A bit sudden, but I'm somewhat intrigued in the idea of rating other posters, no particular structure to this thread aside from simply stating the positives and negatives you perceive of each person. Anyone can come in and judge others, or something.
Essentially, a more unorganized version of a forum game that hasn't been used much anymore.
With that, I'll start with a few:
abraker = you seem to be fairly intelligent, but it looks like you tend to be caught up in your own thing. i can enjoy a few talks and we can run some ideas over each other, but otherwise, nothing crazy worth noting. overall, you're a pretty decent person from what i know. (7.23/10)
Ashton = interesting, brilliant, in some ways. you seem prone to debate, and it looks like you often play a bit of a devils advocate. there's some murky bits to you that may be problematic, but i've yet to discern what exactly these aspects are. i primarily view you as an interesting specimen worth observing. (7.86/10)
Westonini = also pretty intelligent. i'd imagine we could talk about quite a lot, but you're often pretty busy with your studies as things are. we might actually differ on a bit from the time i've known you, but since we don't talk much apart from the forums, i don't know for certain. overall, a pretty damn cool person nonetheless. (7.95/10)
Coldtooth = a peculiar specimen. in a way, you project a weirdness that i get somewhat attracted by. i think you're generally an interesting person with quite a lot in mind, although i don't talk with you much at all. could make for interesting conversation, although there may be some conflicting points considering how we process things, i'd imagine. otherwise, quite nice as a person. (7.52/10)
Penguin = god damn it. you're too cool. i find you to be a damn amazing conversation partner, comparably chill and generally easy-going in some sense. had quite a lot of fun when you were active. hard to come up with much of anything to criticize. (8.63/10)
That'll be all for our first session. Rate away.
Essentially, a more unorganized version of a forum game that hasn't been used much anymore.
With that, I'll start with a few:
abraker = you seem to be fairly intelligent, but it looks like you tend to be caught up in your own thing. i can enjoy a few talks and we can run some ideas over each other, but otherwise, nothing crazy worth noting. overall, you're a pretty decent person from what i know. (7.23/10)
Ashton = interesting, brilliant, in some ways. you seem prone to debate, and it looks like you often play a bit of a devils advocate. there's some murky bits to you that may be problematic, but i've yet to discern what exactly these aspects are. i primarily view you as an interesting specimen worth observing. (7.86/10)
Westonini = also pretty intelligent. i'd imagine we could talk about quite a lot, but you're often pretty busy with your studies as things are. we might actually differ on a bit from the time i've known you, but since we don't talk much apart from the forums, i don't know for certain. overall, a pretty damn cool person nonetheless. (7.95/10)
Coldtooth = a peculiar specimen. in a way, you project a weirdness that i get somewhat attracted by. i think you're generally an interesting person with quite a lot in mind, although i don't talk with you much at all. could make for interesting conversation, although there may be some conflicting points considering how we process things, i'd imagine. otherwise, quite nice as a person. (7.52/10)
Penguin = god damn it. you're too cool. i find you to be a damn amazing conversation partner, comparably chill and generally easy-going in some sense. had quite a lot of fun when you were active. hard to come up with much of anything to criticize. (8.63/10)
That'll be all for our first session. Rate away.
