This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on domingo, 15 de mayo de 2016 at 10:14:56

Artist: DragonForce
Title: Cry for Eternity
Tags: power metal deathstream stamina
BPM: 140
Filesize: 8319kb
Play Time: 08:08
Difficulties Available:

1. Tatsujin (5,95 stars, 4296 notes)

Download: DragonForce - Cry for Eternity
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
taiko needs more dragonforce

Wow what a bad map lol :3
Just kidding~

im screening this

Can't back out now!



#1 Good luck!!!

hello~

[ about]

1. d is don note
2. k is kat note
3. D is big don note
4. K is big kat note

[ General]

• 
  
  SliderMultiplier:1.39999991989136→1.40

[ Tatsujin]

• 
  
  00:50:550 - change to d.I think low sound.
  
  00:56:325 - change to k.I think high sound.
  
  00:59:025 - add k.I think "ddk-ddkkd" is good flow.
  
  01:08:175 - change to k.I hear guitar sound.
  
  02:15:375 - add d.02:14:700 (31,32,33) - same as.
  
  03:34:725 - move to 03:34:875 - & change to d & 03:35:100 - move to 03:35:025 - .because, 03:33:750 (7,8,9,10,11,12) - 2-4 uses the pattern.so I think more good pattern.
  
  04:48:750 - change to d.04:49:200 (278,279,280,281) - same as.
  
  05:55:865 - change to k.I think high sound.
  
  07:55:790 - change to k.I hear guitar sound.

Good luck

Charlotte wrote:

hello~

[ about]

1. d is don note
2. k is kat note
3. D is big don note
4. K is big kat note

[ General]

• 
  
  SliderMultiplier:1.39999991989136→1.40 oops lol

[ Tatsujin]

• 
  
  00:50:550 - change to d.I think low sound. hmmm, but if you silence the hitsounds you can clearly hear the snare hits so i think those are better as kats
  
  00:56:325 - change to k.I think high sound. sure
  
  00:59:025 - add k.I think "ddk-ddkkd" is good flow. okay
  
  01:08:175 - change to k.I hear guitar sound. rearranged the pattern a bit here to fit more the guitar
  
  02:15:375 - add d.02:14:700 (31,32,33) - same as.
  
  03:34:725 - move to 03:34:875 - & change to d & 03:35:100 - move to 03:35:025 - .because, 03:33:750 (7,8,9,10,11,12) - 2-4 uses the pattern.so I think more good pattern. arranged a bit the pattern to match more guitar
  
  04:48:750 - change to d.04:49:200 (278,279,280,281) - same as. sure
  
  05:55:865 - change to k.I think high sound. did something here
  
  07:55:790 - change to k.I hear guitar sound. arranged a bit the pattern here to fit more

Good luck

Thanks a lot!!

hello

01:43:500 (14,15,16,17) - so the stream is kdddkdddkdddkkdd, but what makes it worth putting kkdd at the last quadruplet? I see nothing. If you want variety in it how about kdddkdddkkddkkddkdddkdddkkddkkddk That would make more sense
02:07:800 (61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77) - Following the instruments kdddkkddkdddkkddk would fit better
03:28:200 (45) - make this one k? This stream part is consistently intense and it kind of loosens expression by just putting d
03:37:800 (49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81) - or at least 03:39:000 (65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81) - definitely needs to be more k-based. Guitar is quite heavy here
03:51:900 (57,58,59,60,61) - If you're gonna follow guitar kkddk or kkkdk, 03:52:200 (61) - here needs empahsis imo
04:03:000 ~ 04:12:000 - Exactly 9 seconds lmao Put d in this part. Go follow the melody. Here adds uh, bass guitar? idk so yeah here definitely is need for d.
05:07:941 (51,52,53) - 05:08:294 (55,56,57) - 05:09:000 (63,64,65) - 1/6? Actually you didn't put 1/6 for every 1/6 spot of guitar but here is low bpm, I guess it's okay to
05:41:090 (73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80) - kkkdkkdd or kkkkkkdd for sake of guitar
06:02:990 (201) - k? for both guitar and drum
06:11:690 (81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92) - I don't think this kind of pattern fits here. If you're trying to follow both guitar or drum try kdkkddkdkkkd
06:56:090 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33) - I guess it's same as the part of the first line, exception is 06:57:890 (25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33) - which I would suggest to follow drums (kkddkkkkd)
07:20:090 (51) - same as 03:28:200 (45) -

