cool! i will be first ctb coop-mapper
I saw this too ! Support.Shana wrote:
I SAW THIS MOD IS ALREADY DO IN THE FUTURE.
how you did it in standard?peppy wrote:
Latency makes it a bit hard to achieve, unfortunately.
What I was thinking, is that Player 1's movement is independent of Player 2's. So Player 2 can move freely with their own ghost image of their catcher. Player 1's catcher will still be visible, latency will indeed make it difficult for it to show Player 2 exactly how well they're doing. It'll still show the combo and result score like in Osu! mode, though, even if the catcher displaying on Player 2's end isn't exactly catching it on their end. And when it's player 2's turn, Player 2 will have the ability to catch the fruits of the next combo. Then Player 1 has their catcher as a ghost. Doing this should eliminate the effect latency has on the actual game play, I think.peppy wrote:
Latency makes it a bit hard to achieve, unfortunately.
You can see the latency in standard. I usually see the other players getting misses just after a hard pattern and never in the hard pattern. In fact they miss in the hard pattern and you only see them missing the next fruits, this due to latency. You don't see your mates playing, you only see their miss (and not each time in the good object) when your computer receive the information that they've missed.eldnl wrote:
how you did it in standard?peppy wrote:
Latency makes it a bit hard to achieve, unfortunately.
Honestly I am under the opinion that more stars doesn't make something get implemented with any higher priority than other features. Just that a feature needs a certain threshold of stars to show there is a community want and not just 1 or 2 people. I've seen items with much lower star priority that have only been a suggestion for a short period of time get introduced while some have been around for years with over 4000 stars. In the end of the day it's Peppys decision if an item gets added or not. Heck he adds plenty of items that I am sure no one ever put in as a feature request. (Not that they aren't appreciated after being added) I think people confuse star priority as a democratic voting system. Think of it more of a petition with signed names.Ezzaro14 wrote:
This has like 300 supports. Does anyone even pay attention to these?