This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Mittwoch, 14. September 2016 at 18:28:32

Artist: Vospi
Title: We Met Dat Night
Tags: piano
BPM: 111
Filesize: 2822kb
Play Time: 01:35
Difficulties Available:

1. Futsuu (1,85 stars, 180 notes)
2. Inner Oni (5,36 stars, 511 notes)
3. Kantan (1,28 stars, 122 notes)
4. Muzukashii (3,31 stars, 269 notes)
5. Oni (4,26 stars, 392 notes)

Download: Vospi - We Met Dat Night
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Metadata from Halogen-'s set

--Nwolf's 1/3 sets!--

Anklebiters
We met Dat Night
The end of a century
chaplet

1/12 hype (or 222 BPM 1/6) (or 166.5 BPM 1/8, which is the way it looks!)

haha mapped this a while ago, my diff is almost identical to the inner here (but way worse) so i don't see any point in submitting it now
thx for making me leave room for another pending spot

About the BG

[Futsuu]
00:17:362 - 00:18:984 - hm, ¿why?, I think you can add a note here 00:17:903 - , the break is unnessesary imo
00:54:660 - ^ k

Ok, this diff is too good ~

[Muzukashii]
00:41:687 - Hm, I thing you should add a note here because this is a muzukashii and you omit a note on 00:39:524 - , I thing you cant omit two notes in 10 seconds :/
00:46:011 - ^
00:50:335 - ^

[Oni]
Looks good

[Inner Oni]
Looks good too

This is for you ~

From my queue o/

No tags at all?

[Inner Oni]
00:01:687 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - How about this? http://puu.sh/o4R9H/96d7f64a4e.jpg
00:03:218 - add k
00:05:380 - ^
00:06:416 (25,26,27) - i think these should be 1/8 instead of 1/12
00:07:542 - k
00:10:245 - http://puu.sh/o4S3z/8d164cf6d9.jpg
00:11:687 (53) - d
00:11:957 (55) - k
00:14:299 - k
00:15:110 (72,73,74) - 1/8 again
00:20:786 - k
00:21:146 - k
00:23:759 (28,29,30) - 1/8
00:25:110 - k
00:25:470 - k
00:32:407 (87,88,89) - 1/8
00:35:651 - d
00:39:975 - d
00:40:786 (22,23) - a ddddd (1/6) would fit nicely here imo
00:44:299 - d
00:45:110 (38,39) - like above with ddddk or ddddK
00:46:732 - k
00:47:542 - looks like you skipped this snare because of the finisher. It's really sad to not have it mapped due to variation and significance of the snare imo
00:49:434 (53,54) - ddddd like above
00:52:948 - d
00:53:759 (69,70) - ddddk or ddddK
00:55:380 - k
00:56:191 - same again with the snare
01:08:173 (7,8,9) - How about k kk kd here
01:08:984 - k
01:11:146 - k
01:12:948 - d

[Oni]
00:21:416 (10,11) - kk dk
00:43:038 (24,25,26,27) - dkddk
00:47:542 - i cri evritiem
00:51:687 (49,50,51,52) - ^
01:23:218 (61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70) - you want every lower player to break here right?
01:27:542 (96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105) - ^

[Muzukashii]
00:21:056 (5) - This should be on 00:21:011 -
00:23:218 (11) - to 00:23:173 -
00:25:380 (18) - like above
00:29:705 (31) - ^
00:31:867 (37) - ^
00:34:029 (44) - ^
00:41:687 - k
00:47:002 (30) - i feel like this should be snapped to 1/4 and not 1/6 you should double check this though
00:55:651 (50) - ^

[Futsuu]
00:18:173 - K
01:17:362 - d
01:21:687 - ^
01:26:011 - k

Kantan is fine.

Suggestions for Inner Oni are mostly due to ghost notes, I guess you noticed Good luck with this!

Weef, from my queue.

[General]

> 01:00:606 - insert a break time?

