Autumn wrote:

Hi
Mod from PM ^^

[General]
01:23:046 - 80%的finish显得有点吵,考虑65%-75% um it's fine to me so i want to keep it for now.. if any other modder point this out and i will change it immediately.

[SRY]
00:37:816 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 个人角度还是喜欢滑条或者堆叠,这种排列好看但很难(相比其它部分).. 让我打的话这部分会fail,但换成滑条就能连上
01:29:508 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 同上 i like the patterns. it's fun and NOT really hard imo

01:41:623 (1) - 位置有点尴尬..考虑放在滑条尾给HDHR玩家一些福利 i want to follow the paino sound here and the stack looks weird..
01:44:335 (6) - 老实说直接跟音乐感觉更好,所以可以去掉.其他三连都挺好,就这里显得有些多余 you're right.

01:48:892 -01:50:508 这段的节奏可以改进一下,想办法让 01:50:508 这个重音别落在滑条尾上...以下是一种方案, 由于破坏了对称所以不一定是最好的:
01:49:585 (9) - 向后移一个二分拍并延长一个四分拍, 删掉01:50:046 (1,2) 在01:49:585 和 01:50:277 各添加一个单点. 在01:50:508 添加单点形成三连(+NC),效果如下:

SPOILER

02:13:239 (2) - 试试Ctrl+G,感觉顺手一些 awkward..
02:13:816 (5,1,1,1) - 还能摆好看一些:

364,88,134046,6,2,L|315:149,1,71.4999967269899,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
208,72,134277,6,2,L|208:148,1,71.4999967269899,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
72,140,134508,6,2,L|120:201,1,71.4999967269899,8|10,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
200,336,134739,5,4,0:0:0:0:

(每个滑条旋转大约37.5°) changed by another way, however i increased the spacings on purpose so i only changed the angles.

00:56:162 - 可以加个note, 和 00:56:277 (3) 堆叠. added the circle between them. looks better imo~.
这段与前一段旋律一致,但更明快,所以可以放满一点
-------------------------------------------
个人觉得可以用whistle的地方:
00:04:354 -
00:08:046 -
00:26:854 - √
02:08:392 -
02:12:085 -
02:15:777 -
00:13:816 (4) - Clap or whistle and the other places, i just want silence them..
----------------------------------
00:46:123 (5) - NC从这里开始,代替从00:45:662 (1) 看起来连贯一些 √
01:14:739 (1) - 从这里开始的NC有点难懂..前后四个,一个全用NC一个统一颜色..我觉得要是我就用以下两种安排 i did the new combo pattern deliberately for the combo bursts, and first group circles is all in new combos for the combo bursts bcz i want to stress the ending of the bright sound of piano, then i use the newcombos on the 1/8 circles for a warning. looks obvious for me.

或者


[Hard]
01:45:200 (1) - 可以试试弯一弯包住01:44:739 (5) √

SPOILER

02:10:123 (7) - 可以NC一下,HR玩家血线压力会小一点,毕竟连续单点这里容易miss added new combo at slider (6).
02:17:162 (5) - 总觉得有点违和...似乎在 02:17:277 更舒服..采纳的话排列可以这样放: nah the present is prefer imo..

SPOILER

[Easy]
结尾的转盘可以合并为一个.前一个比较短,对Easy要求有点高 √

That's all
GL~

Sagisawa-Yukari wrote:

[General]
红色：必须遵守
蓝色：只是建议

[Twi's Normal]
OD-1 ._.没啥必要...其实...
00:12:431 (6) - 6的y轴在276而00:11:508 (4) - 的y轴在272，建议6向上一格 fixed
00:18:431 (4) - 第一个折返的clap？ fixed
00:46:123 (1) - 滑条头finish fixed
00:49:816 (1) - 折返处的clap？fixed
01:37:816 (1) - 滑条头finish fixed
02:05:046 (2) - finish？再议

