No Dap wrote:

Hi~ from #modreq
Random short mod to give you a general idea on how to map easier diffs

[General]

1. SV (slider velocity) in lower diffs are extremely fast. you really should lower them
2. also I don't believe in this decimal bpm...
3. Hard diff needs major nerf for better spread. the spacing is really too big

[Easy]

1. OD3 HP3 seems too harsh for the easiest diff. try to lower them by 1 each.
2. 1.2 SV in easy diff is probably unacceptable. I strongly suggest you lower it to .8~1.0 range
3. 00:05:878 (1,2,1) - usually overlapping like this in the easiest diff is a really bad idea. New players tend to click whatever is closest instead of looking for what to actually hit.
4. 00:10:492 (2) - you also usually don't do this. slider is way to short to react for new players to realize there are multiple reverse arrows.
5. 00:15:106 (1,2) - same as above
6. 00:16:644 (2,1) - you really should keep the distance in each note consistent in easier diffs. so it is easier for new players to read the rhythm.
7. 00:22:797 (2,3,4) - you usually don't stack notes under sliders in easy diffs. moreover, you have another stacked note 00:24:719 (4) - with different measure of rhythm apart. so it's a really bad idea
8. 00:27:411 (1,2) - this is same as 00:10:492 (2) -
9. 00:30:487 (1,2) - the stacks are off. and also I prefer you don't stack like this. same reason as 00:05:878 (1,2,1) -
10. 00:33:564 (1,2) - this stack is hard, and also 00:33:564 (1) - you know what i'm talking about
11. 00:35:102 (2,3) - the cirfcle is almost touching the slider, rearrange a little so players have a better view, for example
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 00:38:178 (2,1) - this stack will confuse the poop out of new players
13. 00:39:716 (1,1) - the overlap should be gone
14. 00:41:639 (1,2,3,4) - this is a really confusing placement. the stack must be unstakced
15. 00:42:792 (4,1,2,3) - this is an unrankable pattern for an easy diff i think
16. 00:50:483 (3) - same as 00:10:492 (2) -
17. 00:55:097 (1,2) - usually the reason why we use lower SV in easy diff is to have new players react better, but lower SV also lets us have more space to use because we will be using long sliders like this. so I really suggest you to lower your SV and you will be able to have a better pattern here.
18. 00:56:635 (2,1,2,3,4,1) - really really hard
19. 01:04:710 (3,1) - overlap
20. 01:12:593 (1,2) - try things like this, a lot better to read and the unnecessary overlap is gone.
    
    SPOILER

    
21. 01:14:708 (3,4) - same as 00:10:492 (2) -
22. 01:24:321 (1) - spinner ending at 01:27:013 - has more impact to the finish imo.

I haven't looked at anything else yet, so
I think that's about it..

• i would like to remind you, since this is the easiest diff in the mapset and dedicated for beginners, please use the same ds thorough the diff until the end. when i testplayed it, i already noticed some violation against the ds because you wanted to make a symmetry (like 00:05:861 (1,2) - )
  
  and personally idk why you make old-styled curved slider like 00:15:092 (1) - 00:16:631 (2) - when you can just use 3 nodes to make simple curves like http://puu.sh/drhjV/37f98f3529.jpg since no one used old-style sliders anymore. mappers nowadays prefer 3 nodes curve

1. 00:04:323 (2,1) - fix the ds between them, should be 1.0x
2. 00:05:861 (1,2) - ^ dang it this one is really far. ctrl+G the (2) slider then adjust the ds, but it will make the appearance horrible, so i kinda tweaked the slider's shape and here's what i made http://puu.sh/drgSV/49b9dcc253.jpg or if you want to change the slider's shape yourself, then that's cool . when you fix this, you should also adjust 00:08:938 (1) - prior to the change above
3. 00:10:477 (2) - lmao just use 1/4 beat snap divisor then use this rhythm http://puu.sh/drhbo/9b82d5aef2.jpg fits more with the song :3
4. 00:18:554 (1,2,1) - slider's formation isn't really good. i suggest to place 00:21:246 (1) - somewhere else
5. 00:25:861 (1,2) - fix the ds between them, should be 1.0x
6. 00:27:400 (1,2) - ^
7. 00:36:246 (3,1) - ^
8. 00:36:246 (3,1) - move to 188|148 so it'll be encircled by 01:19:708 (2) - better
9. 01:24:323 (1) - i think ending the spinner at 01:27:400 - is more suitable with the song
   
   overall, you followed the vocal too much. idk usually in easy diffs, people follow the normal 1/4 rhythm and the steady instrument more, which is kinda repetitive, so beginners can follow the rhythm easily, since they can't predict the change of rhythm very well

