1. Oni (3,9 stars, 1773 notes)

Aldwych wrote:

I'm a demon!

Had to do it.

[General]

It seems that you have move the bg to fit the taiko. Howerver for me it goes down more. Maybe you forgot something.
It feel so weird that even with 100% hs on the kiai i don't hear loudly the dons and the kats x_x I nearly recommend 80% music sound and 100% hitsound.

SV 1.96. Woot? Well this is only a guideline soo... lel. editor bug, probably when you opened AiMod, but I have 1.4 here xdd

[DemOni]

00:29:297 : Even if the triple can be still legit, you can delete it and have a D after. ok
00:35:454 : Why you go d here when you did k at 00:34:558, they sounds relatively the same. fixed
00:35:789 : You can add a d here. Without the full d stream is a bit weird. removed quint instead, felt out of place
00:37:916+ : Wise choice for making different patterns. hmm?
00:47:207 : Hmmmm not a good choice to make a quint here, that doesn't really feel well with the music. Delete this d here and instead add at 00:47:431, here you have bass triple like the others after. ok
00:51:013 : Why did you continue your stream at here. Imo that doesn't make sense, you should delete. deleted 00:50:789 -

01:20:901 + 01:23:140 : I don't know why did you go d instead of k, i mean the melody goes a bit higher so let's make a contrast? I prefer the flow this provides `_J`
01:29:185 + 01:37:244 : Same reason but more for a kkd. same answers idk

01:43:513 : High vocal in the middle -> ddkdd? ok
02:15:864 : How about delete it and make a bigger stream on the next one? That follows better the music (dkddkkkkd?). did a different but similar one
02:16:872 : You're allowed to D, up to you. nah

02:41:946 : Imo it's wiser to drop the K and follow the violins (maybe it is?) and to kdd x4 instead. That's more logic. hmm ill think about this
03:40:267 : You can add d here. ok
04:25:715 : Yeah bit stream! But maybe you may delete this note and make a difference between the battery stream and guitar stream. I think the transition feels good already from kkkkdddd to kdddkkdd

Well that's all i can say, i don't really want to be picky on d/k stuff too. GL HF for rank, next step baby -> Shot in the dark https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLz61g0JLxQ

Ps : If you still have slot left in the time: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/368704 you're supposed to PM me before modding anything so I'm quite mad at the moment.
I SWEAR IT'S A GOOD MUSIC! \o\

you're supposed to PM me before modding anything so I'm quite mad at the moment.

Shiroi Hiroshi wrote:

i dont know how to mod a perfect map tho , sorry if not good perfect? pls ;w;
Oni

SPOILER

01:17:655 - d ? I kinda like the pause before the long pattern ;w;
01:34:670 - ^ hmm I think it flows better if I leave a small 1/2 break :3
02:13:849 - ^ hmm added at different time for better flow!
02:14:073 - ^
02:46:200 - change to d ? seem k a little bit weird .-. I think it follows voice quite well ._.
03:24:372 - k ?

goodluck elite mapper lol please >///<

S a n d wrote:

Taiko mod request from: Raiden
Request Type: M4M
Request Diff: Oni
Modding Content: Oni
*Note: I mod map according to my style of mapping, so sorry if it is unpractical >_<*
Raiden is hentai