02:13:816 (5,6) - 为什么5不和前面的3,6不和前面的4在y轴的值相同？ ._.因为我在做对称


[Hard]
too easy,OD+1
00:23:969 (1) - 滑条头finish
00:46:123 (1) - ^
01:10:585 (5,6) - 5向上一格，6向右一格
01:12:892 (2) - 滑条尾finish？
01:23:508 (1) - 建议改成1/2 slider并且上移一格
01:26:739 (1) - 滑条头finish？
01:37:816 (1) - ^


[SRY]
00:08:969 (3) - 往左一格
00:47:508 (5,1) - 我觉得5应该拉长到00:47:854 - 这里结束，然后00:47:854 (1) - 移动到00:47:969 - 这里开始
01:13:354 (3) - 滑条尾finish
01:37:816 (1) - 滑条头finish



good luck

1. 00:01:816 (1) - This applies to other similar parts actually (00:03:662 (2) etc), add whsitle on slider's start for the synth?
2. 00:03:200 (5) - Move this higher, so the slider will carry the flow to your next (1) instead of being horizontal with it?
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:08:277 (3) - I'd rather put this in ~x:110 y:208 (to form a triangle, also to make the spacing more even) but it's up to you (:
4. 00:12:662 (8) - Try this? It encircles (7)'s end better and also follows 00:13:239 (2)'s curve more:
   

   226,324,12662,2,0,P|238:297|235:254,1,71.4999967269899

5. 00:19:354 (6,7) - Err, I don't really like how the overlap looks here imo... I think an overlap could be done better if (7) is somewhat linear though:
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:24:662 (3) - Umm, why no whistle? The piano is quite strong here though...
7. 00:27:892 (1) - Try encircle like this perhaps? It flows better to (2) imo rather than copy-pasting (6)'s shape here:
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:29:046 (6) - Not perfectly stacked to the blue (7), is it intentional?
9. 00:31:008 (6,7,8,1) - Err, why not also apply encircle here to fit your style more:
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 00:46:585 (2) - Again, visible imperfect stack here, is it intentional?
11. 00:48:662 (4) - Err, this is just my idea by modifying your current slider's node, but perhaps you can create an open circle together with (5)'s shape here:
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 00:57:200 (1,2,3) - I'd rather having these moved a bit down so that (1)'s end will be stacked with the blue (3), and then
13. 00:58:008 (4,1) - Move these two a bit further (~x:337 y:145), there shouldn't be any annoying overlap again here though :3 (00:57:200 (1) and 00:58:469 (2) won't overlap in play mode due to the AR, yep)
14. 01:00:316 (6,7) - Not 1/8? I'm sure the song uses 1/8 here...
15. 01:02:162 (6) - New combo here to split the rhythm?
16. 01:05:277 (3,4) - This could be tricky in play mode due to (1,2,3) being 1/4 though, yep (also stack (3) beneath 01:04:008 (4)'s end maybe?)
17. 01:14:739 (1,1,1,1) - Just a suggestion, I think you can use the blue -> light blue -> blue -> light blue combo color sequence here (should be better without that yellow and pink imo)
18. 01:30:431 (1) - Err, I don't really get the slider's concept here orz... If you're aiming for encircle followed by wave you can do it tidier with this ofc xD
    

    216,200,90431,6,0,B|240:192|240:192|281:241|341:224|341:224|383:209|417:224,1,214.49999018097,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

19. 01:37:816 (1) - Finish on slider's start? (obvious enough imo)
20. 01:42:892 (7) - Minor stuff, raise this to ~y:257 to get the ideal (6,7,8) formation
21. 01:46:354 (6,7,8,9) - Considering the next (1,2,3,4) pattern is a windmill formation I'm thinking about arranging the doubles into this actually:
    
    SPOILER

    
22. 01:50:739 (4) - orz, why the bezier part is very uneven here ._.
    