• also since this is normal, the ds should also be the same thorough the diff

1. 00:10:092 (2,1) - dangit the distance is really far. this is really hard for normal. i suggest to use normal ds
2. 00:10:477 (1,2,3) - i suggest to unstack these and place the circles elsewhere because idk more fun to play when we move our mouse more
3. 00:17:785 (4,1) - also please use the normal ds here. the low spacing when their rhythm is quite far (1/4 beat) can trick the players. if it's hard/insane then it's not really a problem
4. 00:20:477 (3,1) - fix the ds between them. should be 1.0x
5. 00:22:400 (2,3) - dangit the distance is really far. this is really hard for normal. i suggest to use normal ds
6. 00:25:092 (2,1) - also please use the normal ds here. the low spacing when their rhythm is quite far (1/4 beat) can trick the players. if it's hard/insane then it's not really a problem
7. 00:39:323 (2,1) - fix the ds between them. should be 1.0x
8. 00:41:631 (4,1) - ^
9. 01:06:246 (1,2,3) - fix the stack properly
10. 01:17:785 (5) - rhythm suggestion. this one fits the vocal more, since you're following it http://puu.sh/dripD/2c4732f956.jpg
11. 01:24:323 (1) - i think ending the spinner at 01:27:400 - is more suitable with the song

• when i testplayed this, some sv changes don't really fit the song and it's kinda awkward when i played it. for example, 00:35:861 (1) - 00:37:015 (5) - 00:45:861 (4,6) - 01:00:477 (3) - 01:18:746 (2,3) - 01:21:246 (1,3) - 01:22:785 (1) - there's no significant change in the music (like, for example, the music suddenly turned into a quiet atmosphere) that can be accented with lower sv and yet you lowered it, even though the instrument in this song is still loud. i know that you're trying to emphasize the vocal, but it's really uncomfortable to play. maybe if it's insane diff, then it's okay

1. 00:07:977 (3,4) - fix the stack
2. 00:09:515 (3,4) - really prefer if you stack these like the previous pattern 00:06:438 (3,4) - 00:07:977 (3,4) -
3. 00:10:477 (6) - lmao i was shocked with this speedup because at this part the song is still quiet and the fast kick-slider this is really weird. if you still want to keep this, i suggest to nc this to warn the players
4. 00:24:708 (1,2) - fix the stack. it's a bit off
5. 00:27:785 (2,3) - well this one is kinda weird idk if i were you, i'd make this a normal reversed slider http://puu.sh/drj9W/f1bd29b4a1.jpg
6. 00:47:785 (1,2) - fix the stack. it's a bit off. you can turn off the Grid Snap when fixing this
7. 00:48:938 (5,6) - ^
8. 01:06:246 (3,5) - only suggestion for better blanket, i guess http://puu.sh/drjnC/10475ab1f5.jpg
9. 01:12:015 (4) - nc
10. 01:14:708 (1,2) - fix the stack. it's a bit off. you can turn off the Grid Snap when fixing this
11. 01:21:246 (1,2,3) - next time when you wanted to make a blanket or things like this, you can use the approach circle as an anchor to adjust the blanket http://puu.sh/drjyc/5d719f8553.jpg
12. 01:25:477 (1) - i think ending the spinner at 01:27:400 - is more suitable with the song
    
    kinda fun when i played it, but the flow is really rough

• idk im not really good at insane

1. 00:18:938 (1) - remove nc
2. 00:19:323 (1) - ^, add nc at 00:19:708 (2) - , then remove nc at 00:20:477 (1) -
3. 00:53:746 (1,4) - you can improve the blanket. i usually place 00:53:746 (1) - near the slider's rhythm so i can use the approach circle to adjust the blanket http://puu.sh/drkil/c8451ed08c.jpg
4. 01:05:477 (3,1) - what's with this anti-jump
5. 01:11:631 (1,2) - switch nc
6. 01:27:111 (8) - ending this at blue tick is really weird ok when i listened to the music the cymbal noises are exactly at 01:27:400 -

