1. Coeur (3,93 stars, 659 notes)
2. Platter (3,14 stars, 566 notes)
3. Salad (2,25 stars, 506 notes)

afk98 wrote:

Short mod, I like the map a lot! Thanks =)

Salad

To be honest, I don't know if 1.8x Slider Velocity is suitable here. But that's just my opinion. how high the sv is isn't really an issue in ctb since it doesn't change a lot apart from sliders (and only when they are totally horizontal)
00:06:922 (3) - Players at this level might not be sure whether to dash or not, make it more apparent? decreased a bit so dash can be used but not needed
00:13:813 (1) - Move this so that the all the movements are in the same direction? However, you can still make it a little further away? The change here is done on purpose like an easy version of direction change
00:52:732 (1) - Maybe don't make this a dash? Changed (4) before so it isn't
01:03:678 (4) - Move (4) on the other side to make the back forth motion more fluid?correct

Platter

00:07:057 (6) - Move to x=144 instead? Prefer to keep the little shift
00:49:084 (2) - Remove? It feels like it doesn't quite fit the song beat. Nope
01:16:246 (3,4,5,6,7) - It might be cool to make this pattern similar to 01:17:868 (3,4,5,6,7). Not exactly the same strong beat so ...
02:21:110 (3,4) - Have the same shape and relationship as (1,2), except translated there instead? I don't get it ._.
02:33:273 (1) - Make this a HDash to accent the beat? Don't really deserve one for a platter
02:52:328 (1) - No NC here? Removed

Coeur

Really good overall, just one comment
If this is a rain, then you should change, if not, then ignore. Yes it is one
00:03:138 (4) - This jump is a little much, I feel like there could be a non Hdash? Changed

00:59:219 (1) - No NC? Removed
Sorry I couldn't find anything else, I just really like it.

Niflheim wrote:

General

1. Offset feels off throughout the whole map. Sounds a lot better around 810~. Re-downloaded with new MP3.

baka :s

Coeur

1. 00:14:219 (1) - Could extend this a reverse slider, finishing at 00:14:458. yap
2. 00:15:840 (8) - ^. Nope feel overdone to me and prefer to keep the break
3. 00:19:219 (10) - Possibly add a note after this ^
4. 00:52:327 (4) - Could extend this a reverse slider. ^
5. 01:06:246 (3,4) - Add a note between here. Changed (3) to a slider
6. 01:07:868 (3,4) - ^ ^
7. 01:09:490 (3,4) - ^ ^
8. 01:11:111 (3,4) - ^ ^

Really nice map though, and good luck for ranked

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

00:02:327 (6,1) - music suggest a small jump here Don't feel like it and prefer to keep a calm begining for a salad
00:05:570 (6,1) - ^ ^
01:08:543 (4,5,1) - i think the bigger gap should be between 5 - 1, not 4 - 5 Looks better yap
02:22:596 (5) - why not continue on with the movement that you have in 02:21:921 (1,2,3,4) - Because movement isn't always needed
02:25:840 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - maybe a better shaped curve? it starts out spread out then it bunches up at the end reworked a bit

Hyper where? not this time

But I do love the song and the mapset does seem really well put together (but we are talking about Krah here so what do you expect). So I have one more question before I leave.

When will this be ranked so I can I get in the top 50 of this mapset? Find me a bn =)

1. 00:00:841 (1) - Shorten by 1/3 and add a circle on the white tick? Sounds better and adds more impact to your current hitsounds I guess.
2. 00:01:651 (3,4) - Replace these with a slider? It sounds really odd to me without it.
3. 00:02:462 (1) - Reduce by 1/3 and add a circle on the white tick. Adds emphasis to 00:02:868 - that I feel is lacking here and doesn't really smother 00:02:732 - .
4. 00:05:705 (1) - Similar to above, I think you are smothering parts of the song you could work with. Suggesting you change this for all similar sliders in this area as it feels a bit lackluster as many of your notes are stacking close to the sliders ( 00:10:030 (3) - etc.) and I feel this change could allow you to put more patterns and movement.
5. 00:13:003 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Really? I love your hitsounds here but the pattern just doesn't live up to it. A walk is super boring here and I'm sure you can bring in a pattern that is much more interesting.
6. 00:29:489 (5) - Replace this with a 1/3 repeater? It sounds better than just the single note as it sounds really heavy and ugly by itself but a repeating slider with the clap on the head sounds great.
7. 00:45:840 - Note here? It follows on nicely as 00:45:435 (3,4) - feels like it has something missing off the end to me.
8. 00:47:868 (1,2,3,4) - This seems a bit sudden and off to me. 00:47:868 (1,2,3) - replaced with a slider as 00:48:003 (2) - just feels disruptive.
9. 00:51:111 (2) - Swap for a 1/3 slider starting at 00:50:976 - ? This feels a bit too prominent to leave out to me.
10. 00:54:354 (1,2,3,4) - Feels a bit sudden and awkward again. Remove 00:54:489 (2,3) - maybe?
11. 01:06:516 (3) - Move this ever so slightly to the right? Gives a slight illusion of movement and looks a lot better than a simple stack even if it works as one. Same can be applied for the other stacks in this section I guess, it feels fitting but a bit lackluster to look at.
12. 01:16:516 (4,5,6,7) - Another simple walk that doesn't live up to it's hitsounding, throw in a wiggle or something here instead of keeping such a slow pace.
13. 01:43:949 (5) - Feels off, you've snapped to a higher BS divisor so do it for ones like this please.
    

