30201102 wrote:

[Hard]

1. 00:08:265 (2) - I would NC here to reflect the BPM change, especially since the distance snap also now changes
   the color is better to be different at heavy beat imo, bpm changing is much more easy to read than the jump
2. 00:20:509 (3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - I would either move the whistle on the end of 00:20:509 (3) - to 00:20:968 (1) - , or move the whistles on 00:21:581 (3) - and 00:22:193 (1) - to 00:21:428 (2) - and 00:22:040 (4) - (I think the 2nd one is better)
   current whistles sound ok imo
3. 00:35:662 (6) - NC here instead of 00:35:815 (1) - Basically you should choose to either NC on the start of a new rhythmic measure or whenever the vocalist changes and then enforce that consistently throughout the entire map
   well I always add nc in every downbeat even the tracks doesn't change, this is better to read the rhythm imo(read pattern is a bit harder but the average of reading difficulty is not hard due to my complex rhythm and simple pattern)
4. 00:09:183 (2) - I would reduce the volume on fast repeating sliders like these. When the hitsounds play rapidly together it makes it sound a lot louder
   nice idea, would fix it too all diffs
5. Note that the points about NC and hitsounding apply to other diffs as well (ie., NC at 00:08:265 (2) - )
6. 00:45:152 (5,6,7) - I would either unstack this group of 3 or move 00:45:152 (5) - onto 00:44:999 (4) - . You never make a stack of 3 anywhere else and the stop and go cursor movement is a bit unusual to run into all of a sudden
   well this is not sudden, they follow the vocal well here: 00:44:693 (2,3) - this 2 are the same patterns as 00:44:081 (4,5,2,3) - , 00:44:387 (1,2,3,4) - this is a group of objects they are following the same vocal, I stacked 00:45:152 (5,6,7) - is for following the new vocal which tone doesn't change so the overlapping is fiting more than regular spacing imo

[Insane]

1. Consider changing the 1/6 streams at 00:09:183 (2,3,4,5) - and so on. It's a sudden 294 bpm stream in a 196 bpm map which only occurs 6 times at the very begging and end. Whereas it's ok of an Extra, it might be a little to complex for an Insane. Furthermore, since it's stacked it takes time to prepare for the jump directly afterwards making it even harder. Essentially, the stacked pattern is harder to play (for me at least) than the spaced out pattern in the Extra diff. I would insert one or more reversing or non-reversing sliders. It doesn't have to be the same slider as from the Hard diff but I think it should be a bit easier than what it is right now
   I'll consider this and probably fix it when I see more similar opinions
2. 00:26:019 (1,2) - I would combine these 2 into 1 slider. The current sliderend isn't really mapped to anything and it would play pretty much the same
   it‘s not good to ignore the drum at 00:26:325 (2) - , it's not good to following the vocal at 00:26:019 - with a 1/2 slider either(the vocal is long sound), so I did the current pattern here

[Extra]

1. Consider reducing the jump dist after 1/6th streams like 00:09:183 (2,3,4,5) - and so on, it's much harder to jump out of a stream than to jump into a stream, especially switching between 1/6 and 1/4 rhythms
   adjusted spacing after 1/6 stream a bit
2. You could make 00:41:019 (2,3,4,5,6) - a perfect star pattern using the polygon tool or by rotating by 72 degrees. It's a bit elongated right now
   well this is a part of hexagon actually

Syph wrote:

hi owo

Insane

00:08:265 (2) - same as extra
same below
00:32:907 (5) - maybe just delete this and place a note on 00:33:060 - ? would be nice imo, especially for insane diff you don't rly have to map everything
01:26:402 (1) - same as extra
I'd like to keep the rhythm, the slider is just a transition to next complex part(that's why I used reverse slider here, circles are too complex)
same below