1. 00:04:323 (1,3) - don't really like it when (1) overlap the previous slider, so i suggest this pattern http://puu.sh/drkJ4/0434f82495.jpg makes the appearance better and more jumpy
2. 00:10:477 (1) - lmao this slider is srsly small and kinda weird when i played it so i suggest to change this into two consecutive circles
3. 00:32:208 (2,3) - i prefer to unstack this, since the slider is really short
4. 00:45:861 (4) - nc
5. 00:46:246 (6) - the slowed down sv doesn't really fit the gameplay
6. 00:48:169 (4,5) - well yes overlap are quite common these days, but if the overlap covered the whole slider border like this, i suppose it's unrankable because it's impossible for player to read for the first time, even though this kind of slider is rankable in the old days, now it's not. also you can refer to Ranking Criteria
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:51:631 (3,4) - you can improve the blanket http://puu.sh/drliU/cf9feaceba.jpg
8. 00:57:785 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - lmao dang it
9. 01:03:265 (9,1) - wtf this is really hard to read
10. 01:04:708 (1) - this slowed-down slider is like a turn off like idk there's no significant change in the music and there's nothing to emphasize in the vocal
11. 01:07:977 (3,4,5,6) - also really hard to read lmao
12. 01:09:900 (4,5) - since this rhythm is a triplet, i suggest to stack it. the current one is really hard to read
13. 01:15:092 (1,2) - also this slowed-down slider is like a turn off, same reason like 01:04:708 (1) -
14. 01:19:708 (1,3,5) - ^
    
    also really weird when you put a bunch of streams when the vocal is holding a long note lol but i guess it's your preference so yeah up to you

• i think this diff kinda represent how you actually express the song, with a lot of sv change according to the vocal, so i won't point those out in here

1. 00:45:092 (9) - only suggestion, ctrl+G makes the flow better
2. 01:01:246 (1,2) - make them curve better http://puu.sh/drm0h/870feedfcf.jpg you can do it by overlapping their border at first (like http://puu.sh/drm5p/3aa108ff96.jpg) then when they're curved exactly the same, you separate it
3. 01:14:708 (1,2,3) - stacks are a bit off. turn off the Grid Snap when fixing this
   
   same like insane, about the streams at the ending

Kocari wrote:

Here and as requested from modding queue. This is probably my 3rd time modding this song =)

[Easy]

00:05:861 (1) - Use DS and snap this in place OK
Starting at this time 00:10:477 do something like this because it sounds better and doesn't have many repeats on the slider to take off the tension http://puu.sh/dqGYx/4cde6fc638.jpg OK
00:30:477 (1) - DS OK
01:05:861 (4) - Same also 01:15:092 (4) What's that mean? Hold
01:21:246 (3,4) - These two sliders can be simplified with a red tick with something like this for both sliders http://puu.sh/dqHf5/fb91bfd5e2.jpg OK
01:24:323 (1) - Spinner sound should end on 01:27:400 OK

[Normal]

Spacing here is a little too close. There isn't much spacing between the notes, so it feels like it's overlayed. I wouldn't want you to go back and use 1.1-1.3 depending on what you choose but I will mod it as it is. Genearlly just the beginning of the song where the SV is really slow
00:10:477 (1) - Too big of a jump please use DS OK
00:15:092 (1) - Whistleslide isn't necessary here otherwise you would have to implement it in every other note for balance. So removing it wouldn't do you any harm OK
00:21:246 (1) - DS OK
00:22:785 (3,1) - Snap please jumps are not necessary in a normal difficulty map OK
00:27:400 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - Sequence is going to be a little too hard to be called a "normal" difficulty map OK, I separate.
00:35:285 (2) - Snap OK
01:25:477 (1) - Ends the same OK

Hope I could've helped you in any way. If you have questions or concern about my mod please contact me I will be glad to help you Have a good day dear friend

AlpacaCokelat wrote:

Hi! from queue :3

[Easy]

• i would like to remind you, since this is the easiest diff in the mapset and dedicated for beginners, please use the same ds thorough the diff until the end. when i testplayed it, i already noticed some violation against the ds because you wanted to make a symmetry (like 00:05:861 (1,2) - )
  
  and personally idk why you make old-styled curved slider like 00:15:092 (1) - 00:16:631 (2) - when you can just use 3 nodes to make simple curves like http://puu.sh/drhjV/37f98f3529.jpg since no one used old-style sliders anymore. mappers nowadays prefer 3 nodes curve OK, I del 1 node

1. 00:04:323 (2,1) - fix the ds between them, should be 1.0x OK
2. 00:05:861 (1,2) - ^ dang it this one is really far. ctrl+G the (2) slider then adjust the ds, but it will make the appearance horrible, so i kinda tweaked the slider's shape and here's what i made http://puu.sh/drgSV/49b9dcc253.jpg or if you want to change the slider's shape yourself, then that's cool . when you fix this, you should also adjust 00:08:938 (1) - prior to the change above OK
3. 00:10:477 (2) - lmao just use 1/4 beat snap divisor then use this rhythm http://puu.sh/drhbo/9b82d5aef2.jpg fits more with the song :3 OK
4. 00:18:554 (1,2,1) - slider's formation isn't really good. i suggest to place 00:21:246 (1) - somewhere else OK
5. 00:25:861 (1,2) - fix the ds between them, should be 1.0x OK
6. 00:27:400 (1,2) - ^ OK
7. 00:36:246 (3,1) - ^ OK
8. 00:36:246 (3,1) - move to 188|148 so it'll be encircled by 01:19:708 (2) - better Didn't use.
9. 01:24:323 (1) - i think ending the spinner at 01:27:400 - is more suitable with the song OK
   
   overall, you followed the vocal too much. idk usually in easy diffs, people follow the normal 1/4 rhythm and the steady instrument more, which is kinda repetitive, so beginners can follow the rhythm easily, since they can't predict the change of rhythm very well

