m4m from my quehuehuehue
Good song choice you got there, star'd and good luck!
Death is the 8th Deadly Sin
General:
Checked metadata, looks good.
Overall volume felt quite loud to me, consider lowering it at some spots.
OD and HP settings look fine too.
Reminder: Make sure to overlook similar points from my suggestions yourself, I might've missed some points.
[Death]
00:25:246 (50) - don? the pitch of the guitar is noticeably lower than 00:25:083 (48,49) - and 00:25:408 (52) -, but both versions sound and play fine.
00:29:543 (95) - consider changing this to don, so you have a nice effect with the 2 previous kkd's and the kdd after that, showing descending guitar pitch. plus, it'd be consistent with 00:34:975 (151,152,153) -.
00:30:516 (105) - I'd move this note to 00:30:354 - to keep the way of emphasis of the lead guitar consistent.
First kiai looks crisp :eyes:
01:18:435 (618) - kat maybe, as the crash is quite high-pitched and the stream flows nicely into it? or do you prefer don here to keep the buildup consistent?
01:39:759 (817) - even if the snare exists here, it's quite faint and for the player it's hardly audible. due to that, I'd prefer a don instead, as it looks, plays (imo) and sounds better.
01:50:381 (930,931,932,933) - I wish this wasn't the case, but even at 25% speed and without hitsound volume, I fail to hear any clear 1/6 sound played in the song, only the drummer being a bit off. If these really don't exist, can you give an explanation of why this is mapped as such?
01:59:300 (1006,1007) - there's no 1/8 drum played here either, but I guess this is for consistency?
2nd chorus looks good too :eyes:
02:45:354 (1423) - kat? the guitar pitch is quite high, leaving that out considering your overall emphasis is a bit weird.
02:55:732 (1488) - same thing as above.
03:21:678 (1691,1692,1693,1694,1695,1696,1697,1698,1699,1700,1701,1702,1703,1704,1705,1706,1707,1708,1709) - assuming you're following the drums,
it should look like this:
03:48:687 (4,9) - I'd delete these two notes; even if the 1/4 are clearly audible, having 5-plets doesn't feel very appropiate for the calmest part of the song. additionally, in my opinion, a 1/2 gap gives the kats a cute impact.
03:58:262 (45) - since you're mapping kats as snares in this stream, consider changing this to don. the only other drum sounds (idk how they're called lol) you mapped as kats are 04:00:005 (66,67,68) - these, while you mapped them as dons elsewhere in the stream, idk why.
04:09:592 (179) - why are you skipping the quite clear guitar here? I think this could be mapped as kat to express that.
04:17:214 (271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281) - I have no clue what this pattern is mapped to, honestly, as doesn't emphasize skips guitar, drums and / or vocals in its best way. If you want to emphasize the vocalist, then 04:17:701 (277) - sounds better as kat.
04:33:106 (463) - due to the high guitar pitch, kat works well here.
04:35:701 (495) - this one too, although I'd suggest this one stronger because the guitar sounds more intense.
[]
In summary, I like the way you appoached the song, it's consistent in its patterning and emphasis for the most part, more intense sections are set apart from others with SV that is done quite smoothly, and the patterns play quite well (even if I can't play the solo cuz 1/6 orz). I hope this bit was helpful.
Checked metadata, looks good.
Overall volume felt quite loud to me, consider lowering it at some spots.
OD and HP settings look fine too.
Reminder: Make sure to overlook similar points from my suggestions yourself, I might've missed some points.
[Death]
00:25:246 (50) - don? the pitch of the guitar is noticeably lower than 00:25:083 (48,49) - and 00:25:408 (52) -, but both versions sound and play fine.
00:29:543 (95) - consider changing this to don, so you have a nice effect with the 2 previous kkd's and the kdd after that, showing descending guitar pitch. plus, it'd be consistent with 00:34:975 (151,152,153) -.
00:30:516 (105) - I'd move this note to 00:30:354 - to keep the way of emphasis of the lead guitar consistent.
First kiai looks crisp :eyes:
01:18:435 (618) - kat maybe, as the crash is quite high-pitched and the stream flows nicely into it? or do you prefer don here to keep the buildup consistent?
01:39:759 (817) - even if the snare exists here, it's quite faint and for the player it's hardly audible. due to that, I'd prefer a don instead, as it looks, plays (imo) and sounds better.
01:50:381 (930,931,932,933) - I wish this wasn't the case, but even at 25% speed and without hitsound volume, I fail to hear any clear 1/6 sound played in the song, only the drummer being a bit off. If these really don't exist, can you give an explanation of why this is mapped as such?
01:59:300 (1006,1007) - there's no 1/8 drum played here either, but I guess this is for consistency?
2nd chorus looks good too :eyes:
02:45:354 (1423) - kat? the guitar pitch is quite high, leaving that out considering your overall emphasis is a bit weird.
02:55:732 (1488) - same thing as above.
03:21:678 (1691,1692,1693,1694,1695,1696,1697,1698,1699,1700,1701,1702,1703,1704,1705,1706,1707,1708,1709) - assuming you're following the drums,
it should look like this:
03:48:687 (4,9) - I'd delete these two notes; even if the 1/4 are clearly audible, having 5-plets doesn't feel very appropiate for the calmest part of the song. additionally, in my opinion, a 1/2 gap gives the kats a cute impact.
03:58:262 (45) - since you're mapping kats as snares in this stream, consider changing this to don. the only other drum sounds (idk how they're called lol) you mapped as kats are 04:00:005 (66,67,68) - these, while you mapped them as dons elsewhere in the stream, idk why.
04:09:592 (179) - why are you skipping the quite clear guitar here? I think this could be mapped as kat to express that.
04:17:214 (271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281) - I have no clue what this pattern is mapped to, honestly, as doesn't emphasize skips guitar, drums and / or vocals in its best way. If you want to emphasize the vocalist, then 04:17:701 (277) - sounds better as kat.
04:33:106 (463) - due to the high guitar pitch, kat works well here.
04:35:701 (495) - this one too, although I'd suggest this one stronger because the guitar sounds more intense.
[]
In summary, I like the way you appoached the song, it's consistent in its patterning and emphasis for the most part, more intense sections are set apart from others with SV that is done quite smoothly, and the patterns play quite well (even if I can't play the solo cuz 1/6 orz). I hope this bit was helpful.
Good song choice you got there, star'd and good luck!