Extra

00:08:265 (2) - nc here for the downbeat?
I'd like to nc at downbeat
00:11:172 (1) - i think ctrl g on this would make the jump from 8 into 1 play better owo
already fixed the spacing in another way
00:23:264 (6,7,1) - personally think having no spacing between 1/4 sliders is pretty weird, maybe increase spacing a bit?
well I didn't use large spacing for 1/4 around here, keep spacing similar is better
00:34:438 (6,1) - ^
similar as before, this one is a bit unique but I don't want spacing being too huge here
01:26:402 (1) - maybe end on blue tick and put a note on white tick? would prefer to see that clickable
that would be more confusing imo..

fun map

gl~

zev wrote:

extra
00:09:183 (2,3,4,5) - the whistle on (2) is it on the cymbal? cause then it needs a whistle aswell on 00:09:336 (5) -
I put the whistle at the highest tone of the 4 sounds(2nd one is highest imo)
00:10:407 (2,3,4,5) - ^
^
00:32:907 (1) - different vocals, nc?
I'd like nc at every downbeat
00:43:468 - sucks a bit to have this on sliderend imo, cus y follow them here 00:43:774 (4,6) -
the slider is more like a transition to next circles part, using clickable objects fits better but the difficulty is too high imo
00:45:305 (7) - remove this hitsound, you are following vocals there, emphasize is not consistent

This pattern 01:20:203 (2,3,4,5) - remove the whistle, the song doesn't do cymbals on (3) anymore for them all
same as first mod here
gl

Log Off Now wrote:

nm from my q

[General]

ya you have a list in map description xd
i dislike having slider ticks as loud as the slider heads as it gets confusing as to what you've clicked and what you haven't but its up to you what you do with this
kicksliders can be acceptable if being used well tho

[Beginner]

im not sure you need this difficulty, as you say above its really difficult to represent the song using such basic rhythms

00:08:877 - useless greenline
01:26:172 - ^
01:26:325 - ^
first is red line, need to be used here. others removed

00:12:397 (2) - this slider misses out this 00:13:315 - beat which i would argue is a lot more important than the current beat it finishes on due to how much emphasis is put on synth. i would suggest ending this slider on the red tick and then having a circle on the white tick you end on atm
00:13:315 - this sound is not heavier than others(00:12:397 - , 00:12:703 - , 00:13:009 - ) here imo, they are the same weight. I used a long slider to follow them all
00:22:958 - 00:23:264 - i know you dont wanna make this difficulty too hard but because of how much you skip due to the long slider 00:20:509 (2) - here it feels like you're putting lots of emphasis on the background music (even if it wasnt intentional, thats how it comes across) so mapping these two white ticks as circles makes it so this section feels less 'empty'
fixed with a better rhythm(being a little bit harder tho)
00:38:877 (1,2) - move these two beats forward to be consistent with 00:33:366 (1,2) - ? (if you do this, extend 00:39:488 (2) - to red tick)
this one if fine imo, in such an easy diff, slider head and tail plays nearly the same(however head is much more heavier than tail in higher diff)
01:15:764 (2) - having slider ticks at full volume is extremely confusing to the player imo, lower them so they're quieter than the slider head
uh, I didn't use any full volume for this slider

[Easy]

im gonna mod this a bit differently then i normally would considering you're considering removing beginner and i'll help give you some ideas on how you could possibly nerf so it becomes a standalone bottom diff along with ways you could improve the way it is as it stands atm