Riari wrote:

Random single diff runover due to how bored I am.

[Salad]

1. 00:00:841 (1) - Shorten by 1/3 and add a circle on the white tick? Sounds better and adds more impact to your current hitsounds I guess. Platter is already like that. I prefer to keep something simplistic for the salad
2. 00:01:651 (3,4) - Replace these with a slider? It sounds really odd to me without it. "sounds" ? droplet will add nothing here
3. 00:02:462 (1) - Reduce by 1/3 and add a circle on the white tick. Adds emphasis to 00:02:868 - that I feel is lacking here and doesn't really smother 00:02:732 - . same as previously
4. 00:05:705 (1) - Similar to above, I think you are smothering parts of the song you could work with. Suggesting you change this for all similar sliders in this area as it feels a bit lackluster as many of your notes are stacking close to the sliders ( 00:10:030 (3) - etc.) and I feel this change could allow you to put more patterns and movement. As I already said I'm "smoothering" part because it's a salad and the easiest diff here
5. 00:13:003 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Really? I love your hitsounds here but the pattern just doesn't live up to it. A walk is super boring here and I'm sure you can bring in a pattern that is much more interesting. Changed to a triple stop/start pattern
6. 00:29:489 (5) - Replace this with a 1/3 repeater? It sounds better than just the single note as it sounds really heavy and ugly by itself but a repeating slider with the clap on the head sounds great. Changed to a 1/3 slider (I don't get the idea to have a repeat here ._.)
7. 00:45:840 - Note here? It follows on nicely as 00:45:435 (3,4) - feels like it has something missing off the end to me. correct
8. 00:47:868 (1,2,3,4) - This seems a bit sudden and off to me. 00:47:868 (1,2,3) - replaced with a slider as 00:48:003 (2) - just feels disruptive. removed (2). prefer to not change it to a slider
9. 00:51:111 (2) - Swap for a 1/3 slider starting at 00:50:976 - ? This feels a bit too prominent to leave out to me. prefer to keep it simple here too
10. 00:54:354 (1,2,3,4) - Feels a bit sudden and awkward again. Remove 00:54:489 (2,3) - maybe? did the same as previously, removed (2) only
11. 01:06:516 (3) - Move this ever so slightly to the right? Gives a slight illusion of movement and looks a lot better than a simple stack even if it works as one. Same can be applied for the other stacks in this section I guess, it feels fitting but a bit lackluster to look at. But it's not a stack Oo
12. 01:16:516 (4,5,6,7) - Another simple walk that doesn't live up to it's hitsounding, throw in a wiggle or something here instead of keeping such a slow pace. reworked in the same way as before
13. 01:43:949 (5) - Feels off, you've snapped to a higher BS divisor so do it for ones like this please.Kinda sure it's correct here, check other diff if you have a doubt (specially the rain)

I'll eventually maybe mod more I guess, you'll have to find me when I feel like modding again.

Tyrell wrote:

[Salad]
00:07:597 (1,2) - I feel the 1/3 spacing used here is awkward and should be reduced a bit. Instead of going through and pointing out all the points where the spacing is similar to this im just gonna say go through the diff and highly consider nerfing the 1/3 jumps like this as they are quite awkward it's like that on purpose, you can catch it without dash but with it it's easier. It's a kind of thing that I think legit in salad
01:03:543 (3,4,5) - Would reduce the spacing between these to make it easier to stationary catch reduced a bit
Other than the weirdness of the 1/3 jumps I feel this diff is quite good thanks

[Platter]
00:13:003 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I would make this simpler to read with just a right to left pattern restacked 2-et a bit but still keep the idea here to emphasis the hs
Not much else for me to point out in this platter, being mapped in 1/3 i find it quite weird but it's mapped well. The song is 1/3 based so it's mapped in 1/3 ._.

Can't mod rains, so that's about it. Good luck with this set, it's interesting. Gimme a BN :'(

1. 00:04:084 (1) - No, dude. NO, NO, NO. This slider is way too curved, for newbie players (like me) it's quite hard to catch 'em and flows quite bad with 00:04:759 (2) - . Learn to map, please.
2. 00:07:327 (1) - Nice NC, dad. Besides, don't you think 00:07:327 (1,1) - should be more spaced? At least a 1,2x ds would be okay, especially if you are willing to maintain your style in the beginning of the song.
3. 00:18:949 (5) - This sounds a biiit weird, what about placing a circle on 00:18:949 - and then the slider from 00:19:084 - to 00:19:286 - ?
4. 00:20:706 (1) - This is questionable, Krah! Listen to me carefully, wait, move your keyboard to the right, it's bothering me where you have it. Okay, now. In the previous combo, you are mapping only circles, even though there's a similar audible sound to 00:20:705 (1) - so why would you place a slider? Let's suppose you leave it, try to add a Soft hitsound on tail at least, it sounds like a hit when you're only following a certain instrument instead of the drums.
5. 00:22:192 - aDd SoMeThInG
6. 00:35:705 (4,5) - Dammit, loun-
7. 01:18:543 (8,1) - WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BOOOOOOOOOOOY. Remember at the beginning of the map which you mapped something similar? Well, the spacing was 2.00x. Wh-What are you trying to do? Kill me!
8. 01:19:084 (1) - Something similar to what I said above, you really want to add a "Soft" in the tail.
9. 02:00:030 (4,5) - I have my doubts on this pattern, and it's the fact that I don't find it worth emphasising as you are doing right now. Let's be honest, I'm nazi'ing too much, that's why I stopped a bit, but this is one of the things I considered as "must-changes" because of the map is build up. (5) to x96.
10. 02:59:084 (5,6) - DAMMIT, LOUN-! This is hella unexpected, MaYbE x264 for a 2,00x ds and no need to dash away? For the sake of the NewBieSsS.

1. 00:20:300 (3,1) - Don't you think you should space them out? A full 1.5x ds pattern followed by a 0,69x (The 69 is worth)? That's a dramatic slowdown.
2. 00:45:840 (7) - You forgot to NC or it's just me?
3. 00:50:300 (3,1) - Another (3,1) lel.This spacing is literally ruining the pace of the song. You didn't map any 3.00x ds jump as far as I'm concerned, so why, loun-! W H Y? ~ W H Y BABY UUH HE SAID UUUH ~. What about some spicy rearrange to x48?
4. 00:52:597 - I REALLY feel that something's missing over here. What do you think of extending 00:52:327 (4) - up to that point? I know that you're following a complete different thing on (4), but even a reverse could work.
5. 01:03:138 (1) - You really forgot a hitsound here. Whistle + Finish would be fine as well. And consider adding a Finish for 01:03:813 (5) - too.
6. 01:57:597 (1,2,3,4,5) - Maybe this will sound extremely stupid, but this part is as easy as the Ensalada difficulty! It's supposed to be harder, come on, a bit more of spacing, I didn't even have to move my guy to catch the spicy fruits.
7. 02:59:084 (6,7) - The same ;w;

1. 00:32:462 (4,5,6) - This flows quite oddly, don't you think? I was thinking about Ctrl+G'ing (5), but that would leave a ridiculous spacing between (5,6). Maybe you can come out with some better ideas.
2. 01:57:597 (1,2,3,4,5) - Just... you... whatever.
3. 02:00:030 (5) - x228? The clap hitsound is worth emphasising! Or maybe even more emphasis! Just look at 02:02:732 (3,4) - .
4. 02:59:084 (6,7) - This has less spacing than in Platillo

Yuii- wrote:

Hi there, #loun- !

You have some really nice "Widescreen Support" and "Letterbox during breaks" thing on
"ENABLE COUNTDOWN" HAHAHA... Remove that, seriously. bleh^2

[Ensalada]

Hey, baby~ uuuuh! What about HP4 to fit the spread properly? \:D/ inb4 "no". no \:D/

1. 00:04:084 (1) - No, dude. NO, NO, NO. This slider is way too curved, for newbie players (like me) it's quite hard to catch 'em and flows quite bad with 00:04:759 (2) - . Learn to map, please. nazi :s
2. 00:07:327 (1) - Nice NC, dad. Besides, don't you think 00:07:327 (1,1) - should be more spaced? At least a 1,2x ds would be okay, especially if you are willing to maintain your style in the beginning of the song. a little break before something else hurt no one, the nc stay
3. 00:18:949 (5) - This sounds a biiit weird, what about placing a circle on 00:18:949 - and then the slider from 00:19:084 - to 00:19:286 - ? if I really add a slider here it'll be a 2/3 not a 1/2 but I'll not do it by consistency with the higher diff and because the break here is useful for a salad (assuming the next pattern)
4. 00:20:706 (1) - This is questionable, Krah! Listen to me carefully, wait, move your keyboard to the right, it's bothering me where you have it. Okay, now. In the previous combo, you are mapping only circles, even though there's a similar audible sound to 00:20:705 (1) - so why would you place a slider? Let's suppose you leave it, try to add a Soft hitsound on tail at least, it sounds like a hit when you're only following a certain instrument instead of the drums. changed to a single note
5. 00:22:192 - aDd SoMeThInG nOpE
6. 00:35:705 (4,5) - Dammit, loun- ._.
7. 01:18:543 (8,1) - WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BOOOOOOOOOOOY. Remember at the beginning of the map which you mapped something similar? Well, the spacing was 2.00x. Wh-What are you trying to do? Kill me! reduced
8. 01:19:084 (1) - Something similar to what I said above, you really want to add a "Soft" in the tail. same as above
9. 02:00:030 (4,5) - I have my doubts on this pattern, and it's the fact that I don't find it worth emphasising as you are doing right now. Let's be honest, I'm nazi'ing too much, that's why I stopped a bit, but this is one of the things I considered as "must-changes" because of the map is build up. (5) to x96. reduced the current jump, keep the same form
10. 02:59:084 (5,6) - DAMMIT, LOUN-! This is hella unexpected, MaYbE x264 for a 2,00x ds and no need to dash away? For the sake of the NewBieSsS. dash are supposed to exist on salad and you can already catch it without dash (just saying)

[Platillo]

