1. Easy (1.44 stars, 114 notes)
2. Normal (1.96 stars, 210 notes)

z1085684963 wrote:

SPOILER

MP3音量有点低
[Normal]
00:48:532 (3) - blanket 改了
00:51:412 (2) - blanket 加了点弧度
这sv感觉像是hard wwwww
[easy]
00:15:890 (1) - blanket 不行啊，因为ds的原因包不了
在easy里用这么多遮挡没问题吗 也许吧

1. 配色应该冷色，背景图都是冷色，歌声应该也是冷色，所以青蓝紫会比较好
2. 音效声音太大了，主歌音量30，副歌50就够了，最后一段20
3. soft-whistle用默认的好

1. 00:23:090 (3,4) - 然而flow并不好，而且也不建议这样短时间内叠，前后调整下http://puu.sh/gGHHq.jpg
2. 00:41:332 (3,1) - 头碰头的话flow会比较好，但是尾对尾就不好了，勉强这样试试http://puu.sh/gGI5H.jpg
3. 00:48:052 (2,3) - 这是逼死强迫症
4. 00:58:613 (3,4) - 最好不要擦到
5. 01:06:294 (1,2,3) - 前后调整下http://puu.sh/gGI1f.jpg
6. 02:27:900 - 圈，转盘这里开始02:28:380 -

1. 00:25:010 - 加break
2. 00:36:051 (2,1) - 可以设计个blanket
3. 00:39:893 (3,1) - 这种其实真的不好
4. 01:15:894 - 加break
5. 01:39:416 (1,2) - 不要擦边
6. 02:28:380 - 转盘这里开始

liangv587 wrote:

SPOILER

[General]

1. 配色应该冷色，背景图都是冷色，歌声应该也是冷色，所以青蓝紫会比较好 印象中不能太接近底图颜色，暂时保持
2. 音效声音太大了，主歌音量30，副歌50就够了，最后一段20 √
3. soft-whistle用默认的好√

[Normal]

1. 00:23:090 (3,4) - 然而flow并不好，而且也不建议这样短时间内叠，前后调整下http://puu.sh/gGHHq.jpg
2. 00:41:332 (3,1) - 头碰头的话flow会比较好，但是尾对尾就不好了，勉强这样试试http://puu.sh/gGI5H.jpg
3. 00:48:052 (2,3) - 这是逼死强迫症√
4. 00:58:613 (3,4) - 最好不要擦到 √
5. 01:06:294 (1,2,3) - 前后调整下http://puu.sh/gGI1f.jpg
6. 02:27:900 - 圈，转盘这里开始02:28:380 - 神改！

然而我看不了puush图。。。
[Easy]

1. 00:25:010 - 加break √
2. 00:36:051 (2,1) - 可以设计个blanket 我试试
3. 00:39:893 (3,1) - 这种其实真的不好 唉
4. 01:15:894 - 加break √
5. 01:39:416 (1,2) - 不要擦边 √
6. 02:28:380 - 转盘这里开始√

Raiden wrote:

Hey there! Raiden from my mod queue :3

Easy

1. 00:40:373 (1) - Change the form of the slider? To something like http://puu.sh/gJoW3.jpg
   
2. 00:51:894 (1) - Change form of slider?
   
3. 00:57:654 (1) - ^ done
   
4. 01:09:175 (1) - ^
   
5. 01:27:896 (1) - ^
   
6. 01:36:536 (1) - ^
   
7. 01:52:377 (3) - ^
   
8. 02:19:740 (1) - ^
   
   I'm saying this because in an Easy difficulty, a newbie player shouldn't have reading problems, and these sliders can give some trouble in my opinion ^^'

Normal

1. Overall: change CS to 3,0? hummm, want keep
   
2. 01:25:015 (1) - Change form of slider?
   
3. 01:39:416 (1) - ^

Chaoslitz wrote:

SPOILER

[Easy]

1. 00:37:492 (1,2) - Suggest you to put 00:38:931 (2) above to have better flow will try. orz
2. 00:38:931 (2) - Avoid stack like this in an Easy diff keep temporary if BN say not
3. 00:47:573 (2) - Curve up instead? Since you curved down in 00:46:133 (1) done
4. 00:57:654 (1) - Move out tail a little bit done
5. 01:01:493 (2,3) - Same as 00:38:931 (2)
6. 01:04:855 (2,1) - ^
7. 01:25:015 (1,2,3,1) - ^
8. 01:30:777 (1,2) - ^ x.x QAQ
9. 01:38:936 (3,1) - ^
10. 01:43:737 (2) - Try another shape instead? as it overlapped with 01:42:297 (1) keep
11. 01:49:017 (2,3) - Remove stack
12. 01:50:937 (1,3) - ^
13. 02:01:498 (3,1) - ^
14. 02:25:500 (1) - Curve up?done

[Normal]

