CelsiusLK wrote:

[general]

1. unnecessary osb file in song folder , better delete it

2. AIBat v3.1 wrote:

   Snapping
   01:06:006 (1) - Unsnapped slider (repeat).
   01:06:006 (1) - Unsnapped slider (repeat).
   01:06:006 (1) - Unsnapped slider (end).
   04:45:477 (1) - Unsnapped slider (repeat).
   04:45:477 (1) - Unsnapped slider (repeat).
   
   Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
   00:21:002 - snap to 00:21:006
   00:21:602 - snap to 00:21:606
   00:21:688 - snap to 00:21:692
   00:22:288 - snap to 00:22:292
   00:22:373 - snap to 00:22:377
   fixed all

3. combo colour 1 and 2 looks pretty similiar , would be better to make it looks a bit more different , this got popped becuase of that reason moved around

[insane]

• nc feel a bit inconsistent , I suggest you to nc every downbeat ( big white tick ) , I think even if they are inconsistent, they make sense

1. 00:16:892 (1,2,3,4) - try place like this ? I think that make flow here a bit better imo It's played in linear flow even when the sliders are curved, I already tried that before and it doesn't play well
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:32:835 (4,5) - I think spacing here should be a bit bigger than 00:32:663 (3,4) - so it would make sense with the music more , 00:33:006 - sound more emphasized than 00:32:835 - so try move (4) to around x152 y168 ? the overlap is fine tho moved the 5 down instead
3. 00:49:635 (8,1) - flow would be better if you increase spacing here a bit imo , try move (1) to around x208 y44 ok
4. 00:50:492 (3,4) - , 00:51:006 (6,1) - these play a bit awkward imo , I would go with triplet instead since it fit the song better it's ok, it fits the small wub, but I will consider
5. 00:54:606 (6,7,8) - try to make spacing consistent for better flow ok
6. 01:06:263 - to 01:16:549 - I think those extended slider kinda not really play good imo , I can hear beat on white tick and red tick so why map the blue tick I don't think it make things fun here and a bit sound not great imo so you would try to consider those extended sliders I tried following one specific sound during that part, but yes I will consider shortening them.
7. 01:28:549 (1,2,3) - better make spacing consistent for better flow what have I done
8. 01:29:406 (1,2,3) - same ^ ^
9. 01:40:720 (2,3,4) - try to make spacing consistent for better flow ok
10. 02:24:777 (3,4) - flow here is pretty weird imo , try move (4) to around x381 y44 ok
11. 02:37:806 (5,6) - flow can be improved here , I would fix slider here a bit tho , pattern suggestion ok
    SPOILER

    
12. 02:39:863 (2) - (nazi) move this to around x240 y192 would make flow here 02:39:520 (1,2,3) - better ok
13. 02:45:692 (3,4) - triplet would fit this better , the current rhythm sound weird imo I like it this way and I'm not sure what you mean by better rhythm if the sound is same
14. 03:16:206 (9) - (nazi) move this to around x308 y362 for better flow here 03:15:864 (7,8,9,1) - ok
15. 04:11:749 (2) - curve the another way so it would make flow here 04:11:406 (1,2) - better imo I'll keep it how it is cause of 04:11:749 (2,3) - flow
    SPOILER

    

hmm I think flow and spacing can be improved a bit there's no limits to improve a map

good luck , have fun mapping

DahplA wrote:

Hey, not modding yet. I had a quick look and I like the mapping, so enjoy some stars ^_^

Boobs wrote:

Insane (5,12 stars, 1239 notes) Quick Mod

01:09:520 (1) - Seems a little to closed to 01:09:006 (1). Distance a little bit. fix

01:17:920 (3) - Ugly slider. [url=Try something like this]http://puu.sh/iTuh0.jpg[/url]. It flows much better. I'm leaving it how it is

01:23:063 (4) - Looks too linear. Try x:100 y:204 you gave current coordinates?

01:23:920 (6) - Reverse the selection. Reason?

01:28:549 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - Boring/Bad Distance snapped jump. Reason

01:31:463 (1,2,3) - Re-map this part. pls changed a bit

01:37:292 (5,6) - These two circles shouldn't be here because it's too repetitive after 01:36:263 (1,2,3). What's wrong with making it consistant?

01:38:492 (2) - Lower the slider velocity. Even change the remake this slider. ok

[General]

• 
  
  Map is too linear. You don't only want square patterns, it's really boring.
  
  Think of using Distance Snap when you need it most. Not through out the whole map because right now, this looks like a 2011 map.\
  
  Try messing with the slider velocity changes, it fits really well with this song if you use it correctly.

Good song pick btw.

01:23:063 (4) - Looks too linear. Try x:100 y:204 you gave current coordinates?

01:23:920 (6) - Reverse the selection. Reason?

slider end to x:96 y:288.

01:28:549 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - Boring/Bad Distance snapped jump. Reason

01:37:292 (5,6) - These two circles shouldn't be here because it's too repetitive after 01:36:263 (1,2,3). What's wrong with making it consistant?

DahplA wrote:

Hi, DahplA here posting from Jloughman14's and DahplA's Modding Team. This is a response in regards to this request. Please be sure to vote here on how helpful our mod was.

Insane

1. Great opportunity to use a custom name, don't you think? I haven't thought of a name
2. Add "Japanese" to tags lol I had it before where did it disappear to
3. The drain time (rather than the time of the song) has to be over 5 minutes if you're looking for Approval. This means you have to map 03:17:920 to 03:28:892 right......
   
   

   Ranking Criteria-senpai wrote:

   Approved Category is only for Marathon maps. Long maps with over 5 minutes of draining time fit the Approval category. Only then they are allowed to be single difficulty mapsets. If they are below 5 minutes of draining time, a full difficulty spread is needed and the map will have to be ranked instead.

4. 00:01:463 (4) - Fix up the stack here fixed
5. 00:18:777 (3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - I would say the positioning of these jumps is random. They go around in a loop twice, not the best positioning. Get creative. Instead of just stacking them on top of each other, use this spot to arrange maybe a shape or pattern for the jumps. Of course, I can't give an exact idea otherwise it wouldn't be your map. remade
6. 00:50:492 (3,6) - Since these act as triples anyways, you should remove the volume decrease so players can get that audio feedback fixed
7. 00:52:377 (9) - ^ ^
8. 00:57:863 (10,11,1) - I feel a transition into a slider from 00:58:035 would work better, just so it doesn't feel like a triple spam with the parts beforehand I need these 00:58:206 (2,3) - as circles though
9. 01:03:177 (10) - I would remove this in favour of a stream section here. It would work better to start this kick slider holding pattern on a downbeat here 01:03:520 (1) - since the sound changes ok
10. 01:05:406 (6) - Slightly off-stacked fixed
11. 01:06:035 (1) - You should rather be safe and remove this. While it feels like it almost does belong there, it causes a really weird gap with 01:05:920 (5) - since you don't have a 1/4 gap, rather a 1/3. It will catch players off-guard. Yeah it's a problem I'm not sure what to do here.
12. 01:06:263 Let's talk about this part. You've used longer sliders which you have to alternate on because of the 1/4 gap in between. I like this idea, however you should consider having a gap after the last slider. Draw your attention to this pattern 01:11:749 (1,2,3) - . As you observe, there's a 1/1 gap there. If you were to put 1/1 gaps after the end slider of each pattern, it would make this relatively calm section feel less mashy. Otherwise, you have the player essentially not letting go of the keys in a part that's not even intense. Since the drain time is 5 minutes, this allows players to also catch a break. Okay I made the 1/1 gaps, not sure if the slider shapes are fine now though
13. 01:19:292 (1) - I feel like these (when I mean "these", I mean the 1/2s that are shaped like this) sliders are overdone slightly. I see you're mapping to the vocals for this part. Thus already, there is no need for these. Like previously mentioned as well, this is a calmer section of the song. You should include more gaps for the players. Alright, removed those.
14. 01:37:635 (1) - Slightly off-stacked fixed
15. 02:09:349 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Instead of stacking, the song presents itself with an amazing opportunity to place some fun and challenging jumps. What kind of monstrosity did I just create....
16. 02:27:177 (1) - Slightly off-stacked fixed
17. 02:47:406 (5) - ^ ^
18. 02:48:777 (6,1) - Because of slider-leniency, the spacing here isn't actually that large. I'd recommend moving 02:49:120 (1) - to x276 y94 and 02:48:777 (6) - to x381 y192. After you've done this, I'd suggest changing 02:49:635 (3) - this to be parallel with 02:49:120 (1) - (if you're confused, just reply here) yep changed
19. 03:10:720 (4) - Slightly-off stacked fixed
20. 03:34:377 (1,2,3) - This one isn't perfectly straight fixed
21. 03:48:092 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I don't like these 1/4s. I mean, why this part of all parts did you decide to emphasis only. Logically, all parts should be the same. For variety? If it doesn't fit at all then I'll just replace them.
22. 04:00:435 (1) - Slightly off-stacked fixed

Mmm, lovely song.

