forum

Shibayan feat. Sakaue Nachi - Cinderella wa Mah...

posted
Total Posts
128
show more
Nozhomi
So as I asked with oko recently, I'm not 100% sure about the Shibayan feat. 坂上 なち, because I never saw it when I looked for metadata.
For example : https://soundcloud.com/shibayan/pachuli / http://homepage3.nifty.com/shibayan/stal1101/ / http://www.akibaoo.com/c/82/2500020206676/

Everytime, vocal is credited but not include with artist as feat.x. So I think it should be just Shibayan as artist.

EDIT : I asked to Alacat about it, artist should be 坂上 なち / Sakaue Nachi so Shibayan should be added on tags.
Topic Starter
truonant
Ok. I've added the tags and changed the artist name.
Nozhomi
Remove old osb file with old artist name.
Remove soft-sliderslide7.wav / soft-slidertick7.wav who are unused hitsounds !

Ayyy
Nozhomi
Okay seems fine now~

Got your bubble ^^
Topic Starter
truonant

Nozhomi wrote:

Okay seems fine now~

Got your bubble ^^
Sweet <3
Shiranai
Great, after two years we have a bubble
Hope someone will check the bubble soon :)
Kibbleru
ok. we have some consistency, rhythm, spacing, and minor aesthetic issues with Lunatic diff

aesthetics
00:08:029 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - you should try using convert slider to stream, it will look alot cleaner
00:36:389 (3,5) - this overlap doesn't look very intuitive
00:38:967 (7,2) - ^
01:57:014 (4,6) - try not to overlap here


consistency
00:16:350 (2,3) - 00:08:850 (2) - why are these different?
00:19:865 (1,2) - ^ same as above, why is this part different?
01:35:568 (8,1) - 01:39:084 (8,1) - why the inconsistency?

rhythm
00:23:029 (3,4) - i dont think extending this to the 1/8 is necessary, 00:23:264 - isn't that strong of a sound
00:27:248 (5,6) - ^
00:28:186 (1,2) - ^
00:31:467 (7,8) - ^ (also kind of inconsistent with 00:31:936 (1,2) - )
also, after 00:56:545 (2) - u don't seem to use them anymore in the same context.
00:56:311 (1,2,3) -
01:15:998 (6,7,8,9) - ^ again, the song doesn't really support an extended slider and it seems to come out of nowhere, it would be acceptable if you were at least consistent with your usage imo.
01:42:834 (8) - you're skipping a vocal by extending this slider, not necessary imo.
02:19:748 - why map such a strong beat with a slider end here?


spacing
00:09:436 (1,2) - needs some more spacing imo, it could easily be misread as 1/4 here.
00:29:826 (9,1,2) - you need to lower the spacing from 9>1 and increase it from 1>2, its a bit misleading again here.
00:13:889 (4,5,6) - why does this have such high spacing when the music isn't even that strong here? at least compared to ur streams like 00:09:904 (2,3,4,5) -
01:08:498 (6,7,8) - come on, u should know that this stuff really plays badly >< also there isn't really any special reason to use this kind of pattern here.
01:31:936 (1,2,3) - ^
01:54:436 (1,2,3,4,5) - why is this spaced so much? i don't even hear a clear 1/4 track here ><
02:01:936 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^
02:09:436 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^
02:16:936 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^



other comments
01:23:029 (3,4,5,6) - the movement is a little sharp here, and circles are not as lenient to land on as sliders are so its kind of hard to catch.
02:20:451 (7,8,9) - could ctrl'g this to make the spacing a little more recognizable here.
Winnie
It was all Kibbs fault
Shiranai
:(
Okoratu
so... i assume this is about truonant's diff?
Kibbleru

Okorin wrote:

so... i assume this is about truonant's diff?
ah. sorry, yes
Topic Starter
truonant

Kibbleru wrote:

Okorin wrote:

so... i assume this is about truonant's diff?
ah. sorry, yes
How bad is it? Should I just remap? Or even better, can you rank it if you deleted my difficulty?
Kibbleru

truonant wrote:

How bad is it? Should I just remap? Or even better, can you rank it if you deleted my difficulty?

hmm, well to me it isnt rankable in its current state, but if other bns find it fine they can disagree with me and rebubble it. (apparently bonsai will do it so.)
but do look into my mod before doing so, cuz you may find some things that u could fix.
Okoratu
should just check the mod like any other, the stuff he pointed out looks fixable
Topic Starter
truonant

Kibbleru wrote:

ok. we have some consistency, rhythm, spacing, and minor aesthetic issues with Lunatic diff

aesthetics
00:08:029 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - you should try using convert slider to stream, it will look alot cleaner - fixed
00:36:389 (3,5) - this overlap doesn't look very intuitive - fixed
00:38:967 (7,2) - ^ - fixed
01:57:014 (4,6) - try not to overlap here - fixed


consistency
00:16:350 (2,3) - 00:08:850 (2) - why are these different? - fixed
00:19:865 (1,2) - ^ same as above, why is this part different? - fixed
01:35:568 (8,1) - 01:39:084 (8,1) - why the inconsistency? - fixed

rhythm
00:23:029 (3,4) - i dont think extending this to the 1/8 is necessary, 00:23:264 - isn't that strong of a sound - fixed
00:27:248 (5,6) - ^ - fixed
00:28:186 (1,2) - ^ - fixed
00:31:467 (7,8) - ^ (also kind of inconsistent with 00:31:936 (1,2) - ) - fixed
also, after 00:56:545 (2) - u don't seem to use them anymore in the same context. - fixed
00:56:311 (1,2,3) - - fixed
01:15:998 (6,7,8,9) - ^ again, the song doesn't really support an extended slider and it seems to come out of nowhere, it would be acceptable if you were at least consistent with your usage imo. - fixed
01:42:834 (8) - you're skipping a vocal by extending this slider, not necessary imo. - fixed
02:19:748 - why map such a strong beat with a slider end here? - fixed


spacing
00:09:436 (1,2) - needs some more spacing imo, it could easily be misread as 1/4 here. - fixed
00:29:826 (9,1,2) - you need to lower the spacing from 9>1 and increase it from 1>2, its a bit misleading again here.- fixed
00:13:889 (4,5,6) - why does this have such high spacing when the music isn't even that strong here? at least compared to ur streams like 00:09:904 (2,3,4,5) - - fixed
01:08:498 (6,7,8) - come on, u should know that this stuff really plays badly >< also there isn't really any special reason to use this kind of pattern here.
01:31:936 (1,2,3) - ^ - fixed
01:54:436 (1,2,3,4,5) - why is this spaced so much? i don't even hear a clear 1/4 track here >< - fixed
02:01:936 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^- fixed
02:09:436 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^- fixed
02:16:936 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^- fixed



other comments
01:23:029 (3,4,5,6) - the movement is a little sharp here, and circles are not as lenient to land on as sliders are so its kind of hard to catch. - fixed
02:20:451 (7,8,9) - could ctrl'g this to make the spacing a little more recognizable here.
Thanks Kibbleru. Can you recheck?
Kibbleru
although i don't plan on personally rechecking this, my complaints are satisfied @noz u are free to rebubble.
Nozhomi
5 months later oui
TicClick
woah
Shiranai
Since when?
J1NX1337
Please revive! I will mod if you do. :(
kunryk
:)
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply