Hello.
osu! is a game I recall.
Mappers are creating the content of the game.
Ranked beatmaps are ranked so that players can have fun and compete in the game.
When you are ranking a beatmap, you are not mapping for yourself, you are mapping for the players. This is because for any game that exists, the game developers/content creators are creating content for the players. Again, they are making it for the players, which means not (just) for themselves. This is what ranking a map entails.
If you are only mapping for yourself, then I would highly recommend that you do not rank your map, as the ranked beatmaps are made for players, not for mappers themselves. It actually is quite absurd to rank a map only for yourself, and osu! is the only game that exists that has this surreal problem where the content creators are not creating content for their audience.
You didn't need to link/embed a bunch of testplays... that doesn't do anything. I merely stated a suggestion that would seems to be better than your slider tick 4 idea currently, and if the testplayers in your target audience says it plays fine, then the chances of it being fine are good... you didn't need to link a bunch of plays and chatlogs saying so; however, I would ask the players if they think that actually mapping to what you are hitsounding to would be better or not, if I were you (because I am very sure they would agree, though I may be wrong).
I do not care what the other modders have said regarding this, as I want to discuss with you 1 on 1 regarding these few problems I have with the beatmap, and I am sure I have given "valid" reasoning so far for this specific point (if I did not, then I would like an explanation as to why).
That last section of your latest reply is irrational... if modders can not figure out what the mapper is trying to do, then the mapper should explain their intentions behind their method of mapping such a way if requested. Failing in doing so shows that the mapper is either swallowed up in ignorance, can't be bothered to, or doesn't know themselves as to why they mapped in such a way. I never said it was relevant either as I was merely interested as to how you came up with choosing such a concept. Again, please do not put words into my mouth!
- VINXIS
tryin to make a change :-\
osu! is a game I recall.
Mappers are creating the content of the game.
Ranked beatmaps are ranked so that players can have fun and compete in the game.
When you are ranking a beatmap, you are not mapping for yourself, you are mapping for the players. This is because for any game that exists, the game developers/content creators are creating content for the players. Again, they are making it for the players, which means not (just) for themselves. This is what ranking a map entails.
If you are only mapping for yourself, then I would highly recommend that you do not rank your map, as the ranked beatmaps are made for players, not for mappers themselves. It actually is quite absurd to rank a map only for yourself, and osu! is the only game that exists that has this surreal problem where the content creators are not creating content for their audience.
You didn't need to link/embed a bunch of testplays... that doesn't do anything. I merely stated a suggestion that would seems to be better than your slider tick 4 idea currently, and if the testplayers in your target audience says it plays fine, then the chances of it being fine are good... you didn't need to link a bunch of plays and chatlogs saying so; however, I would ask the players if they think that actually mapping to what you are hitsounding to would be better or not, if I were you (because I am very sure they would agree, though I may be wrong).
I do not care what the other modders have said regarding this, as I want to discuss with you 1 on 1 regarding these few problems I have with the beatmap, and I am sure I have given "valid" reasoning so far for this specific point (if I did not, then I would like an explanation as to why).
That last section of your latest reply is irrational... if modders can not figure out what the mapper is trying to do, then the mapper should explain their intentions behind their method of mapping such a way if requested. Failing in doing so shows that the mapper is either swallowed up in ignorance, can't be bothered to, or doesn't know themselves as to why they mapped in such a way. I never said it was relevant either as I was merely interested as to how you came up with choosing such a concept. Again, please do not put words into my mouth!
- VINXIS
tryin to make a change :-\