[Oni]

> 00:09:524 (31) - change to D? Although K is matching 00:08:714 (29) - ,but I think a new on-beat pattern is formed in the drum set with 00:09:254 (30) - 00:09:524 (31) - 00:10:065 (34) - 00:10:335 (35) - (k d d k). Perhaps you would like to keep a K for the clear and loud cymbal crash.

> 00:10:786 (40,41) - ctrl+G, it can match the pitch. 00:10:876 (41) - using D can match 00:09:524 (31) - if you adopt the above suggestion.

> 00:14:389 (58) - change to d, sounds better

> 00:15:380 - if you adopt the above change, you may find that a d d dk pattern is repeated. You could add a d here for a complexer pattern. Moreover, the pattern sounds more rhythmatic. But still, I can see that you have not used dd dd dk pattern, this may not be an optimum choice for you.

> 00:18:443 (77) - shift it 2 beats to the right in 1/6. The main reason is that K D k d K this pattern seems not fitting the mood of the music. Another reason is that after a D, it's better to leave some space for the snare to echo.

> 00:19:434 - a k can be added here. This sound quite stands out. If you insist on using a Finish at 00:19:524 (1) - , then neglect this suggestion

> 00:27:542 (40,42) - These two D are umm.... I can't say that they are weird because they actually match well with the piano with pedal. The overall felling is weird, I would say. The ending of the phase is quite rich and the current one just end with a clear D D pattern.... Might be you would like to try this?

Still, matching the petal piano note is still fine, just the mood shown is strange.

> 00:34:299 - d should be added here to state the difference from the new start at 00:34:660 (76) -

> 00:34:930 (77) - change to d? sounds better

> 00:38:984 (15) - from this note onwards, the mapping channels are really unstable. I am confused somehow...

> 00:39:524 - / 00:43:849 - / ... why don't you put a note on these timing?

> 01:11:957 (14) - Have you forgotten to put a Finish here carelessly?

> 01:13:038 (17,18,19,20,21,22,1) - Should it be a zebra (kdkdkdk) pattern? kkkdddk does not fit the pitch. Oh, I see your point now, you are mathing the drums.

> 01:21:146 (51) - change to D? to emphasize 01:21:687 (52) - , the highest pitch.

[Muzukashii]

> 00:16:281 (49,50) - change to d d. souds better

> 00:41:687 (19) - k can be added here. Muzu should also contain this note, not only Oni/ Inner Oni

> 01:13:308 (15,1) - ctrl+G, they should be consistent to Oni's.

> 01:24:119 - add a d here for a symmetrical pattern (nnnn n n). If you want to leave a rest, it is still fine though.

> 01:28:443 - add a k here, same reason.

[Futsuu]

> 00:18:173 (32) - d can be added here because the gap between K k nearby is too wide.

> 01:17:362 - A Finish note can be added here, same reason^

[Kantan]

> Can we use 1/2 in BPM= 111? I have a question here. Well, if you treat it like BPM= 222, I have nothing to say lol.

> 00:09:524 - add a d here, the gap is too large.

> 00:10:335 (13) - add a k here, same reason ^

> 00:18:173 - / 00:18:984 - simular case ^ ^

> There are lots of simular pattern as described above. I really think that there's a need to put notes on those timings.

> 01:10:335 (6) - add a k here

> The Kiai session feels porous, but there're limitations due to the BGM. 1/1 spammed wisely though, still fine.

I have no intention to mod 1/12 Inner Oni lol. I hope my mod is helpful!