1. 00:20:300 (3,1) - Don't you think you should space them out? A full 1.5x ds pattern followed by a 0,69x (The 69 is worth)? That's a dramatic slowdown. I don't get the issue here. It's not the same time during (3,1) & (1,2) and the slowndown itself isn't that harsh considering the (1) movements just before
2. 00:45:840 (7) - You forgot to NC or it's just me? just you
3. 00:50:300 (3,1) - Another (3,1) lel.This spacing is literally ruining the pace of the song. You didn't map any 3.00x ds jump as far as I'm concerned, so why, loun-! W H Y? ~ W H Y BABY UUH HE SAID UUUH ~. What about some spicy rearrange to x48? the hdash was stupid here, removed it
4. 00:52:597 - I REALLY feel that something's missing over here. What do you think of extending 00:52:327 (4) - up to that point? I know that you're following a complete different thing on (4), but even a reverse could work. Tried with the reverse and sound really weird to me ._.
5. 01:03:138 (1) - You really forgot a hitsound here. Whistle + Finish would be fine as well. And consider adding a Finish for 01:03:813 (5) - too. yap
6. 01:57:597 (1,2,3,4,5) - Maybe this will sound extremely stupid, but this part is as easy as the Ensalada difficulty! It's supposed to be harder, come on, a bit more of spacing, I didn't even have to move my guy to catch the spicy fruits. I don't feel like adding some difficulty here. It's just after the break so let's give to the player some time and not directly jump on him with hdash-spam
7. 02:59:084 (6,7) - The same ;w; the same ;w; (this one actually works the same as the previous ones)

[French name]

1. 00:32:462 (4,5,6) - This flows quite oddly, don't you think? I was thinking about Ctrl+G'ing (5), but that would leave a ridiculous spacing between (5,6). Maybe you can come out with some better ideas. Not really bothered by this one and the (5) ctrl+g is a no-go
2. 01:57:597 (1,2,3,4,5) - Just... you... whatever. =)
3. 02:00:030 (5) - x228? The clap hitsound is worth emphasising! Or maybe even more emphasis! Just look at 02:02:732 (3,4) - . Increasing the hdash itself isn't really relevant and actually not worth it ._.
4. 02:59:084 (6,7) - This has less spacing increased

This diff is actually pretty neat. this map* :'(

Alright, you know what? You're cute <3 I know

Krah wrote:

Fixed everything, Yuii-. Thanks. You are definitely THE best.

ghm12 wrote:

throwing this here
rank this please

koliron wrote:

General

1. Combocolours, woo, that colours are sad :c try to chage (3) with [14,254,200] (I understand that others may not be so easy because would be hard to distinguish) Actually the song is sad ... All mili's songs are fucking depressive. I could change those colors but the blue that you suggest is too bright compared to the others ._.
2. NC: all fine!

Salad

1. 01:05:570 (4,1) - 01:07:192 (5,1) - 01:08:814 (5,1) - 01:10:436 (5,1) - long-long-short-long distances, maybe change to short-long-short-long to maintain constancy (Or just add distance in 01:08:814 (5,1) - ) Changed it
2. 02:59:084 (5,6) - As is the last note and jump, maybe slightly higher distance looks good Already slightly higher
3. if you accept the AR in Coeur, change to 6.4 to maintain constancy Gonna change the coeur ar but other will stay
   no more, really good Salad! Thanks ><

Platter

1. 00:27:192 (3,4) - this movement is really hard to platter players! D: maybe reduce the ondulation in (4) changed each (4)
2. 00:28:408 (3,4) - 00:33:678 (3,4) - 00:34:894 (3,4) - the same cases ^
3. 01:16:651 (5,6) - x: 128 is more beautiful reword the short stream to imply a curve
4. 01:23:003 (4,5,6,7) - The platters are to introduce players in HDashes, so this jump is complicated! besides the distance to get there, need go to the opposite side, I suggest you 01:22:597 (2,3,4,5) - x: 212, 01:23:408 (6) - x:112 and 01:23:543 (7,8) - x: 56 (to not remove HDash or cause uncomfortable movements) seems fair
5. 01:30:841 (2,3,1) - i think looks good just a little more distance (obviously no HDash) no need for it, it's like that to show the "break" in the voice
6. 02:25:030 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - Some of these movements is fine, but I find too many for a platter change some 1st stream doesn't change, slightly changed middle of second
7. 02:28:003 (4,5,1) - the same case of 01:23:003 (4,5,6,7) changed
8. 02:34:489 (4,5,1) - the same case I find this one fine and not so harsh
9. 02:40:976 (4,5,1) - the same case ;w; changed
10. if you accept the AR in Coeur, change to 7.8 to maintain constancy same as salad