Boobs wrote:

01:23:063 (4) - Looks too linear. Try x:100 y:204 you gave current coordinates?

Shit i've been doing this wrong the whole time. I meant to move the slider end to x:96 y:288. I still don't think it's a problem to have it linear

01:23:920 (6) - Reverse the selection. Reason?

Flows nicer with

slider end to x:96 y:288. Well since I didn't change it ...

01:28:549 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4) - Boring/Bad Distance snapped jump. Reason

Boring because it feels repetitive and the Distance Spacing is bad on this. Basically, inconsistent jumps. Well I changed it a little but I think the spacing makes sense

01:37:292 (5,6) - These two circles shouldn't be here because it's too repetitive after 01:36:263 (1,2,3). What's wrong with making it consistant?

There's something wrong with it. I don't know why though ;( I don't know either

Altuth wrote:

Mod and better BG

2015-07-10 18:40 Altuth: http://puu.sh/iUcV9/c068f27be3.jpg
2015-07-10 18:40 Altuth: slightly improved with correct aspect ratio
2015-07-10 18:42 Strategas: one second
2015-07-10 18:42 Strategas: I'll give you the full pic
2015-07-10 18:42 Strategas: cause
2015-07-10 18:42 Strategas: I need those plants on the right
2015-07-10 18:42 Strategas: to be in the pic
2015-07-10 18:42 Strategas: and the light
2015-07-10 18:43 Altuth: nonono
2015-07-10 18:43 Altuth: i have it right here
2015-07-10 18:43 Altuth: 2 sec and its done
2015-07-10 18:44 Strategas: ah
2015-07-10 18:44 Strategas: ok
2015-07-10 18:44 Strategas: but don't cut down the bottom part
2015-07-10 18:44 Altuth: ok
2015-07-10 18:46 Altuth: http://puu.sh/iUdux/19a1a273ee.jpg
2015-07-10 18:46 Altuth: there you go
2015-07-10 18:46 Strategas: thank you!
2015-07-10 18:47 Altuth: You want me to go through your map?
2015-07-10 18:48 Strategas: yeah if you can
2015-07-10 18:48 Strategas: need to improve it
2015-07-10 18:49 Altuth: 02:11:406 (7) -
2015-07-10 18:49 Altuth: slider vel to 0,5
2015-07-10 18:50 Altuth: to overdo the 3/4th slider
2015-07-10 18:50 Strategas: right
2015-07-10 18:50 Altuth: maybe even increase slider vel on the rest of the sliders
2015-07-10 18:51 Altuth: 02:09:349 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) -
2015-07-10 18:51 Altuth: make the jumps more compact
2015-07-10 18:51 Altuth: not closer to eachother, but make them feel natural to platy
2015-07-10 18:51 Altuth: play*
2015-07-10 18:52 Altuth: 02:15:349 (4) -
2015-07-10 18:52 Altuth: make the slider go downwards
2015-07-10 18:53 Strategas: how come?
2015-07-10 18:53 Altuth: It felt natural to me when i through it
2015-07-10 18:53 Altuth: played*
2015-07-10 18:54 Altuth: for better flow
2015-07-10 18:54 Strategas: doesn't it flow better how it is?
2015-07-10 18:55 Altuth: the transition from 02:15:349 (4,5) -
2015-07-10 18:55 Altuth: gets awkward
2015-07-10 18:56 Strategas: so you want me to put it higher and face it downward?
2015-07-10 18:57 Altuth: http://puu.sh/iUe9v/0ecb43b9fd.jpg
2015-07-10 18:57 Altuth: like so
2015-07-10 18:57 Strategas: I see
2015-07-10 18:57 Altuth: 02:18:949 (1,2,3,4,5,6) -
2015-07-10 18:58 Altuth: redo this part, i felt like a robot playing it, hard to hit circles just hanging in the air
2015-07-10 18:59 Altuth: 02:18:949 (1,2,3) -
2015-07-10 18:59 Altuth: make them squares
2015-07-10 18:59 Altuth: compact*
2015-07-10 18:59 Altuth: 02:20:320 (1,2,3) - sort of how you did here
2015-07-10 19:00 Strategas: oh
2015-07-10 19:01 Altuth: 02:24:092 (5,6) - put slider here
2015-07-10 19:01 Strategas: nooooooo way
2015-07-10 19:02 Strategas: never
2015-07-10 19:02 Altuth: what?!?!
2015-07-10 19:02 Altuth: ok ok, just keep it like it is
2015-07-10 19:02 Strategas: yes
2015-07-10 19:02 Altuth: 02:27:863 (3,4,5,6,7,1) - this part is delicious
2015-07-10 19:02 Strategas: listen to how strong it was
2015-07-10 19:02 Altuth: good flow
2015-07-10 19:03 Altuth: http://puu.sh/iUevR/071f47535a.jpg
2015-07-10 19:03 Altuth: do it like this
2015-07-10 19:03 Altuth: where i mentioned you put a slider
2015-07-10 19:04 Strategas: but I said never
2015-07-10 19:04 Strategas:
2015-07-10 19:04 Strategas: it's just
2015-07-10 19:04 Strategas: circles a must be
2015-07-10 19:04 Strategas: there
2015-07-10 19:04 Altuth: http://puu.sh/iUezT/43f92d862f.jpg
2015-07-10 19:04 Strategas: strong jump
2015-07-10 19:04 Altuth: do it like that
2015-07-10 19:04 Altuth: triple
2015-07-10 19:05 Altuth: it felt good to play, because the song gets louder
2015-07-10 19:05 Strategas: if I do it like then
2015-07-10 19:05 Strategas: slider end
2015-07-10 19:05 Altuth: louder isnt neccessarily meant to be a jump
2015-07-10 19:05 Strategas: is wrong
2015-07-10 19:05 Strategas: it means emphasis
2015-07-10 19:06 Strategas: and I prefer jumps
2015-07-10 19:06 Altuth: jumps are good
2015-07-10 19:06 Altuth: in the right places
2015-07-10 19:06 Altuth: ^
2015-07-10 19:07 Altuth: 02:25:806 (1,2,3,4) -
2015-07-10 19:07 Altuth: rotate that part
2015-07-10 19:07 Altuth: never go full square
2015-07-10 19:08 Altuth: http://puu.sh/iUeMe/f9d264722d.jpg
2015-07-10 19:08 Altuth: like that
2015-07-10 19:09 Strategas: the most fun part after rotating is fixing overlaps
2015-07-10 19:09 Altuth: 02:30:263 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - make it play against the clock
2015-07-10 19:10 Altuth: that part went with the clock for too long
2015-07-10 19:11 Strategas: kk
2015-07-10 19:11 Altuth: 02:34:549 (3,4,5,6,7,1) -
2015-07-10 19:11 Altuth: structure better
2015-07-10 19:12 Altuth: and distance snap it properly
2015-07-10 19:13 Altuth: 02:39:863 (2) - move it like this http://puu.sh/iUf3Q/c64dc52333.jpg
2015-07-10 19:14 Altuth: 02:42:263 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - go anti clockwise
2015-07-10 19:14 Strategas: I think it's fine
2015-07-10 19:14 Altuth: 02:39:863 (2) - Is bad flow
2015-07-10 19:14 Strategas: it's already anti clokwise
2015-07-10 19:14 Strategas: it's bad flow on purpose
2015-07-10 19:14 Altuth: i meant
2015-07-10 19:14 Altuth: the other way
2015-07-10 19:14 Altuth: clockwise*
2015-07-10 19:17 Altuth: 02:58:720 (1,2,3,4) - overdo this part
2015-07-10 19:17 Altuth: http://puu.sh/iUfjF/ada20c211d.jpg
2015-07-10 19:17 Altuth: like so
2015-07-10 19:17 Altuth: make the last jump double in distance
2015-07-10 19:18 Altuth: 03:54:692 (6,7,8) - make circles curve more nicely to the next slider
