forum

Suzuki Konomi - Absolute Soul

posted
Total Posts
386
show more
Rave-up
Rank this or ill cry
BeatofIke
I don't think any BN is going to push this mapset forward until, huge improvements are made and more effort is put into this mapset (especially Light Insane and Absolute Duo difficulties). Repairing this bubble won't help at all, so there's no point in doing so (my mistake on my part), so I won't do it again until I see some good improvements. I could mod those difficulties endlessly, but in the end you would have to be willing to put more effort towards improving them first, so it is rankable. You're not going to attract BNs if you keep spamming them. Desperation is not good orz.
Topic Starter
Owntrolf
Still sadder than usual because of the long wait lmao
BeatofIke
lol sorry about that :P
Kibbleru
What you need to do is drop this set for a while, and move on to something else. then later comeback and remap when u get better.
Irreversible
Hi, can u delete my map once you update it? I gave it someone else to rank , sorry
Shiguma
Shouldn't Irreversible be removed from the tags since he isn't in the set anymore?
Ashton

Shiguma wrote:

Shouldn't Irreversible be removed from the tags since he isn't in the set anymore?
Weber

Whirl wrote:

Shiguma wrote:

Shouldn't Irreversible be removed from the tags since he isn't in the set anymore?
was quoting that really necessary?
Ashton

Tatsuyu wrote:

Shiguma wrote:

Shouldn't Irreversible be removed from the tags since he isn't in the set anymore?
was quoting that really necessary?[/quote]


it means I agree with the suggestion
Ashton
Hello, here's the mod you've been waiting for!




Easy

-Overall a nice difficulty but still needs a bit of polishing

-Starting 00:23:211 - here volume seems low, I would suggest making it louder


00:23:850 (2) - this can be hard to read for beginners/novices

01:01:350 (1,2) - make these the same exact shape for a better look

01:06:615 (3) - remove this and extend 01:05:977 (2) - this slider 01:07:254 - here

01:17:786 (3,4) - honestly, if you blanket these then you'll have a better look + blanket

01:27:201 (2) - no sliders this short in easy please


Normal

-Overall solid difficulty


00:05:977 (2) - this overlaps 00:07:094 (4) - this giving it a 'meh' look, it could be better

00:09:488 (5) - stack the beginning of this slider with 00:11:084 (2) - this

00:24:807 (5) - I, personally, disagree with these shapes of sliders

00:27:360 (4) - vocalist is a lot more fast, so I would suggest raising sv on this

00:47:467 (3) - make make this a curve, looks to edgy for a slow part of the song

00:49:701 (3) - make this a more expressive shape, as it is currently it feels too curved

00:52:254 (3) - I would just suggest making this an S shape slider, but idk it might be good the way it is already

01:00:073 (3) - curve more for a better looking blanket

01:12:201 (2,3) - why not fully blanket these?


theramdans (god) Hard

-I can see most of your problems have been solved with previous mods

00:15:552 - your missing a pretty important beat

00:53:690 (7,1) - this stack isn't that necesarry tbh



Light Insane

-I honestly think this diff is a little bit worse than last time, but still nice!

(I think the higher the star rating you make the worse your diffs become, I would have honestly just gotten a GD for absoloute dou and Insane)

-change cs to 3.8

00:00:233 (1,2,3) - I would just keep spacing consistant for a light insane tbh

00:08:690 (4,5,6) - ctrl + shift + d to make a perfect triangle

00:09:647 (2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2) - fix all the overlap here, it's pretty easy too see

00:17:147 (5,6,7,8) - this ruins the flow, I would suggest moving 00:17:467 (6,7) - these two circles so they aren't straight

00:23:052 (6,7,8) - I would honestly just stack these

00:25:924 (1,2,3) - same thing as before, this ruins the flow for me imo

00:31:828 (3,4) - ^

00:43:637 (4) - seems a bit too curved

01:03:424 (1,2) - the volume for these seem a little too low

01:17:945 (1,2,3,4) - I personally don't like these stacks, I would just make this into a square because as it is right now it doesn't flow that good



Okay i'll stop here because I need to finish a lot of things



I hope this gets ranked, good luck!
fat pear
ra nk aaboslute OSul hahahah!
ferret irl

microism wrote:

ra nk aaboslute OSul hahahah!
ya i agree
Cerulean Veyron
here's my mod u absolute annoying little c-
2kds k thank

