4' a bit more downward?
   Done

plays like an easy should; rhythm is fine, not much to point out here; also snap that spinner wtf

[ Normal]

1. 00:06:089 (1,3) - I really disagree with skipping over beats here (especially in such a song), focusing more on '3' specifically. These could be replaced with a repeating sldier to make sure no beats get left out (would apply for the latter section when you use them).
   Hmm, I disagree. I had to leave some beats out because I wanted most of the song to be in 1/2, because it is 260 bpm and it is very fast. I wanted a low note density or the spread from the Easy to Normal would be too high.
2. 00:46:012 (3,1,3,4,5) - What's with the sudden outburst of blankets here woah
   I only see one blanket, what's wrong? D:

[ Hard]

1. 00:25:819 (5,2) - Overlap ew maybe bend 00:25:819 (5) - this by the sliderend a bit?
   I don't see overlap!11
2. 00:35:396 (6,1) - i like this lol
   Thanks =w=b
3. 00:42:319 (5,6) - I really really reaally dislike the use of antiflow here; ctrls g 00:42:550 (6,7) - this?
   I disagree, it makes a zig-zag type of movement and really isn't that antiflowish. However, I will follow your suggestion.

i liked this diff a lot gj sharki e c:
Thanksies <3

[ Insane]

1. 00:03:320 (1,2,3) - might be hard to predict rhythm here at this skill level but that's just me
   For an Insane? I think its fine. This map was supposed to be like 4.5 stars but I guess star rating is being a lil BITCH.
2. 00:05:166 (1,2,3,4) - Spacing between these is kinda inconsistent (in comparison to the latter, at the very least).
   Did a thingy
3. 00:34:012 (2,3) - The placement here is also kind of inconsistent (in my opinion) with the other way you use them.
   Did more of a thingy
4. 00:35:973 (2,3) - A stack doesn't match the intensity of this part in the song all that well (literally the strongest part in the song make harder).
   DID THINGIES
5. 00:45:435 (3,1) - Jump here is way bigger than 00:47:281 (3,1) - and these two sounds are pretty much alike, so I'd add consistency.
   Ya, increased spacing a tad.
   

ok i'll stop here, again soz if you expected more gl on your mappo o/

can't wait to be shot down and let known that this mod was useless but igave you a star anyways for such a good map keep up the gr8 work
Nah, you did really well, very insightful, don't doubt yourself!

- Yoshimaro - wrote:

hi im modder c:

hoyl sHTI THIS SETS FUCKING BGIG haha jk its just 53 seconds not so bad

[Hard]
00:10:704 (4) - i'd suggest NC on this to emphasize the difference between 1/2 stack (like 00:08:743 (4,5) - ) and 1/1 stack, would also apply to 00:18:089 (5,4,5) -
ur right ya

[Extra]
00:06:089 (1,3) - make 00:06:550 (3) - the same distance to 00:06:089 (1) - as 00:06:435 (2) - (right now it hits the corner a bit to close)
Hmm, this is fine as is.
00:41:627 (5,6) - feels very unnatural to just stop all of the built up momentum in a part that warrants 100% cursor movement (jumps) as this part
00:34:704 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) -
Changed asdf

00:50:402 (1,1) - does it have to be 2 different elements? consider muting 00:50:783 - sliderend
done.
[Expert]
00:04:012 (4,5) - maybe make slider to capture the slide motion of a hand on guitar?
Nah, I generally follow percussion in my maps.
tbh im not sure what to say about aesthetics because it seems the purpose here is to have it a bit messy... but it works so idk gj lol
It's intentionally ugly. In modern art for example, there's often things that look very clean and realistic, and at the same time, there's also abstract art that's ugly and just splatters everywhere. I'd like to think of intentionally mapping ugly as a parallel to abstract art, where it still interprets the song. Furthermore, note placement has emphasis, structure, and rhythm.

celerih wrote:

Modding makes me happy, mod replies make me sad

[Easy]
00:09:781 (3,4) - a pattern like this is too difficult for an easy. ctrl-g 00:10:704 (4) - to fix this
You're right, I forgot to Ctrl+G this, I was just making sure 00:10:704 (4,2) - stack correctly. Whoops.
00:50:910 (1) - I'm not sold on having a spînner here, but if you do, you should have it start on 00:50:396 -
I disagree, I feel that putting some empty space between the last note and the spinner allows the player to have some time to react.

[Hard]
00:04:012 (2,1) - Try and reduce the overlap on these. Make it like you did here 00:17:858 (4,1) -
I disagree, this overlap is fine. Perfectly readable slider head.
00:20:627 (2,1) - And the same applies here
Same as above.
00:12:666 (4,5) - Move this lower, to around x:10 y:160
I disagree, I use 1.5x distance spacing for notes that are 1 beat apart in that section, I would like to keep it consistent.