00:04:046 (1,2,3) - this rhythm can be simplifed a lot since you seem to be following the vocals a lot here, you could try a rhythm like this so you still hit all of the intense vocals in the section and the loudest ending piano note before the hook
well I'm following vocal only here, but I'm using different rhyhtm is because the piano sound in background. the piano goes more density at last part, so I increased the density of my rhythm a bit to follow
00:12:703 (3,4) - maybe ctrl + g this rhythm since the last note of this short pattern of 3 is the most intense and is the only one thats unclickable atm
I'd like to keep. the tone at 00:12:703 - and 00:13:009 - are same high, but 00:13:315 - is a bit higher, so I used same objects(clickable) at first 2, and different for 3
00:13:774 (1,2,3,4) - this section could potentially be nerfed into just two 3/4 sliders if you wanted to
simple 1/1 rhyhtm sounds better here imo
00:21:428 (1,2) - i'm not sure about this rhythm, it feels really strange to have this sudden transition from following the drum/guitars to the vocals when the music doesn't really change, i would rather you follow the drums/guitars to be consistent with the previous section
well I changed tracks to follow by using a reverse slider, the transition is totally smooth enough imo
00:23:570 (1,2,3,4) - same comment as 00:13:774 (1,2,3,4) -
this goes into a new part so I switched tracks here
00:38:570 (1,2,3,4,5) - i'm not sure about the rhythm you use here, i get that its to follow the vocals, but the most intense vocals are on the red ticks and not the white ones and it feels a bit jarring to play especially with the gap in the middle, you could solve this by trying a rhythm like this. its a trade off of following the held guitar for the next stanza, but i think its worth it especially since the standalone circle on (5) emphasises it in its own different way anyway
the current rhythm is fine imo.. I don't think following 00:40:407 - by using clickable objects are better
00:43:162 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - this section is very dense even for an easy diff and makes this quite a big jump in difficulty even when compared to the normal difficulty, i would suggest picking out one part of the drums to follow for half of this section, alternatively you could follow the vocals instead, which means you would have a very similar rhythm to what you have now but still break up this section a little bit so players get a short rest. if you wanted to do this you can simply turn 00:44:999 (6) - into a single circle
removed object at 00:45:305 -
00:48:979 (2) - this note can safely be removed, it feels overmapped considering how dense the previous two bars were compared to this section, removing this would also act as a useful rest for the player
I don't think the circle makes the difficulty to be too hard here
01:22:652 (1,2) - not sure i like this flow direction, you suggest movement in one way but then go back in the same direction almost which is a bit confusing, i would prefer it if 01:22:958 (2) - followed a much more direct upward motion instead of a curve going back and up in the same direction it came from
the direction is fine imo.. going like a circle is a bit boring

[Normal]

this feels more like an advanced difficulty xd

00:15:611 (3) - its strange that you follow the vocals for the previous two 1/2 sliders but you ignore the vocal on this one, any reason why?
sorry I don't understand this mod.. if you mean the rhythm is strange, I don't think so, it's pretty ok here
00:18:366 (5) - i don't think you need to curve the slider this much, its barely noticeable when compared to just having a normal curved slider and players won't play them any different because of how short/small they are
the slider is to follow the background vocal(you can hear it is much different here)
00:25:101 (1,2,3) - why is this rhythm different to 00:23:877 (1,2,3) - when they are both identical in the music? i would suggest just using the first rhythm here instead to help make this more consistent
if I use same pattern, I have to use unclickable object at 00:26:019 - , this is not good
00:28:162 (4) - same as 00:18:366 (5) -
00:28:928 (2) - missing hitsound?
this drum sounds a bit softer than the other 2 so I din't follow
00:42:550 (4,5,6) - this looks really confusing to a noob playing this diff because its hard to gauge if its 1/4 or 1/2 or what, would recommend just replacing with a repeat slider here
it's not confusing here.. I already used many double stacked object before, the gap between each approach circles is easy to tell here
00:43:162 (1,2,3) - 00:44:387 (1,2,3) - 00:45:611 (1,2,3,4) - here you're using 3 different rhythms within the same section of music, i think you're trying to follow the vocals but because (at least imo) thats not the main focus of the music i suggest you should stick with following the drums and passively following the vocals instead of the other way around. copy pasting the first rhythm for the other 2 would fit nicely and also bring your difficulty down a bit. whatever you decide to do just make sure that this is consistent as atm its kinda strange xd
the first 2 is same section in music, but the 3rd is not(you can hear it leads a new vocalist). I changed the pattern with same rhythm is for not making a boring diff here. it would be confusing at all imo since the pattern is pretty easy(compare with other parts in the diff)
01:04:438 (4,5,6) - same as 00:42:550 (4,5,6) -
this pattern's readability is fine imo
01:23:723 (2) - any reason why this is a repeat slider? there isnt 3 synth notes on here, just the ones one the red ticks, would suggest changing this into a 1/2 slider - circle pattern if you want to hit the snare here so it doesnt look the same as 01:22:958 (4) - when the music is different
just following the 2 guitar sound and the drum in the middle, but I don't want to use hard pattern here so I used the reverse slider

