even "Mei Ayakura" is widely used everywhere you should follow thehappy30 wrote:
do you literally want to translate her japanese name or do you want the name she's widely known as? :/
uhm, wasn't the cd cover enough proof that y"Mei Aakura" is the way to spell it?
then Mei Ayakura would appear to be correct afaikCharles445 wrote:
綾 is aya, 倉 is kura, and 盟 is mei.
Sourcepeppy wrote:
For artists which have a preferred romanisation, use that. For all others, use Last, First. It sounds better when reading it.
lolnopeAndrea wrote:
Another map that is going to be forgotten.
Yeah. Back in 2009 maps were made with much more creativity and were far more interesting. This is a bad thing. We need more boring generic TV size maps.AlphaWaves wrote:
We're no more in 2009. Please get over it.
There is nothing wrong with the audio quality. It sounds the same as the encode I have from TLMC. Not all doujin circles have access to recording studios equipped like popular music producers/composers do. Just because the map does not suit your... refined..? tastes does not mean you need to say anything.AlphaWaves wrote:
Wont make further comment on awful audio quality...
But sadly not only the audio quality is awful here :/
but it's too hard for me to fc ;(Hanyuu wrote:
Great map! Challenging and not boring to play
Buy youself some ears if you cant hear artifacts in this mp3.Lach wrote:
There is nothing wrong with the audio quality. It sounds the same as the encode I have from TLMC. Not all doujin circles have access to recording studios equipped like popular music producers/composers do. Just because the map does not suit your... refined..? tastes does not mean you need to say anything.AlphaWaves wrote:
Wont make further comment on awful audio quality...
But sadly not only the audio quality is awful here :/
Congratulations, kiddly.
I would send you an .iso of the CD and you can see for yourself that it sounds the same, but my internet is too slow. You're kidding yourself if you think your beats by dre and $70 PCI-E sound card gives you the right to comment on the audio quality when you know maps are limited to 192 kbps. That being said, nobody can hear the difference between 320 kbps and 192 kbps. If you think you can, it's because you have it in your head that 320KBPS AUDIO OBVIOUSLY BETTER LOL.AlphaWaves wrote:
Buy youself some ears if you cant hear artifacts in this mp3.
I have an AKG 272 and a Xonar Ess. STX. Not because you dont hear differences means everyone doesnt.Lach wrote:
I would send you an .iso of the CD and you can see for yourself that it sounds the same, but my internet is too slow. You're kidding yourself if you think your beats by dre and $70 PCI-E sound card gives you the right to comment on the audio quality when you know maps are limited to 192 kbps. That being said, nobody can hear the difference between 320 kbps and 192 kbps. If you think you can, it's because you have it in your head that 320KBPS AUDIO OBVIOUSLY BETTER LOL.AlphaWaves wrote:
Buy youself some ears if you cant hear artifacts in this mp3.
I can't help but wonder why you don't lurk WIP or pending for maps that actually have audio problems, instead of bitching about how your $500 headphones can magically hear the difference when there clearly is none. Maybe you could evencomplainhelp out and find a reasonable encode BEFORE something gets ranked.
I said this against my better judgement knowing you are either a troll, or retarded. I really hope it's the former.
Sorry for posting useless shit, but this really frustrates me.
No, this is wrong. There is a clear difference between the two even on shitty headphones. Though of course on osu! from what I know we are not allowed to used above 192kbps. Personally I don't see any issue in this particular mp3, sounds pretty fine for osu! standards but to say there isn't a difference between 192 and 320 is dumb.Lach wrote:
I would send you an .iso of the CD and you can see for yourself that it sounds the same, but my internet is too slow. You're kidding yourself if you think your beats by dre and $70 PCI-E sound card gives you the right to comment on the audio quality when you know maps are limited to 192 kbps. That being said, nobody can hear the difference between 320 kbps and 192 kbps. If you think you can, it's because you have it in your head that 320KBPS AUDIO OBVIOUSLY BETTER LOL.
I can't help but wonder why you don't lurk WIP or pending for maps that actually have audio problems, instead of bitching about how your $500 headphones can magically hear the difference when there clearly is none. Maybe you could evencomplainhelp out and find a reasonable encode BEFORE something gets ranked.
Most of people in osu can't see art while playing beatmaps.RikiH_ wrote:
Just epic.
Why the hell this has only 8.0 of rating while shitty, boring anime maps with 0 creativity have at least 9.0? What is wrong with people?
Sorry for shitty english, regards
Rorry wrote:
Congratz!