[Insane]
00:18:550 (3,4) - The spacing between these two should be the lowest out of 00:18:089 (1,2,3,4) - since the beat on 00:18:781 - is the weakest of the 4. The song slightly goes down in intensity in that section
Although that is usually the case, where I follow the percussion, I actually wanted to follow the lead guitar in this fill.
00:22:704 (1,3) - Try not to have these overlap
Slider body overlaps are fine! Especially in harder diffs like these.
00:39:781 (3,4) - imo this really should be 2 1/2 sliders
I'd prefer to keep the consistency of the rhythm. Like I did here; 00:07:935 (1,2,3,4) -
[Ex]

00:13:012 (4,5) - These two sliders should be the same. That would fit with how you did things at the beginning 00:04:704 (4,5) -
I prefer my uglier design choice here.
00:14:627 (3,5) - Here I'd put the straight slider on 00:14:627 (3) - and the curved one on 00:15:089 (5) -
Again, sorry those are design choices, and I prefer my current design.

This was hard to mod, like really really hard. So I guess that's a good thing for you. GL with this set
Thank you very much!

pkk wrote:

this is a nice set

I'll look at easy-hard when you finish another lo ll

Insane

1. 00:12:089 (2,3) - I guess you could stack this for consistency, (00:13:935 (2,3) - , 00:15:781 (2,3) - ) then move 00:12:435 (1,2) - closer to adjust the spacing of the pattern
   Yaaa, did a thingy.
2. 00:27:666 (3) - sik slider dude
   666
3. 00:29:743 (3) - I suggest moving this a little closer to 4 so the motion is a little more circular, preferably with the same spacing as between 00:29:166 (1,2) - to make your pattern look nicer as well
   Didn't do exactly that but changed it a lil :3
   
4. 00:49:243 (4,2) - i wil destroy you
   move 00:49:473 (1,2) - right a bit to avoid the overlap
   th x,
   I'm keeping it just to annoy you <3

Extra

1. 00:13:473 (1,2,1) - I think if you try stacking it like 00:13:935 (2,1) - it might feel nicer to play; there's just something about the angle/spacing of the current pattern that makes it feel strange to play. It might also be the rhythm since you chose to skip over the white ticks
   Did thaaaat
2. 00:18:435 (4,5) - 3-4 is closely spaced so you have to accelerate from 4-5 and it might feel uncomfortable to play because of the spacing and angle between 4-5. I suggest either moving the last point of 5 left a bit/rotate the slider CCW to make it more vertical, or move the slider down a bit (maybe even stacking with the head of 00:17:858 (6) - )
   Didn't do exactly that but I did changed it!!
   
3. 00:50:166 (4) - ctrl+g here might be pretty cool since you get a circular movement between 2-3-4, then the snap back from 4-5 can be nice for emphasis. Although if you do end up doing this, I might even suggest you ctrl+h ctrl+j 00:50:402 (1) - and move it so it's somewhere below/to the left of 00:49:935 (3) - to continue the circular motion
   Done!

Xtreme

1. 00:10:704 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i think you should get this looked at because I feel that it can probably play better but I'm not good enough to judge this
   I think it plays good =w=b
2. 00:32:166 (2) - hey u shud move this to x 300 y 100 so the increased spacing creates e m pha sis on the 3 woooooo
   I disagree here becaise I always space things higher on snares! Also, I don't want to emphasize that 3 because its not the some as 00:27:666 (3) - However, I did ctrl+g 00:34:127 (2) - so that I am a man of my word and so that that consistency is still there!
3. 00:42:781 (7,8,1) - gud emphasis on the 1
   Thanks -w-

xd

1. 00:12:089 (3,4) - imo ctrl+g'ing this rhythm might sound nicer so the circle lands on the beginning of the vocal. It'll also be consistent with 00:13:819 (2,3) - , 00:15:666 (2,3) - etc.
   Done!~
   
   s a m pletext

   
2. 00:17:512 (4,5,6,7) - DDDDDDDDDDDD
   I think it might play nicer to have 5-6 continue the same bottom to top motion as 1-2 3-4
   Yup yup, Idk what I was thinking. Changed!
   
   example of what you could do

   
3. 00:18:089 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3) - this sounds like 1234 1234 instead of 123 12 123. It might also be easier to read this way
   Absolutely, Idk what I was thinking here as well
   
4. 00:20:858 (1,4) - i will cut u for this overlap (mayb move 4 up a bit/rotate it clockwise more so it overlaps more instead of a tiny overlap cuz that looks like d)
   I like it ;3
5. 00:43:012 (1) - you might have curved this upwards to emphasize it but I feel that it would work better if you rotated it ~4 degrees CCW, then have 9 on the right of 8 instead of on the left (maybe also move 8 closer?? idk lO L)
   
   d

   
   no idea but just do what you feel is more comfortable to play
   Done!
   