[Hard]

00:00:869 (3) - i feel like this doesnt need to be clickable considering how calm the intro is compared to the rest of the song, turning 00:00:308 (2) - into a repeat still follows the vocal but is much easier to play/read at this level
a long reverse slider is really too easy for the diff imo(even in the beginning, such a soft part). if I did, the difficulty gap between the beginning and the later part would be bigger, that's not good either
00:07:037 (1) - i think the slider end isn't snapped to the right note (assuming you're following the piano flick), it should be snapped to 1/6 instead (this also occurs on insane/extra)
would confirm this later(I need more information about the timing here)
00:13:315 (4) - having a slider end on such an intense note that opens up the next section is really strange to me, i get you're following the held synth note but i think this note should have more emphasis on it than a slider end, maybe try doing something like this
I didn't following song using regular patterns always. as it, I did this long slider as a transition to make players take a break, I usually do such of things to connect different part and I think it works well(this why we have break times in long map, however mine is a short one tho)
00:14:999 (1,2,3,4) - if you do that above, make sure to change this rhythm to be the same as 00:13:774 (1,2,3,4) - to be consistent
this 2 parts are not the same sections imo, at least the rhythm of vocal is totally different
00:44:693 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - really not sure about this patterning, not only is this extremely difficult to play at this difficulty at this bpm but its also difficult to read because you stack 2 notes, then no stack, then stack 3 notes. i get it follows the vocals but its really hard to read during gameplay, i would suggest making the stacks even for each or nerfing this pattern into sliders
I used same pattern at 00:44:387 (1,2,3,4) - as I did before, and I stacked 00:45:152 (5,6,7) - for following the same vocal at there(the tone of vocal is the same), I changed the flow direction at 00:45:152 - also. this pattern should work well
00:50:050 (3) - maybe change this into 3 circles since the vocals and the addition of drums make this much more intense than the previous slider?
circles fit much better but play much harder imo
00:52:346 (4) - to be consistent with your rhythm idea of having a circle for every snare before the slider, maybe change this so its a 1/2 slider - circle pattern?
a circle fits well only at 00:52:652 - . but I used a big jump after it, it's better to use unclickable object before a large jumping here, so I did the reverse slider
01:10:713 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - i think i would prefer this section to be at least visually different to previous sections considering how the music changes from previous, but i guess this is subjective and up to you, it just feels like the same as the rest of what i assume the kiai is going to be when the music changes drastically
I think I did change something here. do you noticed that the density of rhythm goes a bit high here, compare with before
01:16:989 (6,1) - i think the spacing here is a bit much even if a jump here is warranted, i would move 01:17:295 (1) - to around x376 y240 to create a right angle with 01:16:683 (5,6,1) - (if you do this make sure to readjust 01:17:754 (2,3) -
the spacing looks big, but only big in looking, when play it's not. because this jump is between 2 sliders, it's much easier to play with a same spacing but different objects(for example, 2 circles)
01:19:438 (4,5) - any reason why this hasn't been given more spacing, i would definitely argue that this vocal is way more intense than 01:18:366 (4,1) - but it has no emphasis on it at all, i would at least space it out a little bit so that 01:18:979 (2) - blankets 01:19:591 (5) - like this
because I used 3 circles before jump at 01:19:744 - , but there's only a single circle before jump at 01:18:519 - . you should know a pattern's difficulty is not only based on the pattern itself but also the other patterns around it
01:19:744 (1) - i'm not really a fan of this strange 'half overlap' here, i think i would prefer it if (1) wasn't overlapped at all or it was closer to the slider end of (2) but its a subjective aesthetic thing so eh
the kind of shape is fine imo

[]

ok i hope this helps gl!