- 00:25:939 - Add d here? You can hear the triplet in the background :3 ok
- 00:27:730 - ^
- 00:36:237 - ^ nah these 2 i like how they flow
- 00:49:782 - Change to ? Because I feel k at 00:50:454 lol yea you probably followed the instrument's pitch but I prefer to keep the don rhythm while following percussion beats instead
- 01:15:752 - Change to d? Helps to emphasize K at 01:15:976 ok
- 01:16:536 - Add k? Why make it a baby diff by ignoring the background sound ;w;w;w; not following violin
- 01:17:431 - ^ same
- 01:19:222 - Change to d? I think it is when the pitch starts to descend nah
- 01:20:789 - Change to k? I think it adds a bit of dynamic in there. tht flows terribly lol
- 01:35:118 - ^
- 01:42:058 - ^ same @_@
- 02:20:454 - Remove finisher? I don't think the sound is emphasized enough here. Or just to be consistent, make 02:16:872 a finisher ok
- 02:23:364 - ddkkk -> dkkdk? I think it sounds better :3. weird pattern, mine sounds btter wtf *runs*
- 02:28:513 and 02:29:409 - Make them finisher? Help to be consistent with 02:27:618 and the emphasize is nice :3. what consistent?the first one is finisher because of the high vocal note O_o
- 02:42:506 - Add k? pls not the baby diff again. zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
- 02:43:401 - ^ blabla
- 02:57:058 - Change to k? Helps to flow the dkdkd at 02:56:051 ddd flows better @_@ why you so against ddd
- 03:09:819 - Change to k? Makes it more interesting. ur ass is also interesting
- 03:11:610 - ^ zzzzzzzzzzz
- 03:17:879 - Add d? Repeated reason as the first suggestion ok
- 03:28:513 - Change to finisher? A new section of the song and worth emphasizing. Also follows the background cymbal. didn't for consistency with other sections)
- 04:17:655 - Change to k? More variation pls :3. i think the dons are fine xd
- 04:20:230 - Change this to d? It really really helps to emphasize the k k d at 04:21:797. And they sound different anyway. Really suggests this ><! even if it's an obvious higher pitched guitar note? hell no
- 04:23:700 - Add k? Ik there isn't really a sound there for it. But it really makes the flow better. yea sounds nice
- 04:27:954 - Add d here to follow the guitar? Because I see that you are trying to follow the guitar at 04:26:834 na, I like the pause
- 04:39:260 - Add D here? Le background sound dou. prefer the epic pause before epic kiai
- 04:41:498 - Change to k? I think it sounds better :3 hmm ok
- 04:43:625 - ^ changed another
- 04:50:678 - ^ Also flows better ok
- 05:23:140 - Dat amazing fade out dou @_@ ty

Raiden is hentai ;w; oh come on

Raiden wrote:

S a n d wrote:

Raiden is hentai ;w; oh come on

-Sh1n1- wrote:

jajajaja xDDD :333

Taiko mod

About

1. d is don note
2. k is kat note
3. D is finish don note
4. K is finish kat note

Hitsounds

1. 00:35:454 (78) - should be d to emphasize 00:35:678 (79) - cuz drums are more ovious at 00:35:230 (77) - and 00:35:678 (79) - 78 has a higher pitched guitar note while still holding the drums, I think it plays fine
2. 00:48:215 (65) - here is another kind of sound that k follow better like 00:48:663 (67) - and 00:49:110 - ooh yes nice
3. 00:57:842 (39) - should be d cuz previously you have high pitch on 00:57:618 (38) -, after that, sound decrease a bit, to mark a difference between 00:57:618 (38,39) - I think it plays better as a k to contrast from next ddd
4. 00:58:737 (44,45,46) - feels better as ddk to avoid repetitive notes cuz you have 00:59:409 (48,49,50,51,52,53) - too close I didn't do that, but I deleted a note to improve flow near these ones
5. 01:02:319 (64,65,66) - it might sounds better as d d k
6. 03:29:408 (6) - and 03:30:304 (11) - should be k you missed 01:06:125 (85,90) - didn't you?
7. 03:32:766 (25,26) - Ctrl+G, is not the same as 03:31:423 (17,18,19,20) - because 03:31:647 (19,20) - follow voice nicer, at 03:32:543 (24,25) - there isn't voice and drum is on 03:32:991 - again, look 01:09:483 (104,105) -
8. 03:42:842 (1) - and 03:46:424 (6) - should be K cuz 03:50:006 (8) - have the same sound, D sounds nicer at this kind of sound 03:49:110 -

