forum

anonymide - MAD Medley 2 (Trial Edition)

posted
Total Posts
6
Topic Starter
Bandison
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on środa, 2 listopada 2016 at 15:50:59

Artist: anonymide
Title: MAD Medley 2 (Trial Edition)
BPM: 183
Filesize: 3277kb
Play Time: 03:15
Difficulties Available:
  1. MEDLEY (5,21 stars, 577 notes)
Download: anonymide - MAD Medley 2 (Trial Edition)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
I think it's my best map.
Diasios
You asked me to check your map so here I am! Some suggestions:

• Using "Distance Snap" is fine but the spacing and the patterns you made in this diff are way too linear and boring. This is supposed to be a Hard/Insane difficulty, right? Then add some jumps and increase both slider velocity and "distance spacing". (hold Alt, I'd use 3,0x)

• 6 breaks? 1 is enough imo, maybe 2 if you're too lazy to map the song.

• Your BG is too small (and ugly, imo), use a 1366x768 one.

• The Mp3 quality is... meh, try to find a better one? Also make sure the bitrate is 192kbps.
Topic Starter
Bandison

Diasios wrote:

You asked me to check your map so here I am! Some suggestions:

• Using "Distance Snap" is fine but the spacing and the patterns you made in this diff are way too linear and boring. This is supposed to be a Hard/Insane difficulty, right? Then add some jumps and increase both slider velocity and "distance spacing". (hold Alt, I'd use 3,0x)

• 6 breaks? 1 is enough imo, maybe 2 if you're too lazy to map the song.

• Your BG is too small (and ugly, imo), use a 1366x768 one.

• The Mp3 quality is... meh, try to find a better one? Also make sure the bitrate is 192kbps.
Thanks for coming.

For me, Distance Snap was used correctly.
Now it's 5 breaks. But the song is long and breaks will be great in these moments.
BG changed to this.
Sorry, I cannot find better mp3. The actual one comes from here.

But thanks for the mod.
Kudosu given <3
Topic Starter
Bandison
Also, improved hitsounds.
Underdogs
meDLEY xdd
-General

The flow is pretty nostalgic, along with the song. It's like 2010 all over again. But of course, that kind of mapping is now irrelevant to the current ranking system. In addition to missing a lot of section, there are parts i need to point out.

-Mods

00:13:955 (8,9) - A slider would fit better

00:16:906 map this part. Missing this beat is really awkward

00:19:201 (8) - I think remove the repeat slider. Better make 00:19:857 clickable

00:23:136 (3) - this is different compared to 00:22:480 (1,2,4) - better make 3 the same as the other.

00:24:447 (7) - Missing clap

00:27:070 (14,1) - hoyl shti TOO CLOSE IN TERMS OF BEAT, put the spinner on the red tick

00:29:857 (5) - Somehow, this slider is kind of irrelevant. I think making 00:29:693 (4) - into a 1/1 slider would do justice

after 00:31:660 (1) - is a strong part whereas not mapping it felt bad. REAL bad. I suggest mapping that part

00:43:463 (1,2) - Lower tier player might be confused with this kind of beat. I suggest the slider to be put at 00:43:463 (1) - , automatically removing the circle.

00:46:086 (1,2,3,4) - I had a hard time reading this. It's because the beat is off. Mapping as sliders would reduce that confusion

00:50:021 (1,2,3) - I'd say this is overmapping

00:51:332 (1,2,3,4) - ^

00:57:889 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - this stream is unclean

01:00:512 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^

01:03:135 (1) - I think the spinner is not relevant. Better map normally.

01:15:431 (2,3,4,5,6) - This is so confusing to read

01:31:168 (2,3) - Too close to each other

01:33:299 (2,3) - These aren't blanketing

01:36:250 (1,2,3) - I think mapping 1/2 would be better imo. Also 01:36:906 (2,3) - is not stacking properly (3 is not stacking on 2's end)

01:39:693 (1) - This is restricting the players from recovering after the spinner. From that duration of spinner and the range of you mapping after the spinner, I'd say this is unrankable (In other word, better delete 01:39:693 (1) - or put a circle at 01:39:856 instead)

01:54:283 (4,5) - these are awkwardly placed. Given the fact that the following sliders are stacked properly

02:01:168 (8,9) - I don't hear anything that required you to make a 1/4 slider.