[Normal]

• also since this is normal, the ds should also be the same thorough the diff

1. 00:10:092 (2,1) - dangit the distance is really far. this is really hard for normal. i suggest to use normal ds OK
2. 00:10:477 (1,2,3) - i suggest to unstack these and place the circles elsewhere because idk more fun to play when we move our mouse more OK
3. 00:17:785 (4,1) - also please use the normal ds here. the low spacing when their rhythm is quite far (1/4 beat) can trick the players. if it's hard/insane then it's not really a problem OK
4. 00:20:477 (3,1) - fix the ds between them. should be 1.0x OK
5. 00:22:400 (2,3) - dangit the distance is really far. this is really hard for normal. i suggest to use normal ds OK
6. 00:25:092 (2,1) - also please use the normal ds here. the low spacing when their rhythm is quite far (1/4 beat) can trick the players. if it's hard/insane then it's not really a problem OK
7. 00:39:323 (2,1) - fix the ds between them. should be 1.0x OK
8. 00:41:631 (4,1) - ^ OK
9. 01:06:246 (1,2,3) - fix the stack properly OK
10. 01:17:785 (5) - rhythm suggestion. this one fits the vocal more, since you're following it http://puu.sh/dripD/2c4732f956.jpg OK
11. 01:24:323 (1) - i think ending the spinner at 01:27:400 - is more suitable with the song OK

[Hard]

• when i testplayed this, some sv changes don't really fit the song and it's kinda awkward when i played it. for example, 00:35:861 (1) - 00:37:015 (5) - 00:45:861 (4,6) - 01:00:477 (3) - 01:18:746 (2,3) - 01:21:246 (1,3) - 01:22:785 (1) - there's no significant change in the music (like, for example, the music suddenly turned into a quiet atmosphere) that can be accented with lower sv and yet you lowered it, even though the instrument in this song is still loud. i know that you're trying to emphasize the vocal, but it's really uncomfortable to play. maybe if it's insane diff, then it's okay Some fix

1. 00:07:977 (3,4) - fix the stack OK
2. 00:09:515 (3,4) - really prefer if you stack these like the previous pattern 00:06:438 (3,4) - 00:07:977 (3,4) - OK
3. 00:10:477 (6) - lmao i was shocked with this speedup because at this part the song is still quiet and the fast kick-slider this is really weird. if you still want to keep this, i suggest to nc this to warn the players Redone
4. 00:24:708 (1,2) - fix the stack. it's a bit off OK
5. 00:27:785 (2,3) - well this one is kinda weird idk if i were you, i'd make this a normal reversed slider OKhttp://puu.sh/drj9W/f1bd29b4a1.jpg
6. 00:47:785 (1,2) - fix the stack. it's a bit off. you can turn off the Grid Snap when fixing this OK
7. 00:48:938 (5,6) - ^ OK
8. 01:06:246 (3,5) - only suggestion for better blanket, i guess http://puu.sh/drjnC/10475ab1f5.jpg OK
9. 01:12:015 (4) - nc OK
10. 01:14:708 (1,2) - fix the stack. it's a bit off. you can turn off the Grid Snap when fixing this OK
11. 01:21:246 (1,2,3) - next time when you wanted to make a blanket or things like this, you can use the approach circle as an anchor to adjust the blanket http://puu.sh/drjyc/5d719f8553.jpg OK, thanks your method
12. 01:25:477 (1) - i think ending the spinner at 01:27:400 - is more suitable with the song OK
    
    kinda fun when i played it, but the flow is really rough

[MiaoFUuU's Insane]

• idk im not really good at insane

1. 00:18:938 (1) - remove nc
2. 00:19:323 (1) - ^, add nc at 00:19:708 (2) - , then remove nc at 00:20:477 (1) -
3. 00:53:746 (1,4) - you can improve the blanket. i usually place 00:53:746 (1) - near the slider's rhythm so i can use the approach circle to adjust the blanket http://puu.sh/drkil/c8451ed08c.jpg
4. 01:05:477 (3,1) - what's with this anti-jump
5. 01:11:631 (1,2) - switch nc
6. 01:27:111 (8) - ending this at blue tick is really weird ok when i listened to the music the cymbal noises are exactly at 01:27:400 -