    256,284,110739,2,0,B|276:244|276:244|256:196|256:196|286:151|250:92,2,189.750003619194,0|2|2,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

23. 02:06:892 (3,4,5) - Considering the faint bass sound I prefer much to use Normal sampleset here instead of Drum, up to you though
24. 02:22:585 (1) - The music continues here, add note here in the center perhaps and start spinner 1/4 after? (also with this spinner, why no whistle on spinner's end for the piano >_<)

1. 00:11:969 (6) - Would be nice imo if you can apply this but you might need to readjust the previous (5) xD
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:13:816 (3) - Umm, I get the idea here to make symmetry with (5) but the slider's shape REALLY bugs me orz... Maybe a simpler slider like this works better:
   

   212,72,13816,2,0,B|161:75|137:106|137:106|95:90|40:112,1,170,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

3. 00:15:200 (6) - Remove whistle on (6)'s start, and then
4. 00:15:662 (7) - Add whistle here? Sounds more fitting with the synth sequence and the staccato here I think
5. 00:19:354 (7,1) - Err, I think it's better to turn off dist. snap here and aim for perfect encircle instead, as following:
   

   120,168,19354,2,0,P|101:109|134:45,2,127.5,0|2|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   187,113,20277,6,0,P|255:157|327:109,1,170,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

6. 00:30:431 (4) - Add another bezier waypoint on ~x:263 y:43 so (1)'s start will somewhat be encircled perhaps?
7. 00:36:892 (5) - This is a bit closer to (4) rather than to (3) actually, barely noticeable though
8. 00:41:508 (7,1) - How about taking a narrower angle here so (1)'s encircle will look less forced:
   
   SPOILER

   
9. 00:47:508 (3) - Move to ~x:309 y:135 here? This will avoid overlap with (1)'s end and will also make 00:48:662 (5) encircles this slider's start~
10. 01:00:892 (1) - Minor stuff here, move the endpoint to ~x:482 y:178 to make it parallel with next slider
11. 01:15:431 (6,7,8) - Due to stacking's nature, I think it's best to place this on ~x:461 y:244 or somewhere a bit further so (5) to (6) will look correctly spaced in play mode
12. 01:23:508 (1) - Place this in ~x:348 y:103 to make symmetry with (2)'s start? Works better this way after the spinner imo
13. 01:29:508 (8,1) - Just a suggestion, you can make an encircle like this probably:
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 01:37:816 (1) - Same as SRY diff, finish on slider's start?
15. 02:04:585 (2,3) - If you curved them a bit it'll give more flow imo:
    
    SPOILER

    
16. 02:06:892 (3) - You can also apply Normal sampleset here (although it's won't result as significant as SRY diff)
17. 02:11:969 (3) - Err, whistle should be on (2) instead of (3)'s start though o.o
18. 02:22:585 (1) - Same as SRY diff

1. 00:11:508 (4) - Move to ~x:296 y:276 to make this doesn't touch (1)?
2. 00:20:277 (1) - Considering (4)'s shape you can make something like this perhaps:
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:23:969 (1) - Whistle on second repeat here (to follow (2)'s hitsounding)?
4. 00:36:892 (3,1) - Err, I don't really like how these two (especially (3)) touches the previous 00:35:046 (1), but it's not a big problem though
5. 00:46:123 (1) - Finish on slider's start? The cymbals is obvious enough imo...
6. 00:51:662 (3) - Really minor but it should be moved to ~x:198 y:321 for perfect symmetry (look at the slidertick for reference), again this is barely noticeable xD
7. 00:56:046 (5) - Why no whistle on slider's start? It's better to have one there imo because you've done the same thing on 00:53:508 (1,2)
8. 01:00:892 (1,2,3,4,5) - Just a suggestion here, considering the music's ascending tone an arc like this would help to support the music imo:
   
   SPOILER

   
9. 01:13:816 (4,5) - Another suggestion here, create something like this perhaps instead of straight lines? (2,3,4,5) will form a square though:
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 01:24:892 (3,1) - Not perfectly stacked, is this intentional?
11. 01:34:123 (1) - It's much better here imo to follow the music (repeating 3/4s) instead of 1/1s ._.
12. 01:37:816 (1) - Finish on slider's start for the cymbals?
13. 01:49:816 (4) - I'd new combo this one to tell that the rhythm has normalized, up to you though
14. 01:58:123 (3,4) - Here, you can make better hollow circle with a 'test circle' like this though: (delete (4) afterwards)
    
