idk if 👏 you 👈 still 👏 want 👏 to 💦 m4m or 💁 not, 🚫 i 👁 don't 🚫 really 😍 care 💅 either 🚫 way 💫
Insane
(I would say use more of the screen)
00:24:417 - your ability to follow the rhythm quite accurately after this point assures me that you can follow the rhythm more accurately before this.
00:20:887 - 00:23:711 - what I mean is putting strong sounds on slider ends like this when there isn't need to.
00:29:005 (1) - I would remove this nc to be consistent with the nc idea of 00:29:358 (1,2) - since they are musically the same
00:36:417 (1) - I would remove this nc since there isn't something special to emphasize like at times with 00:33:946 (1) -
00:40:652 (1,2) - if you are going to nc this for the emphasis, you should also do something with the spacing to make it more clear, otherwise I would remove the nc
00:41:887 (6,1) - at times like these when you want to emphasize the points of nc you should increase the spacing or make the angle into it more unique to give it a real emphasis and make it more clear this is a separate idea.
00:45:946 (2) - cuz when you don't do that, then things like this is confusing because it sounds like it should be emphasized but all the spacing is roughly the same so I can't tell your intentions.
00:58:652 (2,3) - 01:00:770 (4,1) - I wouldn't stack this for emphasis
01:17:005 (1) - 01:17:711 (1) - if you aren't going to especially emphasize these like you did for 01:16:652 (1) - and 01:17:358 (1) - I would remove the nc because its not necessary
01:22:299 (1,1,1,1) - none of these are emphasized like you did previously
01:32:181 - weird fadeout effect.
Hard
00:21:417 (4) - I would nc this otherwise 00:24:417 (1) - seems kind of unnesecary cuz nc emphasis is rather irrelevant for lower diffs.
00:31:299 (2,1,2,3) - 00:32:711 (6,1) - don't put 1/4 stacks and 1/2 stacks right next to eachother they are too hard for hard players to read. (you can find other places on your own.)
01:11:005 - this is a big no no for hard players, don't spam SV change. (you can find other place on your own.)
01:02:887 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - 01:13:476 (5,1) - 01:08:181 (1,2) - 01:19:476 (1,2,3) - inverting movement like this is fairly difficult for hard players, I stronly recommend changing these.
Normal
00:21:417 (4) - nc (explained prior diff)
00:56:887 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - you need to break up this long chain of 1/2 gaps because it's too hard for normal players. consider breaking up 00:51:240 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - as well
Easy
00:20:182 - I would halve the amount of nc you do for this
01:06:770 (1,2,1) - 01:11:005 (1,2,3) - this inverts movement a bunch and will be difficult for noobs
01:11:005 (1,2,3) - plus for this, this kind of arrangement will make the easy players misread because the (3) is closer to (1) than (2) is