[Insane]

1. 00:04:323 (1,3) - don't really like it when (1) overlap the previous slider, so i suggest this pattern http://puu.sh/drkJ4/0434f82495.jpg makes the appearance better and more jumpy OK
2. 00:10:477 (1) - lmao this slider is srsly small and kinda weird when i played it so i suggest to change this into two consecutive circles OK
3. 00:32:208 (2,3) - i prefer to unstack this, since the slider is really short OK
4. 00:45:861 (4) - nc OK
5. 00:46:246 (6) - the slowed down sv doesn't really fit the gameplay OK, Maybe I have no sence on sv :c
6. 00:48:169 (4,5) - well yes overlap are quite common these days, but if the overlap covered the whole slider border like this, i suppose it's unrankable because it's impossible for player to read for the first time, even though this kind of slider is rankable in the old days, now it's not. also you can refer to Ranking Criteria
   
   SPOILER

   
   OK
7. 00:51:631 (3,4) - you can improve the blanket http://puu.sh/drliU/cf9feaceba.jpg OK
8. 00:57:785 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - lmao dang it
9. 01:03:265 (9,1) - wtf this is really hard to read Edited.
10. 01:04:708 (1) - this slowed-down slider is like a turn off like idk there's no significant change in the music and there's nothing to emphasize in the vocal Now hold. I have no idea.
11. 01:07:977 (3,4,5,6) - also really hard to read lmao I'll try to improve it.
12. 01:09:900 (4,5) - since this rhythm is a triplet, i suggest to stack it. the current one is really hard to read OK
13. 01:15:092 (1,2) - also this slowed-down slider is like a turn off, same reason like 01:04:708 (1) - Hold
14. 01:19:708 (1,3,5) - ^ Hold
    
    also really weird when you put a bunch of streams when the vocal is holding a long note lol but i guess it's your preference so yeah up to you

[Unlimited Blade Works]

• i think this diff kinda represent how you actually express the song, with a lot of sv change according to the vocal, so i won't point those out in here

1. 00:45:092 (9) - only suggestion, ctrl+G makes the flow better OK
2. 01:01:246 (1,2) - make them curve better http://puu.sh/drm0h/870feedfcf.jpg you can do it by overlapping their border at first (like http://puu.sh/drm5p/3aa108ff96.jpg) then when they're curved exactly the same, you separate it OK
3. 01:14:708 (1,2,3) - stacks are a bit off. turn off the Grid Snap when fixing this OK
   
   same like insane, about the streams at the ending

your mapping's still a bit rough, but your style is quite unique, i think. i suggest to see other ranked maps and learn their patterns and flow, like how they place their sliders and circles accordingly so that the player can enjoy it when they played it. i guess your forte's in mapping insaney diff, since your insane diffs are great

anyway goodluck~!

m1223961117 wrote:

好好，久等了
最近忙自己的圖，生活中的大小事情都忘了處理，抱歉
確定喵呼~(MiaoFUuU)大大可以用中文我就安心了

From Online PM:

在Mod之前，給大大一個貼心的建議
不是你的Diff的Mod，留言(Quote)內容可以刪除
這樣比較不占空間 窩心

General
1. 請問Custom音效是從自己的Skin弄下來的嗎?? 如果是的話，我認為很沒必要，還不如使用預設的音效還比較好。畢竟從Skin上的音效用在個人我認為可以是合乎情理的，但用在Mapping上，我100%會否定它的使用性。簡單來說，我想請你換音效
2. 會有人請你把Design裡面的選項去掉，自己注意一下(我認為全圖有一致就沒問題...)
3. 我希望兩位大大請把自己最難的難度通關的圖像PM給我，讓我了解一下狀況 (請不要開NF，FC最好)


Easy
00:15:092 (1) - 尾巴拉到00:16:246，接歌詞很奇怪 已修正
00:20:861 - 我認為把這個鼓聲做出來會很棒 已修正
00:39:708 (1) - 改成帶箭頭的Slider吧，這Slider看了有點不舒服... 已修正
00:45:861 (1) - 建議Spinner不要亂擺，這樣擺在審核的過程當中會讓你自己很頭痛(親身經歷... )。刪掉它 已修正
00:52:015 (1) - ^ 已修正
再給大大一個建議，Spinner我個人推薦擺在最尾巴的重點音，比如歌詞或吉他長音。以大大這首歌的話推薦01:24:323 - 01:27:400 (1) (擺對了 )
00:55:092 (1,2) - 這兩個Slider都改成這樣?? 00:38:169 (2,3) 已修正
整張Easy難度是要給最開始的新手玩的，同時我也認為這是最難做的，我希望大大可以把圖的走向做得順暢一點。依我現在的感覺，我覺得很亂，新手會不知道下一個物件的走向在哪，請大大特別注意