2015-07-10 19:20 Altuth: 04:02:149 (2,3) - better flow here
2015-07-10 19:20 Altuth: make slider more welcoming
2015-07-10 19:21 Strategas: 02:58:720 (1,2,3,4) -
2015-07-10 19:21 Strategas: ah this you showed
2015-07-10 19:21 Strategas: 3 suppose to be bigger jump
2015-07-10 19:21 Strategas: than to 4
2015-07-10 19:21 Strategas: I think
2015-07-10 19:21 Altuth: ye
2015-07-10 19:22 Altuth: you're right
2015-07-10 19:22 Altuth: 02:58:720 (1,2) - make them go more up and have jump to 02:59:063 (3,4) -
2015-07-10 19:22 Altuth: make them both parrallell
2015-07-10 19:23 Strategas: 03:54:692 (6,7,8) -
2015-07-10 19:23 Strategas: im not sure how to curve them uhh
2015-07-10 19:23 Altuth: place a curvy slider
2015-07-10 19:24 Altuth: press compose while slider is blue, then press turn slider into stream
2015-07-10 19:25 Altuth: and use it for all streams, as it makes them look more appealing
2015-07-10 19:25 Altuth: and correct in distance
2015-07-10 19:26 Strategas: ik but
2015-07-10 19:26 Strategas: don't really know which way to curve this thing
2015-07-10 19:27 Strategas: etc
2015-07-10 19:27 Altuth: just go downwards
2015-07-10 19:27 Altuth: into straight slider repeat
2015-07-10 19:29 Strategas: but
2015-07-10 19:29 Strategas: it's only 3 circles
2015-07-10 19:29 Strategas: can't really make that huge curve out of 3
2015-07-10 19:30 Altuth: make the first slider curve better
2015-07-10 19:30 Altuth: http://puu.sh/iUg6i/0b0d47817c.jpg
2015-07-10 19:30 Altuth: and make some magic, i made you an example
2015-07-10 19:31 Strategas: can't really move that slider
2015-07-10 19:31 Strategas: cause ds
2015-07-10 19:32 Altuth: huh? I did it just fine
2015-07-10 19:32 Altuth: just change other things to fit the new curvy slider and its fine
2015-07-10 19:34 Strategas: 03:54:092 (4,5) -
2015-07-10 19:34 Strategas: what ds you got there
2015-07-10 19:34 Strategas: when you made it
2015-07-10 19:34 Altuth: 0,5
2015-07-10 19:34 Altuth: alt+scroll
2015-07-10 19:34 Strategas: I mean
2015-07-10 19:34 Strategas: between 4 and 5
2015-07-10 19:35 Altuth: what?
2015-07-10 19:36 Strategas: 03:53:577 (1,2,3,4,5) -
2015-07-10 19:36 Strategas: see this
2015-07-10 19:36 Strategas: ds
2015-07-10 19:36 Strategas: 1.2
2015-07-10 19:36 Strategas: if you moved the slider
2015-07-10 19:36 Strategas: it becomes 1.0
2015-07-10 19:36 Strategas: and it looks
2015-07-10 19:36 Strategas: weird
2015-07-10 19:37 Altuth: 03:53:577 (1) - cope that one and use it as slider repeat
2015-07-10 19:37 Altuth: copy*
2015-07-10 19:38 Altuth: http://puu.sh/iUgzC/eee1838599.jpg
2015-07-10 19:38 Altuth: you can do it like that
2015-07-10 19:39 Strategas: ah nvm
2015-07-10 19:39 Strategas: I missed the part
2015-07-10 19:39 Strategas: you rotated
2015-07-10 19:39 Strategas: 03:54:949 (1) -
2015-07-10 19:39 Strategas: this
2015-07-10 19:40 Altuth: so its all good
2015-07-10 19:40 Altuth: ?
2015-07-10 19:40 Strategas: 03:54:092 (4,5) -
2015-07-10 19:40 Strategas: these are still too close
2015-07-10 19:40 Strategas: though
2015-07-10 19:40 Strategas: if you try to curve
2015-07-10 19:41 Altuth: move them!
2015-07-10 19:41 Altuth: easiest option
2015-07-10 19:42 Altuth: and rotate it so that there is nice flow between the slider and first triangle circle
2015-07-10 19:42 Altuth: 03:54:949 (1,2) -
2015-07-10 19:42 Altuth: between those
2015-07-10 19:43 Strategas: not my point
2015-07-10 19:43 Strategas: this
2015-07-10 19:43 Strategas: 03:53:577 (1,2) -
2015-07-10 19:43 Strategas: this
2015-07-10 19:43 Strategas: and
2015-07-10 19:43 Strategas: 03:54:092 (4,5) -
2015-07-10 19:43 Strategas: should be
2015-07-10 19:43 Strategas: even
2015-07-10 19:43 Strategas: spaced
2015-07-10 19:43 Strategas: with 1.2
2015-07-10 19:43 Strategas: cause of all those before
2015-07-10 19:45 Altuth: make circles in the same combo structured and partially with other combos
2015-07-10 19:45 Altuth: no need to have long structure that goes unnoticed by the player
2015-07-10 19:46 Strategas: k
2015-07-10 19:46 Strategas: lets move on
2015-07-10 19:46 Strategas: if there's anything left
2015-07-10 19:46 Altuth: 04:18:777 (3) - bad flow
2015-07-10 19:47 Altuth: consider moving it under 04:18:263 (1) - pointing upwards
2015-07-10 19:47 Altuth: where 04:18:263 (1) - blankets 04:18:777 (3) -
2015-07-10 19:48 Strategas: k
2015-07-10 19:48 Altuth: 04:19:120 (4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - make jumps more structures
2015-07-10 19:51 Altuth: 04:41:235 (7) - place sliders on red tick would correspond nicely to the song
2015-07-10 19:51 Altuth: (from that point until the end)
2015-07-10 19:52 Strategas: white ticks
2015-07-10 19:52 Strategas: still have stronger sounds
2015-07-10 19:52 Strategas: most places
2015-07-10 19:52 Strategas: there'
2015-07-10 19:52 Altuth: (wub-wub) sound as start of slider makes them feel more acknowledged by the player
2015-07-10 19:52 Strategas: I'd rather follow drums
2015-07-10 19:53 Altuth: I just threw it out there, try considering it and maybe make a small sample and see for yourself how good it feels
2015-07-10 19:54 Strategas: yeah
2015-07-10 19:54 Strategas: I'll check
2015-07-10 19:54 Altuth: white or red tick slider has nothing to say if it feels better for the player
2015-07-10 19:54 Altuth: Usually you place sliders on white
2015-07-10 19:54 Strategas: depends what you hear really
2015-07-10 19:54 Altuth: ye
2015-07-10 19:55 Altuth: that was everything from me
2015-07-10 19:55 Altuth: I need to eat
2015-07-10 19:55 Altuth: bye, and good luck with your map
2015-07-10 19:55 Strategas: aye
2015-07-10 19:55 Strategas: thanks
2015-07-10 19:55 Strategas: you might want to post
2015-07-10 19:55 Strategas: in thread
2015-07-10 19:55 Altuth: i will
2015-07-10 19:55 Strategas: for internet points
2015-07-10 19:55 Altuth: ^^
2015-07-10 19:55 Strategas: enjoy your food
2015-07-10 19:55 Strategas: I will eat too

1. I will be talking about my own opinion on the map as a whole in the mod. While I hope you'll consider what I mention, it is, in the end, only the opinion of one person. If you disagree, that's fine too.
2. You might want to switch the order between combo color 3 and 4, so 4 and 1, which look very similar, don't come right after each other.
3. I'm not a very big fan of the hitnormals you're using. Personally I think the default soft and normal hitnormals work just fine.