okay map gl

bbj0920 wrote:

hello

01:43:500 (14,15,16,17) - so the stream is kdddkdddkdddkkdd, but what makes it worth putting kkdd at the last quadruplet? I see nothing. If you want variety in it how about kdddkdddkkddkkddkdddkdddkkddkkddk That would make more sense see 01:44:700 (30,31,32,33) -
02:07:800 (61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77) - Following the instruments kdddkkddkdddkkddk would fit better to be completely fitting it should be kdddkdddkdddk all the time lol but added a bit of variety
03:28:200 (45) - make this one k? This stream part is consistently intense and it kind of loosens expression by just putting d but the beat starts with a bass drum hit, it discontinues the d k d k structure until then, putting a kat would mean continuing an already discontinued rhythm ;w;
03:37:800 (49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81) - or at least 03:39:000 (65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81) - definitely needs to be more k-based. Guitar is quite heavy here agreed, re-arranged a bit the patterns more to fit the guitar
03:51:900 (57,58,59,60,61) - If you're gonna follow guitar kkddk or kkkdk, 03:52:200 (61) - here needs empahsis imo that one was focused on percussion because it's clear and the guitar loses potency in this part
04:03:000 ~ 04:12:000 - Exactly 9 seconds lmao Put d in this part. Go follow the melody. Here adds uh, bass guitar? idk so yeah here definitely is need for d. I knew someone would suggest lol, did something here hope I didn't fuck up
05:07:941 (51,52,53) - 05:08:294 (55,56,57) - 05:09:000 (63,64,65) - 1/6? Actually you didn't put 1/6 for every 1/6 spot of guitar but here is low bpm, I guess it's okay to I refuse to use any 1/6 in this map >: (
05:41:090 (73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80) - kkkdkkdd or kkkkkkdd for sake of guitar did something
06:02:990 (201) - k? for both guitar and drum sure
06:11:690 (81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92) - I don't think this kind of pattern fits here. If you're trying to follow both guitar or drum try kdkkddkdkkkd but I think it fits... the guitar up and down is well represented with the kdk followed by ddd and then another kdk for the next wub
06:56:090 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33) - I guess it's same as the part of the first line, exception is 06:57:890 (25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33) - which I would suggest to follow drums (kkddkkkkd) same answer, but the most accurate representation is the one I have play-wise, you'll notice it sounds slightly weirder if I end it with a don
07:20:090 (51) - same as 03:28:200 (45) - same answer

okay map gl

tyyyyyyyyyyy

oy Sir!