Normal
※請不要使用變速綠線在Hard以下的難度，你的Distance Snap就沒辦法遵照固定值在走了。間距一致是Easy和Normal的重點 改成全部1.0了
00:11:631 (2,3) - 不要疊在Slider下面，全部分開來 已修正
00:17:785 (4) - ^ 已修正
00:23:938 (4) - ^ 已修正
00:27:015 (2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 超過8個單點Circle的感覺你懂的，中間有一些可以換Slider的地方 已修正
00:31:631 (2) - 疊在(4)的位置，走向比較順 已修正
00:33:554 (1,2) - 這兩個合成一個Slider試試看，推薦大大使用 已修正
00:35:285 (2,3) - ^ 已修正
00:37:015 (1) - 不符合規定，不能疊在帶箭頭的Slider下方 已修正
00:39:323 (2) - ^ 已修正
00:45:861 (1) - 不解釋了 已修正
00:49:323 (5) - 同上 已修正
00:52:785 (1) - Spinner結尾在00:54:323，不改不符合規定 已修正
00:55:861 (1) - 刪掉它跟音樂 已重作
01:02:400 (1,2) - DS規定 速度已修正
01:05:477 (6) - 不符合規定 已修正
01:07:015 (2,3) - ^ 已修正
01:14:708 (1,2,3) - 建議大大不要疊超過2個Circle比較好，會被抓Mod 已修正
01:22:400 (6) - 不解釋 已修正
01:23:938 (2,3) - 不符合規定 已修正


Hard
00:10:285 (5) - 我個人認為刪掉這個，遵從前段的節奏感 已刪
00:16:535 (2) - 刪掉這個 已刪
00:32:015 (1,2) - 你打過一遍之後眼睛不會花嗎 ?? 已修正，改成帶箭頭的slider
00:58:554 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - 多善用Slider，這已經是Insane級別的擺法了 已修正
總體來說，請大大多空出一點空間來讓玩加緩和一下，這是Insane級別的難度，不是Hard
1. 變速線用在激昂的地方會讓整首歌玩起來很有感覺，但用錯了會顯得很多餘、沒有意義
2. Hard也請照著Distance Snap製作，少部分是可以不用照著DS的，注意已Rank的大大的Hard譜(推薦Fycho)


Insane以上的難度，和General給的Mod一樣，我看到成績，我再回來幫大大補Mod


先這樣，有大工程了

m1223961117 wrote:

說好的補Mod~ No Kd~

Insane
00:05:092 (3) - 疊好Slider的尾巴 已修正
00:06:438 (2,3,4) - 這種連打最好少擺，100%是斷C的前奏 先保留
00:09:227 (2) - 刪掉這個保持前面的節奏感 已刪
00:10:477 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - 我個人非常不建議把長音人聲通通做成連打，對我來說這是很糟糕的Mapping方式。我認為這裡可以擺上Spinner或是變速的長Slider會很優 改成2次slider接2個circle不知道有沒有比較好
00:15:092 (1) - 1/4短Slider的速度很快，根據我個人的經驗還有參考DarknessAngel大大的Mapping方式，放在激昂且速速快的地方是最好的，歌曲最開始且沒有什麼特殊的音效就擺上這種短Slider會讓人覺得很反感
※建議大大選擇一種只專精1-2種的Mapping方式，我個人是傾向以歌詞和和背景音為主，不喜歡多餘的物件讓整首歌出限偏差。這就要大大自己去摸索了 (1)-(3)改成單circle
00:29:708 (4,5,6,7) - 改成單點circle 已修正
00:32:015 (1,2,3) - Insane譜盡可能的不要有這種來回跳且物件亂交疊的情形，一樣審核會被抓包...(親身經歷...) (1)-(2)改成單circle
00:34:515 (4,5,6,1) - 太擠了，分開一點(很難讀譜) 已修正
00:40:861 (3,4,5) - 不解釋了 已修正
00:42:881 (7) - 我看不出來這裡有任何借奏。盡可能的不要有藍線結尾，除非是歌曲本身就是藍線結尾 已修正
00:43:554 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - 不解釋 重作
00:49:515 (4) - 希望大大把連打擺好，這種變速連打快快慢慢的一樣會讓人覺得很反感 已修正
00:58:073 (2,3) - 新手Mapper不要做這種連打 (也沒什麼人打得過，請維克大大幫你測譜應該也會斷)，大大自己就是斷這裡的，不用我多解釋了 這邊改為你在hard diff所說的insane級難度，排成星型
01:02:400 (4,5,6) - ^ 已修正
01:02:785 (7) - 這種交疊再接連打的譜要做對才會好玩，給你一張舊譜做參考：https://osu.ppy.sh/b/98955，Ouka難度01:20:322 (1,2,3,4) 分開
01:03:361 (1,2) - 我自己個人的看法，這種3/4接1 Circle的做法，也是要做對才會好玩。畢竟分開來是很難的一種打法，也不容易讀譜 (可以參考No_Gu大大怎麼做這種擺法) 已修正，接在slider尾端
01:04:323 (4,1) - Hard也有說了變速線的問題，我就不解釋了 重作
01:07:977 (3,4,5) - 這種看不出是不是連打的東西，100% Over Map 已修正，疊slider尾
01:19:515 (4,1,2,3,4) - 擠在一起了，分開來 已修正
最後面的連打我也不解釋了。我想大大會放這種連打會是因為這首吧：https://osu.ppy.sh/b/151229，不要學Val大大的0108系列的譜，對你來說沒有幫助 修正為spinner