changed all to D, they sound better as D to me

Structure

1. 00:50:901 (1,2,3) - I can feel a strong beat at 00:50:901 - that should be follow by D, so in this case 00:51:013 (2) - is not necessary, same as 00:36:573 -, furthermore, 00:51:125 (3) - could be nice at 00:51:237 - the start of the two sections is differrent, as the first one doesn't have as clear background drums as the second
2. 01:07:357 (93) - should be at 01:07:133 - cuz you should keep consistency with 01:10:603 (110,111,112) -, ( si vas a seguir esta tonada de bateria en otras partes porque dejarla de lado en esta?) Variedad. En la segunda parte intento seguir un ritmo más basado en kats
3. 01:16:200 (141,142,143) - and 01:17:095 (146,147,148) - are off imo, move 01:16:312 (142) - to 01:16:536 - and 01:17:207 (147) - to 01:17:431 -, same at 02:42:170 (61,62,63,66,67,68) - for consistency. They are not. You probably followed violin (I'll have to map these if more people tell me sigh)
4. Did you miss a note at 02:01:760 - ? intentional, otherwise I'd mapped 02:02:431 - as well
5. 02:20:790 (111) - works better at 02:20:566 -, should be kkd the current one provides more flow with the pattern I used at 02:19:782 (104,105,106,107,108) -
6. 02:46:536 (7) - move to 02:46:312 - and change to d, same as 02:46:200 (5) - should be d applied first part of the suggestion, but ddk ddk doesn't seem to fit quite yet
7. 05:06:908 (197) - could be better at 05:07:133 - deleted a note instead to give more flow, thanks for the suggestion

Buena cancion, haber si te rankeas ese mapa de within temptation que dura como 50 minutos xd, creo que era este https://osu.ppy.sh/s/29157

1. 00:28:505 (36,37,38,39,40,41,42) - kdkkdkk for better connection to 00:24:028 (10,11,12) - and 00:27:162 (28,29,30,31,32) - as they handle kat similar. Should work with the vocal too, and play nicer at end with alternation at 00:29:177 (42,43) - ?
2. 00:29:401 ~ 00:36:565 - Threw me off because it is a lot more different to previous part. Arrangement of kat could be maybe better by following mainly the significant high tone. Example: 00:29:849 (45) - All d and delete 00:30:632 (49) -
   
3. 00:38:356 (9) - don? I find, it sound nicer when kat mainly follows the clash before more alternation begins.
4. 00:39:699 (16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) - kkk ddd k ddd. Following clash sound again and making kkk draws attention at the end of the stanza.
5. 00:41:938 (29) - d ↑
6. 00:43:729 ~ 00:47:087 - Could start to use the same pattern I suggested above, just reverted to fit the higher pitch in this section better.
7. 00:43:505 (38) - d, in case you like what I said above. So you have alternation to next kkk.
8. 00:53:132 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - Move (20) to 00:57:050 - . Not sure if there is a density relation with 00:56:714 (34,35,36,37,38,39) - but how about what I suggested? Feeling wise, but seems to be wrong to me to have less notes in the second stanzas instead of the first one.
9. 00:50:893 ~ 01:05:222 - Just noticed: Could it be you decreased density more and more? Don't know, might be just me. But feels weird since you normaly expect someone to increase density up to the end of a section. Might wanna consider that.
10. 01:05:446 (81) - Delete because 01:12:722 (121) -
11. 01:09:587 - d for guitar which you followed at 01:10:595 - too.
12. 01:14:401 (130) - Following a bit what you did at 01:07:013 - . Sounds nicer to me.
    