    SPOILER

    
15. 02:05:508 (3,4) - I don't feel using 30% on (4)'s end is a good idea orz, sounds too quiet... I'd use 55% on (3)'s end, 40% on (4)'s start, and 55% on (4)'s end here
16. 02:07:354 (1,2,3) - Err what happened to the encircle here orz... I know it's hard to make perfect encircle with current spacing but the angle shouldn't be this narrow either imo:
    

    364,208,127354,6,0,P|385:149|359:83,2,130,4|8|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
    296,148,128739,1,8,0:0:0:0:
    228,209,129200,2,0,P|207:150|233:84,2,130,4|8|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

17. 02:24:085 - Snap the inherit section here 1/4 earlier? (This inherit section comes from the higher diffs I see, well in this diff there's only a single spinner anyway xD)

Sagisawa-Yukari wrote:

[Hard]
too easy,OD+1 √
00:23:969 (1) - 滑条头finish
00:46:123 (1) - ^
01:10:585 (5,6) - 5向上一格，6向右一格 √
01:12:892 (2) - 滑条尾finish？
01:23:508 (1) - 建议改成1/2 slider并且上移一格 有点太紧凑了。。不太喜欢。。
01:26:739 (1) - 滑条头finish？
01:37:816 (1) - ^


[SRY]
00:08:969 (3) - 往左一格 √
00:47:508 (5,1) - 我觉得5应该拉长到00:47:854 - 这里结束，然后00:47:854 (1) - 移动到00:47:969 - 这里开始 唔.. 试了下感觉还是现在的打起来好一点>_>
01:13:354 (3) - 滑条尾finish
01:37:816 (1) - 滑条头finish



good luck

Niva wrote:

Hi Strawberry, trying a random mod here :3

[General]

-> The source should be stylized as 'O2Jam U' (reference here) 01:13:816 (4) -
-> I prefer to make the short kiais only appear 1/4 or 1/8 instead of the current 1/1 though, but up to you (: i think the 1/1 give the kiai burst more adequately

[SRY]

1. 00:01:816 (1) - This applies to other similar parts actually (00:03:662 (2) etc), add whsitle on slider's start for the synth? √
2. 00:03:200 (5) - Move this higher, so the slider will carry the flow to your next (1) instead of being horizontal with it? √
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:08:277 (3) - I'd rather put this in ~x:110 y:208 (to form a triangle, also to make the spacing more even) but it's up to you (: um honestly i was thinking about a jump with the following slider so i want to keep it for now..
4. 00:12:662 (8) - Try this? It encircles (7)'s end better and also follows 00:13:239 (2)'s curve more: √
   

   226,324,12662,2,0,P|238:297|235:254,1,71.4999967269899

5. 00:19:354 (6,7) - Err, I don't really like how the overlap looks here imo... I think an overlap could be done better if (7) is somewhat linear though: um i like the flow anyhow ;w;..
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:24:662 (3) - Umm, why no whistle? The piano is quite strong here though... √ yea
7. 00:27:892 (1) - Try encircle like this perhaps? It flows better to (2) imo rather than copy-pasting (6)'s shape here: √
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:29:046 (6) - Not perfectly stacked to the blue (7), is it intentional? √
9. 00:31:008 (6,7,8,1) - Err, why not also apply encircle here to fit your style more: √
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 00:46:585 (2) - Again, visible imperfect stack here, is it intentional? √
11. 00:48:662 (4) - Err, this is just my idea by modifying your current slider's node, but perhaps you can create an open circle together with (5)'s shape here: √
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 00:57:200 (1,2,3) - I'd rather having these moved a bit down so that (1)'s end will be stacked with the blue (3), and then
13. 00:58:008 (4,1) - Move these two a bit further (~x:337 y:145), there shouldn't be any annoying overlap again here though :3 (00:57:200 (1) and 00:58:469 (2) won't overlap in play mode due to the AR, yep) √ i like it. :3
14. 01:00:316 (6,7) - Not 1/8? I'm sure the song uses 1/8 here... √
15. 01:02:162 (6) - New combo here to split the rhythm? √
16. 01:05:277 (3,4) - This could be tricky in play mode due to (1,2,3) being 1/4 though, yep (also stack (3) beneath 01:04:008 (4)'s end maybe?) restacked, and i feel the spacing is fine since i asked a number of players tried.
17. 01:14:739 (1,1,1,1) - Just a suggestion, I think you can use the blue -> light blue -> blue -> light blue combo color sequence here (should be better without that yellow and pink imo) √
18. 01:30:431 (1) - Err, I don't really get the slider's concept here orz... If you're aiming for encircle followed by wave you can do it tidier with this ofc xD √ that's what i need. LOL
    

