I play a lot of multi, and this is a feature that would make it a lot more enjoyable 
forum
Allow individual mod use in Multiplayer [added]
posted
Total Posts
158
I can even start playing in multi again if this happens
star'd
star'd
I just felt like once again showing my support for this; and yeah, I'd start playing multi again, if this were added.
let anyone chose the mods he wants? what an interesting idea! when playing with bad players, gatting the song harder <3
Suport of course
Suport of course
Support nice idea
Will the max score attained be the same? I'm not sure this could work without breaking the balance of the scoring system.
Someone takes a higher risk of breaking the combo by using more mods, so I don't really see a problem there. But it would be nice if everyone saw what mods people have selected before the song starts, so that people can decide what's allowed and what's not and check that no one cheats.TheVileOne wrote:
Will the max score attained be the same? I'm not sure this could work without breaking the balance of the scoring system.
nouk supports the idea
So if a more skilled person enters a newbie room, the newbs have 0% chance of winning because the better player plays with mods. This just seems to serve only to the pros in the game and noone else really. Any of the pro rooms, there would be no chance of winning, because even if you can play the map, they will have hidden on and instantly win no matter what.ReZero wrote:
Someone takes a higher risk of breaking the combo by using more mods, so I don't really see a problem there. But it would be nice if everyone saw what mods people have selected before the song starts, so that people can decide what's allowed and what's not and check that no one cheats.TheVileOne wrote:
Will the max score attained be the same? I'm not sure this could work without breaking the balance of the scoring system.
Guujin
Isn't the better player supposed to win? Also you can restrict which mods are allowed to use as mentioned in the OP, so if newbies are sore losers they could just choose to restrict all mods.TheVileOne wrote:
if a more skilled person enters a newbie room, the newbs have 0% chance of winning because the better player plays with mods. This just seems to serve only to the pros in the game and noone else really. Any of the pro rooms, there would be no chance of winning, because even if you can play the map, they will have hidden on and instantly win no matter what.
This is an incredibly awesome idea. I like to be able to play with some of my noobier friends by handicapping myself. I'm usually skyping with them and messing around with tablet tap only or mouse only while drunk or something. But if I'm sober I'd like to challenge myself the same way they challenge themselves. It would be level playing grounds for us. Another option for this would be to make it so that the scores were not modified by the mods. It would feel unfair to me if I added a mod to make it more fair to my friends and ended up full comboing something when they full comboed something as well.
If I didn't just dump all my votes on my own request I would have given you a ton of my stars.
If I didn't just dump all my votes on my own request I would have given you a ton of my stars.
My suggestion for implementing this:
Instead of just one mod selection button, there'll be two, one titled "your mods" and another labeled "room mods" but the "room mods" selection button will only be viewable by the host. Likewise, it'll group the two sets of chosen mods into two groups as seen in the room lobby. If people are worried bout mod score multipliers, add a checkbox to toggle individual-use mod multipliers which is togglble only by the host.
Instead of just one mod selection button, there'll be two, one titled "your mods" and another labeled "room mods" but the "room mods" selection button will only be viewable by the host. Likewise, it'll group the two sets of chosen mods into two groups as seen in the room lobby. If people are worried bout mod score multipliers, add a checkbox to toggle individual-use mod multipliers which is togglble only by the host.
Guujin
was also mentioned in the opbenguin wrote:
My suggestion for implementing this:
Instead of just one mod selection button, there'll be two, one titled "your mods" and another labeled "room mods" but the "room mods" selection button will only be viewable by the host. Likewise, it'll group the two sets of chosen mods into two groups as seen in the room lobby. If people are worried bout mod score multipliers, add a checkbox to toggle individual-use mod multipliers which is togglble only by the host.
Woops, my bad, I just read the last two pages before posting>.< Anyways, I think the idea of a toggleable checkbox for mod multipliers is still a good idea that I didn't see in the opGuujin wrote:
was also mentioned in the opbenguin wrote:
My suggestion for implementing this:
Instead of just one mod selection button, there'll be two, one titled "your mods" and another labeled "room mods" but the "room mods" selection button will only be viewable by the host. Likewise, it'll group the two sets of chosen mods into two groups as seen in the room lobby. If people are worried bout mod score multipliers, add a checkbox to toggle individual-use mod multipliers which is togglble only by the host.
Guujin
With 332 stars I'd think this would be a priority. I wonder if it is being worked on.
^ This.G0r wrote:
With 332 stars I'd think this would be a priority. I wonder if it is being worked on.
This sounds like a great idea!
If I had any stars left I would use them for this
The concern with noobs not having a chance when playing with pros, don't worry! They wouldn't have a chance either way. Most likely the pros would just FC it without mods anyway and plus the pros are taking more risks by making it harder to FC anyway.
If I had any stars left I would use them for this
The concern with noobs not having a chance when playing with pros, don't worry! They wouldn't have a chance either way. Most likely the pros would just FC it without mods anyway and plus the pros are taking more risks by making it harder to FC anyway.
i strongly agree with this
i would shoot a star if i have x.x
i would shoot a star if i have x.x
-libili
If DT was allowed then players would finish before others and would have to wait.. But they wouldn't wait too long because DT on this game isn't true DT. It's only 1.5x so they would only wait 1/4th of the entire song when they finish, correct me if i'm wrong. ^_^Uncle Buly wrote:
i cri cuz no dt allowed but still awesome suggestion, support
Uncle Buly
It'd be the choice of the DT user to wait though, and it'd give them time to browse forums or something :p but I doubt this will happen and HR is also niceKuro wrote:
If DT was allowed then players would finish before others and would have to wait.. But they wouldn't wait too long because DT on this game isn't true DT. It's only 1.5x so they would only wait 1/4th of the entire song when they finish, correct me if i'm wrong. ^_^Uncle Buly wrote:
i cri cuz no dt allowed but still awesome suggestion, support
peppy wrote:
If I was to implement this, it would exclude DT and HT completely from the per-user selection, because I believe multiplayer should always be played in realtime. The host would still have control over the game speed.
Support. One of my friend is very strong among us so others always end up with a "Failed"... That would be helpful ^_^
Then everybody would be playing with different mods.
Different Mods = Totally Different Scores.
Different Mods = Totally Different Scores.
Would that even make a difference? I mean, if you play with mods and someone really wants to beat you, they'll use the same mods.H_Hitachiin wrote:
Then everybody would be playing with different mods.
Different Mods = Totally Different Scores.
Or if they just don't want to fail, they'll use easy/No Fail/Half Time and take a lower score because if you fail you won't even have a score.
"Low score" beats "No score"
You have my full support on this. The idea seems like it could work out ^^
she_old
all game modes, obviously