13. 01:17:199 (148) - delete and 01:17:647 (152) - delete to have this pattern ?
14. 01:17:871 - Sounds to me like a note is missing here. Makes the stream a bit weird sincer it starts a bit later.
15. 01:19:102 - ...ddd at the end of the stream for the deep drums in song?
16. 01:28:393 (53) - kat. Sounds nicer. Similar to patterns like 01:23:580 (23,24,25,26) - .
17. 01:34:774 (93) - don for consistency with 01:36:117 (102,103) - and 01:37:908 (112,113) -
18. 01:55:371 - Dunno why, suddenly this fits to me. Maybe because after 1:55 min you have a better impression on the map instead at beginning.
19. 02:01:640 (78,79,80,81,82,83) - Pattern does not fit here since drum provides 7 hits instead of 5. So have either kdddd or ddddd ?
20. 02:29:401 (163) - Can be a finisher as well for a better connection to 02:27:610 (151,1) -
21. 02:46:640 (8,9,10,11,12) - Once you played this pattern, rest feels offleading, since there is nothing else snapped in this way, e.g. at 02:48:654 (21) - . You have expect another 5 plet here.
22. * 02:45:520 ~ 03:14:177 - Kiai looks a bit inconsistent to me? Having that impression because patterns change constantly. Alone standing kdk or 5 plets, or sudden higher density with patterns like kkddd which are placed on the third count of a stanza which makes it feel odd (man, I don't know if you understand what I am talking about. Having hard time to explain too lol). Some more opinion would be nice here.
23. 03:28:729 (2) - delete for 03:36:005 (42) -
24. 03:30:073 (10) - deleting notes like these fits fine if you ask me. Supports vocal nicely.
25. 03:30:072 (10,29,30) - ↑
26. * 04:40:147 - Yes. I do believe there is difference between this kiai and the second one. Here you have at least a reference point; the dddd which appear in a constant way, e.g. 04:55:595 (113,114,115,116) - or 04:57:162 (125,126,127,128) - and 04:58:953 (138,139,140,141) - . I think having reference points in the second kiai would be nice and make it look more structured.

OnosakiHito wrote:

[ Oni]

1. 00:28:505 (36,37,38,39,40,41,42) - kdkkdkk for better connection to 00:24:028 (10,11,12) - and 00:27:162 (28,29,30,31,32) - as they handle kat similar. Should work with the vocal too, and play nicer at end with alternation at 00:29:177 (42,43) - ? yeah, did an alternative but very similar to your suggestion, kkddkdd, I think it fits quite well the buildup before 00:29:401 (43) -
2. 00:29:401 ~ 00:36:565 - Threw me off because it is a lot more different to previous part. Arrangement of kat could be maybe better by following mainly the significant high tone. Example: 00:29:849 (45) - All d and delete 00:30:632 (49) -
   re-arranged and deleted some notes
3. 00:38:356 (9) - don? I find, it sound nicer when kat mainly follows the clash before more alternation begins. I kind of prefer the structure I've chosen: the guitar chords have very similar tone and thus the 2 consecutive triplets of each stanza (aka the one you pointed me and 00:39:699 (16,17,18,19,20,21) - 00:41:490 (26,27,28,29,30,31) - etc.) I prefer to have them as the same notes exactly
4. 00:39:699 (16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) - kkk ddd k ddd. Following clash sound again and making kkk draws attention at the end of the stanza. I preferred to connect the two stanzas by making them both the same colour, as well as using the ddd for contrast next
5. 00:41:938 (29) - d ↑ Same answer
6. 00:43:729 ~ 00:47:087 - Could start to use the same pattern I suggested above, just reverted to fit the higher pitch in this section better. Same answers, also I already made intentionally a higher number of kats due to the fact of the tone rising
7. 00:43:505 (38) - d, in case you like what I said above. So you have alternation to next kkk.
8. 00:53:132 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20) - Move (20) to 00:57:050 - . Not sure if there is a density relation with 00:56:714 (34,35,36,37,38,39) - but how about what I suggested? Feeling wise, but seems to be wrong to me to have less notes in the second stanzas instead of the first one. sure, re-arranged a bit the density to make them similar
9. 00:50:893 ~ 01:05:222 - Just noticed: Could it be you decreased density more and more? Don't know, might be just me. But feels weird since you normaly expect someone to increase density up to the end of a section. Might wanna consider that. yeah it seems I left too many 1/2s alone by themselves, should be fixed now
10. 01:05:446 (81) - Delete because 01:12:722 (121) - oh but there is a powerful guitar note which is really faint (or I'd even say absent) in the second one you pointed
11. 01:09:587 - d for guitar which you followed at 01:10:595 - too. fixed
12. 01:14:401 (130) - Following a bit what you did at 01:07:013 - . Sounds nicer to me. sure
    