* 00:13:974 - don?, 00:20:831 - this already kat, 00:24:260 - and change this don?, 00:34:545 - and this?. for emphasize up/down on guitar flow if you like that, and I think is fine with every 1/2 pattern emphasize, thats fit imo
* 00:47:925 (15,16) - ctrl g? 00:48:000 - strong emphasize on here or 00:48:000 - just change this kat so flow more fit with dkdk+k
* 00:50:400 - change don? better emphasize ( 00:49:800 (37,41,45) - hear this, and 00:50:550 (46,47) - which this ) or 00:50:325 (44,45) - ctrl g, 00:50:325 - thats guitar..
* 00:52:275 - don? I feels this akward if note put a notes, and this better play if adding notes imo ( 00:56:175 (54,55,56,57) - like did it )
* 00:57:900 - change kat or others way? 00:57:600 (69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77) - for better emphasize with this pattern, or 00:57:675 - delete and 00:57:750 (70,71,72) - change ddk? ddkdkkd better play with that guitar? XD
* 01:01:950 - and this fine.. so varies? (previously part is xxxx xx and here is xx xx, if you accept my 4th suggestion)
* 01:02:400 - this good, Flow looks nice
* 01:03:900 - kat? 01:03:750 - its follow this
* 01:05:025 - add kat, more filling that high flow? so 01:03:300 (128,129,130) - this ddk have emphasize for just one on this part
* 02:15:300 - kat? I think is consistent with previous pattern and with arrange guitar
* 02:17:025 - kat? I think is needed more emphasize with this flow
* 02:17:325 (63,64) - and ctrl g this? if you like 02:17:550 - to follow this
* 02:20:475 - change kat for guitar? actually is for drum too, I hear 02:20:400 - this fit to be don alone for emphasize
* 03:36:900 - wah this haha, so you dont know did that on before? XD
* 03:37:800 - kat? 03:37:200 (41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49) - for avoid monotone pattern, its better emphasize imo
* 03:41:625 - kat? I no have idea with word.. cuz rip engrish XDDD
* 03:50:475 - delete? I think you just need kkddk for emphasize that flow
* tatatata ta ta ta tata tata
* 04:34:050 (165) - don, needs variety with before? also 04:33:750 (163,164,165,166) - kkdd its fine too if hear *and next similar part too*
* 04:43:500 - change don? XDD 04:43:200 (234,235,236,237) - tit tat tit tat *^ same above *
* 05:56:240 - kd dk? but I think is fine with k ddk *and next too is fine lol, up to youkd dk is love, -''- live too*
* 07:55:265 - kat? that looks good variety imo
* 08:05:690 - don? so in end is kat finisher. I think is unique XD ( and better differ emphasize, so not boring to hit kat kat kat xd )

lol Deathstream ( how that this overall can moar connected with fingers.. dem how nice map lol ), nice map ay ay XD
GL ye, sir

Surono wrote:

oy Sir!

* 00:13:974 - don?, 00:20:831 - this already kat, 00:24:260 - and change this don?, 00:34:545 - and this?. for emphasize up/down on guitar flow if you like that, and I think is fine with every 1/2 pattern emphasize, thats fit imo to be honest every note in this part should be a kat but I wanted to add variety. Regardless, every pattern starts and ends with a kat and the only variety I add is the middle of the patterns.
* 00:47:925 (15,16) - ctrl g? 00:48:000 - strong emphasize on here or 00:48:000 - just change this kat so flow more fit with dkdk+k I prefer how dkdkd emphasizes more the guitar wub
* 00:50:400 - change don? better emphasize ( 00:49:800 (37,41,45) - hear this, and 00:50:550 (46,47) - which this ) or 00:50:325 (44,45) - ctrl g, 00:50:325 - thats guitar.. I do not understand your reasoning at all, but 45 46 and 47 are heavy snare hits which I will not ignore
* 00:52:275 - don? I feels this akward if note put a notes, and this better play if adding notes imo ( 00:56:175 (54,55,56,57) - like did it ) Adding a note here is what feels really awkward to play lol...
* 00:57:900 - change kat or others way? 00:57:600 (69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77) - for better emphasize with this pattern, or 00:57:675 - delete and 00:57:750 (70,71,72) - change ddk? ddkdkkd better play with that guitar? XD I'm afraid I am not following guitar during these sections
* 01:01:950 - and this fine.. so varies? (previously part is xxxx xx and here is xx xx, if you accept my 4th suggestion) ??? what
* 01:02:400 - this good, Flow looks nice
* 01:03:900 - kat? 01:03:750 - its follow this Would make it inconsistent
* 01:05:025 - add kat, more filling that high flow? so 01:03:300 (128,129,130) - this ddk have emphasize for just one on this part Prefer to leave it blank to give the player enough time to prepare for the stream
* 02:15:300 - kat? I think is consistent with previous pattern and with arrange guitar the sound is the same, I just randomized it a bit and I don't see a problem with it
* 02:17:025 - kat? I think is needed more emphasize with this flow there is enough emphasis at 02:17:325 (63) -
* 02:17:325 (63,64) - and ctrl g this? if you like 02:17:550 - to follow this hell no, percussion structure would be killed then
* 02:20:475 - change kat for guitar? actually is for drum too, I hear 02:20:400 - this fit to be don alone for emphasize 02:20:400 (19,20,21,22,23,24) - listen to these notes by themselves and you'll notice why i mapped it like this
* 03:36:900 - wah this haha, so you dont know did that on before? XD
* 03:37:800 - kat? 03:37:200 (41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49) - for avoid monotone pattern, its better emphasize imo that would haevily kill both the flow and the percussion structure patterning
* 03:41:625 - kat? I no have idea with word.. cuz rip engrish XDDD only start following guitar at 03:42:600 -
* 03:50:475 - delete? I think you just need kkddk for emphasize that flow i think it's well emphasized already
* tatatata ta ta ta tata tata
* 04:34:050 (165) - don, needs variety with before? also 04:33:750 (163,164,165,166) - kkdd its fine too if hear *and next similar part too* no, idk if you have looked at the patterns one by one but you should look at them from a bigger perspective, you'll notice how I arranged them equally on the same parts with minimal variation, this section doesn't demand variation, it's a calm section to rest after the dense parts from before
* 04:43:500 - change don? XDD 04:43:200 (234,235,236,237) - tit tat tit tat *^ same above *
* 05:56:240 - kd dk? but I think is fine with k ddk *and next too is fine lol, up to youkd dk is love, -''- live too* totally no on this section, the percussion is really audible and I mapped strictly to it
* 07:55:265 - kat? that looks good variety imo would make no sense to use an isolated dkk here
* 08:05:690 - don? so in end is kat finisher. I think is unique XD ( and better differ emphasize, so not boring to hit kat kat kat xd ) implying hitting kkD instead of kkK is not boring? lmao