Neku okazaki wrote:

About the BG

I think you can change this: http://puu.sh/o39qU/90cc9f5372.png to "-100", I think is better ^^ using -80 instead. Based on my resolution tho

[Futsuu]
00:17:362 - 00:18:984 - hm, ¿why?, I think you can add a note here 00:17:903 - , the break is unnessesary imo swapped breaks
00:54:660 - ^ k 00:50:335 - nah

Ok, this diff is too good ~

[Muzukashii]
00:41:687 - Hm, I thing you should add a note here because this is a muzukashii and you omit a note on 00:39:524 - , I thing you cant omit two notes in 10 seconds :/
00:46:011 - ^
00:50:335 - ^ spread

This is for you ~

DarkVortex wrote:

From my queue o/

No tags at all? idk what I should put

[Inner Oni]
00:01:687 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - How about this? http://puu.sh/o4R9H/96d7f64a4e.jpg outdated puush OP (I'm sorry ;w;)
00:03:218 - add k too much
00:06:416 (25,26,27) - i think these should be 1/8 instead of 1/12 actually it's a 1/12 doublet but that would play as bad as 1/8 imo
00:11:687 (53) - d
00:11:957 (55) - k changed
00:14:299 - k it's already k??
00:20:786 - k again, too much
00:21:146 - k ye
00:35:651 - d too much
00:40:786 (22,23) - a ddddd (1/6) would fit nicely here imo no it would not
00:47:542 - looks like you skipped this snare because of the finisher. It's really sad to not have it mapped due to variation and significance of the snare imo decided to have kD
00:56:191 - same again with the snare ^
01:08:173 (7,8,9) - How about k kk kd here fully aware it's in the song, still no

[Oni]
00:21:416 (10,11) - kk dk what?
00:43:038 (24,25,26,27) - dkddk changed
00:47:542 - i cri evritiem not doing 1/6 finishers :C
00:51:687 (49,50,51,52) - ^ ye
01:23:218 (61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70) - you want every lower player to break here right? simplified. A lot.


[Muzukashii]
00:21:056 (5) - This should be on 00:21:011 - This and following: I don't think tricky rhythm should hurt lower diffs this much. Helps creating a spread from a rhythmically simple Futsuu to a not-so-much-more-dense-but-rhythmically-complex Muzu/oni
00:41:687 - k as before: Spread, also piano
00:47:002 (30) - i feel like this should be snapped to 1/4 and not 1/6 you should double check this though
00:55:651 (50) - ^ sounds slightly more correct yes

[Futsuu]
00:18:173 - K bass louder here imo
01:17:362 - d
01:21:687 - ^ breaks, spread

Kantan is fine.

Suggestions for Inner Oni are mostly due to ghost notes, I guess you noticed Good luck with this!

Skylish wrote:

Weef, from my queue.

[General]

> 01:00:606 - insert a break time? breaks suck :C

[Oni]

> 00:09:524 (31) - change to D? Although K is matching 00:08:714 (29) - ,but I think a new on-beat pattern is formed in the drum set with 00:09:254 (30) - 00:09:524 (31) - 00:10:065 (34) - 00:10:335 (35) - (k d d k). Perhaps you would like to keep a K for the clear and loud cymbal crash. changed to D

> 00:10:786 (40,41) - ctrl+G, it can match the pitch. 00:10:876 (41) - using D can match 00:09:524 (31) - if you adopt the above suggestion. not changing to keep k d k as lower diffs

> 00:14:389 (58) - change to d, sounds better actually it's more interesting like this imo

> 00:15:380 - if you adopt the above change, you may find that a d d dk pattern is repeated. You could add a d here for a complexer pattern. Moreover, the pattern sounds more rhythmatic. But still, I can see that you have not used dd dd dk pattern, this may not be an optimum choice for you. Yeah it's simple here

> 00:18:443 (77) - shift it 2 beats to the right in 1/6. The main reason is that K D k d K this pattern seems not fitting the mood of the music. Another reason is that after a D, it's better to leave some space for the snare to echo. Repeated the previous section of this instead

> 00:19:434 - a k can be added here. This sound quite stands out. If you insist on using a Finish at 00:19:524 (1) - , then neglect this suggestion FINISHERS FTW

> 00:27:542 (40,42) - These two D are umm.... I can't say that they are weird because they actually match well with the piano with pedal. The overall felling is weird, I would say. The ending of the phase is quite rich and the current one just end with a clear D D pattern.... Might be you would like to try this?