    216,200,90431,6,0,B|240:192|240:192|281:241|341:224|341:224|383:209|417:224,1,214.49999018097,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

19. 01:37:816 (1) - Finish on slider's start? (obvious enough imo) √
20. 01:42:892 (7) - Minor stuff, raise this to ~y:257 to get the ideal (6,7,8) formation √
21. 01:46:354 (6,7,8,9) - Considering the next (1,2,3,4) pattern is a windmill formation I'm thinking about arranging the doubles into this actually: √
    
    SPOILER

    
22. 01:50:739 (4) - orz, why the bezier part is very uneven here ._. √
    

    256,284,110739,2,0,B|276:244|276:244|256:196|256:196|286:151|250:92,2,189.750003619194,0|2|2,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

23. 02:06:892 (3,4,5) - Considering the faint bass sound I prefer much to use Normal sampleset here instead of Drum, up to you though √
24. 02:22:585 (1) - The music continues here, add note here in the center perhaps and start spinner 1/4 after? (also with this spinner, why no whistle on spinner's end for the piano >_<) √

[Hard]

1. 00:11:969 (6) - Would be nice imo if you can apply this but you might need to readjust the previous (5) xD um.. the spacing would be a bit weird i feel.. ;v;
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:13:816 (3) - Umm, I get the idea here to make symmetry with (5) but the slider's shape REALLY bugs me orz... Maybe a simpler slider like this works better: √
   

   212,72,13816,2,0,B|161:75|137:106|137:106|95:90|40:112,1,170,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

3. 00:15:200 (6) - Remove whistle on (6)'s start, and then √
4. 00:15:662 (7) - Add whistle here? Sounds more fitting with the synth sequence and the staccato here I think √
5. 00:19:354 (7,1) - Err, I think it's better to turn off dist. snap here and aim for perfect encircle instead, as following: √
   

   120,168,19354,2,0,P|101:109|134:45,2,127.5,0|2|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   187,113,20277,6,0,P|255:157|327:109,1,170,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

6. 00:30:431 (4) - Add another bezier waypoint on ~x:263 y:43 so (1)'s start will somewhat be encircled perhaps? √
7. 00:36:892 (5) - This is a bit closer to (4) rather than to (3) actually, barely noticeable though √
8. 00:41:508 (7,1) - How about taking a narrower angle here so (1)'s encircle will look less forced: √
   
   SPOILER

   
9. 00:47:508 (3) - Move to ~x:309 y:135 here? This will avoid overlap with (1)'s end and will also make 00:48:662 (5) encircles this slider's start~√
10. 01:00:892 (1) - Minor stuff here, move the endpoint to ~x:482 y:178 to make it parallel with next slider√
11. 01:15:431 (6,7,8) - Due to stacking's nature, I think it's best to place this on ~x:461 y:244 or somewhere a bit further so (5) to (6) will look correctly spaced in play mode √
12. 01:23:508 (1) - Place this in ~x:348 y:103 to make symmetry with (2)'s start? Works better this way after the spinner imo √
13. 01:29:508 (8,1) - Just a suggestion, you can make an encircle like this probably: √
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 01:37:816 (1) - Same as SRY diff, finish on slider's start? √
15. 02:04:585 (2,3) - If you curved them a bit it'll give more flow imo: √
    