1. Opinion stuff first:
2. 00:00:435 - 00:21:006 - For me, this part seems like you just placed a bunch of circles and sliders in 1/2 rhythm, and didn't really do much more in terms of making a consistent pattern, or in some way following more of the different sounds present here. Personally, I would for example use a 1/1 slider at 00:00:435 (1,2) - , and then be consistent, following the (how2describesound) sound at 00:05:920 - and 00:06:435 - with another pair of 1/1 sliders. This also makes it possible for more variation in rhythm without making it feel forced by making it random how many notes or 1/2 sliders are in a row before switching to the other. Obviously for 00:11:406 - etc as well.
3. 00:22:377 - I feel like this part has a similar problem as above. Basically, you're almost exclusively just going with 1/2's, which is fine in general, but then you should try to use the spacing to emphasize parts of the song, and sliders to bring out different parts of the music. For example, in the beginning, I would go with a rhythm similar to this http://i.imgur.com/tdD07PF.png , and arranging them as http://i.imgur.com/lZ4SVoE.jpg and http://i.imgur.com/VI95MXO.jpg . Of course these are in a mapping style closer to mine than yours, but the idea is basically that the difference in spacing between 00:22:377 (1,2,3) - (1,2) and (2,3) will emphasize the beat at 00:23:063 - , and then the same for 00:23:406 (4,5) - , and the beats at 00:24:435 (3,4,5,6) - are very close in intensity, so it feels nice to have about the same DS between them. Going all notes as well works since you want to hit all of those beats in the music.
4. 02:12:092 - For the kiai, I would go with something like http://i.imgur.com/ZWIEanS.png instead tbh, with bigger jumps between (1,2) and (3,4) than (2,3).
5. 02:55:977 - 03:17:920 - I feel like this section is much better mapped in terms of rhythm. Most of the longer vocals are on a slider, and you're consistent in terms of how powerful the notes feel at parts like 03:04:206 (1,2,3,4) - and 03:07:292 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - . The only thing is maybe the buildup at 03:14:835 - being a bit big compared to how easy the sliders before are.
6. 04:01:806 - Also, for the kiai, it's probably fine to add triples to put emphasis on some beats, but right now (both here and in previous kiai) they're kind of randomly placed (or at least feel randomly placed. I can't tell what logic you're using in placing them), and thus makes them feel overmapped.
7. 04:45:692 - For the endpart, a slider/note pattern like: http://i.imgur.com/DPMsazD.png would work nicely imo. Still just a row of 1/2, but less random in terms of what's being followed in the song.
8. Most of these things are suggestions as to how you can make the 1/2's more interesting, as the song is long and repetitive.

1. The mod below will base itself on your current map and style. If you consider the points above and do anything about them, there's probably things here you can disregard. If some idea below feels nice to you, remember to apply them for similar parts of the map as well.
2. 00:02:835 (4) - ctrl+g? Flows nicely as it follows the curve from (2,3) into the sliderhead, and if you feel you want more circular flow, you can place 00:03:349 (2) - on the right side instead of left side.
3. 00:11:749 (2,4) - Maybe move these closer to the previous slider, and further from the next sliders, so the distance emphasizes the beat on the sliderheads? You may do this at 00:06:263 (2,4) - as well, although they're not as noticeable since the spacing is already fairly big there overall.
4. 00:20:149 (4) - I would move this more to the right. Right now it's a 90 degree angle, which doesn't flow that well here imo.
5. 00:23:406 (5,6) - I like the stack, but you should be consistent with it 00:28:892 (5) -
6. 00:25:120 (1,2) - (1) to 242;344 and (2) to 99;245? Makes the pattern look a bit cleaner for me.
7. 00:26:835 (2) - Imo, this note shouldn't be a part of the "repeating/rotating" triangle, since the next notes in the triangle are all when there is vocal.
8. 00:30:606 (1) - Move this to http://i.imgur.com/eC7IEMU.png ? Follows the triangular flow much better, and also flows better into the next slider imo (although you should slightly reposition and reshape the (3) slider)
9. 00:40:206 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - You can make the curves of these streams smoother. Right now they look pretty rough and unpolished. Use the slider->stream tool if you have a hard time making curvy streams.
10. 00:42:949 (1,2,3,4) - Wouldn't it look neater if you made this into a smooth curve, rather than this weird L shaped thing.
11. 00:50:835 (5) - If you're going with these 1/4 sliders, I'd say you should make this a 1/4 as well. I'm not a very big fan of the 00:51:006 (6) though.
12. 00:52:377 (9) - same^
13. 00:57:177 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - What are you following with the triples? I can't really hear any instrument going in that rhythm.
14. 01:02:835 (8,9,10,11) - These just doesn't look neat, when you put them right next to each other. Consider make them the same angle http://i.imgur.com/ItlT6pR.png
15. 01:03:520 (1,2,3,4) - Same with these. You can use the rotate tool to make the rotation angle consistent.
16. 01:09:520 (1) - Kinda useless NC.
17. 01:28:206 (4) - Put this further away from the (1,2,3)? Emphasizing the higher pitch on the vocal. You'll need to rework the pattern a bit to make everything look nice and play smoothly, but yeah.
18. 01:41:920 - 01:43:120 - I don't quite get these triples either. You're not putting them on the beats to emphasize piano or anything, and I can't hear these triples, so yeah. Unless you're following something, I'd remove them, and even if you are following something, you should still consider it since there are probably more people than me that can't really tell what these triples are following. Same with the stream at 01:46:549 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - . Feels a bit artificially placed.
19. 02:06:606 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - You should space these out more, so the bigger jumps afterwards aren't so jarring. Alternatively, make the big jumps later at 02:09:349 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - less big, and instead have an increasing spacing.
20. 02:11:063 (5) - Make this follow the stream-curve?
21. 02:16:377 (2,3,4) - The stack is a bit flow-killing imo, since you're stopping mid-pattern. The triple at 02:17:235 (7,8,9) - works much better as it's at the end of a stanza, but this one is pretty jarring in-play.
22. 02:18:777 (6,1,2) - This flows pretty badly. Feels much more natural to move (1) underneath (6) somewhere, rather than to the left. Maybe something like this? http://i.imgur.com/E3R3h1G.jpg
23. 02:24:435 (1) - A bit too close to (6) after such a huge jump imo. Maybe move this to 345;201?
24. 02:25:977 (2,3) - Doesn't feel like the jump should be here. The stronger note is (2), so if anyhing, (1,2) should have the jump imo.
25. 02:28:377 - I still don't really get these.
26. 02:32:320 (4,6) - NC on both and move (6) a bit so they're parallell? Something like http://i.imgur.com/l6c26nt.png
27. 02:34:892 (4,5,6) - That's a preeeetty big jump all of a sudden, and it doesn't really go up there again either until much later, even though the general power of the song remains around the same level. Consider reducing the spacing here a bit.
28. 02:35:749 (2,3) - While these 1/4 are interesting, they don't seem to follow anything. They work out much better later at 02:45:692 (3,4,5,6) - , and you should follow the same thing for these 1/4 imo.
29. 02:53:577 (2) - Move this to 343;179 maybe? Since it's a "build-down" kind of thing, It'd be more interesting if this one has the note not stacked on the sliderend, while the next one does.
30. 03:10:892 (5,1) - Stack kinda kills flow.
31. 03:14:835 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - As I was saying above, These should start out closer, and gradually build up the spacing, rather than start out big, so it's a proper build-up.
32. 03:18:006 (1) - Start at 03:18:263 - to follow vocal?
33. 03:28:892 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - Personal preference, but I'd move these out a bit more from the center, so they don't overlap. I know you won't see it ingame, but you'll still see that they're occupying the same space. And it's not quite symmetrical either http://i.imgur.com/8O7MWIq.png
34. 04:00:435 (1,2,3,4,5) - The previous jump doesn't flow into this curve at all. Consider rotating it to something like this: http://i.imgur.com/mqVoAhm.png
35. 04:02:663 (4,5) - The jump being between (5,6) works better for me: http://i.imgur.com/5Sp7I3q.png
36. 04:07:806 (3) - Flow feels more natural if you ctrl+g this. Overall the way 04:07:292 (1,3) - overlaps doesn't look very good either, so consider fixing that too.
37. 04:45:692 - ctrl+g? If you do this, same for 04:50:149 (2) - . Nice circular flow imo.
38. 04:51:692 (3,4) - Should be higher spacing here to emphasize the (4) imo.