Coeur

1. 00:02:057 (7,8) - Is at a distance somewhat uncomfortable because you doubt if require dash (but well, not required, but the distance is distinguishably higher than that of 00:04:489 (3,4) - ) reduce the distance a bit reduced really slightly
2. 00:17:057 (5,1) - Why the jump is so strong? this sound is not so remarkable, and is even greater than 00:13:678 (6,1) - still a hdash but reduced it
3. 00:24:760 (5,6) - this jump is a bit uncomfortable, because have to catch the notes almost with the edges, i suggest you (5) x: 424 or less Hdash isn't the only way to create difficulty, keeping it
4. 00:27:192 (2) - You should do the slider with this form because is fast and short-jump and there is a lack of movement, and you probably moved equally, this causes too high probability of losing the seeds correct
5. 00:27:597 (3) - the same case ^
6. 00:41:381 (1) - probably with x: 140 is more cute prefer to keep the current one ><
7. 01:01:111 (3) - I know, I look much the esthetic, a little more upright would look better (01:04:084 (1,2,3) - as this would be fine) changed a bit
8. 01:29:625 (5,6) - this time the distance is clear to use dash, but the jump is slightly stronger, maybe (5) x: 80 ok
9. 02:07:326 (1,2,3,4) - I found it some repetitive, especially because before there were several similar sliders (02:00:840 (1,2,3,4) , 02:04:083 (1,2,3) ), maybe using other positions and shapes I know it's repetitive but i'm actually fine with it... I think it's normal here to have this kind of thing
10. 02:20:299 (1,2,3,4) - the same case, I see you were constant in this, so was on purpose, but I insist on you should giving a little more variety to those sliders \(~o~)/ ^
11. This difficulty have quite strong jumps, I understand that the song is very relaxing, but try to change the AR at least to 8.8 yap hesitated too do it recently so let's go

sorry for not doing hitsounds mod, I'm bad with them, I hope to have helped a little Np your mod was already great =)

good luck!!

+1 star OwO

If you have time Pile - Aishiteru Banzai! I would really appreciate it! I should mod again T_T

BoberOfDarkness wrote:

Hungry in game mod

1. Song Folder: No issues
2. Song Setup: HP3 seems a bit low for a Salad... I assume this is intentional - since it's the easiest difficulty, it does make it more accessible to beginners, but I feel HP4 isn't too punishing here. On HP3 it's possible to pass with less than 75% accuracy xD
3. Metadata: No issues
4. Timing: No issues
5. Hitsounds:
6. AImod: No issues

1. 00:33:205 (6) - Not sure a triplet really fits here as I can't hear anything justifying a beat on that 5/6 tick. However, there's a much clearer drum sound in the previous beat at 00:32:800 so I'd consider placing the triplet here instead
2. 00:37:597 (5,1,2,3) - Antiflow between these two pairs is a little too much for a Salad in my opinion. Consider reducing the distance between these, or alternatively, making one pair move to the right instead, e.g. here - (3) is stacked under (1)
3. 01:13:813 (1) - Due to the prominence of the strong snare drum sound, I feel this plays better as a circle on the downbeat. 01:13:408 (4) plays well as a a slider because of the short, higher-pitched violin sound there, but this note doesn't have the same effect to me
4. 01:15:435 (1) - ^
5. 01:17:868 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - "Tap" spacing is kinda awkward and unfitting here imo, since this is all part of the same drumroll and notes are of equal prominence. I personally feel making this into a smoother movement would be better, but if you do want a slightly more challenging pattern, a direction change or increased spacing between 01:18:138 (5,6) would fit better, since the drum roll is played as two 1/3 triplets
6. 01:24:354 (1,2,3) - No dash is required for any of the previous combos between 01:18:678 and here, and suddenly dash is required consecutively. I get that this section is really prominent and you want to keep these, so maybe a dash or two in the previous combos would lessen the difficulty spike here which has potential to catch the player unaware.
7. 02:01:651 (3) - Spacing here is right on the border of requiring dash, which has the potential to confuse newer players. Since this is a weaker beat, consider reducing the spacing a little here. 02:01:651 (3,4) to x-232 works better
8. 02:08:137 (3) - ^ Whatever you use with the suggestion above, do the same thing here, since the spacings on 02:07:326 (1,2,3,4) are currently quite a bit different from 02:00:840 (1,2,3,4) - currently the movement to (3), the weakest beat, is the largest, which leaves this section feeling inconsistent with your previous patterns
9. 02:14:624 (3,4) - Same idea again, since this one is a direct copy of 02:00:840 (1,2,3,4) - 02:14:624 (3,4) to x-280 gives the same effect as I suggested for the original case
10. 02:29:624 (4) - Increased distance to this to emphasise the snare drum sound would be nice

1. 00:33:138 (6,1) - There was a triple here in the Salad, but just a 1/3 doublet in the Platter lol. Suggest you do the same things as I suggested there, adding a circle at 00:32:800
2. 00:35:976 (6,7) - Reduce the distance to this doublet from 00:35:705 (5) a little please, since that note combines a strong dash to reach it with a direction change after it, which is a little uncomfortable to play
3. 00:37:665 (6) - ^ Triplet fits better at 00:37:192 in my opinion, there are more prominent notes in the music to support it that there are here
4. 00:37:597 (5,6,1) - If you keep the current pattern, consider reducing the distance a little to here, I feel it's a bit too strong than is required for the music it's mapping
5. 00:58:340 - Kick drum sound here, consider adding a note
6. 01:13:408 (4,5,1) - Since the music is quite calm here, I feel this much wiggling is a bit unnecessary. 01:13:678 (5) is a strong note, but I think that moving it to x-296 is enough here
7. 01:28:137 (3) - I can't hear a sound in the music to justify this, but there's a really prominent snare+cymbal sound 1/3 later at 01:28:273 so I suggest moving this note here instead
8. 02:25:840 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Spacing on these doubles feels a little random to me - the resulting pattern has the effect of a smooth curve, but with an odd-looking "kink" at 02:26:381 (5,6) that breaks the flow a little. Consider making into a smoother curve, or two triplets with a jump between them for a slightly trickier pattern
9. 02:31:381 (2) - I can't hear a sound in the music to justify this, please remove it
10. 02:33:003 (3) - ^ You didn't map a note at 02:39:489 or 02:52:462 which is the same pattern
11. 02:37:868 (2) - 02:44:354 (2) - 02:45:976 (3) - 02:50:841 (2) - ^ Same rhythm as before, notes aren't justified
12. 02:54:354 (1) - 02:55:976 (1) - 02:57:597 (1) - 02:59:219 (7) - Whilst these hdashes are fine from a ranking criteria perspective, I don't feel they need to be this strong since the music is quite calm. Reducing the distance to each of these a little would be more fitting - ~2.8x DS works nicely, potentially slightly higher (~3.0x) for the last one