Still, matching the petal piano note is still fine, just the mood shown is strange. Strong enough imo but I might reconsider this...

> 00:34:299 - d should be added here to state the difference from the new start at 00:34:660 (76) - ye

> 00:34:930 (77) - change to d? sounds better makes next dons more noteworthy though

> 00:38:984 (15) - from this note onwards, the mapping channels are really unstable. I am confused somehow... v should fix that

> 00:39:524 - / 00:43:849 - / ... why don't you put a note on these timing? added

> 01:11:957 (14) - Have you forgotten to put a Finish here carelessly? no piano chord here

> 01:13:038 (17,18,19,20,21,22,1) - Should it be a zebra (kdkdkdk) pattern? kkkdddk does not fit the pitch. Oh, I see your point now, you are mathing the drums. latter, yep. it's simpler

> 01:21:146 (51) - change to D? to emphasize 01:21:687 (52) - , the highest pitch. interesting, changed

[Muzukashii]

> 00:16:281 (49,50) - change to d d. souds better changed

> 00:41:687 (19) - k can be added here. Muzu should also contain this note, not only Oni/ Inner Oni same as previous mods

> 01:13:308 (15,1) - ctrl+G, they should be consistent to Oni's. consistent with lower diffs : P

> 01:24:119 - add a d here for a symmetrical pattern (nnnn n n). If you want to leave a rest, it is still fine though. yeah it's a break, else it's too much 1/2

[Futsuu]

> 00:18:173 (32) - d can be added here because the gap between K k nearby is too wide. applied in previous mod

> 01:17:362 - A Finish note can be added here, same reason^ same reason as previous mod

[Kantan]

> Can we use 1/2 in BPM= 111? I have a question here. Well, if you treat it like BPM= 222, I have nothing to say lol. Yes we can. There even are very recent maps with 1/2 usage at 190/200 BPM *stares at Ono*

> 00:09:524 - add a d here, the gap is too large. intended as break (also 3/2 is too much)

> 01:10:335 (6) - add a k here ye

> The Kiai session feels porous, but there're limitations due to the BGM. 1/1 spammed wisely though, still fine. added a few notes also for spread reasons

I have no intention to mod 1/12 Inner Oni lol. I hope my mod is helpful!

thanks everyone :3

Happy Birthday Robin!

[General]

1. It mildly bothers me that be title of the song in the background is slightly lower than the middle of what is seen in play. Consider trying -90. I saw what you about this before, but I don't know how small your screen is. >w<

[Kantan]

1. 00:09:254 - Add a note here. I get why you didn't map this section, since it's too fast of a pattern for a Kantan, but there should still be a note where the first kick begins, so the break here isn't so long. You already fixed this when I asked you so aaaa
2. 00:27:633 - Consider adding a note here to emphasize the piano roll. Also so the rhythm that the dons are mainly following doesn't become the only thing that is expected when the map is played.
3. 01:16:822 - Change to d. Aside from emphasizing the piano here, there's no finish in the background here. So I'd suggest leaving the finishers for those instances, since that's mainly what this song relies on.
4. 01:26:011 - Change to k. Would emphasize the change of the piano's tone here.
5. 01:30:335 - Same suggestion as above.

[Futsuu]

1. 00:05:470 - and 00:05:741 - Why map the weaker two notes here, when the kicks at 00:06:011 - and 00:06:281 - are stronger? You also followed this in Kantan.
2. 00:09:254 - Thank you for fixing this. ;__;

[Muzukashii]
My only real issue with this difficulty, is that the kiai seems a bit denser than the one that was in Futsuu.

[Oni]
weff.