1. General flow of the map is fine. Most of the time notes will transition into each other pretty well, although some parts could be better.
2. Patterning could be much better. Things like 04:30:606 (1,2,3,4,5) - for example just looks really chaotic and without any set structure for the pattern: http://i.imgur.com/2KXXCWB.jpg . Same with things like 04:59:406 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - http://i.imgur.com/pqGt3H4.png etc.
3. The rhythm is very centered around 1/2, which is fine in itself, but there are many ways to make 1/2 more interesting and following the song more closely than you have done.
4. A lot of random triples and streams that I'm not sure is actually following anything, which makes them feel overmapped.

CXu wrote:

m4m

[General]

1. I will be talking about my own opinion on the map as a whole in the mod. While I hope you'll consider what I mention, it is, in the end, only the opinion of one person. If you disagree, that's fine too.
2. You might want to switch the order between combo color 3 and 4, so 4 and 1, which look very similar, don't come right after each other. fixed
3. I'm not a very big fan of the hitnormals you're using. Personally I think the default soft and normal hitnormals work just fine. Hitsounds are just preference

[Insane]

1. Opinion stuff first:
2. 00:00:435 - 00:21:006 - For me, this part seems like you just placed a bunch of circles and sliders in 1/2 rhythm, and didn't really do much more in terms of making a consistent pattern, or in some way following more of the different sounds present here. Personally, I would for example use a 1/1 slider at 00:00:435 (1,2) - , and then be consistent, following the (how2describesound) sound at 00:05:920 - and 00:06:435 - with another pair of 1/1 sliders. This also makes it possible for more variation in rhythm without making it feel forced by making it random how many notes or 1/2 sliders are in a row before switching to the other. Obviously for 00:11:406 - etc as well. It's mainly 1/2 cause I followed the strongest beats mostly. About 1/1 sliders, I'm not that much of a fan of slider ends on strongest dnb beats so I'll have to disagree.
3. 00:22:377 - I feel like this part has a similar problem as above. Basically, you're almost exclusively just going with 1/2's, which is fine in general, but then you should try to use the spacing to emphasize parts of the song, and sliders to bring out different parts of the music. For example, in the beginning, I would go with a rhythm similar to this http://i.imgur.com/tdD07PF.png , and arranging them as http://i.imgur.com/lZ4SVoE.jpg and http://i.imgur.com/VI95MXO.jpg . Of course these are in a mapping style closer to mine than yours, but the idea is basically that the difference in spacing between 00:22:377 (1,2,3) - (1,2) and (2,3) will emphasize the beat at 00:23:063 - , and then the same for 00:23:406 (4,5) - , and the beats at 00:24:435 (3,4,5,6) - are very close in intensity, so it feels nice to have about the same DS between them. Going all notes as well works since you want to hit all of those beats in the music. I mostly mapped it so the strongest beats are clickable and less noticable music hits are on slider ends. I will keep the paterning but will change the spacing so that stronger beats are more spaced then.
4. 02:12:092 - For the kiai, I would go with something like http://i.imgur.com/ZWIEanS.png instead tbh, with bigger jumps between (1,2) and (3,4) than (2,3). I'll change it a little
5. 02:55:977 - 03:17:920 - I feel like this section is much better mapped in terms of rhythm. Most of the longer vocals are on a slider, and you're consistent in terms of how powerful the notes feel at parts like 03:04:206 (1,2,3,4) - and 03:07:292 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - . The only thing is maybe the buildup at 03:14:835 - being a bit big compared to how easy the sliders before are. I'll try to fix the buildup a bit.
6. 04:01:806 - Also, for the kiai, it's probably fine to add triples to put emphasis on some beats, but right now (both here and in previous kiai) they're kind of randomly placed (or at least feel randomly placed. I can't tell what logic you're using in placing them), and thus makes them feel overmapped.
7. 04:45:692 - For the endpart, a slider/note pattern like: http://i.imgur.com/DPMsazD.png would work nicely imo. Still just a row of 1/2, but less random in terms of what's being followed in the song. I can see what you want to follow here, but I still want to go with the drums.
8. Most of these things are suggestions as to how you can make the 1/2's more interesting, as the song is long and repetitive. Yeah I will consider

1. The mod below will base itself on your current map and style. If you consider the points above and do anything about them, there's probably things here you can disregard. If some idea below feels nice to you, remember to apply them for similar parts of the map as well.
2. 00:02:835 (4) - ctrl+g? Flows nicely as it follows the curve from (2,3) into the sliderhead, and if you feel you want more circular flow, you can place 00:03:349 (2) - on the right side instead of left side. It makes kinda of a huge jump from 4 to 1 at the this calm spot randomly then.
3. 00:11:749 (2,4) - Maybe move these closer to the previous slider, and further from the next sliders, so the distance emphasizes the beat on the sliderheads? You may do this at 00:06:263 (2,4) - as well, although they're not as noticeable since the spacing is already fairly big there overall. Good idea
4. 00:20:149 (4) - I would move this more to the right. Right now it's a 90 degree angle, which doesn't flow that well here imo. fix
5. 00:23:406 (5,6) - I like the stack, but you should be consistent with it 00:28:892 (5) - ok
6. 00:25:120 (1,2) - (1) to 242;344 and (2) to 99;245? Makes the pattern look a bit cleaner for me. okay
7. 00:26:835 (2) - Imo, this note shouldn't be a part of the "repeating/rotating" triangle, since the next notes in the triangle are all when there is vocal. Yep
8. 00:30:606 (1) - Move this to http://i.imgur.com/eC7IEMU.png ? Follows the triangular flow much better, and also flows better into the next slider imo (although you should slightly reposition and reshape the (3) slider) fix
9. 00:40:206 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - You can make the curves of these streams smoother. Right now they look pretty rough and unpolished. Use the slider->stream tool if you have a hard time making curvy streams. Okay, should look better now
10. 00:42:949 (1,2,3,4) - Wouldn't it look neater if you made this into a smooth curve, rather than this weird L shaped thing. Yep
11. 00:50:835 (5) - If you're going with these 1/4 sliders, I'd say you should make this a 1/4 as well. I'm not a very big fan of the 00:51:006 (6) though. Alright
12. 00:52:377 (9) - same^ will leave this one how it is for time being
13. 00:57:177 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - What are you following with the triples? I can't really hear any instrument going in that rhythm. Small wubs
14. 01:02:835 (8,9,10,11) - These just doesn't look neat, when you put them right next to each other. Consider make them the same angle http://i.imgur.com/ItlT6pR.png ok
15. 01:03:520 (1,2,3,4) - Same with these. You can use the rotate tool to make the rotation angle consistent. fixed
16. 01:09:520 (1) - Kinda useless NC. Whoops
17. 01:28:206 (4) - Put this further away from the (1,2,3)? Emphasizing the higher pitch on the vocal. You'll need to rework the pattern a bit to make everything look nice and play smoothly, but yeah. fix
18. 01:41:920 - 01:43:120 - I don't quite get these triples either. You're not putting them on the beats to emphasize piano or anything, and I can't hear these triples, so yeah. Unless you're following something, I'd remove them, and even if you are following something, you should still consider it since there are probably more people than me that can't really tell what these triples are following. Same with the stream at 01:46:549 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - . Feels a bit artificially placed. There is a small background music on those blue ticks during that part, so I followed them. I used that change to get more tripples in the map since I didn't want to have everything as 1/2 .
19. 02:06:606 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - You should space these out more, so the bigger jumps afterwards aren't so jarring. Alternatively, make the big jumps later at 02:09:349 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - less big, and instead have an increasing spacing. Changed a little
20. 02:11:063 (5) - Make this follow the stream-curve? fix
21. 02:16:377 (2,3,4) - The stack is a bit flow-killing imo, since you're stopping mid-pattern. The triple at 02:17:235 (7,8,9) - works much better as it's at the end of a stanza, but this one is pretty jarring in-play. Spaced it
22. 02:18:777 (6,1,2) - This flows pretty badly. Feels much more natural to move (1) underneath (6) somewhere, rather than to the left. Maybe something like this? http://i.imgur.com/E3R3h1G.jpg alright
23. 02:24:435 (1) - A bit too close to (6) after such a huge jump imo. Maybe move this to 345;201? k
24. 02:25:977 (2,3) - Doesn't feel like the jump should be here. The stronger note is (2), so if anyhing, (1,2) should have the jump imo. I think that 3 is stronger than 2
25. 02:28:377 - I still don't really get these. Will consider
26. 02:32:320 (4,6) - NC on both and move (6) a bit so they're parallell? Something like http://i.imgur.com/l6c26nt.png works
27. 02:34:892 (4,5,6) - That's a preeeetty big jump all of a sudden, and it doesn't really go up there again either until much later, even though the general power of the song remains around the same level. Consider reducing the spacing here a bit. reduced
28. 02:35:749 (2,3) - While these 1/4 are interesting, they don't seem to follow anything. They work out much better later at 02:45:692 (3,4,5,6) - , and you should follow the same thing for these 1/4 imo. Keeping for now, will consider though.
29. 02:53:577 (2) - Move this to 343;179 maybe? Since it's a "build-down" kind of thing, It'd be more interesting if this one has the note not stacked on the sliderend, while the next one does. Sure
30. 03:10:892 (5,1) - Stack kinda kills flow. Fixed
31. 03:14:835 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - As I was saying above, These should start out closer, and gradually build up the spacing, rather than start out big, so it's a proper build-up. Changed a bit
32. 03:18:006 (1) - Start at 03:18:263 - to follow vocal? ok
33. 03:28:892 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - Personal preference, but I'd move these out a bit more from the center, so they don't overlap. I know you won't see it ingame, but you'll still see that they're occupying the same space. And it's not quite symmetrical either http://i.imgur.com/8O7MWIq.png fixed
34. 04:00:435 (1,2,3,4,5) - The previous jump doesn't flow into this curve at all. Consider rotating it to something like this: http://i.imgur.com/mqVoAhm.png rotated
35. 04:02:663 (4,5) - The jump being between (5,6) works better for me: http://i.imgur.com/5Sp7I3q.png made them both as jumps
36. 04:07:806 (3) - Flow feels more natural if you ctrl+g this. Overall the way 04:07:292 (1,3) - overlaps doesn't look very good either, so consider fixing that too. yeah changed
37. 04:45:692 - ctrl+g? If you do this, same for 04:50:149 (2) - . Nice circular flow imo. Don't want a 1/6 slider jump
38. 04:51:692 (3,4) - Should be higher spacing here to emphasize the (4) imo. sure