    SPOILER

    
16. 02:06:892 (3) - You can also apply Normal sampleset here (although it's won't result as significant as SRY diff) √
17. 02:11:969 (3) - Err, whistle should be on (2) instead of (3)'s start though o.o √
18. 02:22:585 (1) - Same as SRY diff √

[Twi's Normal]

1. 00:11:508 (4) - Move to ~x:296 y:276 to make this doesn't touch (1)? √
2. 00:20:277 (1) - Considering (4)'s shape you can make something like this perhaps: √
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:23:969 (1) - Whistle on second repeat here (to follow (2)'s hitsounding)? √
4. 00:36:892 (3,1) - Err, I don't really like how these two (especially (3)) touches the previous 00:35:046 (1), but it's not a big problem though yea ><
5. 00:46:123 (1) - Finish on slider's start? The cymbals is obvious enough imo... √
6. 00:51:662 (3) - Really minor but it should be moved to ~x:198 y:321 for perfect symmetry (look at the slidertick for reference), again this is barely noticeable xD √ LOL
7. 00:56:046 (5) - Why no whistle on slider's start? It's better to have one there imo because you've done the same thing on 00:53:508 (1,2) √
8. 01:00:892 (1,2,3,4,5) - Just a suggestion here, considering the music's ascending tone an arc like this would help to support the music imo: √
   
   SPOILER

   
9. 01:13:816 (4,5) - Another suggestion here, create something like this perhaps instead of straight lines? (2,3,4,5) will form a square though: √
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 01:24:892 (3,1) - Not perfectly stacked, is this intentional? √
11. 01:34:123 (1) - It's much better here imo to follow the music (repeating 3/4s) instead of 1/1s ._. √ and re-arrange following circles~
12. 01:37:816 (1) - Finish on slider's start for the cymbals? √
13. 01:49:816 (4) - I'd new combo this one to tell that the rhythm has normalized, up to you though √
14. 01:58:123 (3,4) - Here, you can make better hollow circle with a 'test circle' like this though: (delete (4) afterwards) √
    
    SPOILER

    
15. 02:05:508 (3,4) - I don't feel using 30% on (4)'s end is a good idea orz, sounds too quiet... I'd use 55% on (3)'s end, 40% on (4)'s start, and 55% on (4)'s end here √
16. 02:07:354 (1,2,3) - Err what happened to the encircle here orz... I know it's hard to make perfect encircle with current spacing but the angle shouldn't be this narrow either imo: √
    

    364,208,127354,6,0,P|385:149|359:83,2,130,4|8|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
    296,148,128739,1,8,0:0:0:0:
    228,209,129200,2,0,P|207:150|233:84,2,130,4|8|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

17. 02:24:085 - Snap the inherit section here 1/4 earlier? (This inherit section comes from the higher diffs I see, well in this diff there's only a single spinner anyway xD) √

That's it from me, beautiful song indeed~

• • If I were you I'd move the preview point at 00:46:123 (or 00:45:662) since it's the best part of the song imo.
  • Don't use sky blue/azure as a combo color, it doesn't really fit with your BG.

• • Approach Rate: 4.
  • Consider to increase spacing a little, right now every circle/slider looks... ugly, try to use x0,90 spacing, it's a lot better imo.
  • Avoid doing patterns like 01:48:892 (1,2,3) for example, I know that this is a Normal but it is also the easier diff in the mapset.
  • 00:08:277 (4,1) - Delete the circle and end the slider 1/1 later. (keep the \/\/\/\/\ shape)
  • 00:14:739 (3) - Why 3 repeats? Remove 1 or 2 and add another 1/1 slider.
  • 00:21:200 (2) - Make the same shape of the previous slider to keep a consistency.
  • 01:10:123 (4,5,1) - Try this pattern:
  