lol Deathstream ( how that this overall can moar connected with fingers.. dem how nice map lol ), nice map ay ay XD
GL ye, sir

thanks for the check anyway :3

Hello mod as your request!

It's quite solid map! You've followed the guitar and drum very well so I can't say much on it!
And too bad I can't play the stream, so sorry for poor mod x_x
Good luck!

will respond when i'm done with TWC matches
tyyyyy

mintong89 wrote:

Hello mod as your request!

[General]
Decrease the hitsound volume? Actually the song isn't that loud and it's kinda noisy and gameplay, lol. decreased to 90% except kiais

[Tatsujin]

00:20:510 (62,63) - Swap these two notes? I feel that first note isn't really fit to song if you put as k. sure
00:43:200 (13,14,15) - How about k d k here? The sound at here actually isn't really same as first part which is previous "d k d". k k d sounds better to me, ty!
00:47:400 (10,11) - K d? The tone of the big note is quite high pitch but the second note didn't. I think it's the other way around besides the dkdkd right after would flow poorly
00:49:125 (28) - It should be k? The sound at here is same as 00:49:275 (30,31,32) - here (dkkdkk). did something here
01:00:225 (96,97,98) - How about make these k? In my opinion it would be interesting and more fun to have kkdkkkkkkk-. I'll have to say no, the percussion stays stagnant and a high number of kats does not reflect that properly
01:01:200 (106,107,108,109,110) - kkddk? the tone at 01:01:200 (106) - here is just same as 01:01:050 (105) - here. but that would not flow so good, besides it's mapped mainly to percussion
01:02:400 (118,119) - kk, the reason is same as above. same answer as above
01:03:000 - => 01:03:450 - Since the second part is d k ddk too so how about make here a variety by put as d kd dk? adjusted something here
01:12:900 (14,15,16) - kkd? Always ddk makes me feel a little "too much" lol, so I think maybe just change some variety to get better flow too. actually kkd would kill the flow xP that's how most (if not all) DragonForce songs work
01:15:600 (42,43) - kk? the tone of the vocal is higher than previous note. not following vocal
01:17:100 (58) - Delete this note? I feel that d kd dk is more fit to the song and more interesting. sure
01:19:500 (79,80,81) - Same, I think it's too much ddk so how about kkk here? at first I liked the suggestion but then tried playing and it killed my flow on my left hand LOL
01:27:600 (17,18,19,20,21,22) - I feel this should be kkddk d instead of d kkddk lol, you can hear 01:27:600 (17) - here is contain some kind of high pitch sound. I don't hear any O.oo
01:24:600 (49) - k here for high pitch vocal? not following vocals ;w;
01:25:500 (61) - Same as above. same
01:53:550 (13,14,15,16,17,18) - I feel these pattern should be swap too just like you do at first part. It's kinda weird that the pattern suddenly changes. but how are they changed? I focused mainly on percussion structure while still providing interesting patterns to work with (albeit slightly limited due to this kind of style of mapping)
01:57:900 (8) - k for high pitch vocal. I don't like mapping to vocals
02:38:400 (55) - Should be k too, the reason is same as above. same
03:15:000 - => 03:15:600 - Same, I feel some kind of weird that you change the rhythm at here, so swap it? I haven't changed the rhythm, it's the exact same, just some patterns ending in don and others in kats, the structure is still the same o.o