To summarize:

1. General flow of the map is fine. Most of the time notes will transition into each other pretty well, although some parts could be better.
2. Patterning could be much better. Things like 04:30:606 (1,2,3,4,5) - for example just looks really chaotic and without any set structure for the pattern: http://i.imgur.com/2KXXCWB.jpg . Same with things like 04:59:406 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - http://i.imgur.com/pqGt3H4.png etc.
3. The rhythm is very centered around 1/2, which is fine in itself, but there are many ways to make 1/2 more interesting and following the song more closely than you have done.
4. A lot of random triples and streams that I'm not sure is actually following anything, which makes them feel overmapped.

I guess in the end what I'm trying to say is that there's more than just the drums to follow, and it would make the map far more interesting if you varied that in the map. Constantly hitting out a 1/2 rhythm is often pretty boring, especially for a 5 minute long map.

From what I can see, the map still needs more work before it's ready. The basic idea of the map is good, but there's a lot of polish that can go into note placement and rhythm.
Good luck though!

Exa wrote:

[Insane]

00:02:835 (4,1,2,3,4) - While this pattern provides relatively good flow, it not only looks bad because it is asymmetrical, but IF it was symmetrical, it would provide the player with better flow and readability because the hitobjects of said pattern would be in their expected place (due to symmetry). Your best bet is to create a rhombus, but with how you have placed the final slider, it is currently impossible. Okay changed
00:04:206 (6,1,2) - Select (6,1), copy and paste them somewhere on the timeline and rotate by 90 degrees, then move accordingly so the new (6) is above the old (1). New (1) will be moving accordingly and the position it will be when you are do what I told you is the best position to place (2). This is not only for respecting the general symmetry but also respecting the flow and the DS used here. Changed in another way
00:08:492 (6) - Avoid starting sliders on red ticks. It fits.
00:09:177 (3,1) - Their overlap looks ugly. It's really unnoticable, but ok
00:09:692 (5,1,2) - Besides, there are plenty of 3 slider patterns that use alternating flow except this one. Not sure what do you mean
00:16:549 (5,1) - Look where the tail of (5) is facing and where is the head of (1). Your are making a transition that forces the player to move hit cursor in a way that your hitobjects do not suggest. This way, not only the general flow becomes unstable but it's also really unpleasant to play to. Rotated a little bit
00:17:406 (3,4) - You are transiting up from the slider while it's facing right, why not use a straight slider here? It doesn't make a difference, it completely plays the same, just wanted it to look more interesting.
00:21:006 (1,2) - I kept tapping this falsely, you have not made the player familiar with 3/4 rhythms so far and that's why this is too sudden. It fits. Even if it is sudden it is not hard to read. It would be really lame if I ended slider on the white tick, and might be a little missleading since the sound would be before it even ended.
00:23:235 (4,5,6) - Compare this with 00:25:292 (2,3,4) - this. They are practically the same with the only difference being the lack of alternating vocals in the first one. Do not treat such rhythms with so extensive variety, because while it seems fine; it might create inconsistency issues. But they aren't the same I mapped the stack in the first because of the sound it had there, where it didn't happen in the 2nd part it linked.
00:28:892 (5,6) - The presence of another audio sample here is the only reason you should not use an anti jump, why not move (6) at around (238,84)? Alright
00:34:377 (5,6) - Again, same here, avoid the anti jump. I will change all of these
00:35:063 (2,3,4,5) - The flow here is extremely unstable, bare with me: You assume curved flow that starts by entering this pattern from the first slider, which quickly moves towards the left and then a bit down. Then you transit into the last slider by going bottom right, which is currently fine because it's a really common sharp flow. But then, you forcefully make the player follow an completely opposite direction, that being bottom right using a slider shape, without making room for much movement because of the presence of a slider. The flow is as complex as it sounds and that's why it is unstable and, after all, unpleasant to play to. Changed
00:40:206 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3) - While there are 1/4 beats here, most blue ticks have nothing. Please recheck. I think it's fine since those are 1/4 slider ends.
00:49:806 (1) - Why not use a reverse slider here instead of an oddly shaped slider. Because it fits. It's oddly shaped because it follows the wub.
00:50:492 (3,4,5,6,1) - There are again very questionable because they are very sudden. True, but I want it to be more interesting.
00:53:920 (1,2,3,4) - Same as the pattern in the beginning, it's asymmetrical when it could follow the basic principles of symmetry. Changed
00:57:177 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - Fix the combos here, you give out too much HPregen with these. Also use a bit less than normal single note DS. The NCs are the to emphasis paterns, I don't see the problem with ds either.
01:06:263 (1,2,3) - Don't do this, this is supposed to be a calm part but you make it harsh with the small-time-gap-jumps. These jumps are almost non existant cause it's slider jumps...
01:41:063 (3,4) - Transitions like these should generally be avoided. Sliders have a specific shape because you altern their head and tail in a certain way so it follows the flow. Using a slider, only because you used it before is not enough. Okay, rotated them

[General]

- I could keep going and point out the same stuff over and over, but I think you get the point that this clearly needs more work than you might think. It has little to no structure and lacks patterns in a huge degree. The most well-playing patterns in your map are some triangles that include a back-and-forth movement. Recheck all your streams and make sure they actually have beats in their whole of them. Go though your map and search for spacing inconsistency. Most importantly though, sit down and think of more patterns to use in your beatmap; these will create the consistency you are looking for and in the long run- make it fun. I'm doing all I can. That's why I need other people to look at things that I may not notice.

Call me again when you think you've really done the best you possible can, I will edit this post and continue my mod.

RVMathew wrote:

Hi there. You posted a request on my modding queue 2 months ago: t/336458/start=15. I apologize for taking so long to do a mod on your map.

Note that whatever I say is my own opinion so you do not have to follow everything I say. Changes are separated into boxes.

Metadata

1) Data used: http://www.sketchuprecordings.com/suprcd007/
Title: Stargazer (DJ Shimamura Remix) the J is capitalized. Fix
Source: SKETCH UP! REMIXIES (Album, and that is not a typo on my part; check the source data and the album art) You can also put it on tags if you want.


