Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)
  4. Beatmap Graveyard

Usa - The Last Queen

posted
Total Posts
5
Tari
osu! Alumni
1,671 posts
Joined July 2012
Topic Starter
Tari
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Monday, July 24, 2017 at 12:13:30 AM

Artist: Usa
Title: The Last Queen
Tags: luka megurine Nico Nico Douga vocaloid
BPM: 148
Filesize: 3208kb
Play Time: 02:13
Difficulties Available:
  1. Hard (3.12 stars, 371 notes)
  2. Insane (4.07 stars, 485 notes)
  3. Normal (1.78 stars, 189 notes)
Download: Usa - The Last Queen
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
#17
Last edited by Tari , edited 5 times in total.
Sidetail
1,268 posts
Joined October 2012
Sidetail
as requested. just nitpick

[normal]
remove greenline: 01:44:640 -
00:55:992 (1,2,3) - thats pretty sharp turn
01:04:100 (1,2,1,2) - instead of this, i like this better there 00:00:857 (1,2) - . especially it matches better with the song at 01:04:911. These four clickables seems better at places like 02:10:586 (1,2,3,4) -
01:57:613 (1,2,1,2) - ^ (etc)
01:10:586 (1,2) - unstack seems better there
02:04:100 (1,2) - ^
01:42:411 (2) - bend other way so its more flowy without having an impact on distance
02:13:019 (2,3,4) - would just do a slider with reverse since this is your first time introducing circles like this at very end

[hard]
00:03:086 (2) - preferably unstacked like 00:03:897 (4) - . Having mirrored image of 00:03:289 (3,4) - on 00:02:478 (1,2) - seems nice
00:39:775 (1,2) - comparing with 00:41:397 (1,2) - , that aesthetic can improve
01:54:369 (1,2) - sudden hs on sliderend and circle (well i guess hs is still wip)

[insane]
perhaps silence s:c2 sliderslide as well? also its weird that kick drum hs is used as finish. it really doesnt sound very nice :l Perhaps it would be nice if you kept the consistent kicks with the song

00:20:519 (2,3,4) - err stack properly ;w;
01:42:006 (2) - missing whistle in body? cuz you had one on 01:40:384 (2) -

yeah cant find much since its clean from start
do you have better quality bg? anyways gl
Tari
osu! Alumni
1,671 posts
Joined July 2012
Topic Starter
Tari

Sidetail wrote:

as requested. just nitpick

[normal]
remove greenline: 01:44:640 -
00:55:992 (1,2,3) - thats pretty sharp turn I don't think it is sharp at all. The slider sort of points in the direction of the circle.
01:04:100 (1,2,1,2) - instead of this, i like this better there 00:00:857 (1,2) - . especially it matches better with the song at 01:04:911. These four clickables seems better at places like 02:10:586 (1,2,3,4) -
01:57:613 (1,2,1,2) - ^ (etc)
01:10:586 (1,2) - unstack seems better there Stacking isn't a really complicated concept to introduce in normal. I stacked to provide emphasis there and thus would like to keep it stacked.
02:04:100 (1,2) - ^
01:42:411 (2) - bend other way so its more flowy without having an impact on distance I wanted the slider to point to the direction of the next note.
02:13:019 (2,3,4) - would just do a slider with reverse since this is your first time introducing circles like this at very end

[hard]
00:03:086 (2) - preferably unstacked like 00:03:897 (4) - . Having mirrored image of 00:03:289 (3,4) - on 00:02:478 (1,2) - seems nice
00:39:775 (1,2) - comparing with 00:41:397 (1,2) - , that aesthetic can improve
01:54:369 (1,2) - sudden hs on sliderend and circle (well i guess hs is still wip)

[insane]
perhaps silence s:c2 sliderslide as well? also its weird that kick drum hs is used as finish. it really doesnt sound very nice :l Perhaps it would be nice if you kept the consistent kicks with the song

00:20:519 (2,3,4) - err stack properly ;w;
01:42:006 (2) - missing whistle in body? cuz you had one on 01:40:384 (2) -

yeah cant find much since its clean from start
do you have better quality bg? anyways gl
No reply = fixed.

