Verdisphena wrote:

Oni

00:47:414 (321) - D
00:49:700 (334) - D
01:23:986 (560) - D
01:26:272 (573) - D
01:28:557 (583) - D
01:30:843 (595) - D
done them all

Muzukashii

00:30:986 ~ 00:38:843 - This could be hard for a muzu imo
00:47:414 (269) - D
00:49:700 (279) - D
01:07:557 ~ 01:15:414 - Same as above
01:23:986 (466) - D
01:26:272 (476) - D
01:28:557 (486) - D
01:30:843 (496) - D
done them all

Can't find nothing in Futsuu and Kantan. Sorry if my mod isn't useful ):, good luck with the map <3

T o u c h e wrote:

[Kantan]

00:30:986 (37) - Maybe it's better in D
00:40:129 (49) - ^
01:07:557 (76) - ^
01:16:700 (89) - ^

changed

[Futsuu]

00:30:986 (69) - Maybe it's better in Ddidn't do this to keep it easy
00:40:129 (93) - ^ done
01:07:557 (147) - ^ same as first one
01:15:557 (169) - k done
01:16:700 (171) - Maybe it's better in D done
01:34:986 (210) - ^ done

[Muzukashii]

GENERAL: This diff seems like a Oni, why you don't change the name to Oni, the Oni changes to Inner Oni and make a new Muzukashii, or I can make a guest Muzukashii if you want :3 make one if you can make it easier, please XD

00:21:557 (115) - k no change, it felt really good to play as a d
00:42:272 (234) - ^ was switching from k k d to k d d

[Oni]

01:12:129 (481) - K done

[Opinion]

Really, a great taiko mapset. I don't have a large mod (i know) because it's mapper 99% correctly, so... good luck :3

Pheon wrote:

Coming by to just drop a mod in here~

[Kantan]
-The intro is rather plain to me.. You're only using x x x x x x. Perhaps you could add some flavour using x x x x x at times?
-If you plan on keeping it this way, then I do suggest making the x x x x x x a bit more interesting.
-00:23:557 (28) - Following the logic from the section before, this should be a k. done
-01:16:129 (88) - Perhaps remove this? It's a rather long stream for a kantan and it adds a break before the finish done

To be honest, there's nothing wrong structure-wise with it.

[Futsuu]
-00:21:272 (45) - Change into k? There is a bit of a buildup over here (or at least, the pitch is shifting upwards), making k a better choice to me. done

-00:38:986 (91) - vvvvv
-01:15:557 (169) - The music is the exact same in these spots, yet you choose to go for a k here and a d before. Mind if I ask for your reasoning on it? dunno, changed to k for the first one XD

-01:22:414 (184) - vvvvvvvvv
-01:22:985 (185,186) - You could make this part a bit more dramatic, being the last chorus and all. I suggest either turning the first one into a k (you used dkk before), or turn these two into kk. (Or you could do both, for a dkk kkd.. or go for ddk kkd. Seeing as how you use dkd all the time, ddk puts the accent on the latter half) did both, ddk and kkd

-01:42:985 (227,228,229,230,231) - You could turn this into d k D for a bit more accentuated ending. In that case, you might want to add a note at 01:42:700 - (Probably a k, following your previous structures) left it as d k d k D, it feels better imo

An interesting futsuu~

[Muzukashii]
-Wow that intro, not sure if it's too hard, it seems rather awkward for me to all-alternate. Personal suggestions would be;
-00:02:129 (8) - Remove this one for an easier time alternating, or change the pattern into k k d changed to k k d
-00:03:414 (15) - Remove for easier time hitting the finish as well as making it a bit less dense overall. Not sure how finishes are in between streams in muzukashii, personally I think they can be avoided most of the time and thus should be avoided. I removed it now XD

-00:12:414 (64,65,66,67) - You might want to revise this - it's a good pattern, but perhaps it's a tad hard to hit kkk D for 210bpm when looking at the difficulty you're aiming at. (You could also use the suggestion listed later on, the d kkk k D) from how loud I have the hitsounds, I just made it d d k k d d k k D
-00:30:414 (163,164,165,166,167,168) - Perhaps change this into d kkk k D? Also for the sake of making it a tad easier to hit for a muzu. done
-00:35:700 (194) - You might want to listen what it sounds like when this note is removed. It makes it a bit less dense due to the lack of a direct followup after the finish, and it makes for an interesting x x x x x x done XD

-00:49:129 (265) - I'm not a fan of this section in general. Instead of d K K d you could do a lot of it with d k k D, making it a lot less dense and having all the finishes followed by a 1/1 break. If you're going to keep it this way, then I do suggest removing the note I mentioned. I'll leave this alone since it's something I feel I should have.