先這樣，上完課再幫你補最後一個Mod，一樣No Kd


Edit:

Unlimited Blade Works
00:10:477 (1,2,3,4,5) - 這樣的連打沒人過的了 已修正，拉近距離
00:17:400 (9,10,11) - 大大你自己都不穩了 已修正，拉近距離
00:23:169 (6,7,8) - 不會覺得這個太遠嗎?? 已修正，拉近距離
00:32:977 (11) - 放到正中間 這邊我是想一個短距離跳+一個長距離跳，暫時先這樣
00:33:169 (12,13) - 疊太上面了，放下來一點 已修正，拉近距離
00:33:938 (2,3,4,5) - 這裡節奏感快快慢慢的，可以修一下 已修正
00:36:631 (10) - 貼到Scorebar了 已修正，拉近距離
00:37:785 (3) - ^ 已修正，拉近距離
00:50:092 (11,12) - 錯誤節奏 已修正
00:52:015 (4,5) - 這要的跳法很沒意義，看大大在類似這種歌手把音往下沉的階段來個超級大跳，我會直接刪譜 已修正，照DS
01:04:708 (1) - 貼到Scorebar 已修正
01:05:092 (2,3) - 順帶的問一下，這樣的跳法是時也是最容易斷C的要點，Over Map了 保留
01:09:323 (3,4,5,6,7) - 不解釋了 已修正
01:10:477 (2) - Ctrl+G 已修正
01:11:246 (4) - ^ 已修正
01:22:015 (3,4) - 這距離的連打，果斷放棄 保留
01:24:323 (1,2,3,4,5) - 沒是不要放這種分得這麼開且是鋸齒狀的連打，沒人過的了 已修正
01:25:092 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^ 改spinner

看的有點辛苦...有點汗顏
繼續加油

Chocox wrote:

From my Q ^.^

Mod!

[General]
No Video for this? I don't want to add video. But if it is good for this map I will add.

[Easy]
00:02:785 (1,2) - Maybe similar sliders , but I don't this will work because of the following sliders 00:05:861 (1,2) It's hard to replace.
00:30:477 (1) - I think boring slider I think this is ok.
00:59:708 (1) - Finish this head? fix

[Normal]
00:59:708 (1) - Finish this head fix
01:04:323 (4) - This note need attention , experiment with hitsounding it for abit ^^ (I suggest Finish/Whistle) add Whistle
01:22:400 (6,1) - I think this 2 stack with 01:20:861 (4) fix

[Hard]
I think the jumps here are too hard for this difficulty
00:35:285 (1) - This tail should end at the tail of 00:35:861 (8) ? If so , please fix fix
00:59:708 (1) - Finish this head fix
01:04:131 (6) - Similar to normal , I think you should Finish this tail fix
01:16:631 (1) - Too jumpy for Hard!!! fix

[Insane]
00:06:438 (2,3,4) - Stack these if not its really weird fix
00:07:977 (2,3,4) - These too , if not maybe follow this 00:09:323 (2,3,4) fix
00:58:176 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - These is really fun for me , but looks like mapping for difficulty , maybe shorten it , too hard for insane , but I think it will be ok if this is in Extra difficulty. fix
01:06:438 (3) - Weird slider.. I like it

[MiaoFUuU's Insane]
I think this difficulty is ok

-Famous- wrote:

SPOILER

NM request from my Queue

Finally I mod your map! (I'm so lazy ;-;)

General

1. Just want to point out that for some reason the AiMod says that you need at least 1 Easy/Normal diff. It's funny because this mapset definitely have both. Another map of mine has the same problem. idk

Easy

1. 00:18:559 (1,2) - This blanket can be improved slightly. Fixed
2. 00:21:251 (1,2) - Flow can be improved. Fixed
3. 00:22:790 (1,3) - Avoid stack. Fixed
4. 00:30:482 (1) - Move this circle one grid up and left. This flows better to me. Fixed
5. 00:38:174 (3) - Minor, but this blanket can be improved. Fixed
6. 00:39:328 (4,1) - Imrpove blanket. Fixed
7. 00:43:559 (2,3,1) - Fix these spacings. Fixed
8. 00:44:328 (3,1) - Weird flow. Fixed
9. 00:47:405 (5,1) - Blanket can be improved. Fixed
10. 00:56:636 (3,4) - Fix spacing. Fixed

Normal

1. 00:16:251 (3,1) - Improve blanket. Fixed
2. 00:17:405 (2,3) - Blanket can be improved. Fixed
3. 00:17:405 (2,1) - Suggestion: blanket them? Fixed
4. 00:20:482 (4,1) - Improve blanket. Fixed
5. 00:22:790 (4) - Move that slider one grid up for better flow. Fixed
6. 00:24:328 (1,2) - Improve blanket. Fixed
7. 00:37:020 (2,3) - ^ Fixed
8. 00:44:328 (4,1) - ^ Fixed
9. 01:06:636 (1,2) - ^ Fixed
10. 01:12:790 (1,2) - Improve and fix blanket. Fixed
11. 01:18:943 (1,2) - Improve blanket. Fixed

Many blanket errors but a nice difficulty.

Hard

This difficutly is WIP, but I mod it anyway. This is an exception. WIP, because I remap it.

1. 00:08:559 (4,1) - Here we go again: improve blanket. Fixed
2. 00:16:636 (1,2,3,4) - Fix and improve blanket. Fixed
3. 00:21:636 (2,5) - Improve blanket. Fixed
4. 00:22:790 (1,2) - Flows weird. Fixed
5. 00:27:020 (2,1,5,1) - Compared to the other stacks this one is really hard to read. Also you didn't stack 00:31:636 (5,1). 00:31:636 (5,1) is easier to read. Fixed
6. 00:27:790 (2,3) - Blanket. There is not a blanket
7. 00:31:059 (3,4) - Improve blanket. Fixed
8. 00:32:020 (1,2) - Flows weird. You should reflect 00:32:020 (1). Fixed
9. 00:38:174 (1,3) - Improve blanket. Fixed
10. 00:41:251 (5,1,3,1) - I made my point. Fixed
11. 00:45:866 - Remove SV change. This doesn't fit and the spacing is messed up. Fixed
12. 00:59:713 (1,2) - Improve blanket. Fixed

Anyway, this is actually a good mapset. Good luck!

Artavia wrote:

SPOILER

From My Modding Queue

General

1. I think you should check off the Widescreen Support. 'cuz you didn't use storyboard. Fixed
2. I think your hitsounding is inconsistent yet. NC skill too.. but I believe this is that it will be improved. My weakness

Easy

1. 00:18:174 (5) - NC and 00:18:559 (1) - Removal NC Fixed
2. 00:19:328 (2) - Removal Clap and 00:19:713 (3,4) - Add Clap at tail part Fixed
3. 00:22:790 (1) - Try *this? Fixed
4. 00:43:559 (2) - ^ Try *this? Fixed
5. 00:50:866 (1) - Why did you added NC? if you're exists the intention, please tell me (: Removed NC >_<

Normal

1. 00:20:482 (4) - Removal clap at head part, please. it would be better, imo. Fixed
2. 00:22:790 (4) - Removal one reverse and add circle is more than better. Fixed
3. 00:32:790 (1) - I wonder why did you added NC? Fixed
4. 01:15:097 (1,2) - Add clap at tail part. Fixed

Hard

1. AR+1 it would be better, imo. Fixed
2. 00:06:828 (3,4,1) - This stack skill is very wrong, imo. also the hard player were expected to cause confusion. I think hard player has the ability to read it. The break time to react next stack is enough.
3. 00:11:059 (2) - Why did you used the beizer slider? The rhythm? idk lol
4. 00:23:174 (2,1,2) - Hmm... I do not recommend this patterns. This is not normally use in hard. It's ok.
5. 00:58:751 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ^ especially, If I were you, this is won't use in hard. Keep

Good Luck. Sorry for my late.