Thank you!
SkinnyJommy
788 posts
Joined January 2014
SkinnyJommy
hello! m4m!!! :D

[Insane]
  1. 00:03:897 (4) - me personally, i would delete this note, just to emphasize the vocals more!
  2. 00:04:100 (1,6) - really ugly overlap here D:
  3. 00:08:154 (3,4,5,6) - i think that these being stacks kind of takes away from the vocals here, i feel it should have some spacing!
  4. 00:09:269 - missed a triple here!
  5. 00:23:965 (2,4) - with these, you could have them moved in a way so that the previous 1 and 3 sliders are centered with the slider body! like this

    example
  6. 00:23:559 (1,3) - also could you make these parallel??
  7. 00:32:275 (3) - this seems really misplaced as it overlaps like 40 other notes, its too clustered and looks very ugly imo
  8. 01:08:762 (9,1) - i believe you could move 1 closer to 9, it doesnt look very pretty as it is
  9. 01:17:884 (1,1) - i dont think that either of these need nc's
  10. 01:21:127 (6,2) - oh boy please stack :D
  11. 01:39:573 (5) - move this to x258, y102
  12. 01:43:019 (1) - shouldnt you just keep following the general frow of the previous notes here?? no reason to change!
  13. 02:04:505 (1) - i dont think you need an nc here either
  14. 02:07:951 (5,6) - this is some nasty and random anti-flow right here, consider changing this!!!
  15. 02:11:397 (1,1) - same thing here, no nc's i feel!

[Hard]
  1. 00:26:802 (1,2) - you could do a better job of blanketing this!
  2. 00:28:424 (1,3) - also here
  3. 00:38:356 (2,3) - this spacing here is a big distance gap compared to previous notes for no reason really?? i think you should just stick do the normal distance snap here!
  4. 00:50:721 (5) - i dont like how you have a big drum beat landing on the tail end of this slider
  5. 01:29:235 (3,4,5,6) - i agree in the spacing increase, but i think its a bit too much spacing

[Normal]
  1. honestly it looks perfectly fine to me!

really cool maps! good luck on this man, keep it up
Tari
osu! Alumni
1,671 posts
Joined July 2012
Topic Starter
Tari
SkinnyJommy

SkinnyJommy wrote:

hello! m4m!!! :D

[Insane]
  1. 00:03:897 (4) - me personally, i would delete this note, just to emphasize the vocals more! I sort of agree but personally the gap makes this part feel empty.
  2. 00:04:100 (1,6) - really ugly overlap here D:
  3. 00:08:154 (3,4,5,6) - i think that these being stacks kind of takes away from the vocals here, i feel it should have some spacing! There is a build-up concept here.
  4. 00:09:269 - missed a triple here!
  5. 00:23:965 (2,4) - with these, you could have them moved in a way so that the previous 1 and 3 sliders are centered with the slider body! like this


  6. 00:23:559 (1,3) - also could you make these parallel?? I can't move three any lower than it is because it still has to be in the play field.

  7. 00:32:275 (3) - this seems really misplaced as it overlaps like 40 other notes, its too clustered and looks very ugly imo
  8. 01:08:762 (9,1) - i believe you could move 1 closer to 9, it doesnt look very pretty as it is
  9. 01:17:884 (1,1) - i dont think that either of these need nc's I wanted to show that at this part the vocals are repeating.


  10. 01:21:127 (6,2) - oh boy please stack :D
  11. 01:39:573 (5) - move this to x258, y102
  12. 01:43:019 (1) - shouldnt you just keep following the general frow of the previous notes here?? no reason to change! The same rhythm patterns repeated multiple times gets boring to play. I decided to switch it up.
  13. 02:04:505 (1) - i dont think you need an nc here either[color=#FF0000] For consistency with 01:10:992 (1) -

    [/color]
  14. 02:07:951 (5,6) - this is some nasty and random anti-flow right here, consider changing this!!! I wanted consistency in design with 01:59:235 (1,2,3,4) -
  15. 02:11:397 (1,1) - same thing here, no nc's i feel!This is already explained above in your first NC suggestion.

[Hard]
  1. 00:26:802 (1,2) - you could do a better job of blanketing this!
  2. 00:28:424 (1,3) - also here
  3. 00:38:356 (2,3) - this spacing here is a big distance gap compared to previous notes for no reason really?? i think you should just stick do the normal distance snap here! Spacing seems to match well with the intensifying of the music imo. Will get more opinions here.
  4. 00:50:721 (5) - i dont like how you have a big drum beat landing on the tail end of this slider My failed attempt at spicing up the rhythms lol!
  5. 01:29:235 (3,4,5,6) - i agree in the spacing increase, but i think its a bit too much spacing Due to rhythm nature and stacking, this isn't hard to play or read at all.

[Normal]
  1. honestly it looks perfectly fine to me!

really cool maps! good luck on this man, keep it up

The other non-mentioned stuff are fixed or changed in some way. Thank you!
BanchoBot
w00t p00t
34,830 posts
Here since the beginning
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 5