-01:20:557 (427) - Change into d for the sake of consistency? (kkd kkd kkddk d kdd kdd kdddk) done

-01:23:557 (441) - The same suggestions as before on this section. In fact, you might want to try d kkk d instead of d K K d. You aren't using a lot of 1/4ths in the muzu, which is probably a good thing, but in dense parts like this, it'd fit. same as the one before the one above

-01:43:914 (538) - In the music, this does not have a logical backup. I also suggest removing it for a bit smoother ending - the dense ending is the section before this, anyway.done

Overall a nice diff, I didn't really look into consistency of notes and sections and structure - I can do this later on if you'd like.

[Oni]
-In the first half of the chorus, you use a lot of 1/4. In the second half, not so much. It is a rather good idea, but I suggest doing stuff like that on a section-basis.

Probably the worst suggestion 2012, but;
-00:54:414 (362) - You could turn this into a 1/3 kkddddd for flavour. The section is in a 3/4 beat, making it forgiving, and... Flavour! nop lol

In general, I think you know what's wrong with the difficulty structure-wise. I can do a full revision of this as well if you'd like, but right now I'm derping up. If you'd like, then I can do this tomorrow (or perhaps this evening).


Awesome set, lolwhat-title, good luck on getting it ranked~

mintong89 wrote:

Taiko Mod <3

d = don
k = kat
D = BIG DON
K = BIG KAT
re = remove

[Taiko Oni]

00:11:557 - -> 00:12:700 - d d k, d d k, D. i just hear this part's drum, i wonder why you put the kkk or kkddd.I used kkk d d kkddd because kkd wouldn't feel right there, since that's originally how it goes. And the kkddd because kdddd wouldn't feel right for my style. Sorry

[Taiko Muzu / Futsuu / Kantan]

yeah no problem.

/me runs

good luck. and my poor mod lol/ i can't find anything.

Kawayi Rika wrote:

You must post a IRC log first ~

OnosakiHito wrote:

[Kantan]

{ 00:46:986~01:05:272
00:53:272 (61) -
01:01:272 (70) -
This section is a problem here which is music based. It will probably confuse the beginners with the different spacing.
You followed the light sound in the song at circle (61) and (70), which you didn't done at 01:02:986. What do you think if we follow all of these sounds in this section? There would be less notes, so a bit easier for beginners to play. I prepared it in this file: http://puu.sh/1v1Se
In the Test-Kantan, note (12,13) would be a good entry for (14,15,16). What do you think about this solution/suggestion?
}

In general Kantan is totally fine. It would be maybe adviceable to use next time akekobe style(reverse pattern constalation), since it is hard to make with those general huge gaps a connection between the single notes.

[Futsuu]

You should have a less pattern ratio here in the Futsuu. Right now it's just a little bit much on some sections.

00:18:986 (40,41,42) - I would suggest to stick on d k d as you did it before and afterwards.
00:21:272 (45,46,47) - ^
00:52:700 (122) - move to 00:52:986 because it is probably harder to consider how to hit the notes with these spacings in Futsuu(same problem as kantan).
00:54:414 (126) - move to 00:54:700 because ^
00:58:700 (135) - d because of on the top said reason?
01:23:557~01:32:700 - Great part!


That's all. Decent difficultys you have here. Said suggestions in Kantan and Futsuu are mostly because of difficulty thingies. Overall everything is fine, couldn't find anything in Muzukashii and Oni.
Difficulty spread is great in my opinion.

Hope I could help you with this. Good luck with the ranking!

Stefan wrote:

Just asking: Is it correct that the "P" is capitalized?
Because at the ranked Standard Mapset, the P at Problems isn't it. Just asking~

Charles445 wrote:

Stefan wrote:

Just asking: Is it correct that the "P" is capitalized?
Because at the ranked Standard Mapset, the P at Problems isn't it. Just asking~

Uhoh

KinomiCandy wrote:

this sucks

MMzz wrote:

It's just a letter. It doesn't effect the map quality at all.