1. Use CS 3/3.5 instead hmmm, keep
2. 00:23:090 (3,4) - Same as Easy, remove stack, still it is not suggested to use in Normal diff QAQ
3. 00:33:171 (1) - Remove NC √
4. 00:41:332 (3,1,2) - This pattern may mislead players to hit 00:42:772 (2) instead of 00:42:292 (1) fixed
5. 00:59:093 (4) - curve up a bit, nearly touch 00:58:613 (3)
6. 01:16:855 (3,4) - remove stack
7. 01:37:976 (4,5) - Try this?:
   keep
8. 01:40:856 (4,1) - overlapped fixed
9. 01:50:937 (1,2) - Not suggested to use this pattern
10. 02:01:018 (4,5) - Same as 01:37:976 (4,5)
11. 02:16:859 (1,2,3) - flow here looks weird QAQ

good luck :3

1. 00:39:892 (3,1) - Probably shouldn't stack like this in an easy
2. 00:43:253 (1) - You could ctrl+g here to change up flow and emphasize the vocals a bit more
3. 00:54:774 (1) - Flip the curve for flow change and accentuate vocals again
4. 01:01:493 (2,3) - Avoid stacks like this
5. 01:04:855 (2,1) - ^
6. 01:25:015 (1,2) - ^
   yeah you probably get my point with these stacks lol
7. 01:33:656 (1) - imo a ctrl+j would play better here, the angle of movement from the previous slider feels kind of tight

• Try CS 3.7~ it's already quite a big jump from the easy difficulty
  Also don't forget those stacks ;w;

1. 00:59:093 (4) - A larger curve would look much nicer like in 01:00:533 (1)
2. 02:00:058 (2,3) - Try to move these so the tail of (2) isn't so close

sukiNathan wrote:

SPOILER

from #modreqs

[Easy]

1. 00:39:892 (3,1) - Probably shouldn't stack like this in an easy about this stack, arranged for the time being
2. 00:43:253 (1) - You could ctrl+g here to change up flow and emphasize the vocals a bit more
3. 00:54:774 (1) - Flip the curve for flow change and accentuate vocals again
4. 01:01:493 (2,3) - Avoid stacks like this
5. 01:04:855 (2,1) - ^
6. 01:25:015 (1,2) - ^
   yeah you probably get my point with these stacks lol ORZ....
7. 01:33:656 (1) - imo a ctrl+j would play better here, the angle of movement from the previous slider feels kind of tight keep because the stack...

[Normal]

• Try CS 3.7~ it's already quite a big jump from the easy difficulty
  Also don't forget those stacks ;w; i know...

1. 00:59:093 (4) - A larger curve would look much nicer like in 01:00:533 (1) keep for better flow
2. 02:00:058 (2,3) - Try to move these so the tail of (2) isn't so close done

Nice map, not much to say

m1223961117 wrote:

SPOILER

晚來了~~

這張圖我好像之前有載過，不過沒有認真去看

[Easy]

1. 聲音好小聲...還是我的聽力有問題 (要不要把所有難度的聲音提高10%，沒辦法合音樂的話就算了)
2. 我只有抓到比較危險的幾個地方: 01:27:896 (1) - 01:52:377 (3) - 02:13:979 (1) -
   
   這三條Slider靠右側的那個我想應該沒問題，我拉過Slider去貼他只超出點陣圖的一格...
   剩下兩個尾巴有點低，能不能往上調一下??
   
   其实这几个地方超界反倒是次要，要改就要重下取消重叠了，总之先改超界

[Normal]

• 
  00:23:570 (4) - 沒跟DS沒關係嗎?? 這裡也是01:18:295 (4) - 01:47:337 (4) - 小程度大约0.1左右误差可以归为ds的
  00:49:972 (3) - 我自己會改成Circle，我的Mapping直覺告訴我要這樣作 (無視掉沒差)
  01:23:095 (3) - ^

1. 後面音量太小要憑感覺打了....

就這樣，抱歉這麼晚才過來
今天沉澱一下心情準備摸大量的圖，這是第一張
這張我看已經可以找BN了，星星送你祝你一臂之力
早日Rank

Gray Veyron wrote:

Hello! Ticket used from my queue!

I found this map quite great! So ... ~

[> General <]

1. - Timing Check: I think the BPM is actually 125BPM, it'd still be the same as you've made. 124.990 more appropriate imo ;w;
2. - Just Easy and Normal? Nothing harder?cant make hard for this song Orz
3. - I don't think soft-hitclap and soft-hitfinish sounds fitting to the song like this one. But maybe you could try another softer custom hitsounds unlike this one. √

[> Easy <]

1. 00:30:291 (2,1,2) - Are you planning to make a blanket here? or not? done
2. 00:38:931 (2,1) - Is this overlap on purpose? fixed
3. 00:47:573 (2,3) - Maybe you should try another pattern than this one, sth like blanket or circularize. done
4. 01:35:096 (2,1) - Same as 00:38:931 (2,1) - fixed
5. 01:59:578 (1,3) - A little recorrect blanket. done
6. 02:04:378 (3,1) - I think you could make a double blanket here a bit? √
7. - Some overlaps doesn't like okay to me, but most i found are quite amazing!

[> Normal <]

1. 00:57:173 (5,2) - Stack or sth? fixed stack
2. 01:14:934 (1,3,4) - ^
3. 02:03:418 (3,4) - Recorrect blanket or sth? done
4. - Perfection.

Get me back when you're done! B)