It's quite solid map! You've followed the guitar and drum very well so I can't say much on it!
And too bad I can't play the stream, so sorry for poor mod x_x
Good luck!

Thanks for your mods and comments mintong! <3

Raiden wrote:

Thanks for your mods and comments mintong! <3

mintong! <3

Raiden wrote:

fuck you

upd8

Sorry I'm really late :/

Tatsujin

Nothing really major to say.

00:13:974 - This repetitive section here is totally fine, but I'd personally prefer if there was some consistency with the kind of patterns you use. Nothing big, but perhaps you could just reuse the whole first half or something for the second half.

00:41:400 (1) - Remove finisher? I felt like 00:42:600 (10) and other finishers in this section lost some emphasis because of the finisher on this. Also felt like 00:46:200 (1) had a more audible sound for the finisher compared to this hit.

00:54:525 (36,37) - This would sound nice Ctrl+G'd to emphasize the high guitar pitch imo.

00:56:325 (55) - It's possible to delete this to have this section only include 2 hit 1/4 rhythms for a more organized look.

01:42:600 - Thought you could match this stream a bit more to the vocals at about 01:43:050 (7,8,9) and 01:44:175 (23,24,25). Feels kinda weird after listening to a stream that was fully matched to the vocals. Same with the stream at 03:04:200 and 06:56:090.

01:52:200 - 90% for audio volume is enough for the kiais imo. Also because it's hard to notice the subtle drum changes like the one I mention below.

02:08:175 (68) - Change to k? Felt that the drum sound was similar to 02:08:400 and 02:08:700. Perhaps it's a bit repetitive tho. Same at 03:29:775 (68) and 07:21:665 (73). Alternatively, you could change 02:08:475 (72) to d.

02:08:475 (72) - This is different from the other two ending kiai streams lol

02:15:900 (48) - ^ If you want to be more precise with the melodic pitch.

03:13:650 (4) - ^ Thought it'd emphasize 03:13:800 (1) better, and match the pitch considering that if a hit at 07:05:615 the rhythm would likely be something like kkkkd. Same at 07:05:540 (4).

03:33:900 - Is there a specific reason there's no hit here Just felt really weird, idk.

03:42:300 (105,106,107) - Maybe you could change these to k to match to the high pitch.

03:51:750 (55) - ^ Changing this would nicely compliment the matching at 03:51:900 (57,58,59,60).

03:53:400 - I think you should match to the pitch more closely if you're going to do so later at 03:58:200.

04:03:000 - ^

04:44:850 (245,246,247) - These should all be the same colour as they sound very similar.

04:45:600 (250,251) - ^

04:50:775 (299) - Change to k? Literally every stream that ended with k except for this one ended with kkddk. Also sounds better imo.

05:13:764 (111,112) - The position of your 3/4 gaps have changed. Was this intentional? Doesn't really matter, altho this section's 3/4 sounds more fitting.

05:30:065 (38) - Change to k, sounds pretty similar to 05:30:665 (46) and 05:31:265 (54).

05:40:040 (59) - ^ I think it'd help support the ascending pitch of the guitar that was matched at 05:39:740 (55) and 05:39:890 (57).

