1. Flask's Normal (2.72 stars, 238 notes)
2. Hard (4.8 stars, 496 notes)

RANK O [flow] wrote:

this song is wonderful and touching. I like the hitsounds ><

[CSGA]Ar3sgice wrote:

artist: GhostFinal 这个最好和rank图一样而且b站的也是大写

no KDs, 占个前排ww

captin1 wrote:

Hey! M4M from your queue

Flask's Normal

00:31:749 (1) - {x:224 y:80} for blanket
01:04:906 (1,2,3,4) - {x:464 y:284},{x:452 y:188},{x:452 y:188},{x:288 y:208}, neater pattern
01:17:933 (3) - Flatten this curve out a bit? node #1 to {x:316 y:84}, node #2 to {x:279 y:137}, node #3 to {x:272 y:196}
01:47:933 (2,4,5) - {x:104 y:316}, {x:52 y:144}, {x:52 y:144} smooth out the curve some
02:06:485 (4) - Don't like how this slider looks, perhaps add another white tick or get rid of the red one and curve it
02:31:749 (1) - node #2 to {x:448 y:312}, node #5 to {x:296 y:348}, clean up the blanket. Fix for 3 as well
02:34:906 (1) - Isn't quite symmetrical with itself, I would fix
02:45:170 (3) - {x:388 y:236} for triangle

Hard

Replay
Ugh, sliderbreak. Relaxing, not much else to say about it playwise. Maybe a bit slow of an sv and the hitsounds a touch too loud at parts like 00:41:222. I would suggest 45% there

00:17:933 (4) - Center this between 3 and 5
00:55:235 (3,4,5,6,7) - I would suggest something closer to this

SPOILER

00:58:393 (3,4,5,6,7) - Why don't you do the same distance pattern as ^? The music is pretty much the same so it would make sense
01:37:670 (7,1) - Increase the distance between these two, fits music to have a jump
01:43:985 (10,1) - ^
01:50:301 (7,1) - ^
02:11:222 (4) - Rotate this so it follows the curve of 2,3,4

SPOILER

02:20:696 (4) - any reason this isn't spaced the same? I don't see one
02:21:288 (5,6) - delete 5 and have 6 start on 02:21:288 and end on 02:21:880
02:54:643 (3) - {x:68 y:232} for triangle. Fix 3,4,5 triangle after this
04:10:038 (1) - I would bring this down, {x:372 y:92} maybe

Sorry for all the nazi, hope it helps though!

288,44,61749,2,0,B|240:44|200:28|200:28|156:44|112:44,2,180,2|0|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

1. OD+1 because there are a lot of slider in this diff
2. 00:24:643 (2,3) - Maybe you could do a better overlapping:
   
3. 00:27:012 (4,1) - ^
4. 01:04:906 (1,2,3,4,1) - Maybe you could do something like this:
   
5. 01:15:959 (1) - Too high it touches the score when you play it.
6. 01:15:170 (4,1) - Well if you want to keep the overlapping suggestion there are a ton of others like this in your map but i will stop pointing them out.
7. 01:23:854 (4) - Very weird slider. It stops on a blue tick and seems a little off following the music. Maybe you could do this instead:
   
8. 01:36:485 (3) - ^
9. 01:49:117 (5) - ^ Ok, apparently it's done on purpose so i will stop pointing them out but when i heard the music it really seems weird (except for some of them where it fits well)
10. 02:06:485 (4) - Remove the red tick. It doesn't really modify it's shape. (Or make the change od shape more obvious like this:
    
    or like 03:07:867 (3).
11. 02:47:538 (1) - Move it to x=164 y=260. The blanket will be better.
12. 03:11:222 (3) - Move the second point to x=164 y=144 and the end point to x=96 y=92 for a better blanket.
13. 03:39:246 (2) - Not properly centered. Move it two or three grid up.
14. 04:15:959 (1,3) - Try making them at the same high.
15. 04:22:275 - Since the singer hold the note i think you can add a spinner at the end.

1. 00:22:275 (1) - I think a whistle is more suiet and fits better.
2. 00:32:538 (3) - Whistle at the start (because of the drum)
3. 00:35:696 (3) - ^
4. 00:38:854 (3) - ^ etc.....
5. 00:59:380 (7,8,1) - They are really close and looks like 1/8. Compare to 01:05:499 (5,6,7)
6. 01:09:249 (5,1) - You can avoid this overlapping.
7. 01:18:722 (5,6,1) - Same as before.
8. 01:42:012 (3) - Try avoiding to touch the end of 01:41:22 (1) with this slider.
9. 01:54:643 (3) - ^
10. 02:02:341 (1,2,3) - The three notes seems useless and don't follow anything. You can remove 1 and 2.
11. 02:15:380 (5) - The red tick seems pretty useless.
12. 02:15:170 (7,8,1) - Try making them less stuck together.
13. 02:19:906 (2,3,4) - Spacing different from 2 to 3 than from 3 to 4.
14. 02:21:485 (6,7,1) - Same as before.
15. 02:40:827 (5,6,1) - ^
16. 02:47:538 (1) - I found this slider a little bit weird. Why not making a perfectly round one?
17. 02:56:420 (8,1) - The red point is pretty much useless.
18. 03:16:749 (3) - ^
19. 04:08:656 (1,2,3) - Same as before.

1. 00:59:380 (7,8,1) - 这个节点感觉怪怪的没有蓝线很少用这种节点的

1. 03:55:433 (5,6,7) - 怎么说呢这个虽然有些突然但是也可以接受 可以吧 不知道> <。。。？？

1. 做的不错 但是combo的摆放美感没有到达极致的感觉这个是很柔美的歌曲 用那么多直滑条真心不好

1. 00:36:485 - 这怎么有两条时间线

1. 不错的说 好评

eveless wrote:

bubbled

Nymph wrote:

SPOILER

20:41 *buhei zhens(?) nymph
20:41 Nymph: 00:58:393 (3,4) -
20:41 Nymph: spacing
20:41 Nymph: hard
20:41 buhei: okay
20:42 Nymph: 01:08:064 (3,4) -
20:42 Nymph: 这些节奏略莫名
20:42 Nymph: 我建议跟鼓
20:42 Nymph: 01:11:222 (3,4) - 同上
20:42 buhei: ..我觉得没什么啊
20:42 Nymph: 那就随便了
20:43 Nymph: 只是不知道跟的什么 略奇怪
20:43 Nymph: 01:23:854 (3,4,5,6) - spacing？
20:43 buhei: 因为后面加快了吧
20:44 buhei: SV
20:44 Nymph: 但是你前面用的1.3 1.4啊
20:44 Nymph: 为啥这里变成1.2了
20:44 buhei: 前面不太想贴着
20:45 buhei: 我看看
20:45 Nymph: 就是因为前面没贴着所以这里贴着我觉得很乱很挤 so
20:45 buhei: 改好了
20:45 buhei: 后面我也该下
20:45 buhei: 改*
20:46 buhei: done
20:47 Nymph: 02:45:959 (3,4,5,6) - 这里改完了？
20:47 buhei: 是的
20:51 buhei: ?
20:51 Nymph: =
20:55 Nymph: 没了

Nymph wrote:

ranked.

Flask wrote:

什麼我都還沒看mod

384059043 wrote:

什么 不黑神麻婆又rank

384059043 wrote:

什么 不黑神麻婆又rank