Wikozo wrote:

Begginner
------------
00:55:254 (1) - on this slider do kiai mode
would add later
------------
Easy
------------
00:07:037 (1) - get away from earlier circle
sorry I dont understand what you mean here..
00:51:274 (2) - remove
it's pretty ok imo
------------
Normal
------------
00:28:162 (4) - make this slider to be not so round
the curve slider is following the unique background vocal sound
------------
Hard
------------
00:08:265 (2) - new combo color
I'd like to add nc at downbeat
------------
Insane
------------
00:08:265 (2) - new combo color
same
01:11:019 (6) - make this circle more visible
it's totally visible imo
------------
Extra
------------
nothing
------------
Generally work at kiai mode and song preview. Everything else is good

h4d0uk3n1 wrote:

Hello there. From queue

Extra

1. 00:08:265 - unnecessary green point (refers to all diffs)
   removed
2. 01:11:172 (1) - are you sure about this slider? does it represent anything?
   sure, vocal and drums
3. 00:13:672 (5,6,7) - these synth notes are 1/8's, not 1/6's, if i'm not mistaken. Not sure if really an issue
   listened it carefully with low speed and I found the rhythm here is a bit mess(seems like 1/6 at first and end in 1/8). I'll confirm this later

Insane

1. 00:13:672 (5) - same as highest diff. You can put 1/8 reverse slider 00:13:660 - here and 1/2 slider 00:13:774 - here (to represent synth sustain)
   same as before
2. 00:23:264 (6) - is this on purpose? if for simplification reason ok then
   I changed rhytm in Extra, but here better to be consistent(or too hard to play)
3. 00:32:907 (5) - would make circle and slider instead
   the reverse slider is just a transition connect 2 sections
4. 01:11:632 (2,3,5) - not nice overlaps
   it's fine imo
5. 01:11:172 (1) - same as Extra diff
   same as 00:32:907 (5) -

Hard

1. 00:49:744 (2,3) - nc because of different singers?
   I'd like to add nc at downbeats

Hope that you'll find something useful. Good luck!

100bit wrote:

/me reminds about reminder
Heyo from my queue.
[General]

1. I think Beginner=Easy; Easy=Normal; Normal=Advanced. It's more suitable for density of objects in this diffs.
   if more ppl mentioned this I'll consider to fix their names
2. 00:08:265 (2) - consider to put NC here in all diffs for new rhythm and part of song.
   I use nc at every downbeat
3. If Google saying this - it means "nothing".
   what o.o?

[Beginner]

1. A lot of unused green points.
   won't matter if no 2 same color sections together
2. 00:20:509 (2) - don't really think that repeat in this place is correct. Yep, i hear a guitar here, but it starts from 00:20:968 , not like your slider.
   already fixe
3. 00:40:407 - very high beat which not clickable. Consider to make 00:38:877 (1) repeated and make another slider from highlighed place.
   I don't think this beat is heavy.. at least not as heavy as 00:40:560 - this one. however if I need to follow them, the rhythm might be too hard here
4. 00:43:774 (1,2) - the first and only one place where you breaks flow (usually you fit "train-style") so what about this?
   the flow is changed, but it doesn't matter in a low diff imo(mouse moving too slow)
   Strange for reading diff tbh. Also i don't like this because some objects is not parallel (yep, im perfectionist)... like, for example, 00:33:366 (1,2) (proof) - 00:23:570 (1,2) - etc.
   these sliders are totally fine imo

[Easy]

1. 00:21:734 (2,1) - as for me this two sliders is really close to each other and it needs to move away, what about this or even this?
   the current pattern is fine imo, they are near but at least doesn't touch each other, readability is ok here
2. 00:40:407 - the same as in Beginner.
   00:40:560 - here is the most important beat imo, and I followed
3. 00:41:325 (1,3) - nah, does it really looks nice? Here is a new problem - distance between 00:41:325 (1,2) isn't intuitive because this objects is located so close and maybe players will click to 00:42:550 (3) first.
   I don't think the readability is bad here. if you follow the flow, you'll meet 00:42:244 (2) - at first not 00:42:550 (3) -
4. 01:11:938 (1,2,3) - the same as above, but now looks a bit better.
   same as before

[Normal]