05:48:890 (31,32,33,34,35) - Should be 1/3, assuming that you've been matching to the melody.

05:50:990 (59) - Change to k? The pitch was higher compared to 05:50:390 (51).

05:52:190 (75) - ^

06:00:515 - You could add a d here for consistency with 05:56:840 (131,132,133,134,135).

06:13:790 (109,110,111,112,113) - o I lied earlier about every stream ending with kkddk

07:30:590 (13) - Change to k? The way the melody was sounded similar to 07:29:840 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9).

07:44:540 (7,8) - Personally thought Ctrl + G sounded better.

That's all, call me back

newyams99 wrote:

Sorry I'm really late :/

Tatsujin

Nothing really major to say.

00:13:974 - This repetitive section here is totally fine, but I'd personally prefer if there was some consistency with the kind of patterns you use. Nothing big, but perhaps you could just reuse the whole first half or something for the second half. I think the variety is beauty here :p

00:41:400 (1) - Remove finisher? I felt like 00:42:600 (10) and other finishers in this section lost some emphasis because of the finisher on this. Also felt like 00:46:200 (1) had a more audible sound for the finisher compared to this hit. I think the finisher is a good indicator of the 200 bpm section's beginning

00:54:525 (36,37) - This would sound nice Ctrl+G'd to emphasize the high guitar pitch imo. patterning in mid sections are mostly focused on drums

00:56:325 (55) - It's possible to delete this to have this section only include 2 hit 1/4 rhythms for a more organized look.

01:42:600 - Thought you could match this stream a bit more to the vocals at about 01:43:050 (7,8,9) and 01:44:175 (23,24,25). Feels kinda weird after listening to a stream that was fully matched to the vocals. Same with the stream at 03:04:200 and 06:56:090. prefer keeping the stream here to the drums, only most complicated streams follow other elements

01:52:200 - 90% for audio volume is enough for the kiais imo. Also because it's hard to notice the subtle drum changes like the one I mention below.

02:08:175 (68) - Change to k? Felt that the drum sound was similar to 02:08:400 and 02:08:700. Perhaps it's a bit repetitive tho. Same at 03:29:775 (68) and 07:21:665 (73). Alternatively, you could change 02:08:475 (72) to d. I kinda prefer mantaining the ascending tone by doing more kats by the end

02:08:475 (72) - This is different from the other two ending kiai streams lol YA I FIXED LOL

02:15:900 (48) - ^ If you want to be more precise with the melodic pitch.

03:13:650 (4) - ^ Thought it'd emphasize 03:13:800 (1) better, and match the pitch considering that if a hit at 07:05:615 the rhythm would likely be something like kkkkd. Same at 07:05:540 (4). I don't believe a continuous kkk is good idea before the finisher in the kiai :c

03:33:900 - Is there a specific reason there's no hit here Just felt really weird, idk. even pattern :p

03:42:300 (105,106,107) - Maybe you could change these to k to match to the high pitch. only changed first kat

03:51:750 (55) - ^ Changing this would nicely compliment the matching at 03:51:900 (57,58,59,60). I don't kinda like that pattern plus I prefer sticking to the drums

03:53:400 - I think you should match to the pitch more closely if you're going to do so later at 03:58:200.

04:03:000 - ^

04:44:850 (245,246,247) - These should all be the same colour as they sound very similar.

04:45:600 (250,251) - ^

04:50:775 (299) - Change to k? Literally every stream that ended with k except for this one ended with kkddk. Also sounds better imo.

05:13:764 (111,112) - The position of your 3/4 gaps have changed. Was this intentional? Doesn't really matter, altho this section's 3/4 sounds more fitting. intentional :p

05:30:065 (38) - Change to k, sounds pretty similar to 05:30:665 (46) and 05:31:265 (54). prefer to keep it to indicate an ascending tone compared to 05:30:665 (46) -

05:40:040 (59) - ^ I think it'd help support the ascending pitch of the guitar that was matched at 05:39:740 (55) and 05:39:890 (57).