  SPOILER

  
  • 01:26:739 (1) - Don't use red slider points, curve this slider a little.
  • 01:27:662 (2) - ^

• • 00:10:123 (3) - I know what you're trying to do here but this slider can be improved a bit, look:
  
  SPOILER

  
  • 01:00:892 (1) - Make this slider a normal ~ for a better flow.
  • 01:50:739 (3) - Don't use a linear slider, curve it a bit to keep a consistency with the previous ones.
  • 02:22:585 (10) - Add a new combo. (also try to not overlap this circle with the previous slider, move the end a bit to the left)
  • 02:22:700 (1,1) - Why 2 spinners? There's a piano sound, ok, but a single spinner here fits a lot better imo.

• • HP 6 and AR 9, why? Set AR 8 and HP 7, BPM is too low for AR 9 and this is supposed to be an Insane diff so HP 6 is a no-no.
  • There are a lot of jumps that are a bit too hard even for an Insane imo, try to not go over x3,00 spacing.
  • Also, the difficulty jump between this diff and Hard is big, consider to make Hard a bit harder or make an easier Insane diff.
  • 01:14:854 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - Why all these new combos? Remove them, they're totally useless.
  • 02:14:046 (1,1,1) - ^ just add a new combo at 02:13:816 (5) and remove these.
  • 02:22:585 (5) - Same as Hard, add a new combo.
  • 02:22:642 (1,1) - Same as Hard, use only 1 spinner.

xxheroxx wrote:

Mod Infos:

• Suggestion.
• You should fix this.
______________________________________________
______________________________________________

General

• • If I were you I'd move the preview point at 00:46:123 (or 00:45:662) since it's the best part of the song imo. √
  • Don't use sky blue/azure as a combo color, it doesn't really fit with your BG. tbh i didn't feel any issue about the colors.. personally i'd like to keep for now..

Twi's Normal

• • Approach Rate: 4. √
  • Consider to increase spacing a little, right now every circle/slider looks... ugly, try to use x0,90 spacing, it's a lot better imo. as you said the the diff is the easiest on the mapset, and the higher spacing is not really suitable for a skillful music.
  • Avoid doing patterns like 01:48:892 (1,2,3) for example, I know that this is a Normal but it is also the easier diff in the mapset. √
  • 00:08:277 (4,1) - Delete the circle and end the slider 1/1 later. (keep the \/\/\/\/\ shape) √
  • 00:14:739 (3) - Why 3 repeats? Remove 1 or 2 and add another 1/1 slider. √
  • 00:21:200 (2) - Make the same shape of the previous slider to keep a consistency. √
  • 01:10:123 (4,5,1) - Try this pattern: i prefer the present one. sorry ><
  
  SPOILER

  
  • 01:26:739 (1) - Don't use red slider points, curve this slider a little. √
  • 01:27:662 (2) - ^ √

Hard

• • 00:10:123 (3) - I know what you're trying to do here but this slider can be improved a bit, look: √ thank you a lot about dat!!
  
  SPOILER

  
  • 01:00:892 (1) - Make this slider a normal ~ for a better flow. isn't it equal the song? ;w;
  • 01:50:739 (3) - Don't use a linear slider, curve it a bit to keep a consistency with the previous ones. √
  • 02:22:585 (10) - Add a new combo. (also try to not overlap this circle with the previous slider, move the end a bit to the left) √ i moved it right away however i'd keep to not set nc here bcz the combo burst on the previous slider looks awkward..
  • 02:22:700 (1,1) - Why 2 spinners? There's a piano sound, ok, but a single spinner here fits a lot better imo. the 'ring-ring' fit the piano sound on music really much, so i'd like to keep them ><