[- - Light Insane - -]
  1. 00:17:147 (5,6,7,8) - I think having a higher spacing on these circles would allow for the flow between the two sliders look visually appealing, and it would improve cursor guiding a little bit too. Try the same thing you've did on 00:25:924 (1,2,3) - , 1.1x spacing. Might put a suitable consistency here.
  2. 00:18:264 (1,2,3) - I would suggest spacing these out a little more, about 1.7x spacing as you defaulted on the previous tracks. That might give a bit more density alongside with the music change over this part.
  3. 00:27:679 (4,5) - Optional objective: There's nothing very important and it's quite nazi here, just a minor thing. What a great blanketing, btw. Could've just moved a bit higher up even though trying to not intend a perfect blanket. But I believe x:161|y:90 or somewhere around that grid might get you the best spacing.
  4. 00:31:190 (2,3,4,1) - Probably the same issue as 00:17:147 (5,6,7,8) -
  5. 00:37:892 (1,2,3) - The end of the slider (3) doesn't really fit the tightness of the rhythm around this track, I would probably stick to using 00:36:615 (2,3,4) - in order to follow that tense downbeat on 00:38:530 - .
  6. 00:55:924 (4) - What's this slider end snapped into? Doesn't look like 1/8 snap division.
  7. 01:05:818 (3) - Shouldn't you make this sharp slider differ somehow? It's too steep and linear that would probably make it look very clunky imo.

[- - Insane - -]
  1. 00:14:115 (1,3) - If you're attempting for a back-and-forth flowing or something, then this didn't really worked well. I think this doesn't have much flow and kind of clashes through other notes like circle (2). I think having these two straight sliders make a bit of variation like getting them rotated, flip or curved. It'd give a better feel with the upcoming tracks as you could at least make a better patterning on this part.
  2. 00:24:807 (3,6) - I would think moving the angle outward more so the slider (6)'s head don't overlap the tail very much, but it's not important making the head more visible. At least just a half of it, while keeping the structure the same due to the spacing here.
  3. 00:45:552 (3) - You could've mainstreamed the vocals more just before following the melody on 00:46:350 - as the rhythm composition changes. I literally suggest a usual 1/1 slider and a circle on the downbeat for this part. The note density doesn't increase a lot, so you can adjust it if you don't mind.
  4. 01:03:903 (1,3,5) - 01:06:935 (2,3,4) - 01:17:307 (4,5) - This is pretty much repetitive, both rhythm and structure doesn't really suit much over these tracks. Unlike 01:23:690 (1,2,3) -, it followed the upbeats that landed on red ticks more accurately along with the track. But these three slider patterns have totally different emphasis and transition. I recommend changing every single structure, more like....... remapping.

[- - Absolute Dog- -]
  1. 00:05:100 (4) - This 1/4 circle just appeared out of nowhere, as I assume you haven't even added a circle on a similar part alike 00:10:206 - . So I highly suggest you remove it.
  2. 00:14:914 (4) - I would actually onward the slider tail position towards the circle on 00:15:154 (5) - in order to smoothly flow without an edgy guiding.
  3. 00:23:372 (1,2,3) - The spacing here is pretty low and could actually not be considered an anti-jump or something like that. It's legitimately comparable to the similar parts like 00:25:925 (1,2,3) - or 00:28:478 (2,3,4) - . So I can see there's a patterning inconsistency.
  4. 00:33:105 (1) - The direction change seems really overdone, an enforced movement while streaming this. Well, you could probably space them out or you should map some prep for stream patterns. Like curving the flowing or something rather than straight and linear streams.
  5. 00:35:340 (3,4,5) - 00:36:616 (2,3,4) - 00:39:169 (1,2,3) - 00:40:445 (3,4,5) - 00:41:723 (3,4,5) - I actually don't understand these as why you haven't made the slider velocity change, as how you've been doing on 00:34:063 (1,2,3) - . It's not a bad thing imo, but they don't really support an awkward transition as sampling these five. So It's quite unfitting and breaks a lot of consistency.
  6. 00:49:701 (1) - Optional objective: You could at least polish the slider's curves a little bit more. Somehow similar to this may describe much better.
  7. 00:52:574 (1,2,3,4,1) - I might suggest redoing the placements of these circles, for an improved polygon ofc. It mostly increases up aesthetics and a little bit of structure, so it wouldn't hurt giving a try.
  8. 01:18:264 (2) - A reverse arrow you're attempting to do a symmetry here doesn't make a great impact including the rhythm composition. As there's quite a really intense hit landed on 01:18:584 - which sounds really audible and deserves a click on this tick. If you want to keep the reverse, you could at least try Ctrl + G by selecting 01:18:264 (2,3,4) - for another way changing this rhythm.

Poke me when you see something orange on my forum post.
Mordred
Loved inc
Linada

Yoshino-- wrote:

Loved inc
no
pls
Azrael_-
Hello, I can make an extra difficulty for your map?
Weedy

Azrael_- wrote:

Hello, I can make an extra difficulty for your map?
for fuks sake look at his spread before commenting lol
Mordred

Linada wrote:

Yoshino-- wrote:

Loved inc
no
pls
well yeah about that...
Anxient
The absolute madman
strickluke
fuck
Please sign in to reply.

New reply