1. 00:04:354 (2) - A smaller distance from (1) would be welcome here since the dash between 00:03:881 (7,1) is quite strong - 00:04:354 (2,3) to x-52 feels better to me
2. 00:23:949 (1) - This hdash is a little stronger than it needs to be in my opinion, and it's making the return jump to 00:24:219 (2,3) pretty uncomfortable. Try moving to x-72
3. 00:25:030 (6) - This is also a little uncomfortable to dash to, try reducing the distance to here a little please
4. 00:29:557 (7) - There's no beat in the music to support this triplet, please remove this note
5. 00:33:205 (6) - As in the other diffs, this triplet note fits better at 00:32:800
6. 00:38:138 (3) - This is annoying to dash to as it has a high chance of resulting in droplet misses. Rotate 180 degrees and Ctrl+G this please
7. 00:41:043 (2,3,4,5,6) - I don't hear any 1/6 here
8. 00:44:557 (4) - Again, I don't hear a beat here you can justify mapping here
9. 00:58:340 - But there's a note here you could map for a triplet! (^:
10. 01:04:151 (2) - No beat here, but there are drum beats at 01:04:422 - 01:04:692 and 01:05:638
11. 01:24:084 (10) - Nothing here either
12. 01:28:408 (5) - I'd curve this a little more to reduce the distance to 01:28:814 (1) whilst still maintaining the hyper. The direction change to 01:29:084 (2,3) after the hyper is kinda tricky currently
13. 02:04:016 (5) - 02:10:502 (5) - 02:16:989 (5) - 02:23:475 (5) - Aside from the fact that there are no note in the music here, these triplets feel so artificial and really don't fit with the music at all in my opinion. Please remove them ;w;
14. 02:13:138 - Prominent beat unmapped here, part of a drumroll at 02:12:867 (1,2,3,4)
15. 02:26:786 - Regarding overmapping, from here until 02:52:732 the same suggestions as in the Platter apply, since you used a similar timleine

JBHyperion wrote:

Yeah I'm late, you may hit me if it makes you feel better ): Hi I'm late too

General Comments:

1. Song Folder: No issues
2. Song Setup: HP3 seems a bit low for a Salad... I assume this is intentional - since it's the easiest difficulty, it does make it more accessible to beginners, but I feel HP4 isn't too punishing here. On HP3 it's possible to pass with less than 75% accuracy xD changed to 4
3. Metadata: No issues
4. Timing: No issues
5. Hitsounds:
6. AImod: No issues

Difficulty-Specific Comments:

Salad

1. 00:33:205 (6) - Not sure a triplet really fits here as I can't hear anything justifying a beat on that 5/6 tick. However, there's a much clearer drum sound in the previous beat at 00:32:800 so I'd consider placing the triplet here instead The idea here was to emphasize this drum but yap it's not really justified (specially for a salad) so deleted it
2. 00:37:597 (5,1,2,3) - Antiflow between these two pairs is a little too much for a Salad in my opinion. Consider reducing the distance between these, or alternatively, making one pair move to the right instead, e.g. here - (3) is stacked under (1) I could reduce it but you already don't even need to dash to catch all of them so I don't think it will be an issue
3. 01:13:813 (1) - Due to the prominence of the strong snare drum sound, I feel this plays better as a circle on the downbeat. 01:13:408 (4) plays well as a a slider because of the short, higher-pitched violin sound there, but this note doesn't have the same effect to me feels better yap
4. 01:15:435 (1) - ^ ^
5. 01:17:868 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - "Tap" spacing is kinda awkward and unfitting here imo, since this is all part of the same drumroll and notes are of equal prominence. I personally feel making this into a smoother movement would be better, but if you do want a slightly more challenging pattern, a direction change or increased spacing between 01:18:138 (5,6) would fit better, since the drum roll is played as two 1/3 triplets used the 2nd version with a pattern who can still be played as 6 1/3 (look tricky but isn't)
6. 01:24:354 (1,2,3) - No dash is required for any of the previous combos between 01:18:678 and here, and suddenly dash is required consecutively. I get that this section is really prominent and you want to keep these, so maybe a dash or two in the previous combos would lessen the difficulty spike here which has potential to catch the player unaware. Even if I totally understand it I can't find any legit part where I could add a dash before (btw you can catch those notes without dash)
7. 02:01:651 (3) - Spacing here is right on the border of requiring dash, which has the potential to confuse newer players. Since this is a weaker beat, consider reducing the spacing a little here. 02:01:651 (3,4) to x-232 works better correct
8. 02:08:137 (3) - ^ Whatever you use with the suggestion above, do the same thing here, since the spacings on 02:07:326 (1,2,3,4) are currently quite a bit different from 02:00:840 (1,2,3,4) - currently the movement to (3), the weakest beat, is the largest, which leaves this section feeling inconsistent with your previous patterns slightly changed
9. 02:14:624 (3,4) - Same idea again, since this one is a direct copy of 02:00:840 (1,2,3,4) - 02:14:624 (3,4) to x-280 gives the same effect as I suggested for the original case changed as previously
10. 02:29:624 (4) - Increased distance to this to emphasise the snare drum sound would be nice reduced 1,2,3 spacing and increased 3,4

