1. Collab Hard (2,9 stars, 396 notes)
2. Easy (1,54 stars, 175 notes)
3. Haaaaard (3,43 stars, 430 notes)
4. Normal (1,82 stars, 243 notes)

1. 00:49:474 (5) - It's something personal, but consider removing the note here since the instrument ends at 00:49:250. I felt this lyric wasn't worth mapping. Making this a blank also felt better in emphasizing 00:50:370 (1).
2. 01:33:355 - Consider starting the break from here, but since it can't be applied to Normal, not a must.
3. 01:54:847 (1,2) - The space between (2) and the slider body of (1) is quite close. You know it's already fine enough, but giving an extra space would be never bad for aesthetic.

1. 01:52:161 (2,3,1) - Since this is basically an pattern originated from the same laugh sound, dividing combo by a new stanza didn't felt to fit the music perfectly. Removing the combo at (1) is recommended. I believe this will be fine enough to be an exception of your combo pattern.
2. 01:55:743 (2,3,1) - Same here.

1. 00:10:967 (1,2) - This 3/4 usage was less effective since there was an 3/4 slider usage right before at 00:09:623 (3), which was fitting the instrument. The inconsistent intention of your 3/4 slider appearing in a short interval made me feel like that. Tuning the volume down at the end of 00:10:967 (1) is what I suggest.
   
   Spots for similar recommendation

   00:12:758 (1) - 00:53:952 (1) - 00:55:743 (1) -
2. 01:32:235 (3,1) - Personally this mini jump didn't felt effective since basically it didn't felt like a jump. Changing the placement as a long note will play better imo, but up to you.
3. 01:35:146 (1) - Umm Since there's a sound in the background, consider adding a whistle. Not highly recommending, just add if you feel so.

1. 00:34:922 (3,4) - Personally a stack appearing between these two objects will look better. Consider increasing the stack leniency to 10.

• you summoned me for a moddd
  
  c:
  
  Easy

1. 00:14:101 (5) - I don't think this should be a whistle when 00:57:086 (6) - and 02:19:474 (6) - don't have one? (or these two are missing whistles idk)
2. 01:02:907 (4) - remove the Normal-Additions on this
3. 01:58:429 (1) - no hitsounds at all on this one? again happening across all Diffs
4. 02:14:101 (2,3,4) - spacing between these is a little uneven, could just move 3 a little for an easy fix
   
   Normal
   
5. 00:21:713 (1) - very minor, but 186/231 for this gives the whole thing a very subtle downward curve (barely noticeable I guess) but I feel like it improves the flow here by having it go along with the curve of the slider
6. 00:46:564 (5) - would be nicer if this was moved to 00:46:340 (5) - to catch the high pitched sound landing on this, feels more intuitive to follow than the drums landing on the red tick
7. 00:52:161 (1,2,3) - feels odd to miss out on the drums here, http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3611974 feels more appropriate to me. I honestly don't think that the vocals on 00:52:832 (2) - need a 1/1 slider on them to catch them properly, does not justify skipping drums to meee. Happens more than once but I guess you'll easily figure this out on your own, should you feel like this actually needs fixing
8. 01:21:489 (3) - would reaaally move this forward by 1/2 to have it land on the white tick, I think just following drums here is the most intuitive and easy to follow rythm avaialable here
   
   Collab Hard
   
9. 00:15:892 (5,6,1) - very minor complaint, but it would be neat if these were lined up properly so the player can move in one straight line without the little wiggle
10. 00:38:280 (2) - 299/176 for slightly improved flow?
11. 01:10:519 (2,3,4,5) - very petty complaint and a very subjective matter, but I think that it is a little odd to have such a dense rythm during what feels like should/could be a break, there is a very little going on in the song so something less dense like just turning 01:10:519 (2,3) - into a slider feels more appropriate
12. 01:32:235 (3,1) - would personally prefer if the angle between these was a little sharper to give it a little more impact, goes along well with the gasp in the song
    
    Haaaaard
    
13. 00:30:668 (1) - ctrl+g would be more intuitive to follow I think, your call though as the current one probably works well too, more like personal preference
14. 01:27:534 (6) - would move a little to the left, makes it a tad nicer to catch the following circle, something like 422/195 works well I think
15. 02:26:638 (4) - why not have a note here? had one in the Easy and Collab Hard + a tail land on this in the Normal, so missing out on this here is a bit eh especially since you catch a similar sound on 02:26:415 (3) - would feel more intuitive to catch this one too
    
    Not much to say, will shoot a star to compensate for a pretty picky and shitty mod.
    
    Good Luck!

1. 00:12:758 (4) - reverse feels off cause of the vocals. circle + slider would emphasise them better
2. 00:18:131 (1) - similar here. circle + slider instead?

1. 00:19:922 (1,2) - meh. why ignore the vocals totally? :c you could emphasise them so nicely. also, end of (1) should be clickable cause it's clearly louder than the rest. try this? - http://puu.sh/jUXTj.jpg
2. 00:45:892 (3,4,5,1) - looks a little confusing cause (5)'s so short -> looks like too many objects at once. unstacking (3,4,5) helps avoiding that
3. 01:35:146 (1,1) - aahm. hmh, a little sad you ended this on the downbeat. it's the strongest beat and the vocals start here, so it'd match better if this were clickable. I'd prefer if you replace the spinner with 3/1 slider + circle (/ a 1/1 slider)
4. 02:05:146 (4) - try emphasising the vocals a little by replacing this with 1/2 slider?
5. 02:16:116 (3,1) - this is the only time you stack two circles after a slider, could be confusing for beginners. unstack them, maybe? or stack some other circles, too, so players get used to it.

1. 00:20:818 (5,6) - stack plays weird. the previous stacks (1,2) / (3,4) work better because the second sound's weaker than the first. but here, (6) is just as dominant as (5), so unstacking them matches better, imo
2. 01:03:803 (5,6) - same here

1. 01:35:146 (1,1) - basically same as in Normal. also atm this is way easier than in Collab Hard -> a little boring to play for a Hard diff, imo. can you shorten the spinner and add a circle or 1/2 slider on the downbeat? it works either way, but I really miss emphasis on this

1. 00:44:101 (3) - чуть против часовой стрелки.
2. 01:04:586 - может, когда вот вокал такой становится св поменьше сделать, на этом кусочке.
3. 01:57:086 (3) - а этот по часовой.

1. 00:15:444 (4,5,6,1) - не нравится это движение, может ровно ровную линию сделать вот тут00:15:892 (5,6,1) - или еще как-нибудь облагородить.
2. 01:11:191 (5) - а так ли нужен тут слайдер с слабой доли?
3. 01:59:773 (5,6,1) - что насчет такого ритма? http://puu.sh/jVtmu/defadeafec.jpg

1. HP Drain Rate -1 or 0.5. I feel it's high for easiest difficulty.

1. Great difficulty. I could not confirm collab parts. So i recommend to write collab part to somewhere.

1. 02:33:807 (4,5,6) - You took this sound to follow the background effect at here 02:34:142 (5) - . So you should consider adding a note to here 02:33:919 - . Otherwise, you don't have to take this sound 02:34:142 (5) - . In short, It's better to take this sound for playing in my opinion. 02:33:919 -

alacat wrote:

words