2) Difficulty Name: You can chose a custom one considering the ranked beatmap has one and most approved ones have a custom difficulty name. I know, just I'm not very creative with names

Strategas's Insane

1) 00:01:463 Overlaps are fine, but I think that the map will look a lot more better if you do not use that many overlaps. Make use of the whole playing field. The rhythm here is fine, but I think note placement can be improved; just by using the whole playfield for the beginning section, you might see that the overall feel of the map will be better. Yeah I agree I overused overlaping, will try to make other paterns.

2) 00:23:577 Considering that in the combo, all earlier notes were roughly the same distance apart, wouldn't it make sense for this note to be also be the same distance apart from the previous note? If you do make this the same distance, you can try a nice triangle pattern:

SPOILER

However, when I was playing the beatmap for the 1st time I still hit it fine; this is more for aesthetics ( hence I stress equal distances between notes)

Other instances where this occurs: 00:29:063 , 00:34:549*

*I would like to mention if you keep that pattern, this note is not centered properly inside the triangle.

I just wanted to split the ds into two parts, making a nice jump to the NC, but you're right it kinda looks bad lol, I don't think triangle patern fits since it goes 1-2 1-2.

3) 00:44:149 Perhaps the spacing between the triplet is too little for an insane difficulty?

Other instances where this occurs: 00:53:749

I think it's alright the tripple isn't very intense

4) 00:55:292 and 00:55:635 Straighten out both sliders (move 00:55:292 to x: 212, y:74). At 00:55:977, move the note to x:280, y:233.
The change will look like this, and a lot better than before:

SPOILER

k
5) 01:00:606 I do not think you should curve the slider as it ruins the look of the diamond pattern:

SPOILER

fix
6) 01:06:263 and 01:06:777. I do not understand why the sliders should end on the blue tick, because if you listen closely and over and over again, linking the sliders like that when there is no obvious sound does not sound right, and ruins the feel of the song. I would recommend the sliders end at 01:06:606 and 01:07:120 because it sounds better. What I do like though is the change in volumes; it makes this part a lot nicer. Look at the rhythm pattern at 01:17:235 to see what I am trying to get at.

It got extended because the sound continues for a long time and the part where it's normal I follow vocal instead.

Other instances where this occurs: 01:09:006 and 01:09:520, 01:11:749 and 01:12:263, 01:14:492 and 01:15:006

7) 01:18:435 The overlap looks messy. I would move it somewhere else like this (or try something better):

SPOILER

Try and avoid overlaps like these.

Other instances where this occurs: 01:21:177

fix
8) 01:23:920 and 01:26:492: I would make them the same shape; since you have the same rhythm pattern, it looks better if you copy the slider shapes as well. fix

9) 01:28:549 You can try a star pattern for example:

SPOILER

If you can get the positioning right, you can get the last note of the star pattern to flow into the next note seamlessly, and that is a great thing to do.

ah well I'm following different things here, I can't really make a star here if I consider the pitch of the voice, those small triangles emphasises it pretty well I think

10) 01:50:149 I would try and avoid intersecting the previous slider. It does not look good.

SPOILER

fix
11) 02:12:006 Somehow this rhythm pattern is better than the current one, though I may be wrong:

SPOILER

but there's nothing on the red tick
12) 02:55:292 The idea of using increasing distance snap is a nice idea, but then when it is put into that W pattern, it looks a bit weird to me.
ok changed
13) 04:14:663 Tuck this note underneath note 2 (04:14:320), looks a lot better.

I like it this way more

14) 04:59:920 to 05:00:606 Convert this to a star jump. Currently the pattern looks too cramped and hence does not look pleasing. alright

Final thoughts: The rhythm is great, so I could not find any major error apart from those sliders I mentioned earlier in the mod. However, if there is one major thing I can tell you, it is to try and reduce the amount of times you overlap; make use of the whole playfield and you can stack some notes. It will look a lot better that way.

Good luck and again I apologize for making you wait 2 months for my mod. If you need anything else from me, just forum PM me.

Edit: You can move it to pending.

Maakkeli wrote:

Yo! M4M from yer que ok cool

[General]
Idk maybe AR 9.2 would be better your choice here m8 note density is pretty low here

[Galaxy of Oppai]

00:02:149 (2) - This flows gay to me (no offense to gay people. I don't mean the homosexual way of gay but the bad way of gay). Maybe ctrl+g?
00:16:549 (5,1) - This kind of slider curving just triggers me. http://puu.sh/kULGX/892c8c809b.jpg ? yea, I'll do that
00:19:120 (5,6) - Random big jump here you never did this before. I know there's a loud kick on the white tick but still. I suggest you keep the jump but maybe a bit lower ds. Maybe you could apply this the whole starting whatever it's called maybe you know what I mean lol
00:21:692 (2) - Not completely sure but shouldn't this be nc'd since sv changes sure
00:40:206 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3) - You mapped the super silent 1/4 m8 plox. Not really anything wrong with that just a random pick I tried to use all of the variety I could get
01:06:006 (1) - Make it end at the blue tick and start at the white tick like this http://puu.sh/kUM4B/3ad0237e97.jpg It currently starts and ends where the sound is even though it might be lame to play
01:06:263 (1,2,3) - Wow, Many sliders much overlap. Doesn't look good imo fix
01:11:749 (1,2) - No pls no 01:10:035 (3,1) - these overlap too which looks dumb fix
01:17:920 (3) - Ctrl+g? ok
01:20:663 (3) - ^ btw 01:19:977 (2,4) - these two overlap fix
01:32:663 (6) - 1/1 Slider? works
01:50:492 (2) - NC? sv change k
02:11:406 (7) - ^ k
02:36:606 (7,1) - For some reason this felt just really awkward i have no idea why fixed the flow I guess
02:48:263 (4) - This is really annyoing to play since it's closer to (3) than (2) well not really annyoing just random lol ok made it even more random
03:18:263 (1) - Move this spinner to 03:18:006 - keep the end at the same point sure
04:01:806 (1) - Overlappy pls fixerino fixerinoed
04:23:063 (3) - Hnnnnggghhhh.... just please move this closer to (2) or just stack it moved the 2 on top instead
04:35:406 (3) - NC sv change it's k rather keep this one consistent
04:52:892 (2) - ctrl+g? kinda breaks flow
05:00:606 (8,1) - oh i hate it when people do this. this is just my opinion don't give two shits about this if you like it but the spacing is bad with that moved it a bit up then

All in all your spacing seems a bit off imo but I really like playing this map.
Hope this helps at least in some way. Yeah I'll try to fix the remaining things, this was made long time ago anyway. Thanks!
Good luck!

Kalibe wrote:

Let's do this

Metadata: It's good, but japanese in tags isn't nessesary imo :3

[Galaxy Of Weekend]

00:11:063 (5) - remove red struction and make normal linear slider ok
00:13:120 (2,3,4) - hmm... http://puu.sh/kUOc1/06ec7914a1.jpg ? I think it's ok
00:34:720 to 00:40:035 - you should add here some triplets to beat the rhythm, you know? idk I decided to follow the stronger beat there, but maybe I'll add some
00:51:692 (4) - NC? I'll keep it consistent
00:54:777 (7) - ctrl + G? It plays better like this I think
01:06:263 (1,2,3) - please, avoid this overlapping. It's so confusing fix
01:09:006 (1,2,3) - but this is good pattern to make overlap :3
01:36:263 (1,2,3,5,6) - not nessesary 0.4 DS. Try use 1.0, it isn't slow part here it's pretty calm though
01:42:006 (2,3) - bad place to triplet not in the music or placement? I didn't really understand
02:45:692 (3,4,5,6) - better rhythm imo : http://puu.sh/kUOLT/a41cc51657.jpg I like how the last slider follow the wub
02:47:920 (2) - stack on (4) okkkkkk
03:28:892 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - omm... don't symmetry this. Ye i know it's cool, but i prefer to put at random places :3 I prefer to have it structured than random
03:45:863 (3,5,7) - NC all to create a nicely readable pattern? I put NC on one for consistency
03:48:092 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i don't like symmetry 1/4 sliders, but ok ;w; rotated them a bit
03:54:006 (3) - overmapped I feel like it fits
03:54:692 (6,8) - ^ imo ^

And, that's all GL :3

FCL wrote:

NM from my queue

• [diffl]