[Inner Oni]

1. 00:43:308 - Change to K. Sounds really weird to not follow the finish here, but do so in every other instance.
2. 00:47:497 - k? I don't know if you purposely skipped this kick because it's a bit awkward when hitting the finisher, but I thought I'd mention it anyways.
3. 00:51:957 - Change to K. Same reason as before.
4. 00:56:146 - k. Same question as the first time.
5. 01:11:146 - Sounds really weird to leave this unmapped if you're going to have every other red tick mapped to the same sound.

Ayyri wrote:

Happy Birthday Robin! : D

[General]

1. It mildly bothers me that be title of the song in the background is slightly lower than the middle of what is seen in play. Consider trying -90. I saw what you about this before, but I don't know how small your screen is. >w< Changed to -93 C:

[Kantan]

1. 00:09:254 - Add a note here. I get why you didn't map this section, since it's too fast of a pattern for a Kantan, but there should still be a note where the first kick begins, so the break here isn't so long. You already fixed this when I asked you so aaaa ye
2. 00:27:633 - Consider adding a note here to emphasize the piano roll. Also so the rhythm that the dons are mainly following doesn't become the only thing that is expected when the map is played. 00:26:822 - added it here instead. Want to keep this is a "break" still and it at least feels different with 5/2 instead of 2/1
3. 01:16:822 - Change to d. Aside from emphasizing the piano here, there's no finish in the background here. So I'd suggest leaving the finishers for those instances, since that's mainly what this song relies on. changed
4. 01:26:011 - Change to k. Would emphasize the change of the piano's tone here.
5. 01:30:335 - Same suggestion as above. I want these to be somewhat simple tho

[Futsuu]

1. 00:05:470 - and 00:05:741 - Why map the weaker two notes here, when the kicks at 00:06:011 - and 00:06:281 - are stronger? You also followed this in Kantan. changed
2. 00:09:254 - Thank you for fixing this. ;__;

[Muzukashii]
My only real issue with this difficulty, is that the kiai seems a bit denser than the one that was in Futsuu. fixed

[Oni]
weff.

[Inner Oni]

1. 00:43:308 - Change to K. Sounds really weird to not follow the finish here, but do so in every other instance. I prefer not to do this after the 1/12 triplet
2. 00:47:497 - k? I don't know if you purposely skipped this kick because it's a bit awkward when hitting the finisher, but I thought I'd mention it anyways. mapped it here, didn't map the next one to keep it a finisher. Maybe that balances this out?
3. 01:11:146 - Sounds really weird to leave this unmapped if you're going to have every other red tick mapped to the same sound. deleted one more note here instead

thanks :3

Here's my birthday present to you:

A bubble.

happy birthday ducking furry

thank you so much <3

gratz kweff


dem, my birthday is still a long... "o dem, the wa-

wehh, I edited here than post on next page xd
how to do Circledem?!/1/ dem Idk really D:<

kek

Sorry for interrupting the gratz here, isn't Ayyri a STD BN? Is he capable to bub/qua Taiko mapset?

mode-specific BNs have NOT been a thing for over a year now, the same mode icons (e.g. ) are NOT required for ranking at all

Skylish wrote:

Sorry for interrupting the gratz here, isn't Ayyri a STD BN? Is he capable to bub/qua Taiko mapset?

She*
This is the first time someone has questioned me about my Taiko ability, rather than my Standard ability. I'm sure you can guess why.

I've been down this dark road and I know where it leads Good luck!

Shame on the taiko bn's for letting her do something like this when the consequences are clear

There are no consequences at all. I checked the Taikos myself, just that Raiden ninja'd me. Taiko BNs, QATs (+Ayyri) are in contact anyway. So no worries at all.

OnosakiHito wrote:

There are no consequences at all. I checked the Taikos myself, just that Raiden ninja'd me. Taiko BNs, QATs (+Ayyri) are in contact anyway. So no worries at all.

Her name isn't Ascendance so I figured there is no consequence anyways the double standards in the staff are really something else

If you have nothing useful to provide to this thread, please do not post at all.