1. 00:18:366 (5) - don't like very curved sliders, even this should be good. The same in 00:28:162 (4) .
   it follows the vocal in background very well imo, without reduced the readability
2. 01:11:019 (1,2) -
   Nothing to say anymore but this map move me to 2013.
   what? but this one is pretty fine

[Hard]

1. 00:41:325 (3,4,5,1) - linear flow isn't really suitable here, consider to make triangle in 00:41:325 (3,4,5) .
   I don't want to make triangle here..
2. 00:44:387 (1,2,3) - it's almost identical sounds except vocal, i think you can make slider against 00:44:693 (2,3) and unstack 00:45:152 (5,6,7) after.
   the 00:44:387 (1,2,3,4) - is following first vocal with regular patterns, 00:45:152 (5,6,7) - is stacked to follow the repeating vocal with same tone. I changed the flow between the 2 parts also. it's ok imo
3. 00:53:877 (5,1) - if you often fit your train-style, better to move 00:54:030 (1) to x=192 y=240 for making pentagon with previous cirlces, also it's should be good if you move 00:54:336 (2,3) away after.
   diamond shape is also good imo
4. 01:05:509 (2) - following your style i really can't find the logic in this jump.
   01:05:662 - the vocal here is a bit high so I added the small jump

Insane seems fine except four-circle patterns like 00:09:183 (2,3,4,5) - it's still hard to read.
Good luck!
{end of the mod}

Yasaija 714 wrote:

From Queue

I only see 1 diff

• 
  [Extra]

1. 00:06:289 (5) - Add NC
   current nc is fine
2. 00:13:009 (4) - I think that it is better to stack on (2)
   uh.. why? the current patterns are fine imo
3. 00:27:703 (4) - delete
   00:17:907 - Just like here
   00:27:703 - here's vocal to follow.. so I don't see why
4. 00:32:907 (5) - Maybe I can spread it a bit more
   current spacing is fine
5. 00:45:152 (6,7,8) - I like this better
   00:47:448 (5,6,7) - Just like here
   can't understand this 2.. but the patterns you pointed out are fine imo
6. 01:06:887 (3,4) - I feel like I am a bit far away.
   cuz the vocal at 01:07:040 - is heavy enough for the jump
   I think that it is better to use DS 2.50 as a guide

Good luck!

Hytex wrote:

from qqq

[extra]
00:04:046 (1) - silence sliderend cuz there is no sound there
vocal exist..
00:09:183 (2,3,4,5) - i dont know if these are allowed, since its 196 bpm.. eh.
it's fine imo, I already reduced the spacing here
01:26:402 (1) - maybe shorten slider to here 01:28:315 - and start triplet here 01:28:468 -
the spinner end won't follow anything if I did what you said..

[insane]
00:10:407 (2,3,4,5) - same with extra
01:26:402 (1) - ^
same as before for this 2

i guess thats it
sorry for short shitmod :c

nika mika wrote:

m4m

[Normal]
00:04:794 (2,1,2,1) - 略挤
还好，时间间隔够久了
00:42:550 (4,5,6) - 用折返盖掉 感觉这样对于当前段来说有点难
这里难度我觉得还行
至于01:04:438 (4,5,6) - 就留着……做成kiai段的对比吧？
[Hard]
00:05:916 (2,3,5,6) - 如果随钢琴走的话flow不应该停
downbeat的时候就改了下flow
00:09:183 (2) - note盖掉 insane里类似段落用这种方式处理
这里应该毫无问题，应为是reverse slider
[Insane]
00:09:183 (2,3,4,5) - 这个1/6太突兀了……如果全曲大量出现类似节奏也就算了，后面的节奏和这个1/6相比要简单得多。见Hard
1/6的问题要是太多人提我打算改简单点

Extra打不动就不摸了！偷懒要找个正当理由 嗯
其实是摸不出来

Monstrata wrote:

Extra

00:09:948 (1,2) - Some blanket pattern here would give 2 a better placement. Use that curve of slider 1.
fixed
00:27:550 (3,4) - Use a slider instead. There's nothing on 4 really. Vocal is earlier so clicking on 4 sounds weird to me,
well I'm sure these's a vocal sound like "i" at 00:27:703 - , it's not that obvious but it can't be said as nothing imo
00:32:601 (3,4,5,6,7) - Stacks just feel really weird. 00:33:060 (6) - especially is such a different sound that the others cuz of the drum. 00:32:754 - as well with the crash.
I'm not following drums at all here.. a new vocalist start at 00:32:907 - so I didn't continue the stack here from 00:32:601 (3,4) - and made a spacing to next objects. also, you can easily realize that the tones of vocal at 00:32:907 (5,6,7) - is the same so I stacked them. the tone start to be different at 00:33:366 - , so I made a new spacing
00:45:305 (7,8) - Why are these stacked as opposed to spaced like the other circles?
this is kind of same reason as the one above. a new vocalist start at 00:45:152 - and 00:45:152 (6,7,8) - this 3 notes is at the same tone of the vocal sound. so I stacked them. new vocalist comes, this is a enough reason to make the part a bit different imo. and the tone is consistent, so I think stacked circles fit the song very well(their position is the same, just like the tone)
00:46:223 (5) - Linear instead? I dont see why this should deviate from the pattern.
sorry but the slider could be different.. please listen carefully, you can realize that 00:45:611 (1) - 00:45:917 (3) - this 2 slider's tone is going down(the tone at the head is higher than the end), that's why I made their direction to the bottom of the screen. for 00:46:223 (5) - this one, the tone changed to go up now, so I made a different shape of the slider, and try to makde the direction change to the top of the screen
00:47:754 (7) - Not good to stack imo. Doesn't give 7 good emphasis.
reasonable, fixed
01:11:172 (1) - Map the downbeat to something more significant xP. Repeat slider is really lame imo
umm, I'd like to keep the current pattern.. I'm mainly following vocal at this part, I did some 1/1 sliders to follow at 01:08:877 (1,1) - , however this one doesn't start at downbeat, so I chose to make the rhythm consistent.(if I make 01:11:325 - clickable, I'm not only following vocal then, that's not good imo)
01:18:979 (2,3,4,5,6) - Not really liking how the drums + vocals are mapped to similar (if not larger) jumps. Like the vocals are rather weak, why such large jumps? 01:19:438 (5) - especially.
I don't think the vocal here is weaker, the 2 tracks has nearly the same weight through the whole song imo, that's why I used the similar spacing for drums and vocal. but the spacing at 01:19:438 - is a bit too huge indeed, so I reduced the spaicng a bit
01:21:428 (2,3,4,5) - Really uncomfortable linear movement xP.
umm, indeed.. fixed the patterns

Honestly, the placements are just really messy for me. The inconsistencies from your Drop Kick map have been ironed out for the most part (aside from what I mentioned) but the structural issues are still there imo.

Insane

00:04:046 (1,2) - Why are they two different sliders? Make them the same design?
sorry I don't know why you mean here.. the current design is already totally the same imo(the shape, rhythm and hitsounds)..
00:22:193 (1,2,3,4,5) - Good structure, but the overlaps from 00:23:264 (6,1) - make it really messy xP.
fixed
00:30:611 (5,1,2) - Kinda odd how the spacing here doesn't really reflect emphasis. 5>1 is where you should emphasize the jump.
sorry but the jump between 1 and 5 is much more bigger than 1 and 2, let me explain why. a jump's weight is not based on the spacing and time gap only, the objects type also effect a lot. for example, a jump from a circle to another circle, with the same spacing and time gap, it's much harder to play than a jump from slider to slider. that's why I made the spacing between 00:30:764 (1,2) - a bit bigger than 00:30:611 (5,1) - , in fact the first jump is much more heavier(especially, because slider 1 is a 1/1 slider, the time is long enough for players to get ready jump to next object)
00:35:815 (1,2,3,4) - Poor structure imo. Position 2 to somewhere more equidistant from 3 and 4
fixed
00:43:162 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Your rhythm choice is so different even though these two sections are so similar. One uses a lot of slider rhythm the other is almost pure 1/2
well because the 2 parts are not totally the same, the part 2 is different from 00:45:152 - , the vocalist is changed and the tone is suddenly go down at 00:45:152 - . that's why I didn't use same pattern from 00:45:152 - . also, after the tone suddenly goes down(at 00:45:152 - ), the tone is consistent at 00:45:152 (5,6,7) - , so it's better to use same object type to follow imo. as a result, if I use a slider at 00:44:999 - , then 00:45:152 - here couldn't be a clickable object, it's no way to do same objects at 00:45:152 (5,6,7) - , so I used a circle at 00:44:999 - Instead
01:11:632 (2,3,5) - Can you do something else here? The overlaps just look really bad imo xP
fixed
01:17:754 (2,3) - Easy to mistake this for 1/2 imo. Use something that makes it more obvious this is 1/1?
the 1.0x spacing is far enough to be read as 1/1 imo.. it's not hard to read for anyone who can play the diff