1. 00:18:263 (1) - why not copy 00:17:920 (5) - and ctrl+H? yea, didn't notice they weren't even
2. 00:45:349 (5,6) - the distance between them should be more, imo it's ok I think, everywhere else on same beat has same spacing or is stacked
3. 00:49:120 (5,6,7,8) - again, you can make jumps here, following the voice It's not that intense I think
4. 00:53:577 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - i suggest rotate a little bit ok
5. 00:55:977 (3,4) - on (4) circle haven't clearly expressed sound, so I think that don't need make this big distance shrinked it a bit
6. 01:12:777 (3) - it's boring, maybe make like this or something similar ok
7. 02:20:835 (4,1) - ugly stack with end fix
8. 03:07:292 (2) - maybe move on 272;268 for create patterns in form of star? ok
9. 03:39:863 (1,2) - 03:40:377 (3,4) - - these patterns should be with same distance, i guess ok
10. 03:40:892 (1,2,3,4) - ^
11. 04:02:149 (2) - i don't like place of this slider here, maybe move on 320;124? you mean circle? sure
12. 04:37:463 - you should start stream here, imo I think it's ok, I put it where the sound was most noticable
13. 05:02:663 (3,4) - make more distance ye

Good luck!

chucentry wrote:

Hi Strategas

Galaxy Of Dreams

00:37:206 (8) - remove. and do the triple here 00:37:377 - ok

00:37:892 (3) - remove, and do the triple when finish the slider ( put note here 00:37:720 - ) ok

00:51:692 (4,5,6,7,8) - i feel bad the placement but its my opinion. if u want to change here x:300 Y: 76 IF U WANT ok

01:37:292 (5,6,7) - is hard to read but not bad it's slow so easy to read

01:42:006 (2) - this triple lsiten bad. maybe do the triple here 01:41:835 - or 01:42:177 - feels fine to me

02:17:320 (8) - remove. can do the triple here 02:17:492 - ok

02:21:435 (7) - same but here 02:21:606 -

02:22:120 (3) - remove it and if u want the triple put here 02:22:635 -

02:31:035 (6) - same but here 02:31:206 - changed all these

02:33:349 (1) - maybe make the continue stream. i mean make this slider a triple nah, it would be overmap

02:34:377 (2) - blanket with 02:35:406 (1) - ? ok

02:39:263 - remove and triple here 02:39:435 -

02:41:920 (5,6,7) - this triple feels akward maybe remove the 02:42:006 (6) - and can put the future 6 (02:42:092 (6) - ) in x:322 y:108 change

02:48:263 (4,5) - sound better for me if the slider start in white tick and note stay before the slider it sounds the same though lol

03:01:549 (2) - remove no, it follows the instrument

03:52:635 (3) - triple here 03:52:463 - if u want it I like that part

03:53:235 (6,7,8,1) - add ntoe here 03:53:492 - and make a streak with 5 notes I intended something else here

03:54:006 (3) - remove. the triple is here 03:53:835 - i think nah

04:13:206 (3) - remove. the triple is here 04:13:377 - i think ok

04:16:635 (7) - remove it and 04:16:720 (7) - stack with the end of this slider 04:16:035 (4) - ok

In kiai try with more HS volume like 75% its very loud already because not soft hitsounds

Good luck!

Lazer wrote:

From Kudosu Alchemists Queue

[Galaxy Of Dreams]
Change the difficulty name to "Galaxy of Dreams" (I think it would be better :^>) k

00:05:406 (4) - I suggest lowering the spacing of this one I guess it's a bit too much
00:52:892 (2,4) - These two sound almost the same yet the first one has alot more spacing, maybe even it out? The two is much stronger though, but I made it less spaced to match 00:53:577 (5) -
01:32:663 (6) - this hits the HP bar moved
01:33:692 (3,1,2,3) - I suggest changing this pattern around a bit as it doesnt look that great imo ok
01:37:635 (7,1) - blanket plox ok if I got what you meant
01:45:692 (8) - hits hp bar moved
02:04:549 (3) - move towards y:192
02:05:921 (3) - move towards y:192 moved both
02:06:606 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - I would slowly make the slider velocity lower with increased spacing changed a little
02:26:663 (5) - lifebar hit moved
02:18:777 (6,1) - put emphasizement on the downbeat, not the beat before that I feel like the other note is more important to be emphasized
02:22:720 (7,1) - ^ the note before is emphasized with spacing while the downbeat gets emphasized by breaking the flow
02:39:006 (5,6) - align them correctly it wasn't my intention but why not
02:40:378 (4,5,6,7,1) - this jump is so huge like why 4 is building up 5 and 6 are just quite strong imo
02:49:977 (4) - lifebarbar fix
02:58:720 (1) - emphasize on this beat by making it more spaced than (2) 2 and 3 are stronger imo 1 is just the start of the beat
03:03:177 (2) - ctrl+g I don't want a huge jump to 3 for no reason
03:06:606 (5,1) - touchy touchy ;w; but they like touching
03:08:320 (2) - rip emphasism on this beat completely I'll try to sort this out later, nothing comes to mind right now
04:59:406 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - too extreme for this part I think it's ok, the ds isn't really higher than the biggest jumps here
05:03:349 (7,1) - increase spacing on (1) That's the part where I follow the buildup so it's low like that, I know there's a strong drum beat but I avoided all of strong beats in the whole patern there

BellxCranell wrote:

Sekmės stratėgas. Man dar reiks lipti iki tokio lygio, kad galėčiau žaist.

1. 00:08:320 (4,1) - Jump felt random and unsupported by the music xPP
2. 00:27:863 (1,2,3) - Flow a bit less than ideal here D: A jump from 2>3 would be cool.
3. 00:38:749 - I think a triplet would fit better here than on 00:38:920 (2) - . Generally triplets feel good when they end on white ticks because they're a means to emphasize beats like jumps/flowbreaks. When 1/4 rhythm is kind of ambiguous like here having them end on white ticks is better imo.
4. 01:26:149 (4,5) - Weird you dont blanket here but you do so with your other patterns prior to this.
5. 01:30:435 (1,2,3,4,5) - These jumps felt really big for a section thats supposed to be calm/simple. I'd make this a pentagon pattern rather than a star.
6. 01:50:149 - 01:54:263 - This section felt a lot simpler than 01:39:177 - 01:47:406 - etc.. cuz you don't use as many 1/4's even tho the music is kind of building up.
7. 02:12:092 (1) - 1/2 slider + circle fits better imo D:
8. 03:06:606 (5,6,1) - Really sharp angle from 5>6>1 D::
9. 04:15:520 (1,2,3,4) - A larger jump from 3>4 would fit the emphasis of the song better. 1>2 seems too big anyways since 2 doesn't really land on a very significant beat like 4.

monstrata wrote:

Some quick things to mention before #2

[Galaxy of Dreams]

1. 00:08:320 (4,1) - Jump felt random and unsupported by the music xPP rip
2. 00:27:863 (1,2,3) - Flow a bit less than ideal here D: A jump from 2>3 would be cool. Tried something
3. 00:38:749 - I think a triplet would fit better here than on 00:38:920 (2) - . Generally triplets feel good when they end on white ticks because they're a means to emphasize beats like jumps/flowbreaks. When 1/4 rhythm is kind of ambiguous like here having them end on white ticks is better imo. ya ok changed the other one too
4. 01:26:149 (4,5) - Weird you dont blanket here but you do so with your other patterns prior to this. It was a blanket though, made it more normal I guess.
5. 01:30:435 (1,2,3,4,5) - These jumps felt really big for a section thats supposed to be calm/simple. I'd make this a pentagon pattern rather than a star. Only left the strong beat as a jump then
6. 01:50:149 - 01:54:263 - This section felt a lot simpler than 01:39:177 - 01:47:406 - etc.. cuz you don't use as many 1/4's even tho the music is kind of building up. Added some 1/4s
7. 02:12:092 (1) - 1/2 slider + circle fits better imo D: yeah I had that way before, but I wanted to put much more emphasis on the downbeat
8. 03:06:606 (5,6,1) - Really sharp angle from 5>6>1 D:: imo fits because of the strong beat + vocal
9. 04:15:520 (1,2,3,4) - A larger jump from 3>4 would fit the emphasis of the song better. 1>2 seems too big anyways since 2 doesn't really land on a very significant beat like 4. Made the distance to 4 largest, I'm keeping the distance from 1 to 2 cause I focused on drums and snares the most during the song

Call me back!