Platter

1. 00:33:138 (6,1) - There was a triple here in the Salad, but just a 1/3 doublet in the Platter lol. Suggest you do the same things as I suggested there, adding a circle at 00:32:800 triplet removed on salad so no longer relevant owo
2. 00:35:976 (6,7) - Reduce the distance to this doublet from 00:35:705 (5) a little please, since that note combines a strong dash to reach it with a direction change after it, which is a little uncomfortable to play reduced a bit because yap right now it's kinda tricky
3. 00:37:665 (6) - ^ Triplet fits better at 00:37:192 in my opinion, there are more prominent notes in the music to support it that there are here Not added to 00:37:192 but removed (6)
4. 00:37:597 (5,6,1) - If you keep the current pattern, consider reducing the distance a little to here, I feel it's a bit too strong than is required for the music it's mapping restacked a bit
5. 00:58:340 - Kick drum sound here, consider adding a note Don't think it's really needed in the platter but gonna do it in the rain
6. 01:13:408 (4,5,1) - Since the music is quite calm here, I feel this much wiggling is a bit unnecessary. 01:13:678 (5) is a strong note, but I think that moving it to x-296 is enough here Reduced both (4,5) and (5,1) instead
7. 01:28:137 (3) - I can't hear a sound in the music to justify this, but there's a really prominent snare+cymbal sound 1/3 later at 01:28:273 so I suggest moving this note here instead yap
8. 02:25:840 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Spacing on these doubles feels a little random to me - the resulting pattern has the effect of a smooth curve, but with an odd-looking "kink" at 02:26:381 (5,6) that breaks the flow a little. Consider making into a smoother curve, or two triplets with a jump between them for a slightly trickier pattern Changed to a smoother curver
9. 02:31:381 (2) - I can't hear a sound in the music to justify this, please remove it Removed most
10. 02:33:003 (3) - ^ You didn't map a note at 02:39:489 or 02:52:462 which is the same pattern ^
11. 02:37:868 (2) - 02:44:354 (2) - 02:45:976 (3) - 02:50:841 (2) - ^ Same rhythm as before, notes aren't justified ^
12. 02:54:354 (1) - 02:55:976 (1) - 02:57:597 (1) - 02:59:219 (7) - Whilst these hdashes are fine from a ranking criteria perspective, I don't feel they need to be this strong since the music is quite calm. Reducing the distance to each of these a little would be more fitting - ~2.8x DS works nicely, potentially slightly higher (~3.0x) for the last oneReduced to 2,7*, kept the last at 3,4*

Coeur

1. 00:04:354 (2) - A smaller distance from (1) would be welcome here since the dash between 00:03:881 (7,1) is quite strong - 00:04:354 (2,3) to x-52 feels better to me It's already quite small ...
2. 00:23:949 (1) - This hdash is a little stronger than it needs to be in my opinion, and it's making the return jump to 00:24:219 (2,3) pretty uncomfortable. Try moving to x-72 reduced a bit
3. 00:25:030 (6) - This is also a little uncomfortable to dash to, try reducing the distance to here a little please Don't find this one uncomfortable. (6) is +/- vertical so ...
4. 00:29:557 (7) - There's no beat in the music to support this triplet, please remove this note Removed
5. 00:33:205 (6) - As in the other diffs, this triplet note fits better at 00:32:800 not as other diffs, yap
6. 00:38:138 (3) - This is annoying to dash to as it has a high chance of resulting in droplet misses. Rotate 180 degrees and Ctrl+G this please changed the shape only
7. 00:41:043 (2,3,4,5,6) - I don't hear any 1/6 here :'(
8. 00:44:557 (4) - Again, I don't hear a beat here you can justify mapping here :'(
9. 00:58:340 - But there's a note here you could map for a triplet! (^: Yap
10. 01:04:151 (2) - No beat here, but there are drum beats at 01:04:422 - 01:04:692 and 01:05:638 removed (2) and added 01:04:422 and 01:04:692
11. 01:24:084 (10) - Nothing here either sure
12. 01:28:408 (5) - I'd curve this a little more to reduce the distance to 01:28:814 (1) whilst still maintaining the hyper. The direction change to 01:29:084 (2,3) after the hyper is kinda tricky currently Curved a little, I don't think it's that tricky the ar is quite slow so people can see it coming
13. 02:04:016 (5) - 02:10:502 (5) - 02:16:989 (5) - 02:23:475 (5) - Aside from the fact that there are no note in the music here, these triplets feel so artificial and really don't fit with the music at all in my opinion. Please remove them ;w; ;A;
14. 02:13:138 - Prominent beat unmapped here, part of a drumroll at 02:12:867 (1,2,3,4) Not really a fan of adding it and I don't find it so much prominent
15. 02:26:786 - Regarding overmapping, from here until 02:52:732 the same suggestions as in the Platter apply, since you used a similar timleine Same as platter, removed some

This is all from me. Hopefully you find this mod helpful, but if you have any questions, feel free to get back to me and I'll do what I can to help.