[]

Being perfectly honest here, I'm just not a fan of the structure. I think more care can be put into placement, and how the placement interacts with other objects visually. You're obviously entitled to your own opinion, and if you disagree with me that's fine. Good luck with the set.

not only placement, you also concerned about a few rhythm too. after reading your mods I think you probably pay attention to drums more than vocals so I explained the reason how I handle the vocals in placement and rhythm, hope you can read and consider them. once you think they are reasonable but still need to be improved I think we can have further discussion

1. adjusted spacing for 01:15:152 (1,2,3,4,5) - in Insane and Extra
2. changed the shape for 00:08:724 (1,1,1) - in Hard
3. adjusted the directions for 00:45:611 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - in Easy

Rizia wrote:

According to anime and artist official website, Title should be METAMORISER(TV Size)
thanks, fixed. I also removed the words from tags

[Extra]

1. 00:08:724 (1,1,1) - 這幾個slider造成的停頓感有點大 而這感覺是最後那段沒有的 看看有沒有其他方法去表達
   不太明白你的意思，这三个因为是长音所以我用的1/1slider，你是说与00:12:397 (1) - 这个不同的话，应该是没问题的，因为歌曲就是这样。但是如果你说的是与01:19:744 (1,1,1) - 这几个比较的话我就不是很懂了，因为我听着觉得这两段是一样的
2. 00:16:530 (2) - 是不是漏了個clap 音也挺強的
   感觉是，fixed to all diffs
3. 01:26:402 (1,1,2) - 最尾我覺得放個三連也可以
   三连感觉比较难，因为很少有人会觉得spinner后还有东西，我就只用了二连

[Insane]

1. 00:16:530 (2) - same as Extra
   same as before
2. 01:26:402 (1,1) - same as Extra
   same as before

[Hard]

1. 00:08:265 (2,3) - 這兩個可以ctrl+g一下 上下的移動也不錯的
   我感觉现在的flow更好一点，hard感觉少用点锐角跳好点
2. 00:44:693 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - 這段circle有點多啊 試試把00:44:846 (3,4) - 換成一個1/2 slider
   这里其实很难下1/2 slider，用我的节奏的话，因为我把00:44:693 - ，00:44:999 - 这两个设成了重音，00:45:152 - 这里开始了一个新vocal所在的stack。如果要加1/2的话最好是把00:44:693 (2,3) - 这个变成slider，不过这样一来就与前面的pattern相悖了（00:44:081 (4,5) - ），所有我觉得还是现在这样好点
3. 01:05:815 (4,5) - 根據你前後的做法 節奏上應該調換一下
   恩，fixed

低難度ok, 但是beginner的存在有點不需要(!?)
我觉得Easy比普通的E还是难一些，所以beginner还是留着好点
call me back for rebub

pishifat wrote:

extra/insane
00:13:315 (4,5) - clicking on a 1/6 tick is pretty hard to interpret. should cut 4 shorter and start 5 on the red tick, like this or this. 00:23:417 (7,1) - it's done better here
01:28:545 (1,2) - similarly, super gross to start clicking a triple from the blue tick. nobody will treat it like a slider+1/4 circles. better to go with spinner shortened by 1/4 (possibly with a silenced end) + a 3 circles starting from white tick

if you change those, i'll qualify!!