SRY

• • HP 6 and AR 9, why? Set AR 8 and HP 7, BPM is too low for AR 9 and this is supposed to be an Insane diff so HP 6 is a no-no. the pattern would be easier to read on AR 9 and the HP 6 is set for HR player~
  • There are a lot of jumps that are a bit too hard even for an Insane imo, try to not go over x3,00 spacing. um.. since the bpm is some low for a expert diff, i feel that they are suitable.
  • Also, the difficulty jump between this diff and Hard is big, consider to make Hard a bit harder or make an easier Insane diff. someone did it~
  • 01:14:854 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - Why all these new combos? Remove them, they're totally useless. i SO love these combo spam. aren't they gorgeous?
  • 02:14:046 (1,1,1) - ^ just add a new combo at 02:13:816 (5) and remove these. same ^
  • 02:22:585 (5) - Same as Hard, add a new combo.and same as hard these two points as well.
  • 02:22:642 (1,1) - Same as Hard, use only 1 spinner.

Flower wrote:

123

[tleM]
00:02:277 (2) - 向上移一点，和1分开 √
00:04:123 (6) - ^ √
00:05:969 (2) - ^ √
00:05:969 (2) - ^ √
00:11:969 (3,4) - 改成切分音的节奏试试，间隔改成1/4在00:12:662 - 加上一个note，位置可以在x:385,y:33 我觉得现在这样作为简单I就可以了..
00:13:354 (2) - 感觉跳这么远不是很爽快 向右移动至和1接触可能会舒服些 √
00:16:354 (6) - 试着删除或者去掉whistle看看？这里有个突然变弱的感觉，甚至我觉得如果有sb的话也可以在这里像pulse的sb一样突然变暗 √
00:19:354 (3,4) - 同00:11:969 (3,4) - ^
00:38:739 (1) - 有点感觉flow断得太突兀 因为这里有个"锣"的声音啊.. flow在这里break一下反而可以映衬音乐
00:52:585 (5,6,7) - 改成这样？太远了感觉不好读……

00:59:508 - add soft whistle √
01:03:431 (5,6,7) - 感觉这个有点缺乏活力 ↓只是建议 √

SPOILER

01:10:816 (3,4,5,1) - 同00:02:277 (2) - √
01:15:200 (4) - ^ √
01:23:046 (1,2) - 微调一下blanket √
01:29:508 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - 也是感觉太突兀 同^
01:46:354 - +note？不好…… 感觉难读
01:57:200 - ^

[Hard]
00:36:892 (5,6) - blanket √
00:42:431 (1) - 要么1/2要么1/1 3/4听起来蛋疼 感觉没差..
00:59:046 (4) - 可以叠在00:57:200 (1) - 下面？√
02:03:662 (1,2) - blanket √

[twice]
00:08:277 (4) - 歪了 √
00:41:508 (4,1) - blanket √
01:35:969 (2) - 考虑一下要不要再加个nc 现在的可以啊..
01:48:892 (1,2,1) - flow有点糟糕 ↓只是建议 √

SPOILER

Good luck~

• • Tags: add "tlem"

• I still think that 0,90x or 0,80x spacing will fit a lot better with the current slider velocity but I'm not going to force you to change it, it's not a big deal anyway.
  • 01:48:892 (1,2,1) - If you want some rhythm variation and want to use 1/4 then use some repeating sliders to make these patterns easier:
  
  SPOILER

  
  • 01:54:892 (2,3,4) - Select all these circles and reverse them (ctrl + g), seeing the same identical pattern twice is kinda boring imo.

• • 00:51:662 (5) - What about using a ~ slider for a better flow?
  
  SPOILER

  
  • 02:16:585 (4,5) - I guess you want some rhythm variation here, still I don't really like this pattern, try this:
  
  SPOILER

  

• • 00:45:431 (2) - Delete this slider and add a circle at 00:45:546, also try this:
  
  SPOILER

  
  • 02:22:585 (5) - Move this circle at x:256 y:39.

• • 00:42:431 (1) - Don't use a boring straight slider, try this:
  
  SPOILER

  
  • 01:14:739 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - If you really want to use all these combos then change the colors a bit:
  
  SPOILER

  

Loli Cjj wrote:

what do you mean it doesn't have easy diff?
orz ok :<