6. 00:50:402 (1,1) - maybe move the first one down 2 pixels so the head overlaps more of the sliderbody, I think that might make it look nicer but up to you

Done!

aesthetics r nice even tho you tried a messier style and I think you handled the rhythm well in general

maybe a bit of polishing on jumps on the higher diffs
Changed a lot of jumps in the Ex on my own!


less than three Love you <3

squirrelpascals wrote:

you dont have enough diffs, imo

Easy

Nothing here, looks fine

Normal

• 00:45:666 (2) - Move this down so that the sliderend points toward it?
I think this is fine!
• 00:47:512 (2) - Same, but move this up
Hmm, I'd argue this is okay

Hard

• 00:20:627 (2,1) - 00:50:402 (1,2) - Maybe add the offset stack to these like all the other times?
Wanted to be consistent with this 00:04:012 -

Idk, this is a pretty good diff
Thanks!

Insane

• 00:09:319 (3,2) - Move 2 further to the left? Its touching 3 ;p
Didn't move 2, moved 3 instead.
• 00:37:935 (3,4) - Space these? It plays similar to a double and doesn't really fit imo
Hmm, I'd argue this is fine because its similar spacing to other patterns like here 00:05:627 (3,4) - 00:36:550 (1,2) -
• 00:49:243 (4,1,2) - Move 2 upwards and space it from 4
Hmm, I disagree here. 00:48:550 (1,4,1) - This makes a triangle so that it has good structure!

Another

I SSed this one so nothing is wrong with it

• 00:10:012 (3,6) - Space these?
I'd argue that the overlap makes sense because of 00:10:127 (4,6) - has consistency with 00:07:243 (2,5) - 00:07:704 (5,2) -

• 00:21:781 (1,2) - 00:21:204 (2,3) - I don't know which of these you're going to do but just be sure to do it consistently
Yup!
• It's not finished

Extra

• 00:17:281 (2,3,4) - Make this jump part more of an angle
I didn't do that but I changed the pattern.
• 00:23:050 (2,3) - If you wanted to blanket here, then your blanket is off
Not a blanket asdf
• 00:25:704 (2,3) - You can probably space these a little bit more?
Done!

Expert

• 00:06:781 - Put something clickable here
Although I usually map to percussion, I'm mapping the rhythm guitar.

• 00:10:704 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This is okay, but it just feels really weird to play imo. The angles and changes in spacing are just offputting or smth. I would try moving 4 to the left and 8 to the right to make it feel like a nicer jump section
Changed the pattern!
• 00:20:281 (2) - End this slider at 00:20:627 - since there's a vocal and guitar note here? I don't really know why you ended it where you did
Following guitar! The guitar note that's with the vocal is separate. I don't like mapping diffs the same exact way every time.
• 00:35:166 (5,6) - Why the smaller spacing here?
6 is a bass drum hit.

Extreme

• 00:31:935 (1,2,3) - this pattern feels kind of bland, maybe move 2 up near 3's slidertail to give it a jump and make gameplay slightly more interesting
I don't like how that plays.
• 00:49:473 (1,2,3,4,5) - I respect the fact that you're into the ugly sliders and all of that, but this just feels messy rather than ugly
Hmm, I think its fine because its a similar shape to 00:37:473 (1) - this slider. Although slightly more curved.

Ex

• 00:06:435 (2) - Move this up and too the left a little bit, because of the way 00:06:089 (1) - is flowing?
Done!

• 00:08:396 (3,5) - Maybe consider ctrl+g for these? Just looks like it would play a lot smoother without that obtuse jump
Agreed!

• 00:22:473 (4,1) - You can space these and put more of a jump here is you wanted. Even if its a smol one you would put emphasis on that big white tick
Done!
call me when someone fcs this
Gotcha.

Good luck!
Thanks!

1. 00:11:627 (1,2,1) - So on each of these 3 sliders represent the same sounds in the music, I mean, they're very similar in what they follow~ one huge scream on the head and then a vocal landing on the repeat part. So I believe the 3 of them should have a similar shape so represent more accurately the song and the map feels with more sense~ So I'd either make 00:13:473 (2) - this one with a soft curve or make all the 3 of them with a sharp curve to represent the similarity in the music~
2. 00:21:781 (2,3) - Blanket perhaps?