Good luck! (:

- Magic Bomb - wrote:

I'm finally here to mod a literal Turtle's Heart.

General

Any reason for letterboxing during breaks? I don't mind if there's a reason, but I think it's better turned off. To turn it or not change nothing and I like this little effect owo

Salad

00:19:895 (2) - x:240, to avoid that double dash, that's not recommended in a salad. Changed a bit the whole (2,3,4) so there isn't a double dash
01:18:678 (1) - x:88? I think this would be a very good place to emphasise a dash, due to the drum and your use of finish here showing it deserves to be emphasised. Increased but not till x:88 owo
01:24:759 (2) - x:216, again to avoid the double dash. same as previously
01:30:435 (2) - This dash doesn't feel required to me with the music. Maybe move this note to x:296? play weirdly yap
01:42:597 (1) - This distance feels a bit overemphasised in my opinion. Moving this to the right a bit more, like x:48, fits the music better to me. reduced a bit

Nice salad overall. No HDashes? Please include gders name in diff name and tags :^) ;A;

Platter

00:02:868 (2,3,4,5) - This exact same sound wasn't a HDash earlier. Move this section to x:204, to better suit the music and be more consistent. Simplified the intro
00:06:111 (2,3,4) - x:268, ^, and also the HDash after this doesn't seem very fitting either, the drum sound isn't that strong, a normal dash works fine. ^
00:10:570 (1) - There's barely even a drumbeat here. If anything, have a normal dash by moving this to x:408. Still totaly ok for me. Reduced what come after anyway
00:18:543 (6) - x:488, keeps this HDash but weakens it slightly to make it feel better for a newer player into the slider. reduced but changed (7) too
00:25:029 (6,7,8) - This drum beat isn't really strong enough for a HDash at this kind of difficulty. Move this section to x:72, to better fit the drum beat, with a normal dash. Moved to avoid the 5,6 hdash
00:26:381 (3) - However, a HDash would fit really nicely here for the cymbal. Try x:192. (1,2) plays better and having both is a bit too much
00:59:219 (1) - x:496, HDashes against the wall trigger me. This keeps the HDash, but takes it away from the wall. HI DIEF
01:05:705 (1) - x:480, ^, these things can cause dqs sometimes. U CUTE
01:30:030 (7) - Please curve this the other way, like this, for example, this slider how it is currently would cause misses for platter players due to them trying to catch all the droplets. Ok this one was evil xD
01:34:286 (7,1,2) - A HDash to this would work nicely for the very strong drum sound here. One way to make this without ruining the flow of the following section is to move this section to x:368. prefer to keep those sounds as dash instead of hdash for the platter
01:37:530 (7,1,2) - ^, however, instead of a more simple fix like that, a way I found was to move 7 to x:104, 1 to x:48, and 2 to x:136. ^
01:44:016 (7) - This is a timing jump how it is now, which I wouldn't recommend on platters. I think a HDash would work nicely here for the strong drum beat, so move this to x:304. slightly reduced
02:34:759 (5,1) - Timing jumps are bad in platters. Move this to x:124. reduced

I feel like this platter has quite a lot of HDashes, but hopefully this should be fixed by these points.

French Word

00:02:057 (7,8) - x:296, a hyper here doesn't really fit due to the strength of this note being weaker than the hyper before and after. Keeping the hdash but reduced it
00:05:300 (7,8) - x:244, ^ ^
00:06:381 (4,5) - The double HDash of 2,3,4, feels awkward to me, and 4 doesn't really feel strong enough to have a HDash to it in my opinion. A nice flowing option would be to have 4 at x:320, and then 5 at x:472. This also keeps the HDash to 6. Removed the (3,4) hdash and changed a bit what you suggested to avoid a too big gap between either (3,4) and (4,5).
00:19:489 (1,2,3) - I think this would be a really nice place for 3 HDashes, the emphasis put on these notes by the finish would fit this. Added between (1,2) & (2,3)
00:25:436 (8,9) - HDash from 8 to 9 feels better than HDash from 7 to 8, as the strong drum beat is on 9. A nice movement here would be 8 to x:272, and then 9 to x:488, this also makes a lead in to the HDash from 10 which makes the flow feel good. ay
00:45:570 (7) - x:344 please, feels a lot nicer to play. It change nothing for me . A bit changed the curve of the slider.
01:16:786 (6,7) - I think this pattern flows better with a slightly stronger curve to ease out of the HDash to this better. Move 6 to x:144 and 7 to x:124. Prefer to keep the lil' amount of "difficulty" here.
01:24:354 (1,2,3) - Again, 3 HDashes please. Same as before
02:02:597 (2,3) - Steeper curve please, for better flow from this HDash. 2 to x:64, and 3 to x:40. ayy/color]
02:29:759 (5) - Move to x:160, for better flow from the hyper. This just feels weird to play right now.
02:33:003 (3) - x:92, ^.
02:36:246 (5) - x:172, ^.

Really nice map overall.

Alright, done

Droplets OP

Pawsu wrote:

AHH BEST SONG. LOVE U KRAH

Emiru wrote:

god mapper ＼(º □ º l|l)/