05:48:890 (31,32,33,34,35) - Should be 1/3, assuming that you've been matching to the melody. whaaaat? of course not LOL guitar is still 1/4

05:50:990 (59) - Change to k? The pitch was higher compared to 05:50:390 (51).

05:52:190 (75) - ^

06:00:515 - You could add a d here for consistency with 05:56:840 (131,132,133,134,135).

06:13:790 (109,110,111,112,113) - o I lied earlier about every stream ending with kkddk

07:30:590 (13) - Change to k? The way the melody was sounded similar to 07:29:840 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9). I think that part is more focused on drums

07:44:540 (7,8) - Personally thought Ctrl + G sounded better. I think the guitar wub goes better this way here lol

That's all, call me back

the ones not replied are fixed w/o comment

thank you <3

It's happening.

01:07:500 (29) - I feel this note could work better with the guitars as a kat, as 01:07:050 (23,24,25) - and 01:07:350 (27,28,29) - have a very similar sound.
01:14:700 (33) - Is there a special reason to have a kat here?
01:39:000 (49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65) - This sounds a bit odd, not following clearly the guitar nor drums, I'd suggest a kkddkddd structure here.
01:52:050 (73) - For some particular reason I find a kat plays better here due the next note being a big don. More like personal feeling.
02:23:400 (59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90) - The kat usage gets a bit inconsistent here compared to the first half. Having a kkkdkxxd or kkddkxxd structure for this second half would be a nice touch. Similar for 03:45:000 (33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64) -
03:01:050 - You're missing a kat for drums here.
03:53:400 - 04:12:600 - I don't remember this section having so many dons not like it's bad, but I liked the previous style more, heh.
04:55:235 (4,8) - These notes would be better as big dons, as the tone is really different from the others.
05:17:823 (137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145) - I'd expect some kind of variation here as the guitar sounds different, unless you're being faithful to drums.
07:36:590 (85) - I think a don would make a better transition for the guitar, as you did in previous stream.

Also, I'm a bit curious why you decided to map notes like 01:14:700 (33) - and 01:56:700 (48) - as kats. Those aren't that fitting for me.

That'd be all.

DakeDekaane wrote:

It's happening.

01:07:500 (29) - I feel this note could work better with the guitars as a kat, as 01:07:050 (23,24,25) - and 01:07:350 (27,28,29) - have a very similar sound. this is a kat already? o.o
01:14:700 (33) - Is there a special reason to have a kat here? I guess not ;w;
01:39:000 (49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65) - This sounds a bit odd, not following clearly the guitar nor drums, I'd suggest a kkddkddd structure here. did kkkkddddkkddkkkkd
01:52:050 (73) - For some particular reason I find a kat plays better here due the next note being a big don. More like personal feeling. newyams suggested it but I rejected I think it follows better the structure and ending on kkk seems a bit odd for this section
02:23:400 (59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90) - The kat usage gets a bit inconsistent here compared to the first half. Having a kkkdkxxd or kkddkxxd structure for this second half would be a nice touch. Similar for 03:45:000 (33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64) - It's not inconsistent though, I wanted to emphasize the guitar pitch going higher with a higher amount of kkk usage (which also plays epicly imo )
03:01:050 - You're missing a kat for drums here.
03:53:400 - 04:12:600 - I don't remember this section having so many dons not like it's bad, but I liked the previous style more, heh. so many people suggested it that I had to change it in the end ;___;
04:55:235 (4,8) - These notes would be better as big dons, as the tone is really different from the others. sure
05:17:823 (137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145) - I'd expect some kind of variation here as the guitar sounds different, unless you're being faithful to drums. on the 2nd half of the 170 bpm part I prefer to keep the steady d k _dk d kd dk as it's exactly what the drums give
07:36:590 (85) - I think a don would make a better transition for the guitar, as you did in previous stream. sure

Also, I'm a bit curious why you decided to map notes like 01:14:700 (33) - and 01:56:700 (48) - as kats. Those aren't that fitting for me.

The first mentioned is fixed, but the second one is to mark the rising voice pitch and also have a slightly challenging offhand pattern before the next stanza begins

That'd be all.

=w=