1. 00:11:627 (1,2,3) - I gotta say that this pattern follows well the music, but it will be a challenge to hit the note in the middle (00:12:435 (2) - ) for players at this level (and I say it cuz I felt awkward while playing it). I highly suggest to change it to something like this (note first slider is 00:11:627 (1) - ) so it is easier to read~ Same applies for the following similar patterns~
2. 00:31:012 (2,3) - A nice blanket could come out of this~

1. 00:42:550 (3) - Perhaps doing jumps over 3x is too challenging for hard in this song
2. 00:49:473 (1) - ^

1. 00:32:858 (1) - I don't get why you decided to pause a bit in this part, it doesn't emphasize nothing imo + I hear the same rhythm going on + aren't the same words from 00:31:935 (1,2) - being repeated? so I guess it would be nice to do a similar pattern instead of the small pause~

1. 00:41:166 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The way you arranged the objects for this pattern is tough to read imo~

~Good luck~

KnightC0re wrote:

hopefully not too crappy mod (all my opinions so not sure if you'll like them)

Easy

SPOILER

00:06:224 - Make this aligned with the next slider(looks neater)
Nah, its fine.
00:21:781 - ^^
This is fine as well, they're design choices.
00:49:473 - lower sliderhead?
I prefer the messy design choice, they both play fine.

Normal

SPOILER

00:12:435 - move it to the previous white tick? (its easier)
Nah, that's more confusing. There's no note on that white tick. The red tick it is currently placed on has a bass drum hit on it.
00:49:243 - straight line instead?
Both play fine, I prefer what I have now.

Another

SPOILER

00:22:012 - Stack this on next slider (easier to read, apply to similar patterns)
I disagree, also the difficulty that it is to read is intentional for the difficulty of the map.

00:28:185 - Develop/curve this slider more? (looks kinda plain compared to other sliders)
It's fine
00:39:319 - Ok this looks a bit weird though
It's supposed to ya, it plays fine.

Extra

SPOILER

00:07:704(1,2) - Move this closer like so?
For both of these suggestions, I'd lose emphasis. I'm emphasizing the snare drum hit on 5 and the cymbal crash on 1. And the same for 0:17:166 - Crash+Snare on 1,

0:17:166 - move this closer too maybe

Expert

SPOILER

00:04:127 - Move this like this
Nah, I prefer having emphasis on the downbeat.

00:42:435(4,5,6,7,8) - Jumps a bit overkilled...
I disagree, its a percussion fill so~
00:49:935(6,7) - Spacing a bit overkilled...
I disagree, it fits

Extreme
00:03:320(1,2) - Replace with circles?
Nah, I like this rhythm.

Hard and insane is out of my territory and ex is good to me, good luck!

ezek wrote:

here a quick check for this nice set ~

[Easy]

1. 00:11:627 (1,2,1) - So on each of these 3 sliders represent the same sounds in the music, I mean, they're very similar in what they follow~ one huge scream on the head and then a vocal landing on the repeat part. So I believe the 3 of them should have a similar shape so represent more accurately the song and the map feels with more sense~ So I'd either make 00:13:473 (2) - this one with a soft curve or make all the 3 of them with a sharp curve to represent the similarity in the music~
   I disagree here, I prefer my design because it has a strange visual that isn't necessarily appealing. Although, thank you for the suggestion!
2. 00:21:781 (2,3) - Blanket perhaps?
   Done! Moved sliders accordingly to fit the 1x spacing.

[Normal]

1. 00:11:627 (1,2,3) - I gotta say that this pattern follows well the music, but it will be a challenge to hit the note in the middle (00:12:435 (2) - ) for players at this level (and I say it cuz I felt awkward while playing it). I highly suggest to change it to something like this (note first slider is 00:11:627 (1) - ) so it is easier to read~ Same applies for the following similar patterns~
   Remapped both sections.
2. 00:31:012 (2,3) - A nice blanket could come out of this~
   I don't like using too many blankets.

[Hard]

1. 00:42:550 (3) - Perhaps doing jumps over 3x is too challenging for hard in this song
   Fixed
2. 00:49:473 (1) - ^
   Fixed.

[Another]

1. 00:32:858 (1) - I don't get why you decided to pause a bit in this part, it doesn't emphasize nothing imo + I hear the same rhythm going on + aren't the same words from 00:31:935 (1,2) - being repeated? so I guess it would be nice to do a similar pattern instead of the small pause~
   Hmm, I disagree here, the rhythm I used in this section, I have the 4 measures and repeat that for the rest of the section, since the percussion rhythm is exactly the same every four measures in that section. I used anti-jumps to add not only something different, but to add difficulty without increasing note density. I think its a good way for people who are learning to play Extras, to get used to seeing patterns such as these.

[Extra]

1. 00:41:166 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - The way you arranged the objects for this pattern is tough to read imo~
   I disagree, I think its similar to this pattern 00:34:704 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - which can be read by those who play Extras.

I'm skipping those diffs that are higher than Extra since I have no experience with those at mapping~
~Good luck~