a chu from my queue <3
Hard:
Normal:
Easy:
Just a few consistency issues, everything else is ok. good luck \o
owlcity makes me tingle
Hard:
- 00:10:355 (2,3) - Could just align along the y-axis for that symmetrical look, no?
- 00:12:053 (5) - Honestly, these notes just makes the vocals sound awkward. I know it's for the jingles, but I recommend you remove it for the sake of vocals. Of course, this choice is up to you.
- 00:25:923 (1,2) - Could use some more distinct pattern, I thought it was 1/4. Maybe try http://puu.sh/xEIge/7bb0415138.jpg? The small DS could be enough to distinguish the snapping. Up to you.
- 00:31:301 (5) - Ends differently than 00:40:358 (5,1) - , even though they're rhythmically similar.
- 00:42:339 - Missed a drum?
- 01:56:497 (4,5) - Its a similar situation near the intro.
- 01:57:629 - Maybe add a 1/8 mini buzz for the synth?
- 01:57:912 - Could use a mini finish.
- 02:28:764 (4) - Maybe move this note to the opposite side, relative to 02:28:481 (3,5) - ? Like, http://puu.sh/xEIMp/fc34aa2b56.jpg so it doesn't have an awkward looking pattern.
- 02:52:823 (2) - Puts the vocal focus in an awkward situation. Most likely 02:53:106 - ending on a vocal, makes the vocals not distinct.
Normal:
- 00:14:884 (2) - To solve the awkward pause here, I suggest you make the slider 3/4, then repeat it. Of course, you'll have to rearrange 00:16:016 (1) - a bit. Like https://puu.sh/xEJ6G/0524066382.jpg.
- 00:21:394 - I really suggest you do what you did 00:12:620 (2,3) - here.
- From 00:27:338 - to 00:45:453 - , You have a few consistency issues here. Most notably 00:27:338 (1,2,3) - compared to 00:29:602 (1) - and 00:31:867 (1,2,3,4) - compared to 00:40:924 (1,2,3) - . Even if it is for "variety," I think consistency is important in lower difficulties due to interpretive patterning, so I'll break it down specifically and help you try to solve it:
- 00:29:602 (1,2) - Is pretty similar to 00:27:338 (1,2) - , simple.
- 00:31:867 (1) - Here, you can do the same as 00:27:338 (1) - . Though, 00:32:999 (2,3,4) - will be a different case. You'll probably need to rearrange the pattern, so I made something you could try http://puu.sh/xEJDk/fedfa0effe.jpg. This way, it improves the vocal emphasis, but you can interpret it differently, so its really up to you to rearrange it.
- 00:39:226 (2) - You hit the vocals here, but couldn't 00:28:187 - ? You could apply this pattern to 00:27:904 (2) - , 00:36:961 (2) - , etc. But since you rarely did this pattern in this specific section, I suggest you follow with what you did, like 00:36:395 (1,2,3) - .
- 00:40:924 (1,2,3) - Also another awkward vocal situation, similar to 00:31:867 - . But in this case, you'll just need to rearrange it so 00:41:773 - isn't a slider end and 00:42:056 (3) - as a 3/4 repeat, similar to the situation with 00:14:884 - . - 01:02:436 (2,3) - isn't the same as 00:53:378 (2) - , even though they're similar in rhythm?
- 02:08:668 (3,3) - I really think you should avoid the slider 'ending on big white ticks' in this case, usually because they start another measure.
- 02:35:558 (2,3) - I don't think stacking on a Normal is a good idea, usually because it's difficult for new beginners to read.
- 03:06:693 (2) - Why not a 3/4 here? It would fit just fine and follow the vocals.
Easy:
- 00:09:223 (1,2,3) - Awkward beginning, don't you think? I'd recommend you do what you did similar to 00:19:413 - .
- 00:19:413 (1,2,3,1) - Eh, it can be argued that 00:19:979 (2) - could or couldn't end on a big white tick. In this case, I'll let it slide, but wanted to make note.
- 00:30:168 (3) - You should do here what you did with 00:39:792 (4) - , it'd be a good emphasis on vocals.
- 01:38:665 (3) - Why not a 1/2 repeat?
- 03:10:372 (1,2,3) - Why didn't you map the background vocal here? Of course, its understandable 01:21:683 (1,2,3) - here, but in this case, there are background vocals.
Just a few consistency issues, everything else is ok. good luck \o
owlcity makes me tingle