13. 01:17:199 (148) - delete and 01:17:647 (152) - delete to have this pattern ? hmm alright
14. 01:17:871 - Sounds to me like a note is missing here. Makes the stream a bit weird sincer it starts a bit later. oh fixed, I think it flows quite nicely
15. 01:19:102 - ...ddd at the end of the stream for the deep drums in song? I'll have to say no to this one, I kinda prefer how the "messy" stream reflects the up and downs of the instruments at the moment before the chorus start.
16. 01:28:393 (53) - kat. Sounds nicer. Similar to patterns like 01:23:580 (23,24,25,26) - . sure
17. 01:34:774 (93) - don for consistency with 01:36:117 (102,103) - and 01:37:908 (112,113) - I swapped the 2 next notes, now it flows much better. Thanks!
18. 01:55:371 - Dunno why, suddenly this fits to me. Maybe because after 1:55 min you have a better impression on the map instead at beginning.
19. 02:01:640 (78,79,80,81,82,83) - Pattern does not fit here since drum provides 7 hits instead of 5. So have either kdddd or ddddd ? Yeah, fixed.
20. 02:29:401 (163) - Can be a finisher as well for a better connection to 02:27:610 (151,1) - yeah
21. 02:46:640 (8,9,10,11,12) - Once you played this pattern, rest feels offleading, since there is nothing else snapped in this way, e.g. at 02:48:654 (21) - . You have expect another 5 plet here. fixed
22. * 02:45:520 ~ 03:14:177 - Kiai looks a bit inconsistent to me? Having that impression because patterns change constantly. Alone standing kdk or 5 plets, or sudden higher density with patterns like kkddd which are placed on the third count of a stanza which makes it feel odd (man, I don't know if you understand what I am talking about. Having hard time to explain too lol). Some more opinion would be nice here. I do understand, and it was intentional, so 1st kiai would be X density, 2nd kiai would be X+1 density, and 3rd kiai X+2 density (progressive increase), but yeah some patterns felt a bit odd so I reworked them a bit.
23. 03:28:729 (2) - delete for 03:36:005 (42) - Same answer as 01:05:446 (81) -
24. 03:30:073 (10) - deleting notes like these fits fine if you ask me. Supports vocal nicely. I do not usually follow vocals
25. 03:30:072 (10,29,30) - ↑ Same answer as above
26. * 04:40:147 - Yes. I do believe there is difference between this kiai and the second one. Here you have at least a reference point; the dddd which appear in a constant way, e.g. 04:55:595 (113,114,115,116) - or 04:57:162 (125,126,127,128) - and 04:58:953 (138,139,140,141) - . I think having reference points in the second kiai would be nice and make it look more structured. What is the suggestion? o.o // Nevertheless I fiddled around 2nd kiai and it should be fine now

That's all. Might be that I left some points out because of the similarity with other points I mentioned a few times already. Hope I could help. Good luck!

DakeDekaane wrote:

Just small complains/doubts/suggestions.

00:45:075 (46,47,48,49,50,51) - Why are these kkk and not kdd? @_@ because guitar and vocal are getting higher tone ;w;
01:19:328 (171) - I feel a kat plays better here, the colour change helps to emphasize the big note a bit more.
02:30:858 (178,179) - Doesn't dk makes more sense with the violin?
02:44:850 (82,83,84,85,86) - Given how the drums are here, either kkkdk or kdkdk would fit better than kkkkd.
02:58:283 (80) - A kat here would be great with the drums too. If you do this, change 02:58:507 (81,82) - to dons to keep following the drums.
04:40:149 - I do know the intention of this SV, but aren't the denser patterns enough for the emphasis/intensity of this section?
05:23:134 (1) - This is hardly a noticeable fade-out sound to deserve a spinner >_>

yaddayadda