02:04:446 This had a strong beat, I highly suggest you map this

02:07:069 ^

02:08:709 (3,4) - these arent stacked properly

02:10:021 (6,7) - ^

02:11:332 (8,9) - ^

02:24:119 (5,7) - Instant unrankable. 5 is covering the reverse slider of 7

02:27:724 (6,7) - I think these are hard to read

02:40:921 (1) - Ninja-ish spinner and i think unrankable

03:04:937 (2,3,1) - Close the distance

03:08:708 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I hear very different. I think a stream is an overmap

03:14:609 (12,1) - WAT YOU DID IT AGAIN, SO CLOSE.


the flow is kinda...idk. seriously gotta lot to improve before this map gain respect.


Wishing you best luck with this map o/
Topic Starter
Bandison

Underdogs wrote:

meDLEY xdd
-General

The flow is pretty nostalgic, along with the song. It's like 2010 all over again. But of course, that kind of mapping is now irrelevant to the current ranking system. In addition to missing a lot of section, there are parts i need to point out.

-Mods

00:13:955 (8,9) - A slider would fit better fixed

00:16:906 map this part. Missing this beat is really awkward fixed

00:19:201 (8) - I think remove the repeat slider. Better make 00:19:857 clickable fixed

00:23:136 (3) - this is different compared to 00:22:480 (1,2,4) - better make 3 the same as the other. fixed

00:24:447 (7) - Missing clap fixed

00:27:070 (14,1) - hoyl shti TOO CLOSE IN TERMS OF BEAT, put the spinner on the red tick fixed

00:29:857 (5) - Somehow, this slider is kind of irrelevant. I think making 00:29:693 (4) - into a 1/1 slider would do justice fixed

after 00:31:660 (1) - is a strong part whereas not mapping it felt bad. REAL bad. I suggest mapping that part fixed

00:43:463 (1,2) - Lower tier player might be confused with this kind of beat. I suggest the slider to be put at 00:43:463 (1) - , automatically removing the circle. fixed

00:46:086 (1,2,3,4) - I had a hard time reading this. It's because the beat is off. Mapping as sliders would reduce that confusion fixed

00:50:021 (1,2,3) - I'd say this is overmapping fixed

00:51:332 (1,2,3,4) - ^ fixed

00:57:889 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - this stream is unclean ugh, fixed?

01:00:512 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^ fixed

01:03:135 (1) - I think the spinner is not relevant. Better map normally. fixed

01:15:431 (2,3,4,5,6) - This is so confusing to read fixed i think xD

01:31:168 (2,3) - Too close to each other fixed

01:33:299 (2,3) - These aren't blanketing Hmm, I think this is good.

01:36:250 (1,2,3) - I think mapping 1/2 would be better imo. Also 01:36:906 (2,3) - is not stacking properly (3 is not stacking on 2's end) fixed

01:39:693 (1) - This is restricting the players from recovering after the spinner. From that duration of spinner and the range of you mapping after the spinner, I'd say this is unrankable (In other word, better delete 01:39:693 (1) - or put a circle at 01:39:856 instead) fixed, replaced the spinner with a slider

01:54:283 (4,5) - these are awkwardly placed. Given the fact that the following sliders are stacked properly fixed

02:01:168 (8,9) - I don't hear anything that required you to make a 1/4 slider. umm, fixed?

02:04:446 This had a strong beat, I highly suggest you map this fixed

02:07:069 ^ fixed

02:08:709 (3,4) - these arent stacked properly fixed

02:10:021 (6,7) - ^ umm, fixed?

02:11:332 (8,9) - ^ This is good.

02:24:119 (5,7) - Instant unrankable. 5 is covering the reverse slider of 7 umm, fixed?

02:27:724 (6,7) - I think these are hard to read umm, fixed?

02:40:921 (1) - Ninja-ish spinner and i think unrankable fixed

03:04:937 (2,3,1) - Close the distance fixed

03:08:708 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I hear very different. I think a stream is an overmap fixed

03:14:609 (12,1) - WAT YOU DID IT AGAIN, SO CLOSE. fixed


the flow is kinda...idk. seriously gotta lot to improve before this map gain respect.


Wishing you best luck with this map o/
Thanks for wasting your time and modding this shitmap! Kudos earned!
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply